NC State
BioResources
Şimşir, E., Yavuz, I., and Serbest, E. (2026). "Mechanical performance and energy absorption characteristics of sustainable bio-based luffa/woven carbon fabric hybrid epoxy composites," BioResources 21(2), 4919–4938.

Abstract

Mechanical behavior was tested for hybrid composites with natural luffa fiber and artificial woven carbon fabrics within an epoxy matrix with orientation angles of [90°], [45°], and [0/90°]. Specimens were produced with artificial and natural fibers in a four-layer configuration. Three-point bending, tensile, and low-speed impact tests were applied. In tensile tests, specimen [0/90º Carbon – Luffa – Luffa – 0/90º Carbon] exhibited the highest strength, reaching approximately 42 MPa. In three-point bending tests, specimen [0/90º Carbon – Luffa – Luffa – 0/90º Carbon] showed the highest force of approximately 120 N. In low-speed impact tests, at an impact energy of 5 J, the impactor rebounded without penetrating any of the specimens. At an impact energy of 15 J, punctures and fiber damage occurred in samples [90º Carbon – Luffa – Luffa – 90º Carbon] and [45º Carbon – Luffa – Luffa – 45º Carbon]. In contrast, sample [0/90º Carbon – Luffa – Luffa – 0/90º Carbon] reached maximum force values of approximately 6000 N at 15 J impact energy and approximately 3500 N at 5 J impact energy, exhibiting higher impact resistance without puncture. Based on these results, the woven carbon fabric orientation angle had a decisive effect on the bending, tensile, and impact behavior of hybrid composites.


Download PDF

Full Article

Mechanical Performance and Energy Absorption Characteristics of Sustainable Bio-based Luffa/Woven Carbon Fabric Hybrid Epoxy Composites

Ercan Şimşir D:\ENGPERSPECTIVE\800px-ORCID_iD.svg.png ,a İbrahim Yavuz D:\ENGPERSPECTIVE\800px-ORCID_iD.svg.png ,a and Emre Serbest D:\ENGPERSPECTIVE\800px-ORCID_iD.svg.png b

Mechanical behavior was tested for hybrid composites with natural luffa fiber and artificial woven carbon fabrics within an epoxy matrix with orientation angles of [90°], [45°], and [0/90°]. Specimens were produced with artificial and natural fibers in a four-layer configuration. Three-point bending, tensile, and low-speed impact tests were applied. In tensile tests, specimen [0/90º Carbon – Luffa – Luffa – 0/90º Carbon] exhibited the highest strength, reaching approximately 42 MPa. In three-point bending tests, specimen [0/90º Carbon – Luffa – Luffa – 0/90º Carbon] showed the highest force of approximately 120 N. In low-speed impact tests, at an impact energy of 5 J, the impactor rebounded without penetrating any of the specimens. At an impact energy of 15 J, punctures and fiber damage occurred in samples [90º Carbon – Luffa – Luffa – 90º Carbon] and [45º Carbon – Luffa – Luffa – 45º Carbon]. In contrast, sample [0/90º Carbon – Luffa – Luffa – 0/90º Carbon] reached maximum force values of approximately 6000 N at 15 J impact energy and approximately 3500 N at 5 J impact energy, exhibiting higher impact resistance without puncture. Based on these results, the woven carbon fabric orientation angle had a decisive effect on the bending, tensile, and impact behavior of hybrid composites.

DOI: 10.15376/biores.21.2.4919-4938

Keywords: Hybrid composite; Luffa fiber; Woven carbon fabric; Low-speed impact testing; Mechanical properties

Contact information: a: Faculty of Technology, Department of Automotive Engineering, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyonkarahisar, Türkiye; b: Kros Automotive Industry and Trade Inc., Kutahya, 43020 Türkiye;

* Corresponding author: esimsir@aku.edu.tr

INTRODUCTION

Composite materials are materials formed by combining multiple different components at the macro level without dissolving into each other. The use of composite industrial equipment in technology fields, such as aviation, marine, automotive, robotics, and aerospace, makes it increasingly important that they meet the requirements for good strength, durability, thermal resistance, and stability, in addition to being of suitably low density (Bhong et al. 2023; Phiri et al. 2024; Yavuz et al. 2025). Fibers can be classified into two groups: artificial and natural fibers (de Azevedo et al. 2021; Ez-Zahraoui et al. 2023). The use of artificial (synthetic) fibers can have harmful effects on human health and the environment (Aldalbahi et al. 2021; Gonzalez et al. 2023). These effects include serious health problems, such as skin allergies and lung cancer (Lauerma et al. 2025). To reduce these negative effects, environmentally friendly materials, such as natural fibers, have begun to be preferred with increasing interest in the composite industry.

In recent years, agricultural-based natural fibers have shown great potential, offering numerous advantages, such as biodegradability, recyclability, abrasion resistance, ease of processing, low density, low cost, non-toxicity, high strength-to-weight ratio, and good acoustic properties. However, due to their cellulose content, natural fibers are intrinsically hydrophilic and have a high-water absorption capacity (Johansson et al. 2012; Palaniappan et al. 2025). This property can lead to weakening of interfacial bonds. Chemical modification processes are necessary to reduce the hydrophilic nature of natural fibers and increase surface roughness. Natural fibers, such as those obtained from squash, sisal, jute, hemp, kenaf, and flax, are comparable to synthetic fibers in terms of mechanical properties; however, they also have some disadvantages that limit their use in structural and non-structural applications. These disadvantages include excessive moisture absorption, poor wettability, low thermal stability, and susceptibility to impact damage at low speeds. Natural fibers in polymer matrices play a critical role in meeting industrial demand and support researchers’ mission to address global disagreement. Although many types of natural fibers exist worldwide, only a small fraction have been used and recognized as potential reinforcing materials in polymer composite applications (Jeyapragash et al. 2020; Palanisamy et al. 2024).

In recent years, the hybridization of natural fiber composites with fibers possessing different properties has become a focal point for researchers, aiming to improve the resulting mechanical properties. This combination of artificial and natural fibers has led to the emergence of hybrid composite types, and new research is constantly being conducted. Literature shows that hybridizing natural fibers (jute, linen, cotton, kenaf, coconut, etc.) with artificial fibers (glass, carbon, etc.) both reduces costs and improves mechanical properties. The literature review focused particularly on the last five years, and some studies are given in Table 1.

Table 1. Some Studies on Hybrid Composites

Some Studies on Hybrid Composites

Luffa and woven carbon fabric were added to an epoxy matrix in specific weight ratios to produce composites. Epoxy matrices can offer significant advantages in fiber-reinforced composite production due to their ability to be processed under low shear stress. In methods such as hand lay-up, they minimize fracture and damage by preserving the structural integrity of the fibers. In contrast, extrusion-based composite production techniques generate high shear forces. This can lead to mechanical damage to natural fibers such as luffa. Therefore, the use of epoxy matrices provides a suitable system for preserving the fiber architecture and accurately determining the reinforcement effectiveness (Alsuwait et al. 2023). In the experiments conducted, morphological images, tensile tests, three-point bending tests, and damage surfaces were evaluated using scanning electron microscopy on these samples, and various failure mechanisms were described (Ashok et al. 2020; Natrayan and Kaliappan 2023). In most of the experiments conducted, the fibers were used in the form of scraps. Some of the studies on loofah sponge are also review articles, researching the past and future of this fiber (Alhijazi et al. 2020; da Silva et al. 2021). Natural composite and nanocomposite panels produced from luffa fibers and chitosan resin were studied, and their penetration resistance and compressive strength were examined. The researchers concluded that the results obtained were at an acceptable level (Goudarzi et al. 2022). In another study using luffa fiber, polymer composites were produced using polyester resin, marble, and natural luffa fiber particles, and their mechanical properties were then evaluated. They concluded that the luffa fiber particles contributed to stress absorption (Martínez-Barrera et al. 2025).

In the literature, natural fiber reinforced composites (NFRCs) have become a significant research topic in recent years due to their low density, renewability, and environmental advantages. Many studies have shown that using plant-based fibers such as flax, hemp, jute, bamboo, and sisal in composite structures can reduce costs and environmental impact. However, the lower strength and stiffness values ​​of natural fibers compared to synthetic fibers such as glass and carbon fibers limit their use in structural applications. Therefore, most studies in the literature have focused on composite systems where natural fibers are used in hybrid form with synthetic fibers; particularly, the use of chopped plant fibers in specific ratios within resin matrices or the production of woven fibers as sheet structures and their mechanical testing has become a common approach. However, a large portion of these studies have focused on parameters such as fiber ratio, surface treatments, or matrix content, and the structural architecture of hybrid composites and the effect of naturally interconnected three-dimensional plant structures on mechanical behavior have been investigated to a limited extent. In particular, the role of plant structures with natural three-dimensional networks, such as luffa, in hybrid composites has been largely neglected. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the impact response and energy absorption behavior of hybrid composites consisting of woven carbon fiber surface layers and a natural luffa mat core. Luffa fibers differ from traditional plant fibers due to their naturally interconnected three-dimensional network structure and high porosity. Therefore, it is believed that they may have a high energy absorption capacity under impact loads and exhibit gradual deformation behavior instead of sudden brittle fracture. Luffa fibers improve load distribution within composites by maintaining their internal network structure. They are also used as reinforcement material in their natural felt form, without separating into individual fibers.

In fiber-reinforced composites, impact can involve the simultaneous occurrence of energy absorption mechanisms such as fiber fracture, matrix cracks, interfacial separation, and interlayer separation. The unique structural properties of natural fibers can increase impact resistance by distributing crack propagation in a controlled manner instead of sudden fracture. The natural three-dimensional network structure of luffa fibers can prevent the concentration of stress in specific areas under impact load, allowing the load to be distributed over a wider area. Therefore, it is predicted that the luffa mat structure can increase impact tolerance and delay crack propagation in hybrid composites.

Fiber orientation and layer arrangement are parameters that affect composite performance. The novelty of this study does not lie solely in changing the fiber orientation. The unique contribution of this study is the use of luffa mat, which retains its natural structure, as a three-dimensional porous core within a layered hybrid composite system together with woven carbon fiber surface layers. Unlike traditional studies using natural fibers, luffa reinforcement is used in its whole form to preserve its intrinsic network architecture. This approach allows for the evaluation of how the bio-based cellular core interacts with different carbon fiber orientations in terms of impact response and energy absorption.

This study aimed to provide a unique contribution to the search for sustainable and high-performance materials in the literature by hybridizing luffa fiber mats with woven carbon fabric. In this study, hybrid composites were produced using an epoxy matrix reinforced with luffa and carbon fibers. Unlike the literature, layered composites were produced using luffa fiber mats as plates. For a different approach from the literature, the mechanical behavior of hybrid composites produced using woven carbon fabric orientation angles of [90°], [45°], and [0/90°] was investigated. Unidirectional [0°] woven carbon fabric was not included in the study because it exhibited a similar mechanical response to the [90°] orientation in impact tests and did not provide additional information. Instead, woven carbon fabric reinforcement was used to more realistically represent the multidirectional stress distribution under impact loads. The literature generally shows that compression, tension, and in some experiments, three-point bending tests are performed for mechanical properties. In this study, in addition to these tests, dynamic low-speed impact tests were also performed.

EXPERIMENTAL

This research aimed to determine the mechanical properties of hybrid composites produced using different orientation angles of natural fibers, namely luffa fiber and woven carbon fabric. A hybrid composite panel was obtained by placing woven carbon fabrics with different orientation angles on both the top and bottom surfaces of the luffa fibers and using epoxy resin. This hybrid panel was cured under hot pressing at high temperature. The produced materials were cut to standard sample dimensions for tensile, three-point bending, and impact tests. Impact energies of 5 and 15 J were applied to the prepared impact test specimens. In this study, the basic mechanical properties of luffa fiber hybrid composites, such as durability, elasticity, and strength, were experimentally investigated and evaluated.

Types of Woven Carbon Fabric

Woven carbon fabric is the basic component that was used to form the hybrid composite material. Resin diffuses between the layers of woven carbon fabric. The hybrid composite emerges as a single structure when the curing process is complete. In the production of the hybrid composite material, woven carbon fabric with orientations of (0º), (45º), and (0 to 90º), with a density of 300 g/m² and approximately 1.75 g/cm³, were used. The woven carbon fabric layers layers were positioned during manufacturing according to the orientation angles indicated in Fig. 1, and their positions were kept constant throughout the hand lay-up process to prevent orientation errors. Figure 1 schematically shows the different orientation configurations ([90°], [45°] and [0/90°]) of woven carbon fiber fabrics used in production. All the fibers shown in Fig. 1 belong to the woven carbon fiber fabric used as a reinforcement layer in the composite structure.

Schematic representation of different orientation configurations of woven carbon fiber fabric used in composite production: (a) 0°, (b) 45° and (c) 0/90°. The figure only shows the orientation pattern of the carbon fiber reinforcement layers.

Fig. 1. Schematic representation of different orientation configurations of woven carbon fiber fabric used in composite production: (a) 0°, (b) 45° and (c) 0/90°. The figure only shows the orientation pattern of the carbon fiber reinforcement layers.

Mechanical and physical properties of woven carbon fabric in the (0°), (45°) and (0°–90°) directions are shown in Table 2 according to Dost Kimya catalog values.

Table 2. Mechanical and Physical Properties of Woven Carbon Fabrics

Mechanical and Physical Properties of Woven Carbon Fabrics

Luffa Fiber

In Turkey, luffa fiber production is carried out in the Mediterranean, Aegean, and Southeastern Anatolia regions, where luffa cultivation is intensive. Antalya, Adana, İzmir, and Mersin are particularly prominent centers for luffa production and the subsequent extraction of fiber. Luffa fiber is widely used in textile and biocomposite material production due to its environmentally friendly structure, light weight, and mechanical strength. The luffa fibers used in this study, shown in Fig. 2, were produced in the Kumluca region of Antalya. The fibers were cut vertically with a utility knife to open up the woven structure and formed into sheets. To ensure homogeneity and uniform layer formation in production, the fibers were pressed under 10 bar pressure for approximately 45 min before the application of epoxy resin. The thickness of luffa pads before pressing was approximately 2 to 5 mm. This thickness decreased with the pressure applied during sample preparation. Luffa fiber layers, due to their natural structure, have an unoriented, random fiber distribution and were used as the core layer in the composite.

Natural fiber: a) Luffa fiber in its natural state, b) Luffa fiber prepared for production

Fig. 2. Natural fiber: a) Luffa fiber in its natural state, b) Luffa fiber prepared for production

The average physical and chemical properties of luffa fiber are shown in Table 3.

Table 3. Average Chemical and Physical Properties of Luffa Fiber (Hadigheh et al. 2021)

Average Chemical and Physical Properties of Luffa Fiber (Hadigheh et al. 2021)

Composite Production by Hand Lay-up Method

Epoxy and hardener are chemicals that form the resin mixture and enable it to solidify. MGS H287 hardener and MGS L285 epoxy were used in the production of the layered composite material. The names of the woven carbon fabric and luffa fiber used in this study are given in Table 4.

Table 4. Composite Layer Names Used in Production

Composite Layer Names Used in Production

Figure 3 shows the arrangement sequence of woven carbon fabric and luffa fiber used in the study during production. Woven carbon fabric with orientation angles of 90°, ± 45°, and 0°/90° were placed on the top and bottom surfaces, and two layers of luffa fiber were placed between them.

Arrangement of carbon and luffa fiber hybrid composite structures: a) [CL]1, b) [CL]2, and c) [CL]3

Fig. 3. Arrangement of carbon and luffa fiber hybrid composite structures: a) [CL]1, b) [CL]2, and c) [CL]3

Production Method

In the production process of hybrid composite panels, MGS L285 epoxy resin and MGS H287 hardener were first prepared by mixing them in a 100:40 ratio by weight using a mixer for approximately 5 min. As a bottom layer, woven carbon fabric with orientation angles of 0°, ± 45°, and 0°/90° was placed, and the prepared epoxy resin was applied homogeneously using a brush and hand lay-up method. Then, two layers of natural luffa fiber were placed in the middle layer, and epoxy resin was applied using a brush. As the top layer, woven carbon fabric with the corresponding orientation angle was placed in a single layer, and epoxy resin was applied to complete the hybrid composite layers. Due to the use of the hand lay-up method, the epoxy-fiber ratio was not determined as a fixed mass ratio.

The amount of resin was controlled by applying it in such a way that it could be visually verified that all fiber layers were completely impregnated. Hybrid composite plates with dimensions of 200 mm × 300 mm were produced, consisting of three layers for each orientation angle. The prepared plates were subjected to compression and curing under a hydraulic hot press with the top and bottom plates heated to 50 °C and a pressure of 20 bar for 180 min.

The average total thickness of the composite laminates obtained after the curing processes was measured to be approximately 2 mm. The hybrid composite plates produced, with different orientation angles, were cut and sized using a band saw to the required standard sample dimensions for tensile, three-point bending, and impact tests. During the production of the samples, fiber orientations were carefully controlled, and woven carbon fabric layers were placed on the outer surfaces at the specified orientation angles, while luffa fiber layers were positioned as a randomly distributed core structure without orientation control. The test sample production process of hybrid composites consisting of a mixture of natural and artificial fibers is shown in Fig. 4.

Test sample production process for hybrid composite of natural and synthetic fibers

Fig. 4. Test sample production process for hybrid composite of natural and synthetic fibers

Low Speed Impact Test

Low-velocity impact tests were conducted at the Hitit University Scientific and Technical Application and Research Center (HÜBTUAM). The Instron/Ceast 9350-Fractovis Plus impact testing machine shown in Fig. 5 was used. A hemispherical, rigid impact tool with a diameter of 12.7 mm and a weight of 4.926 kg was used as the test tip. The tests were performed at room temperature (26 ± 1 ºC). The impact machine is capable of performing tests from high energies (1800 J) to low energies (2 to 3 J). Impacts were applied to the test specimens at energy levels of 5 and 15 Joules. The tests were performed according to the ASTM D3763 (2018) standard (Mulla et al. 2023; Şimşir et al. 2024).

Low-speed impact testing device

Fig. 5. Low-speed impact testing device

Three-point Bending Test

Three-point bending tests were performed using a Shimadzu Autograph tensile testing machine with a capacity of 10 kN. The feed rate was set to 1 mm/min. Three-point bending tests were conducted on specimens with dimensions of 13 × 130 mm2 in accordance with the ASTM D7264M (2021) standard (Kaboglu and Ferik 2022; Esleman and Önal 2023). The properties of the samples can be calculated using the test data and Eq. 1 below,

 (1)

where b is defined as the width of the specimen (mm), σf is the bending stress (MPa), F is the maximum applied force (N), h is the thickness of the specimen (mm), and L is the distance between the support points (mm). Figure 6 shows images of specimens with different orientation angles during testing with the testing device.

Three-point bending tester

Fig. 6. Three-point bending tester

Tensile Test

Tensile tests were performed using a 10 kN capacity Shimadzu Autograph tensile testing machine shown in Fig. 6. The tests were conducted at an ambient temperature of 26 ± 1 ºC and a tensile speed of 1 mm/min. The experiments were carried out in accordance with the ASTM D3039M (2017) standard (Faidallah et al. 2023; Sritharan and Askari 2023). The force values ​​obtained during the tests were substituted into Eq. (2) to calculate the stress values,

 (2)

where σ represents stress (MPa), A represents the standard cross-sectional area (mm2), and Fn represents the force (N). Figure 7 shows pre- and post-test images of samples with different orientation angles, using the device used during the test.

Tensile test

Fig. 7. Tensile test

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In this study, low-velocity impact, three-point bending, and tensile tests were applied. Three specimens were tested for each test, and the results were analyzed based on average values.

Three-point Bending Test Results

This study investigated the force-strain behavior of hybrid composite materials with orientation angles [CL]1, [CL]2, [CL]3 and luffa within the scope of three-point bending testing. Figure 8 shows the corresponding force-strain curves. Three specimens from each group were tested. The average values ​​of the tested specimens were taken to calculate the maximum force and deformation values, and graphs of these values ​​were created.

As a result of the three-point bending tests, it was determined that specimen [CL]exhibited the highest strength. This specimen fractured after reaching a deformation of 27 mm under a force of approximately 120 N. Specimen [CL]fractured after reaching a deformation of 30 mm under a force of approximately 45 N. Specimen [CL]had the lowest force value and fractured at a force of approximately 20 N and a deformation level of 18 mm. In the case of luffa, the maximum value is reached at around 9 N at approximately 30 mm deformation, after which the sample fractures. According to the results obtained, specimen [CL]showed the highest strength value, while specimen [CL]was found to have the highest deformation, i.e., elongation capacity. In line with the three-point bending tests, it was determined that the woven carbon fabric orientation angle has a decisive effect on the mechanical properties of the composite material.

Shows the three-point bending force-strain graph of the composite plates [CL]1, [CL]2, [CL]3 and Luffa

Fig. 8. Shows the three-point bending force-strain graph of the composite plates [CL]1, [CL]2, [CL]3 and Luffa

Tensile Test Results

The stress-strain behavior of hybrid composite materials with orientation angles [CL]1, [CL]2 CL]3 and Luffa was investigated within the scope of tensile testing, and Figure 9 shows the stress-strain curves obtained from the tensile test of the composite plates. Three specimens from each group were tested. The average values ​​of the tested specimens were taken to calculate the maximum stress and elongation values, and graphs of these values ​​were created.

Tensile test stress-strain graph of composite plates [CL]1, [CL]2, [CL]3 and Luffa

Fig. 9. Tensile test stress-strain graph of composite plates [CL]1, [CL]2, [CL]3 and Luffa

The graph in Fig. 8 compares the stress-strain curves of three different materials. Examining the graph, it can be seen that material [CL]exhibits the highest strength; this material fractured after showing an elongation of 3 mm under approximately 42 MPa stress. Material [CL]withstood an elongation of 3.4 mm under approximately 24 MPa stress before fracture. Material [CL]exhibits the lowest strength, reaching an elongation of 2.8 mm under approximately 15 MPa stress before fracture. A similar graph to Luffa tensile curve [CL]was obtained, and an elongation of 1.4 mm was achieved under a stress of approximately 10 MPa. The tensile test results reveal that the materials have different tensile strength and elongation capacities. Material [CL]has the highest strength, while [CL]as the best elongation value. This difference between the samples indicates that the woven carbon fabric orientation used notably affects the performance of the samples under tensile stress.

Impact Test Results

In this study, the force-strain behavior of [CL]1, [CL]2, and [CL]3 composite materials were investigated within the scope of impact tests performed under two different impact energies of 5 J and 15 J. Three specimens were tested for each orientation group at both impact energies. Using the average values ​​obtained from the tested specimens, the maximum force and deformation values ​​were calculated and graphs of these values ​​were created. Damage images showing the pre-impact and post-impact conditions of the specimens under 5 J impact energy within the scope of low-speed impact tests of hybrid composite plates are presented in Fig. 10