The Retention and Drainage Behavior of Cross-linked Gelatin with Glutaraldehyde in a Papermaking System
Yaohui You, Xubing Sun, Qiubing Cui, Bi Wang, and Jing Ma *
A type of novel retention aid, cross-linked gelatin, was prepared using low-grade industrial gelatin as the raw material and glutaraldehyde as the crosslinking agent. The structure of cross-linked gelatin was characterized according to the crosslinking degree, isoelectric point, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy. The results indicated that the crosslinking reaction was successfully performed between the primary amine group of gelatin and the aldehyde group of glutaraldehyde, resulting in the formation of a Schiff base structure. The retention test showed that the addition of cross-linked gelatin remarkably improved the retention of filler. This effect was mainly attributed to the fact that cross-linked gelatin, with a high molecular weight and highly branched structure, exhibited favorable bridging flocculation and induced filler aggregation into the flocs, which were retained in the paper sheet. The drainage test showed that the cross-linked gelatin exhibited a poor drainage effect, which was attributed to the synergic effects of excellent hydrophilicity, film forming property, and sealing property.
Keywords: Low-grade industrial gelatin; Cross-linked gelatin; Retention; Drainage
Contact information: Key Laboratory of Fruit Waste Treatment and Resource Recycling of Sichuan Provincial Higher Learning Institutes, Neijiang Normal University, Neijiang Sichuan, 641100, P. R. China; *Corresponding author: email@example.com
In recent years, a trend toward higher filler content in paper has been driven by a reduction in papermaking cost and the improvement in optical performance, printing performance, paper formation, etc. (Yoon and Deng 2006). However, in the absence of additives, filler retention mainly depends on mechanical entrapment, and the retention rate is lower because the diameter of filters is considerably larger than the fillers (Forsberg and Ström 1994). To improve the filler retention rate, it is necessary to add retention aids to the pulp suspension before the filtration process. The retention aid promotes the flocculation of fillers and the adsorption of flocs on the network of cellulose fibers (Blanco et al. 2005, 2009). Additionally, most retention aids improve the dewatering of fibers and fillers by decreasing the polarity and specific surface area.
The most common retention aids are inorganic salts (alum, polymeric aluminum, etc.) and natural or synthetic polymers (cationic starch, polyacrylamide, etc.) (Hubbe et al. 2009). Synthetic polymers, such as polyacrylamide, exhibit good performance at low cost, but they do not degrade easily and can harm the environment. Among the natural polymers, cationic starch has favorable biodegradability and renewability; however, it requires a higher additive quantity (1 to 3 wt.%, based on dry fiber) to meet the performance requirement (Khosravani et al. 2010). Chitosan has good performance, but it is expensive and cannot be used in neutral or alkaline conditions. In addition, this material is high-cost because of the chemical modifications required during its processing (Allen et al. 1999; Li et al. 2004). Cationic micro-fibrillated cellulose has been used as a retention aid (Diab et al. 2015). Although cationic microfibrillated cellulose has some beneficial effects, the synthetic procedures are seemingly impractical because of the stepwise nature of this method (the preparation of micro-fibrillated cellulose and cationic reaction), and the expensive cationic reagent. Hence, there is an urgent need to explore efficient, low-cost, and environmentally friendly retention aids.
Gelatin, a denatured form of collagen, derived from connective tissue, is an abundant renewable biomass resource. Gelatin is a mixture of polypeptide chains, with molecular weights ranging from a few thousand to several hundred thousand Da (Li et al. 2005), and it has abundant reactive amino, carboxyl, hydroxyl, and acylamino groups, which implies that gelatin possesses flocculation abilities (Lefebvre and Antonov 2001; Piazza and Garcia 2010).
The flocculation ability is an important indicator of a retention aid; thus, it is reasonable to hypothesize that gelatin can be used for this purpose. Moreover, cross-linked gelatin may be a more promising retention aid because its flocculation ability would be improved upon higher molecular weight. In this study, cross-linked gelatin was prepared as a retention aid using low-grade industrial gelatin as the raw material and glutaraldehyde as the crosslinking agent. The performance and mechanism of cross-linked gelatin on retention and drainage were investigated.
Low-grade industrial gelatin (30 Bloom strength) was obtained from a local market (Sichuan, China). Commercial stock glutaraldehyde (50% concentration) was purchased from the Kelong Chemical Reagent Factory (Sichuan, China). Bamboo-bleached kraft pulp, with a 31 °SR beating degree, cationic starch (DS = 0.03), and cationic polyacrylamide (CPAM; DS = 0.5, Mw = 8000 kDa) were obtained from a local paper mill (Sichuan, China). Before application, the cationic starch was gelatinized at 95 °C for 20 min.
Kaolin was purchased from the Fengcheng Chemical Reagent Factory (Shanghai, China). Polyaluminum chloride (PAC) was prepared using a slow alkalinity titration method at 80 °C. Under rapid stirring, an aluminum chloride (AlCl3) solution was titrated using NaOH to the target ratio (OH/Al) of 1:2 within 3 h. The final concentration was 51 g.L-1 (mass concentration of aluminum oxide). All other chemicals were of analytical grade.
Preparation and characterization of cross-linked gelatin
The cross-linked gelatin was synthesized using glutaraldehyde as the crosslinking agent (Fig. 1). First, 5 g of gelatin was dissolved in 100 mL of distilled water, and the pH of the gelatin solution was adjusted to 7.5 using 0.5 M NaOH. Subsequently, the gelatin solution was incubated at 40 °C for 30 min, when 0.5 mL of 50% glutaraldehyde solution was added to the gelatin solution. The crosslinking reaction was performed at 40 °C for 3 h until a viscous liquid with a light yellow color was obtained.
Fig. 1. Synthesis of cross-linked gelatin
The properties of crosslinked gelatin were analyzed by determining the crosslinking degree, isoelectric point, Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectrum, and ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectrum. To analyze the crosslinking degree, the primary amine content of the cross-linked gelatin and untreated gelatin were measured as previously described (Sarin et al. 1981; You et al. 2014). Briefly, 0.5% (w/v) ninhydrin solution in 0.5 mol·L-1 phosphate buffer (pH 6.0) was prepared and stored in a sealed brown volumetric flask at room temperature. The ninhydrin reaction was performed by incubating 2 mL of 1.0 g·L-1 untreated gelatin/cross-linked gelatin solution with 1 mL of the ninhydrin solution in boiling water for 15 min. Subsequently, the mixture was diluted with 40% (v/v) ethanol to 10 mL and was then measured at 570 nm by UV-Vis spectroscopy (UV2800, Hitachi, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The primary amine content was calculated according to the calibration curve of glycine: y = 0.01864 + 2.19823x, R2 = 0.9949, where y and x are the absorbance of the diluted solution and the glycine concentration (mmol·L-1), respectively. The crosslinking degree was calculated as follows:
The isoelectric point (pI) was estimated according to the change in the zeta potential, which was measured using a Zetasizer instrument (Nano ZS90, Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK). The cross-linked gelatin and untreated gelatin were diluted to 1.0 g·L-1 with varying pH. The test samples were equilibrated at room temperature for 30 min prior to analysis. The structures of the cross-linked and untreated gelatins were analyzed by FT-IR spectroscopy (Nicolet iS10, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) in the range of 500 to 4000 cm-1. The cross-linked and untreated gelatin solutions (800 mg·L-1) were analyzed by UV-Vis spectroscopy (UV2800, Hitachi, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The spectra were recorded in the range of 230 to 450 nm.
Retention and drainage test
The filler retention performances were conducted using a self-made dynamic drainage jar (SDDJ). The SDDJ suspensions consisted of 0.2 wt.% fiber and 30 wt.% (based on dry fiber) kaolin, and the pH of the suspensions was adjusted to 7.0, with a stirrer speed of 500 rpm for the entire experimental procedure. Subsequently, a certain amount of retention aid (based on dry fiber) was added, and the filtrate was collected after 20 sec. The kaolin amount in the filtrate was tested by FT-IR spectroscopy (Ma et al. 2015), and the filler retention (%) was calculated as follows:
The drainage performance was evaluated by Schopper-Riegler degree (°SR), an important parameter to evaluate the drainage performance of pulp suspensions. When the °SR is low, the dewatering of the pulp suspension is favorable (Chi et al. 2007). The °SR was measured using a YT-DJ-100 beating degree tester (Yante Science & Technology Co. Ltd., Hangzhou, China), according to the China national standard ISO 5267-1 (1999). The zeta potential of the pulp suspension was determined with a pulp zeta potential instrument (Mütek SZP-06, BTG Instruments, Germany, UK). In this test, the concentration of fiber was 1 wt.%, and the proportion of kaolin and retention aid (based on dry fiber) was consistent. The morphology of the hand-sheets was observed using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM; S-4800, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Characteristics of Crosslinked Gelatin
Because the crosslinking reaction mostly occurs at the site of the primary amine groups in gelatin (Farris et al. 2010), the primary amine content of untreated gelatin and cross-linked gelatin were analyzed (Table 1). The primary amine content of cross-linked gelatin was appreciably less than that of untreated gelatin, which indicated that the primary amine reacted with the aldehyde group. Meanwhile, the solution of cross-linked gelatin exhibited a higher viscosity than the solution of untreated gelatin, also suggesting that the crosslinking reaction was successful.
Table 1. Content of Primary Amine Groups and the Crosslinking Degree
The structures of untreated and cross-linked gelatins were characterized by FT-IR spectroscopy (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2. FTIR spectra of untreated gelatin and cross-linked gelatin
The absorption bands around 1647 cm-1, 1542 cm-1, and 1244 cm-1 represented the amide I, II, and III bands of gelatin, respectively (Sionkowska et al. 2004). The absorption band of a Schiff base is located at approximately 1620 cm-1 (Cai et al. 2011), which is similar to that of the amide I band of gelatin. Hence, the FT-IR spectrum of cross-linked gelatin exhibited a changed peak at 1638 cm-1, suggesting a red shift, as compared with the amide I band of gelatin. This result implied that the gelatin reacted with glutaraldehyde, resulting in the formation of a Schiff base (Liu et al. 2011).
The UV-Vis spectra of untreated gelatin and cross-linked gelatin solutions are shown in Fig. 3. Cross-linked gelatin showed a new absorption band at 265 nm, which was ascribed to the formation of a Schiff base structure between the aldehyde group and the primary amine group (Bowes and Cater 1968; Damink et al. 1995). This result is additional evidence of the crosslinking reaction between gelatin and glutaraldehyde.
Fig. 3. UV-Vis spectra of untreated gelatin and cross-linked gelatin
Fig. 4. The isoelectric point of untreated gelatin and cross-linked gelatin
The zeta potential of untreated and cross-linked gelatin solutions, at varying pH, are shown in Fig. 4. Gelatin is an amphoteric polymer, and the pH of the gelatin solution at which the zeta potential is zero is referred to as the isoelectric point. The amino group of gelatin can bind to a proton to become positively charged in an acidic environment. With increasing pH, the zeta potential decreases and finally becomes negative. The pI of untreated gelatin (approximately 5) was slightly higher than that of cross-linked gelatin (approximately 4.5). This result was expected because the crosslinking reaction leads to a decline in primary amino groups. The above results strongly suggest that the crosslinking reaction was successfully performed.
The influences of varying untreated gelatin and cross-linked gelatin dosages on the filler retention are shown in Fig. 5. The retention rate of the filler was only 43% in the absence of a retention aid, suggesting that filler retention depended on mechanical entrapment. When using untreated gelatin as the retention aid, the retention rate of the filler exhibited no considerable improvement, which could be explained because normal gelatin has a relatively low molecular weight, insufficient to result in bridging flocculation. In contrast, cross-linked gelatin positively impacted the retention of filler; the retention rate of filler was considerably improved with increasing dosage of cross-linked gelatin, with an optimum retention rate of greater than 63% when the dosage was 0.4 wt.%. This result was attributed to the fact that cross-linked gelatin has a high molecular weight and highly branched structure, which is beneficial for inducing the aggregation of kaolin particles into the flocs with large size and retention in the paper sheet (Shin et al. 1997; Antunes et al. 2008). When the dosage of cross-linked gelatin was greater than 0.4 wt.%, the retention performance tended to decrease, potentially because excess cross-linked gelatin plays a role in dispersion (Wu et al. 2012).
Fig. 5. Retention performances of untreated gelatin and cross-linked gelatin
To evaluate the practicability of cross-linked gelatin, several commercial retention aids (PAC, cationic starch, and CPAM) were selected as controls, and the optimized dosage of PAC, cationic starch, and CPAM were 0.80 wt.%, 1.00 wt.%, and 0.05 wt.%, respectively. Figure 6 shows a comparison of the commercial retention aids and cross-linked gelatin. The retention rate of cross-linked gelatin was better than PAC and cationic starch but not as good as CPAM. However, the safety risk and ethical issues of these papers using cross-linked gelatin as retention aid should be fully evaluated before being used in the food industry. Overall, cross-linked gelatin was a very promising retention aid.
Fig. 6. Comparison of cross-linked gelatin and the commercial retention aids
Fig. 7. The effect of cross-linked gelatin dosage on the zeta potential and conductivity of pulp
To study the retention mechanism of cross-linked gelatin, the zeta potential and conductivity of the pulp suspensions were tested (Fig. 7). The conductivity of the pulp slightly increased after adding cross-linked gelatin. Because cross-linked gelatin is a weak electrolyte, its addition increased the conductivity of the pulp. In contrast, the zeta potential of the pulp notably increased with the addition of cross-linked gelatin. This result can be explained in two ways. First, the pI of cross-linked gelatin was higher than that of the pulp; therefore, the addition of cross-linked gelatin improved the zeta potential of the pulp. Secondly, the decrease in the absolute value of the zeta potential means that the pulp was unstable and favored aggregation (Zhang et al. 2010); thus, the results are consistent with the retention result. When the dosage of cross-linked gelatin was greater than 0.4 wt.%, the zeta potential was stabilized. Nevertheless, the zeta potential of pulp never reached a positive value because the cross-linked gelatin is anionic under neutral conditions, such that the charge neutralization of crosslinked gelatin is poor. The zeta potential analysis tentatively suggested that the retention mechanism of cross-linked gelatin included bridging flocculation.
To verify this hypothesis, the effect of pH on the retention performance of cross-linked gelatin was investigated (Fig. 8). There was no difference in the retention performance between the different pH conditions. The cross-linked gelatin exhibited a wide applied range. If the retention mechanism of cross-linked gelatin was mainly dependent on charge neutralization, then the change in pH would strongly influence its retention performance. Hence, it was confirmed that the retention mechanism of cross-linked gelatin was mainly bridging flocculation.
Fig. 8. The effect of pH on the retention performances of cross-linked gelatin
Fig. 9. Scanning electron microscopy of hand sheets: (a) without additives and (b) with cross-linked gelatin
The surface morphology of the hand-sheets was observed by SEM (Fig. 9). In the absence of additives, there were very few small kaolin flocs on the paper sheet. When the cross-linked gelatin was present, the aggregates were larger and more numerous than in the control group. Thus, cross-linked gelatin participated in bridging flocculation, which proved helpful in the conglomeration of kaolin particles and improved the retention efficiency. Besides, the addition of cross-linked gelatin did not significantly change the color of the handsheets.
The dewatering of the pulp suspension is an important parameter that has a direct influence on the speed of the paper machine and the energy consumption of the drying process. Hence, as the evaluating index of drainage performance, the °SR was measured (Fig. 10). When adding untreated gelatin as the drainage aid, the drainage performance gradually worsened with the increasing dosage. Compared with untreated gelatin, the drainage performance initially improved and then gradually worsened with an increasing dosage of cross-linked gelatin. Overall, the drainage performances of untreated gelatin and cross-linked gelatin were poor. This result could be explained as follows. First, untreated gelatin and cross-linked gelatin, with excellent hydrophilicity and film-forming property, easily form a film on the fiber and floc surface, enhancing water retention (Peña et al. 2010). Secondly, the film seals the pores of the fiber and floc to prevent dewatering of the area. Based on this scenario, an optimized process to improve the drainage performance of cross-linked gelatin warrants further investigation.
Fig. 10. Drainage performances of untreated gelatin and cross-linked gelatin
- Low-grade industrial gelatin was used as a raw material for preparing a novel biomass-based retention aid through a crosslinking reaction. This method is low-cost, simple, and requires mild reaction conditions.
- The retention rate of filler was improved with increasing dosages of cross-linked gelatin, and the optimum retention rate was greater than 63% at 0.4 wt.%. The retention mechanism of cross-linked gelatin mainly included bridging flocculation. Compared with commercial retention aids, cross-linked gelatin exhibited better retention than PAC and cationic starch but worse performance than CPAM.
- The drainage performance of cross-linked gelatin was poor.
This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21506103), the Science and Technology Support Program of Sichuan Province (No. 2015GZ0170), and the Major Training Program of the Education Department of Sichuan Province (No. 15CZ0026).
Allen, L., Polverari, M., Levesque, B., and Francis, W. (1999). “Effects of system closure on retention- and drainage-aid performance in TMP newsprint manufacture,” TAPPI Journal82(4), 188-195.
Antunes, E., Garcia, F. A. P., Ferreira, P., Blanco, A., Negro, C., and Rasteiro, M. G. (2008). “Use of new branched cationic polyacrylamides to improve retention and drainage in papermaking,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 47(23), 9370-9375. DOI: 10.1021/ie801216t.
Blanco, A., Negro, C., Fuente, E., and Tijero, J. (2005). “Effect of shearing forces and flocculant overdose on filler flocculation mechanisms and flocs properties,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 44(23), 9105-9112. DOI: 10.1021/ie050870v
Blanco, A., Fuente, E., Monte, M. C., Cortés, N., and Negro, C. (2009). “Polymeric branched flocculant effect on the flocculation process of pulp suspensions in the papermaking industry,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 48(10), 4826-4836. DOI: 10.1021/ie8011837
Bowes, J. H., and Cater, C. W. (1968). “The interaction of aldehydes with collagen,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)- Protein Structure 168(2), 341-352. DOI: 10.1016/0005-2795(68)90156-6
Cai, B., Chen, L., and Luo, J. (2011). “Synthesis and characterization of bis-(O-vanillin) benzoic imine Schiff base,” Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition)35(5), 91-94. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2011.05.020
Chi, H., Li, H., Liu, W., and Zhan, H. (2007). “The retention- and drainage-aid behavior of quaternary chitosan in papermaking system,” Colloids & Surfaces A 297(1-3), 147-153. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.10.039
Damink, L. H. H. O., Dijkstra, P. J., Luyn, M. J. A. V., Wachem, P. B. V., Nieuwenhuis, J., and Feijen, J. (1995). “Glutaraldehyde as a crosslinking agent for collagen-based biomaterials,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 6(8), 460-472. DOI: 10.1007/BF00123371
Diab, M., Curtil, D., El-Shinnawy, N., Hassan, M. L., Zeid, I. F., and Mauret, E. (2015). “Biobased polymers and cationic microfibrillated cellulose as retention and drainage aids in papermaking: Comparison between softwood and bagasse pulps,” Industrial Crops & Products 72, 34-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.01.072
Farris, S., Song, J., and Huang, Q. (2010). “Alternative reaction mechanism for the cross-lingking of gelatin with glutaraldehyde,” Journal of Agricultural & Food Chemistry 58(2), 998-1003. DOI: 10.1021/jf9031603
Forsberg, S., and Ström, G. (1994). “The effect of contact time between cationic polymers and furnish on retention and drainage,” Journal of Pulp & Paper Science 20(3), 71-76.
Hubbe, M. A., Nanko, H., and Mcneal, M. R. (2009). “Retention aid polymer interactions with cellulosic surfaces and suspensions: A review,” BioResources 4(2), 850-906. DOI: 10.15376/biores.4.2.850-906
ISO 5267-1. (1999). “Pulps – Determination of drainability – Part 1: Schopper-Riegler method,” International Organization of Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Khosravani, A., Latibari, A. J., Mirshokraei, S. A., Rahmaninia, M., and Nazhad, M. M. (2010). “Studying the effect of cationic starch-anionic nanosilica system on retention and drainage,” BioResources 5(2), 939-950. DOI: 10.15376/biores.5.2.939-950
Lefebvre, J., and Antonov, Y. (2001). “The effect of the melting of the collagen-like gelatin aggregates on the stability against aggregation of the bovine casein micelles,” Colloid & Polymer Science 279(4), 393-397. DOI: 10.1007/s003960000438
Li, H., Du, Y., Xu, X., and Zhan, H. (2004). “Effect of molecular weight and degree of substitution of quaternary chitosan on its adsorption and flocculation properties for potential retention-aids in alkaline papermaking,” Colloids & Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 242(1-3), 1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2004.04.051
Li, G., Fukunaga, S., Takenouchi, K., and Nakamura, F. (2005). “Comparative study of the physiological properties of collagen, gelatin and collagen hydrolysate as cosmetic materials,” International Journal of Cosmetic Science 27(2), 101-106. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-2494.2004.00251.x
Liu, Y., Huang, X., Guo, P., Liao X., and Shi, B. (2011). “Skin collagen fiber-based radar absorbing materials,” Chinese Science Bulletin 56(2), 202-208. DOI: 10.1007/s11434-010-4343-5
Ma, J., You, Y., and Liu, Y. (2015). “Determination of properties of retention aids by spectrophotometry using kaolin as filler model,” Paper & Papermaking 134(8), 91-93. DOI: 10.13472/j.ppm.2015.08.022
Peña, C., Caba, K., Eceiza, A., Ruseckaite, R., and Mondragon, I. (2010). “Enhancing water repellence and mechanical properties of gelatin films by tannin addition,” Bioresouce Technology 101(17), 6836-6842. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.112
Piazza, G. J., and Garcia, R. A. (2010). “Meat & bone meal extract and gelatin as renewable ﬂocculants,” Bioresource Technology 101(2), 5759-5766. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.03.078
Sarin, V. K., Kent, S. B. H., Tam, J. P., and Merrifield, R. B. (1981). “Quantitative monitoring of solid-phase peptide synthesis by the ninhydrin reaction,” Analytical Biochemistry 117(1), 147-157. DOI: 10.1016/0003-2697(81)90704-1
Shin, J. H., Han, S, H., Sohn, C., Ow, S. K., and Mah, S. (1997). “Highly branched cationic polyelectrolytes: Filler flocculation,” TAPPI Journal 80(11), 179-185.
Sionkowska, A., Wisniewski, M., Skopinska, J., Kennedy, C. J., and Wess, T. J. (2004). “Molecular interactions in collagen and chitosan blends,” Biomaterials 25(5), 795-801. DOI: 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00595-7
Wu, W., Gu, J., Jing, Y., Zhou, X., and Dai, H. (2012). “Preparation and retention performance of crosslinked and hydrophobically associating cationic polyacrylamide,” BioResources7(4), 4926-4937. DOI: 10.15376/biores.7.4.4926-4937.
Yoon, S., and Deng, Y. (2006). “Clay-starch composites and their application in papermaking,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science 100(2), 1032-1038. DOI: 10.1002/app.23007
You, Y., Zeng, Y., Liu, Y., Liao, X., and Shi, B. (2014). “Fabrication of highly hydrophobic paper by coating with modified collagen hydrolysate,” Journal of the Society of Leather Technologists & Chemists 98(2), 69-75.
Zhang, Z., Xia, S., Zhao, J., and Zhang, J. (2010). “Characterization and flocculation mechanism of high efficiency microbial flocculant TJ-F1 from Proteus mirabilis,” Colloids & Surfaces B 75(1), 247-251. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.08.038
Article submitted: March 11, 2016; Peer review completed: May 22, 2016; Revised version received and accepted: May 24, 2016; Published: May 26, 2016.