Abstract
The essential oils of clove species Eugenia caryophyllata (COs) from northern Buru Island were obtained by steam distillation. The chemical components were characterized by gas chromatography (GC-FID) and GC-mass spectrophotometry (MS). In total, five components were identified in COs of leaf, four components were identified in COs of bud, and two components were identified in COs of stem. The main constituents are eugenol (77.1% to 78.8%) and β-caryophyllene (17.0% to 19.6%) in COs of leaf. The main components are eugenol (76.1% to 87.7%) and eugenyl acetate (6.0% to18.9%) in COs of bud and the only main component was eugenol (94.2% to 97.6%) in COs of stem from Waihani (COsWh), Ilath (COsI) and Waimoli (COsWm). The antioxidant activity COs of leaf, bud, and stem was identified using DPPH and ABTS assay. Results showed that COsI of bud had higher ABTS free radical scavenging (IC50 value: 0.09 ± 0.61 μg/mL) than the eight samples in the study. When this activity was compared with synthesis antioxidant of BHT (IC50 value: 0.83 ± 0.54 μg/mL) and AA (IC50 value: 0.81 ± 1.64 μg/mL), the COs in three locations show potential of being used as an antioxidant.
Download PDF
Full Article
Chemical Composition and Antioxidant Activities of the Essential Oils of Eugenia caryophyllata from Northern Buru Island, Moluccas
Hanoch Julianus Sohilait,a,* Healthy Kainama,b,* and Martha Kaihena c
The essential oils of clove species Eugenia caryophyllata (COs) from northern Buru Island were obtained by steam distillation. The chemical components were characterized by gas chromatography (GC-FID) and GC-mass spectrophotometry (MS). In total, five components were identified in COs of leaf, four components were identified in COs of bud, and two components were identified in COs of stem. The main constituents are eugenol (77.1% to 78.8%) and β-caryophyllene (17.0% to 19.6%) in COs of leaf. The main components are eugenol (76.1% to 87.7%) and eugenyl acetate (6.0% to18.9%) in COs of bud and the only main component was eugenol (94.2% to 97.6%) in COs of stem from Waihani (COsWh), Ilath (COsI) and Waimoli (COsWm). The antioxidant activity COs of leaf, bud, and stem was identified using DPPH and ABTS assay. Results showed that COsI of bud had higher ABTS free radical scavenging (IC50 value: 0.09 ± 0.61 μg/mL) than the eight samples in the study. When this activity was compared with synthesis antioxidant of BHT (IC50 value: 0.83 ± 0.54 μg/mL) and AA (IC50 value: 0.81 ± 1.64 μg/mL), the COs in three locations show potential of being used as an antioxidant.
DOI: 10.15376/biores.18.4.7551-7565
Keywords: Eugenia caryophyllata; Buru Island; Essential oil; Chemical composition; Antioxidant
Contact information: a: Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematic and Natural Science, Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia; b: Department of Chemistry Education, Faculty of Training and Science Education, Universitas Pattimura Ambon, Indonesia; c: Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematic and Natural Science, Universitas Pattimura Ambon, Indonesia;
* Corresponding authors: nokesohilait@yahoo.com; healt_kainama@yahoo.com
GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
The clove tree, Eugenia caryophyllata Thunb. (Myrtaceae), grows naturally in Moluccas Islands, East Indonesia, and are cultivated in Tanzania, Madagascar, Sri Lanka, India, Malaysia, Brazil, Jamaica, and Guinea (Ozturk and Ozbek 2005). Eugenia caryophyllata (synonym: Syzygium aromaticum) commonly known as clove, is a medium size tree (8 to 12 m) from the Myrtaceae family native from the Moluccas islands in east Indonesia. For centuries, the trade of clove and the search for this valuable spice stimulated the economic development of this Asia region (Kamatou et al. 2012). Clove can be used in cooking, either whole or in ground form. The spice is used in Europa and Asia, and in Indonesia, it is used for cigarettes, known as “kreteks” (Alma et al. 2007). Furthermore, the essential oil of clove (clove oils/ COs) has been widely used as spice and is well known for its medicinal properties. Eugenia caryophyllata (Clove) is considered an important medicinal plant with a wide range of biological activities, such as anti-bacterial or anti-oxidant activities (Barakat 2014). Therefore, many researchers have been looking for scientific evidence for the use of clove extracts and essential oil. Some evidence of antioxidant, analgesic, antipyretic, and sedative effects (Rojas et al. 2014) have been found and include, treatments for dengue fever and larvicidal issues (Lopes et al. 2020); antioxidant effects (Lee and Shibamoto 2001; Sohilait and Kainama 2019; Kaur et al. 2019; Alfikri et al. 2020) and anti-inflammatory effects (Han and Parker 2017).
Three types of essential oils are available from clove (E. caryophyllata): clove leaf oils, clove stem oil, and clove bud oil. Each has a different chemical composition and flavour. Clove leaf oils contain eugenol (81.06% to 86.04%) and β-caryophyllene (11.95% to 16.16%). Clove stem oils contain eugenol (97.20% to 98.83%), bud clove oil contain eugenol (81.13% to 84.44%) and eugenyl acetate (11.60% to 15.02%) (Sohilait 2015). The differences of the essential oil composition are affected by different environmental and genetic factors, chemotypes, and soil condition of the plants, which may influence the composition (Salleh and Ahmad 2016; Sohilait et al. 2021; Kainama et al. 2023).
Several studies reported that the amount of chemical composition contained in COs varied according to the location where it was grown. COs of bud in Turkey contained 18 compounds (Alma et al. 2007), CO of leaf contained 38 compounds and COs of bud in Bangladesh 31 compounds (Bhuyan et al. 2010). The chemical composition of COs of bud contained 10 compounds, COs leaves had 9 compounds and 10 compounds were found in COs stem in Madagascar. The COs of bud were 22 compounds, and COs of leaf contained 21 compounds in India (Srivastava et al. 2005). In addition, the free radical scavenging DPPH activity of COs of bud in India and Tunisia has been reported by Mahboubi et al. (2015) and Chaieb et al. (2007).
However, the chemical composition of COs bud, leaf, and stem from northern Buru Island, Moluccas-Indonesia and free radical scavenging activity of DPPH and ABTS have not been reported by various sources. This research is important so that it can provide information regarding the quality and quantity of the phytochemicals of essential oils of COs from the locations where E. caryophyllata is abundant. On the other hand, this information can also explain the free radical scavenging activity of DPPH and ABTS for COs containing five to seven compounds in these sites.
EXPERIMENTAL
Materials
Fresh cloves from the tree were collected December 2021 from Waihani, Ilath, and Waimoli Village, northern Buru Island, Moluccas and were deposited in the Organic Chemistry Laboratory, Universitas Pattimura, Ambon. The chemicals used in the study were anhydrous sodium sulfates p.a (E. Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl), ABTS (2,2-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid diammonium salt), standard BHT(butylated hydroxytoluene), and AA (ascorbic acid). The tools used in this study were a set steam distillation, Gas Chromatograph GC-2010, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan, and GC-Mass Spectrophotometer (GC-MS QP-2010 Plus, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan).
Methods
Isolation of COs from leaf, bud and stem
To obtain clove essential oils (COs), dried plant materials from the leaf, bud, and stem of Eugenia caryophyllata (Table 1) were steam-distilled using a steam distiller for 6 h. The product of essential oil was then dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and cool-stored in a brown bottle for further analysis. The essential oils yield of Eugenia caryophyllata was calculated by the method described by Taipabu et al. (2022), defined using Eq. 1:
Yield (%) = COs weight (g)/Sample weight (g) x 100 (1)
Gas Chromatography Analysis
The COs was analyzed using a Shimadzu QP-2010, equipped with an FID and Rtx-5 using a fused silica capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm ID, film thickness 1.0 µm). Oven temperature was set at 60 °C for 5 min, and heating was programmed from 60 to 180 °C at a rate of 20 °C for 5 min, and from 280 °C for 4 min, injector temperature was 270 °C; detector temperature was 280 °C; pressure of carrier nitrogen gas at inlet was 7 psi, split ratio 20:1, and the volume injection was 0.5 µL.
Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Analysis
The GC-MS analyses of COs were performed using Shimadzu QP-2010 Plus at 70 eV and 320 °C with auto sampler. The system was equipped with Rtx-5 using a fused silica capillary column (30 m x 0.25 mm ID, film thickness 1.0 µm). Oven temperature was set at 60 °C for 5 min, then program heated from 60 to 220 °C at a rate of 10 °C for 5 min, and 280 °C for 4 min, with the injector temperature set at 270 °C. The carrier gas used was helium at flow rate of 1.40 mL/min. The spectra were scanned from 40 to 600 m/z, at split ratio of 20, and ion source temperature of 225 °C. The spectrum of the unknown component was compared with that of known components stored in the Wiley 7 library and retention index (Adams 2007), name, molecular weight, and structure of the component of the test materials were ascertained.
DPPH and ABTS Radical Scavenging Activity
The DPPH and ABTS assays were performed according to the method described by Sohilait et al. (2019). The BHT and AA were used as positive controls. The percentage of radical scavenging activities was calculated as follows:
Inhibition (%) = (Absorbancecontrol– Absorbance sample)/Absorbancecontrol ×100 (2)
The result was expressed as IC50, the concentration of the extract to scavenge at 50% of the DPPH and ABTS radical scavenging activities.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Performance of COs from Northern Buru Island
The yield of COs in bud, leaf, and stem were distilled from dry plant material using steam distillation, and the results are shown in Table 1. Results show that the highest COs yields were 8.21% (w/w), in bud 4.22% (w/w) in leaf oil, and 3.75% (w/w) in stem oil from Waihani village. Sohilait (2015) reported the yield of bud (7.05% w/w), leaf (3.21%, w/w), and stem (3.58%, w/w) of E. caryophyllata from Amboina Island, Moluccas. Other studies have also reported the yield of bud as 7.1 ± 0.8% (Hassine et al. 2021).
Table 1. Yield of COs from Northern Buru Island
COsWh: sample of Waihani village; COsI: Ilath village; COsWm: Waimoli village
Chemical Composition of COs in Leaf
Chemical composition of COS in leaf from Northern Buru were analyzed by GC and GC-MS. There were four components in COsWh, five components in COsI, and three components in COsWm (Table 2, Fig. 1), according to their elution order on the Rtx-5 column. The main constituent eugenol in COsWh (77.1%), COsI (78.8%), and COsWm (78.7%) of leaf and the second main constituent was β-caryophyllene (19.6%, 17.0% and 18.3%, respectively). Other studies have also reported high concentrations of eugenol in leaf clove oil 81.0% to 86.0% at growing area Amboina Island (Sohilait et al. 2019) and 78.3% in West Amboina Island (Sohilait et al. 2018).
Table 2. Chemical Composition of leaf in CosWh, COsI, and COsWm
Kovats Index literature, * a): Adam, 2007, b) Concentration of compounds base on GC-FID peaks
Chemical Composition of COs in Bud
The chemical composition of COs in bud were analyzed the same method as used for the previous sample, which is by their elution order on the Rtx-5 column. The COsWh and COsI contain four components but COsWm was composed of three components (Table 3; Fig. 1). Both COsWh (77.7%) and COsWm (76.1%) showed that same concentration of eugenol as main component in bud. However, the eugenol concentration in COsI (87.7%) was higher than the two previously mentioned samples. Other studies have also reported high concentrations of eugenol in bud clove oil 81.1% to 86.0% (Sohilait 2015), 49.7% (Bhuiyan et al. 2010), and 84.6% ( Lopes et al. 2010).
Table 3. Chemical Composition of Bud in COsWh, COsI, and COsWm
Kovats Index literature, *a): Adam, 2007, b) Concentration of compounds base on GC-FID peaks
Chemical Composition of COs in Stem
The data from GC/GC-MS of COs in stem from Buru showed that the presence of eugenol in the three samples had similar concentration (94.2% to 97.6%). However, COsWh contains phenyl propene group of eugenol (2) (94.2%) and chavicol (7) (0.4%), sesquiterpene hydrocarbon (α-humulene (4), at; 0.5%) and sesquiterpene oxygenated component (caryophyllene oxide at 0.6%), though these were at low concentrations (Table 4, Fig. 3G, 3H, 3I). Other studies have also reported high concentrations of eugenol in stem clove oil 97.2% to 98.8% from Amboina Island (Sohilait 2015).
Table 4. Chemical Composition of Stem in COsWh, COsI, and COsWm
Kovats Index literature, * a): Adam, 2007, b) Concentration of compounds base on GC-FID peaks
Eugenol (2) is the main component in different plant parts that produce COs from Waihani, Ilath, and Waimoli villages. Eugenol (2), β-caryophyllene (3), α-humulene (4) and eugenyl acetate (5), were observed as the four versatile common components present in leaf, bud, and stem oils with variations in percent content (Tables 2, 3, and 4).
Fig. 1. GC Chromatogram of COsWh (A); COsI (B); and COsWm (C) of leaf
Fig. 2. GC Chromatogram of COsWh (D); COsI (E); and COsWm (F) of bud
The study reveals that except for eugenol (2) as the main component, the composition of the oil differs from earlier reports (Srivastava et al. 2005; Razafimamonjison et al. 2014) and may, therefore, be treated as different chemotypes. The high concentration of eugenol in leaf, buds, and stem oil makes it potentially useful in the medicines because they exhibit antibacterial, antifungal, anti-inflammatory activity, insecticidal, and antioxidant properties, and it is used traditionally as flavoring agent and antimicrobial material in food (Kamatau et al. 2012; Lopes et al.2020; González et al. 2021).
Fig. 3. GC Chromatogram of COsWh (G); COsI (H); and COsWm (I) of stem
Furthermore, COs were identified from northern Buru Island and there were a total of seven secondary metabolites. The compound structures are shown in Fig. 4. The compounds contained in COs from northern Buru show that the essential oils in this area are dominated by the phenylpropene (77.9 to 96.0%) followed by the sesquiterpenes hydrocarbon (2.4 to 21.7%). Compound 1,8-cineole is an oxygenated monoterpene (1.0%) only found in COsI of leaf. The oxygenated sesquiterpenes were found in small amounts in COsI of leaf (1.14%) and COsWh
of stem (0.5%), respectively. However, monoterpene hydrocarbon is not found in all plant tissues of COsWh, COsI, and COsWm. The highest concentration of phenylpropene compounds can be found in COsI stem (97.6%) and the lowest content is COsWh leaf (77.9%). A COsWh leaf contained the highest sesquiterpene hydrocarbon (21.7%) among the nine samples analyzed. Based on the analysis of areas where plants grow and the tissues that can produce COs, it can be explained that COsI contains almost all terpene compound groups except for monoterpene hydrocarbons (Fig. 5).
Fig. 4. Structure compounds in COs from northern Buru Island
Fig. 5. Profile concentration of terpene in COs northern Buru Island
Geographic condition and environmental factors strongly influence the essential oil chemical composition (Xie et al. 2011). Chemical composition of COs of bud in several growth areas and results from this research (Fig. 6) showed the concentration of the major compound of eugenol (2) in CosI as 87.7%, which is similar to Madagascar 2 (87.1%). The concentration of eugenyl acetate (5) in COsWm (18.9%) was higher than the two samples analyzed in this study and the areas where E. caryophyllata grow compared to Manado (8.70%), Malang (8.74%), Indonesia (10.55%), Madagascar 2 (6.40%), India (14.38%), Egypt (8.99%), and Algeria (8.74). However, the concentration of eugenyl acetate (5) in COsWm is lower than Java (20.5%) and Madagascar 1 (21.3) and similar to Brazil (18.69%). The presence of eugenyl acetate (5) in COsWh (14.8%) was not noticeably different from that in India (14.4%). Concentrations of β-caryophyllene (3) in COsWh (6.03%), COsI (5.56%), and COsWm (5.04%) were not noticeably different from Madagascar 2 (5.1%) but were higher than Palu (0.96%) and Malang (3.92%).
*a This research, *bAmelia et al. 2017; *c Tahir et al. 2020; *d Prianto et al. 2013; *e Razafimamonjison et al. 2014; *f de Oliviera et al. 2016; *g Gonzales et al. 2016; *h Kaur et al. 2019; *i Nassar et al. 2007; *j Selles et al. 2020
Fig. 6. Concentrations of major compounds in COs Bud of northen Buru Island and other locations
*a This research, *b Razafimamonjison et al. 2014; *c Srivastava et al. 2004; *d Sohilait et al. 2018
Fig. 7. Concentrations of major compounds in COs leaf of northern Buru Island and other locations
The concentration of eugenol (2) COs of leaf E. caryophylata in Fig. 7 showed that WOsI > COsWh > COsWm. The concentration of (2) as the main compound in COsI (78.8%) is similar to that in India (79.7%) and Indonesia (77.5%) but lower than Amboina Island (81.2%) and Madagascar (83.6%). The composition of caryophyllene (3) in COsWh (19.6%) is the same as COs Indonesia (19.5%) and India (19.5%) and higher than Madagascar (15.0%) and Amboina Island (16.2%). The chemical composition of eugenyl acetate (4) was the same in COs of leaf from three locations in northern Buru island, COsWh (2.12%), COsI (2.02%) and COsWm (2.03%) respectively. Likewise, when compared to the other four locations, Indonesia (1.93%), Madagascar (1.39%), India (1.90%) and Amboina Island (1.80%) did not show a noticeable difference.
*a This research, *bRazafimamonjison et al. 2014; *c Raina et al. 2001; *d Sohilait et al. 2015
Fig. 8. Concentration of major compounds in COs Stem of Northen Buru Island and other locations
Figure 8 shows that major components are eugenol (2) and caryophyllene (3) COs of stem in northern Buru Island. The eugenyl acetate (5) component was not found in COsWh, COsI, and COsWm, respectively. The composition of eugenol (2) in COsI of stem (97.6%) was higher than COsWh (94.2%) and COsWm (96.0%) also at five other locations. However, the concentration of eugenol (2) in COsWh of stem is similar to Little Andaman (94.4%) but higher than Indonesia (89.3%), Zanzibar (89.5%), and Amboina Island (90.8%). The concentration of caryophyllene (3) component, in COsWh (4.30%) is similar to Madagascar (4.48%) but lower than Zanzibar (9.70%), Indonesia (7.75%) and Amboina Island (6.16%).
Antioxidant Activities of COs from Northern Buru Island
The antioxidant activity of COs from Buru was evaluated by DPPH and ABTS assays. Free radical scavenging effect of COs in various concentration is shown in Figs. 9 and 10. Concentrations of 159.73 to 0.623 μg/mL were found for DPPH; and 99.0 to 1.54 μg/mL for ABTS. Data show the mean SD (n = 3) for each experiment performed in triplicate; p < 0.01 for comparisons of BHT and AA as positive control.
The COsWh of bud (97.21 ± 0.58%) and COsWm of bud (97.21 ± 0.13%) showed the same inhibition of DPPH free radical scavenging at the highest concentration (159.7 μg/mL). The inhibition of DPPH at concentration 0.623 μg/mL (lowest concentration), COsWm of bud (47.03 ± 0.33%) was higher than the nine samples used in this study, even the positive control (Fig. 9). Furthermore, COsWh of bud showed higher DPPH activity, as indicated by the IC50 value 0.09 ± 0.37 μg/mL (Table 5).
This study shows data on COs northern Buru inhibition of ABTS free radical at highest concentration (99 μg/mL) in the range of 96.02 ± 0.30 to 99.74 ± 0.23%. There is no remarkable difference when compared with BHT and AA as positive controls. The COs in bud at different locations showed the same inhibition of COsWh and COsWm, namely 99.74 ± 0.23%. However, at the lowest concentration in the ABTS assay (1.54 μg/mL), COsI of bud inhibition (37.06 ±0.64 μg/mL) was higher than all samples and controls used in study (Fig.10). Calculation based on the equation of the interpolation curve, the free radical scavenging activity of ABTS COsI of bud (IC50 value 0.09 ± 0.61 μg/mL) is higher than samples evaluated in this study. These data also showed that COsI of bud is higher than AA (IC50 value 0.81 ± 1.64 μg/mL) and BHT (IC50 value 0.83 ± 0.54 μg/mL) as positive controls (Table 5).
Fig. 9. Inhibition (%) of DPPH Free radical scavenging of Cos
Fig. 10. Inhibition (%) of ABTS Free radical scavenging of COs
The results obtained provide information that COs from different plant parts have free radical scavenging activity of DPPH and ABTS in strong classification. This excellent performance is dominated by COs of bud, followed by stem and leaf. The COs of bud contain high eugenol (76.10% to 87.74%), and there is also eugenyl acetate (14.82% to 18.86%) from phenyl propene group. Both compounds synergize with proton donors in powerful free radical scavenging action. Phenolics compound have favorable antioxidant activity naturally (Wang et al. 2022).
Free radical scavenging (IC50 value) depends on chemical composition of essential oils. The large quantities of phenyl propene serve as main compounds in clove oil, increasing its activity (Mahboubi et al. 2015). The hydroxyl group available in eugenol on the aromatic ring is responsible for the antioxidant activity. The phenolic compounds transfer electrons or hydrogen atoms and neutralize them to free radicals, resulting in a blocked oxidative process (Gonzales et al. 2022). The eugenol (2), eugenyl acetate (5), and β-caryophyllene (3) as the main components of clove oil play a very important role, as shown in this research. The present research data shows concentrations of (2) (77.7%), (3) (6.03%), and (5) (14.8%) and synergistic effects in COsWh (IC50 0.09 ± 0.37 μg/mL) of bud that against DPPH free radical is higher than COsI (IC50 0.64 ± 0.54 μg/mL) and CosWm (IC50 0.09 ± 0.37 μg/mL). COsI of bud, as well as against ABTS free radical (0.09 ± 0.61 μg/mL) with concentration 87.7% of (2), 6.02 % of (5), (5.56%) of (3) (Table 5). This data is strengthened by the values of Pearson correlation coefficients (r) between chemical composition and free radical scavenging DPPH and ABTS. High positive correlations between free radical scavenging DPPH activity of COsWh bud and major compounds are (2) (r: 0.85, p < 0.01); (3) (r: 0.87, p < 0.01); (5) (r: 0.70, p < 0.01) respectively. This relationship also applies to COsI and ABTS free radical scavenging DPPH activity which are (2) (r: 0.98, p < 0.01); (3) (r: 0.73, p < 0.01); (5) (r: 0.65, p < 0.01).
Table 5. IC50 Value of COs from Northern Buru Island
The location of plants during their growth will influence chemical composition and bioactivity (Kainama et al. 2023). This result showed that COsWh of bud DPPH free radical scavenging abilities of (2), (3) and (5) were higher than COs in Indian plants. In addition, high concentration (5) (14.82%) can affect DPPH free radical scavenging, which is more active compared to Indian COs bud (IC50 value 2.6 μg/mL).
CONCLUSIONS
- The essential oils of clove (Eugenia caryophyllata) from northern Buru Island were obtained by steam distillation. The chemical composition of COs was analyzed by GC–FID and GC–MS techniques. The main component is eugenol (77.1 to 78.8%) and β-caryophyllene (17.0% to 19.6%) in leaf oil. The main components are eugenol (76.1% to 87.7%) and eugenyl acetate (6.0% to 18.9%) in bud oil and the only one component was eugenol (94.2% to 97.6%) in stem oil from Waihani, Ilath, and Waimoni.
- The COs of leaf, bud, and stem showed strong activity and strong potential for the application of clove essential oil as a natural DPPH and ABTS free radical scavenging.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors are grateful for the support of Postgraduate program, Universitas Pattimura Ambon, Grant no. 1204/UN13/SK/2022.
REFERENCES CITED
Adams, R. P. (2007). Identification of Essential oil components by Gas chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy, Allured Publishing Corporation, Carol Stream, Il, USA.
Alfikri, F. N. H., Pujiarti, R., Wibisono, M., Gand Bhakti, E., and Hardiyanto (2020). “Yield, quality, and antioxidant activity of clove (Syzygium aromaticum L.) bud oil at the different phenological stages in young and mature Trees,” Scientifica 2020, article ID 9701701. DOI: 10.1155/2020/9701701
Alma, H. K., Ertas, M., Nitz, S., and Kollmannsberger, H. (2007). “Chemical composition and content of essential oil from the bud of cultivated Turkish clove (Syzigium aromaticum L.),” BioResources 2(2), 265-269. DOI: 10.15376/biores.2.2.265-269
Amelia, B., Saepudin, E., Cahyana, A. H., Rahayu, D. U., Sulistyoningrum, A. S., and Haib J. (2017). “GC-MS analysis of clove (Syzygium aromaticum) bud essential oil from Java and Manado,” AIP Conference Proceedings 1862, 030082 (2017); DOI:10.1063/1.499118
Barakat, H. (2014). “Composition, antioxidant, antibacterial activities and mode of action of clove (Syzygium aromaticum L.) buds essential oil,” British Journal of Applied Sciences and Technology 4(13), 1934-1951.
Bhuiyan, Md. N. I., Begum, J., Nand, N. C., and Akter, F. (2010). “Constituents of the essential oil from leaves and buds of clove (Syzigium caryophyllatum L.),” African Journal of Plant Science 4(11), 451-454.
Chaieb, K., Zmantar, T., Ksouri, R., Hafedh Hajlaoui, H., Mahdouani,K., Chedly Abdelly, Ch., and Bakhrouf, A. (2007). “Antioxidant properties of the essential oil of Eugenia caryophyllata and its antifungal activity against a large number of clinical Candida species,” Mycoses 50, 403-406. DOI:10.1111/j.1439-0507.2007.01391x
de Oliveira, M. S., da Costa, W. A., Pereira, D. S., Botelho, J. R. S., Tatiany Oliveira de Alencar Menezes, T. O. A., et al., (2016). “Chemical composition and phytotoxic activity of clove (Syzygium aromaticum) essential oil obtained with supercritical CO2,” The Journal of Supercritical Fluids 118, 185-193, DOI: 10.1016/j.supflu.2016.08.010
González, J. N. H., Herrera, G. A. C., Velázquez, M. M., and Andrews, H. E. (2021). “Clove essential oil (Syzygium aromaticum L. Myrtaceae): Extraction, chemical composition, food applications, and essential bioactivity for human health,” Molecules 26(21), 1-25.
Han, X., and Parker, T. L. (2017). “Anti-inflammatory activity of clove (Eugenia caryophyllata) essential oil in human dermal fibroblasts,” Pharmaceutical Biology 55(1), 1619-1622.
Hassine, D. B., Euch, S. K. E., Rahmani, R., Ghazouani, N., Kane, R., Abderrabba, M., and Bouajila, J. (2021). “Clove buds essential oil: The impact of grinding on the chemical composition and its biological activities involved in consumer’s health security,” BioMed Research International 2021, article ID 9940591. DOI: 10.1155%2F2021%2F9940591
Kainama, H., Awan, A., and Sohilait, H. J. (2023). “Chemotype essential oil of Melaleuca cajuputi leaf from Lektama in South Buru District,” AIP Conference Proceedings, 2642, article 060001. DOI: 10.1063/5.0110562
Kamatou, G. P., Vermaak, I., and Viljoen A. M. (2012). “Eugenol-from the remote Maluku Islands to the international marketplace: A review of a remarkable and versatile molecule,” Molecules 17(6), 6953-6981. DOI: 10.3390/molecules17066953
Kaur, K., Kaushal, S., and Rani, R (2019). “Chemical composition, antioxidant and antifungal potential of clove (Syzygium aromaticum) essential oil, its major compound and its derivatives,” Journal of Essential Oil Bearing Plants,” 22(5), 1195-1217, DOI: 10.1080/0972060X.2019.1688689
Lee, K. G., and Shibamoto, T. (2021). “Antioxidant property of aroma extract isolated from clove buds [Syzygium aromaticum (L.) Merr.et Perry],” Food Chemistry 74(4), 443-448. DOI: 10.1016/S0308-8146(01)00161-3
Lopes, Cr. M. U., de Oliveira, J. R. S., Holanda, V. N., Rodrigues, A. Y. F., da Fonseca, C. S. M., Rodrigues, F. F. G., Camilo, C. J., Lima, V. L. d. M., Coutinho, H. D.M., Kowalski, R., et al. (2020). “GC-MS analysis and hemolytic, antipyretic and antidiarrheal potential of Syzygium aromaticum (Clove) essential oil,” Separations 7(2), article 35. DOI: 10.3390/separations7020035
Mahboubi, M., and Mahboubi, M. (2015). “Chemical composition, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of Eugenia caryophyllata essential oil,” Journal of Essential Oil Bearing Plants 18(4), 967-975. DOI: 10.1080/0972060X.2014.884779
Nassar, M. I., Gaara, A. H., El-Ghorab, A. H., Abdel Razik, H., Farrag, A. R. H., Shen, H., Huq, E., and Mabry, T. J. (2007). “Chemical constituents of clove (Syzygium aromaticum, Fam. Myrtaceae) and their antioxidant activity,” Revista Latino americana de Quimica 35(3), 47-57.
Ozturk, A., and Ozbek, H. (2005). “The anti-inflammatory activity of Eugenia caryophyllata essential oil: An animal model of anti-inflammatory activity,” European Journal of General Medicine 2(4), 159-163.
Prianto, H., Retnowati, R., and Juswono, U. P. (2013). “Isolasi dan karakterisasi dari minyak bunga cengkeh (Syzygium aromaticum) kering hasil distilasi uap, [Isolation and characterization of dried clove oil (Syzygium aromaticum) from steam distillation,” Kimia Student Journal 1(2), 269-275.
Raina, V. K., Srivastava, S. K., Aggarwa L. K. K., Syamasundar, K. V., and Kumar, S (2001). “Essential oil composition of Syzygium aromaticum leaf from Little Andaman India,” Flavour and Fragrance Journal Flavour Fragr. J. 16, 334-336 DOI: 10.1002/ffj.1005
Razafimamonjison, G., Jahiel, M., Duclos, T., Ramanoelina, P., Fawbush, F., and Danthu, P. (2014). “Bud, leaf and stem essential oil composition of Syzygium aromaticum from Madagascar, Indonesia and Zanzibar,” International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 3(3), 224-233. DOI: 10.14419/ijbas.v3i3.2473
Rojas, D. F. C., de Sousa, C. R. F., and Olivera, W. P. (2014). “Clove (Syzygium aromaticum): A precious spice,” Asian Pacific Journal Tropical Biomedicine 4(2), 90-96. DOI: 10.1016%2FS2221-1691(14)60215-X
Salleh, W. M. N. H. W., and Ahmad, F. (2016). “Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of essential oils of Actinodaphne macrophylla and A. pruinosa (Lauraceae),” Natural Product Communications 11(6), 853-855.
Selles, S. M. A., Kouidri, M., Belhamiti, B. T., and Amrane, A. A. (2020). “Chemical composition, in-vitro antibacterial and antioxidant activities of Syzygium aromaticum essential oil,” Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization 14, 2352-2358. DOI: 10.1007/s11694-020-00482-5
Sohilait, H. J. (2015). “Chemical composition of the essential oils in Eugenia caryophyllata, Thunb from Amboina Island,” Science Journal of Chemistry 3(6), 95-99. DOI: 10.11648/j.sjc.20150306.13
Sohilait, H. J., Kainama, H., and Nindatu, M. (2018). “Essential oil components of Eugenia caryophyllata leaf from West Amboina Island,” AIP Conference Proceedings 2049(1), article ID 020028. DOI: 10.1063/1.5082433
Sohilait, H. J., and Kainama, H. (2019). “Free radical scavenging activity of essential oil of Eugenia caryophyllata from Amboina Island and derivatives of eugenol,” Open Chemistry 17(1), 422-428. DOI: 10.1515/chem-2019-0047
Sohilait, M. R., Sohilait, H. J., and Kainama, H. (2021). “Comparison of chemical compositions of seed and mace nutmeg (Myristica fragrans) essential oils from Amboina Island, Moluccas, Indonesia and their antioxidant activities,” Natural Volatiles and Essential Oils Journal 8(6), 5537-5545.
Srivastava, A. K., Srivastava, S. K., and Syamsundar, K. V. (2005). “Bud and leaf essential oil composition of Syzygium aromaticum from India and Madagascar,” Flavour and Fragrance Journal 20, 51-53.
Tahir, M., Hafsah, Chuzaemi, S., and Widodo, E. (2020). “Chemical compounds and antioxidant contents of cloves leaves essential oil,” AGROLAND: The Agricultural Science Journal 7(1), 37-44, DOI: 10.22487/agroland.v6i1.3
Taipabu, M. I., Sohilait, H. J., Viswanathan, K., Wu, W., Fransina, E. G., Naqvi, S. R., and Kelukur, F. J. (2022). “Potential application of essential and fat oils of Myristica argentea Warb for pharmacochemical industry and green energy production: Experiment and modeling,” Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Online, 1-18. DOI: 10.1007/s13399-022-02836-z
Wang, Q., Zhou, S. T., Wu, X. M., Pang, X .Q., Ni, L. L., Yuan, S. M., Zhi-Bin, Z., Xiao, Y. H., and Li, Y. H. (2022). “GC-MS analysis of Vespa velutina auraria Smith and its anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities in vitro,” Open Chemistry 20(1), 602–610. DOI: 10.1515/chem-2022-0177
Xie, Y., Wang J., Yang F., and Lei C. (2011). “Comparative analysis of essential oil components of two Cryptomeria species from China,” Industrial Crops and Products 34(1), 1226-1230. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.04.016
Article submitted June 5, 2023; Peer review completed: July 26, 2023; Revised version received: September 5, 2023; Accepted: September 6, 2023; Published: September 19, 2023.
DOI: 10.15376/biores.18.4.7551-7565