NC State
BioResources

1985 Volume 3

Latest proceedings

View our current issue
  • Proceedingpp 1072-1074AbstractPDF

    One of our current interests is in the achievement of dry strength by means of wet-end addition.

    The purpose of this contribution is to draw attention to the effect on sheet formation that the additions of dry strength agents, such as cationic starch, to the wet-end may produce.

    For this work, we have used C14 labelled cationic starch, the synthesis of which is shown in Figure 1.

    When added to a fibre suspension in a sheet machine, the cationic starch does show a very high retention on fibres related to their degree of beating and the pH of the suspension as shown in Figure 2. Native starches, on the
    other hand, show very low retentions and are much less
    dependent on pH.

    However, in normal sheetmaking, the introduction of cationic starch may cause quite severe changes in sheet formation which, of course, will be important in any subsequent measurement of physical properties such as tensile strength.

    Figure 3 shows the breaking length obtained from hand sheets made from suspensions of fibres and cationic starch which had been pre-stirred for 0, 2, 10 and 15 minutes before being added to the sheet machine. It illustrates that the addition of cationic starch to the suspension may either increase or decrease the breaking length of the sheet depending on the degree of pre-stirring applied.

    The effect of the addition of cationic starch on formation for three of the pre-stirring periods; 0, 2, and 10 minutes, is shown in Figure 4. Notice that, for the case of the suspension which had been pre-stirred for 10 minutes, the breaking length had increased while the formation had deteriorated with increasing levels of starch addition.

    These results illustrate how important it is when analysing results of the effects of the addition of dry strength additives, to ensure that sheet formation remains constant.

  • Proceedingpp 1117-1120AbstractPDF

    Alum has been used in pa papermaking for about 200 years. Despite the enormous amount of theoretical work done, the chemistry of alum in the papermaking process is still not adequately understood. To explain the chemistry of aluminium salts, three basic approaches have been taken by the various investigators. One is the use of classical analytical techniques to identify the ionic species formed by hydrolysis of Al-salts. Another approach uses coagulation of extremely small anionic colloids, such as silver halides. The third approach is surface-chemical, whereby the structure of the complex aluminium ions is deduced from the interaction patterns with mono-molecular rosin films. Conclusions drawn from the hydrolysis studies dominate the explanations of alum chemistry in the papermaking process. Many authors have used the Hayden-Rubin distributions (1) as a basis for deducing that the octamer structures of type Al₈⁺⁴ (OH)₂₀ or Al₈⁺⁴ (OH)₁₀ (SO₄)₅ are the active species in the papermaking process (2,3).