Abstract
A facile and eco-friendly system for synthesis of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) from glucose has been investigated with the catalyst dihydric phosphate (H2PO4—) in a methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK)/H2O biphasic system. The results showed that the catalyst dosage, reaction temperature, and reaction time had noticeable effects on glucose conversion and the HMF yield; more than 50% yield of HMF was achieved at the optimum conditions. In addition, this catalytic system was broadly substrate-tolerant; a satisfactory HMF yield was obtained from higher substrate concentrations and complex substrates. Furthermore, this efficient catalyst was recycled up to nine consecutive times without the loss of catalytic activity.
Download PDF
Full Article
A Facile and Eco-Effective Catalytic System for Synthesis of 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural from Glucose
Junjiang Teng, Hao Ma, Furong Wang, Lefu Wang, and Xuehui Li *
A facile and eco-friendly system for synthesis of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) from glucose has been investigated with the catalyst dihydric phosphate (H2PO4—) in a methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK)/H2O biphasic system. The results showed that the catalyst dosage, reaction temperature, and reaction time had noticeable effects on glucose conversion and the HMF yield; more than 50% yield of HMF was achieved at the optimum conditions. In addition, this catalytic system was broadly substrate-tolerant; a satisfactory HMF yield was obtained from higher substrate concentrations and complex substrates. Furthermore, this efficient catalyst was recycled up to nine consecutive times without the loss of catalytic activity.
Keywords: Dihydric phosphate; Glucose; 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural; Biphasic system; Platform chemical
Contact information: School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Pulp & Paper Engineering State Key Laboratory of China, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, PR China;
* Corresponding author: cexhli@scut.edu.cn
INTRODUCTION
Because of the depletion of fossil fuels and increased environmental concerns, the development of environmentally and economically viable synthetic means for producing chemicals and fuels from non-fossil fuel sources has been invigorated in recent years (Petrus and Noordermeer 2006; Alonso et al. 2010; Yan et al. 2014). In this context, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF), named as one of the “top 10 biobased chemicals” by the U.S. Department of Energy (Werpy et al. 2004), has received significant attention as a precursor for synthesizing a broad range of chemicals and liquid transportation fuels, such as levulinic acid, 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid, 2,5-diformylfuran, dimethylfuran, and dihydroxymethylfuran (Bozell and Petersen 2010; Teong et al. 2014). The demand for HMF will continue to grow with the diminishing supply of petroleum feedstock.
It is well known that excellent yields of biomass-derived HMF can be prepared via dehydration of the preferred feedstock, viz., fructose, in the presence of an acid catalyst (such as HCl, H2SO4, cation exchanged resins, and others) (Rosatella et al. 2011; van Putten et al. 2013; Yan et al. 2013). In nature, however, fructose is not a highly prevalent carbohydrate. In contrast, the isomer of fructose, glucose, which is the monomeric unit of cellulose and the most abundant monosaccharide in nature, is a better candidate for the production of HMF. The possibility to economically convert glucose into HMF has motivated a tremendous amount of recent research (Song et al. 2013).
Obtaining HMF from glucose is, however, difficult because the direct synthesis of HMF from glucose usually proceeds in two steps. First, the isomerization of glucose to fructose occurs in the presence of enzyme, base, or metal chloride (Huang et al. 2010; Peng et al. 2012; Song et al. 2013; van Putten et al. 2013). Next, the fructose is dehydrated in the presence of an acid catalyst (H+) to yield HMF. The two-step process for producing HMF from glucose results in a low selectivity of HMF and a high amount of humins. Hence, the ideal strategy for the catalytic conversion of glucose into HMF requires a bifunctional catalyst that would affect both the isomerization of glucose to fructose and the subsequent dehydration of fructose. In recent years, a series of novel bifunctional catalysts have been synthesized, such as N,N‘-dimethylformamide (DMF), which combines Amberlyst-15 (a solid acid) and Mg–Al hydrotalcite (a solid base) for the one-pot synthesis of HMF from glucose (Takagaki et al. 2009). An HMF selectivity of 58% and a glucose conversion of 73% was achieved at 180 °C. In this catalytic system, the base acted as the catalyst for isomerizing the glucose into fructose, and the acid was the catalyst for dehydrating the fructose into HMF. In another instance, Cao et al. (2015) used an ammonium resin (PBnNH3Cl) as a single catalyst for the glucose and polysaccharide dehydration into HMF, with high selectivity (> 80%). This example demonstrated, through decomposing ammonium resin under the high reaction temperature, that the in situ formation of –NH2 (PBnNH2) and H+ (HCl) could act as both the isomerizing agent for glucose and the acid catalyst for the dehydration of fructose. However, the procedures for preparing bifunctional catalysts are tedious and cumbersome, although these catalysts display high catalytic performance and recyclability, and using a commercially available commodity as the bifunctional catalyst would be preferred.
Interestingly, recent breakthroughs have indicated that some metal chlorides can effectively catalyze isomerization and dehydration of glucose into HMF in ionic liquids. Zhao et al. (2007) were the first to report a significant HMF yield of nearly 70% from glucose by using chromium(II) chloride (CrCl2) in 1-ethyl-3-methyl-imidazolium chloride ([C2mim]Cl), at 100 °C, for 3 h. Hu et al. (2009) found that SnCl4 could also act as the catalyst for the conversion of glucose-based feedstocks (glucose, cellobiose, and starch) into HMF with an acceptable yield. Zhang et al. (2011) converted glucose into HMF with a yield of 48.4% by employing GeCl4 as the catalyst. Kim et al. (2011) developed a binary metal chlorides catalyst system, consisting of CrCl2 and RuCl3, and obtained up to 60% yield from cellulose. Moreover, it has been found that some metal oxides (such as Nb2O5·nH2O, Cr2O3, and TiO2) (McNeff et al. 2010; Nakajima et al. 2011; Zhang et al. 2015) and phosphate (NbPO, TaOPO4, Ti3(PO4)4, Sr(PO3)2, and others) (Daorattanachai et al. 2012; Dutta et al. 2012; Behera and Parida 2013; Ordomsky et al. 2013; Dutta et al. 2014; Jiménez-Morales et al. 2014; Atanda et al. 2015; Jain et al. 2015) could also have the capacity to convert glucose into HMF. However, these contributions still encountered problems in terms of environmental toxicity, low catalytic activity, and tedious workup procedures for catalyst preparation (Agirrezabal-Telleria et al. 2014; Deuss et al. 2014). In addition, methods like these that use ionic liquids as the solvents are expensive, and probably not suitable for developing into an economically favorable and scalable HMF production method. Developing a relatively inexpensive, low-toxicity, and high-yield catalytic system for producing HMF from glucose is still necessary and desirable.
As a continuation of an ongoing research program to develop a mild catalytic route for preparing bio-chemicals from biomass (Ma et al. 2012, 2015a,b), this paper reports an efficient method with an intensification strategy to produce HMF from glucose. In this method, the high efficiency was realized via selective conversion of glucose-based carbohydrates promoted by H2PO4— into HMF. This occurs in an aqueous solution, which is then enriched in an organic phase (MIBK) under mild conditions. The effect of the reaction process parameters (catalyst dosage, temperature, and time) and the extent of the substrate concentration and types are evaluated in detail. The recycle performance of the catalyst was also investigated.
EXPERIMENTAL
Materials
D-glucose (99%), D-fructose (99%), sucrose (98%), maltose (99%), starch (99%), cellulose (99%), and CH3OH (high-performance liquid chromatography, HPLC) were purchased from the J&K Chemical Company (Beijing, China) and used as received. Analytical graded KH2PO4 (99%), K2HPO4·3H2O (99%), K3PO4·3H2O (99%), NaH2PO4·2H2O (99%), Na2HPO4·12H2O (99%), Na3PO4·12H2O (99%), B(OH)3 (99%), H3PO4 (85%), H2SO4 (98%), HCl (36.5%), MIBK (99%), and other reagents were supplied by the Guanghua Chemical Factory Co. Ltd. (Shantou, China).
Procedure for the Dehydration of Glucose
A 25-mL hydrothermal autoclave reactor was charged with 5 mmol (0.9 g) of glucose, 2 mmol of KH2PO4, 2 mL of H2O, and 8 mL of MIBK, and then blown with a nitrogen stream for 1 min to displace air. The autoclave reactor was capped and immersed in an oil bath that was pre-heated to the designated temperature of 160 °C for a reaction time of 2 h, while undergoing magnetic stirring of 500 rpm, and then rapidly brought to room temperature by loading it with cooling water.
Analysis Procedure
The analysis of the reaction products was carried out by means of an HPLC apparatus. After reaction, the catalyst KH2PO4 and the unconverted glucose were enriched in an aqueous phase. The formed HMF was distributed in both phases. The glucose was determined by an Agilent 1200 HPLC (Agilent Technologies, USA) equipped with a RID detector and a HPX-87H column (300 × 7.8 mm, 5 μm, 5 mM H2SO4, 0.6 mL·min-1). The HMF distributed in each phase was determined by the above HPLC using a UV detector (284 nm) with a C18 reversed-phase column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm, CH3OH/H2O [v/v, 1:4], 0.6 mL·min-1). The amount of glucose and HMF were determined by comparison to standard calibration curves using commercially available standard substrates. The conversion of glucose (Conv., mol%), yield of HMF (YHMF, mol%), selectivity of HMF (SHMF, mol%), and extraction ratio of HMF (ERHMF, mol%) were calculated according to Eqs. 1 through 4.
Recycling of catalyst was done according to the following procedures: After reaction, the MIBK phase was first isolated from the reaction mixture using a separation funnel; and then the HMF component existed in aqueous phase was extracted with MIBK (15 mL× 3). At last, the fresh glucose and MIBK were added into the residual aqueous solution for the next run. The amount of HMF in pooled MIBK was examined to represent the total HMF yield, and the total separation efficiency of HMF was approximately 95%.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Catalytic Conversion of Glucose into HMF
A wide range of catalysts, including mineral acids (H3PO4, H2SO4, and HCl), dihydric phosphates (NaH2PO4 and KH2PO4), hydrogen phosphates (Na2HPO4 and K2HPO4), phosphates (Na3PO4 and K3PO4), and others (KCl, K2SO4, and B(OH)3), were screened for the production of HMF from glucose in a MIBK/H2O biphasic system (Table 1).
Table 1. Dehydration of Glucose with Various Catalysts [a]
It can be seen that the HMF yield was highly dependent on the catalyst. In the absence of catalyst, the yield of HMF was only 5.5% (Table 1, entry 1). When H3PO4 was added, the HMF yield improved to a certain degree, with a final HMF yield of 8.1% (Table 1, entry 2). Unexpectedly, NaH2PO4 had obvious catalytic activities in the conversion of glucose and gave an HMF yield of 24.9% with 61.3% HMF selectivity (Table 1, entry 3). However, as NaH2PO4 was replaced by Na2HPO4 and Na3PO4, the conversion of glucose increased obviously while the yield of HMF declined sharply from 24.9% to trace (Table 1, entries 3-5). These results showed that the acid strength was not the only determining factor in glucose conversion, as the weak acid NaH2PO4 had a better catalytic effect on this reaction than H3PO4 (Table 2).
Table 2. pH Value of Aqueous Solution
Because of the instability of HMF in aqueous solution (Teong et al. 2014), the presence of a base catalyst accelerated the occurrence of side reactions. This increase is illustrated in Fig. 1, where the color of the reaction mixture gradually turned from pale yellow to deep brown as the base strength of the catalyst increased, and resulted in lower HMF yields in the presence of Na2HPO4 and Na3PO4.
Fig. 1. Photographs of mixtures from different catalyst systems: (a) no catalyst, (b) H3PO4, (c) NaH2PO4, (d) Na2HPO4, and (e) Na3PO4. Reaction conditions: 5 mmol glucose, 0.5 mmol catalyst, 2 mL H2O, 8 mL MIBK, 160 °C for 2 h
To confirm the contributions of cations and anions from NaH2PO4, a series of catalysts with different cations and anions were used in the reaction. It was found that KH2PO4, K2HPO4, and K3PO4afforded similar catalytic activity as NaH2PO4, Na2HPO4, and Na3PO4, respectively (Table 1, entries 6-8). When KH2PO4 was used as catalyst, a 25.8% HMF yield was achieved. In addition, as expected, KCl and K2SO4 had no obvious catalytic participation in the conversion of glucose, and gave HMF yields of less than 6% (Table 1, entries 9 and 10). Therefore, the results mentioned above demonstrated that the anion H2PO4-1 played a key role in the consecutive isomerization-dehydration reactions.
Subsequently, the well-known isomerizing agent B(OH)3 was examined as the catalyst (Ståhlberg et al. 2011). Its HMF yield of 7.1% was much less than those from NaH2PO4 and KH2PO4 catalyst systems (Table 1, entry 11), which demonstrated B(OH)3 was not an available catalyst in this water-based catalytic system. The use of mineral acids (HCl and H2SO4) as catalysts in these reactions (Table 1, entries 12-16) yielded less HMF than the catalyst-free system (5.5%). These results were ascribed to the miscibility of mineral with water and MIBK, which resulted in the distribution of the acid in organic phase, the subsequent decomposition/rehydration of the formed HMF into organic acids or other byproducts (van Putten et al. 2013), and lower yields of HMF. Based on the results above, the dihydrogen phosphate was the preferred catalyst in this reaction. Therefore, KH2PO4 was chosen as the best catalyst for subsequent studies on process parameters.
Effect of Process Parameters
With KH2PO4 as the appropriate catalyst, several experiments were designed to study the catalytic dehydration of glucose into HMF under various experimental conditions, such as catalyst dosage, reaction temperature, and reaction time. The effect of several reaction parameters on HMF yield and the catalyst’s effectiveness are described below.
Effect of catalyst dosage
As shown in Table 1, the nature of the catalyst played an important role in this system, and, similarly, the intake of catalyst is another crucial factor in producing HMF from glucose. Hence, the effect of catalyst dosage when converting glucose into HMF was investigated, and the results are pictured in Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. The effect of catalyst dosage on conversion of glucose into HMF. Reaction conditions: 5 mmol glucose, 2 mL H2O, 8 mL MIBK, 160 °C for 2 h
It can be seen that the glucose conversion increased from 36.1% to 88.0% when the KH2PO4 dosage was increased from 0% to 60%. The experiments highly loaded with catalysts had increased glucose conversion, implying that the kinetic of glucose dehydration was faster with a higher catalyst dosage. Analysis of the HMF yields shows a different trend: up to 52.3% of HMF was yielded at a 40% catalyst dosage, but higher dosages revealed a decline in the HMF yield (51.0% at 60% catalyst dosage). The selectivity of HMF showed a similar trend; its peak value of 65.2% was also achieved at the 40% catalyst dosage. The decrease in both the HMF yield and the selectivity at higher catalyst dosages can be ascribed to the fact that more catalyst can also accelerate side reactions of HMF, such as rehydration or condensation (Hu et al. 2012). With the aim to obtain the maximum HMF yield and selectivity, the 40% mole ratio of KH2PO4 to glucose was chosen as the preferred catalyst dosage for subsequent experiments.
It should be noted that the addition of salt can improve the partition coefficient of HMF in a biphasic system (Román-Leshkov and Dumesic 2009). To check the salting-out effect in the present study, the extraction ratio of MIBK in this biphasic system was given as a function of catalyst loading (Fig. 3). It was found that the higher catalyst dosage did improve the extraction ratio of HMF during the reaction phase, and, at 60 mol% catalyst dosage, the extraction ratio of HMF reached up to 90.4%. Therefore, the salting-out effect may have a potential influence in increasing HMF yield in this biphasic solvent mediated dehydration reaction.
Fig. 3. The extraction ratio of this catalytic system at different catalyst dosages. Reaction conditions 5 mmol glucose, 2 mL H2O, 8 mL MIBK, 160 °C for 2 h.
Effect of reaction temperature and time
In this study, reaction was not tested at higher temperatures because such temperatures would cause high energy consumption and difficulties in control. Therefore, the reaction temperatures of 150, 160, and 170 °C were employed for different reaction times hereafter.
The results are shown in Fig. 4, which indicates that the reaction temperature and reaction time had a significant influence on this reaction. For example, as shown in Fig. 4a, at the reaction temperature of 150 °C, the glucose conversion was only 15.2% after 0.5 h; however, when the reaction temperature was elevated to 170 °C, the conversion of glucose reached up to 50.8% in the same reaction time. Furthermore, prolonging the reaction time improved the conversion of glucose, implying the positive influence of increased reaction time on glucose conversion.
The reaction temperature and reaction time also played important roles determining the HMF yield (Fig. 4b). Elevating the reaction temperature or extending the reaction time consistently improved the HMF yield, until it reached its peak value. For example, at 160 °C, the peak value of HMF yield was 52.3%, which occurred at 2 h. However, further extending the reaction time decreased the HMF yield due to the side reactions in which the produced HMF participated (Chuntanapum et al. 2008).
At different initial reaction temperatures, initially the HMF selectivity increased when reaction time increased (Fig. 4c). When the HMF selectivity reached its peak value, any further increase in reaction time resulted in lower selectivity of HMF due to the competitive side reactions of HMF (Hu et al. 2012). Hence, based on the results above, to obtain the highest yield of HMF (52.3%), the preferred reaction temperature and reaction time was 160 °C for 2 h. The optimum conditions were concluded to be 40% of catalyst dosage at a temperature of 160 °C for 2 h.
Fig. 4. The effect of reaction temperature and reaction time on: (a) the glucose conversion, (b) HMF yield, and (c) HMF selectivity. Default condition: 5 mmol glucose, 2 mmol KH2PO4, 2 mL H2O, 8 mL MIBK.
Substrate concentration and scope
The efficient conversion of a high concentration of substrates is crucial for the practical production of HMF. In general, the substrate concentration has a significant influence on the HMF yield. Thus, in this work, the effect of the initial glucose concentration, viz., 22.5 wt%, 45.0 wt%, 67.5 wt%, and 90.0 wt%, on the HMF yield was investigated in detail (Table 3). It can be seen that the glucose conversion and the HMF yield were partly affected by the initial concentration of glucose. The highest HMF yield was 56.4% at 22.5% of the initial glucose concentration. Although there was a slight decrease when the initial glucose concentration was further increased to 90.0%, an HMF yield of 40.4% was still achieved. This yield indicated that the KH2PO4 catalyst was more effective in converting high glucose concentrations into a high yield of HMF. In addition, the partial loss of HMF at high glucose concentrations might be attributed to higher rates of side reactions, which are associated with high glucose concentrations, and which produce some undesired by-products (Ma et al. 2015b).
Table 3. Effect of Glucose Concentration[a]
To further assess the practicality of this biphasic catalyst system, a large-scale production of HMF was carried out at a glucose concentration of 45.0% with 9.0 g glucose intake (Table 3, entry 5). The acceptable HMF yield of 48.8% was obtained, demonstrating that this catalyst system could be promising for scalable production of HMF.
Table 4. Substrate Range of this System in Sugar Dehydration [a]
Subsequently, because of the robustness of the KH2PO4 catalyst in synthesizing HMF from glucose, the capability of this catalyst system for converting more complex carbohydrates, such as disaccharides (maltose and sucrose) and polysaccharides (starch and cellulose), was carried out (Table 4). Synthesis of HMF from maltose, sucrose, starch, and cellulose involves the hydrolysis, isomerization, and dehydration steps with an acid or enzyme, and complicates the process. Here, maltose and sucrose were converted into HMF by the catalyst, and the yield of HMF was more than 40% without introducing other acids or enzyme catalysts (Table 4, entries 1 to 5). This result implied that this biphasic system was effective in hydrolyzing the glycosidic linkage of disaccharides (Charmot and Katz 2010). Conversion of starch and cellulose to HMF was not as efficient and selective. Cellulose conversion was especially poor, affording trace HMF yield under the same conditions (Table 4, entries 6 and 7). The majority of the cellulose remained unconverted, as a solid suspension in the aqueous phase. This poor reactivity with cellulose was most likely due to ineffective depolymerization and decrystallization with KH2PO4 at 160 °C. Indeed, a higher temperature was needed for starch and cellulose conversion. When the reactions were run at 180 °C for 3 h, HMF yields increased to 27.1% for starch and 5.9% for cellulose (Table 4, entries 8 and 9). These results were promising since they show that KH2PO4 in MIBK/H2O biphasic system were used directly for the conversion of complex carbohydrates to HMF without other acid catalysts.
Recycling Performance of Catalyst
The recyclability of a catalyst in industrial processes is of great importance. To reinforce the advantage of this catalyst system, the recyclability of the KH2PO4 catalyst was evaluated by recycling the reaction mixture containing the spent catalyst nine times. The lifetime study of the catalyst was carried out with 45.0% glucose and a 40% KH2PO4 dosage at 160 °C for 2 h.
Fig. 5. Recycling experiments of KH2PO4 for conversion of glucose into HMF. Reaction conditions: 5 mmol glucose, 2 mmol KH2PO4, 2 mL H2O, 8 mL MIBK, 160 °C for 2 h.
As can be seen in Fig. 5, the KH2PO4-MIBK/H2O system retained high catalytic activity for the conversion of glucose into HMF, and the yield of HMF remained above 50% even after being recycled nine times. The yield of HMF in some recycled material was even higher than the first yield, which can be attributed to the retention of HMF and unreacted glucose from the previous cycle (Lai and Zhang 2010). These recyclability studies indicate the potential application of KH2PO4 as a catalyst for the production of HMF from glucose. Lastly, it should be noted that the recovered dihydric phosphates could be used as a phosphatic fertilizer in agriculture, implying its eco-friendly nature.
CONCLUSIONS
- A simple, facile, and environmentally friendly catalytic system was established for the highly efficient conversion of glucose into HMF in a biphasic system (MIBK/H2O) with the cheap and nontoxic KH2PO4 as a catalyst.
- An excellent HMF yield of 52.3% was achieved at a point of compromise between the reaction temperature and the reaction time (160 °C for 2 h) with 45.0% of glucose concentration.
- This catalytic system was broadly substrate-tolerant; the satisfactory HMF yield was obtained from higher substrate concentration (67.5%) and complex substrates (maltose, sucrose, etc.).
- This catalyst system was reused nine times without marked activity loss.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21336002 and 21276094), the Doctoral Fund of the Ministry of Education of China (No. 20130172110043), and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China (No. 2015A030311048).
REFERENCES CITED
Agirrezabal-Telleria, I., Gandarias, I., and Arias, P. L. (2014). “Heterogeneous acid-catalysts for the production of furan-derived compounds (furfural and hydroxymethylfurfural) from renewable carbohydrates: A review,” Catal. Today 234, 42-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2013.11.027
Alonso, D. M., Bond, J. Q., and Dumesic, J. A. (2010). “Catalytic conversion of biomass to biofuels,” Green Chem. 12(9), 1493-1513. DOI: 10.1039/C004654J
Atanda, L., Mukundan, S., Shrotri, A., Ma, Q., and Beltramini, J. (2015). “Catalytic conversion of glucose to 5-hydroxymethyl-furfural with a phosphated TiO2 catalyst,” ChemCatChem 7(5), 781-790. DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201402794
Behera, G. C., and Parida, K. M. (2013). “One-pot synthesis of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural: A significant biomass conversion over tin-promoted vanadium phosphate (Sn–VPO) catalyst,” Catal. Sci. Technol.3(12), 3278-3285. DOI: 10.1039/C3CY00481C
Bozell, J. J., and Petersen, G. R. (2010). “Technology development for the production of biobased products from biorefinery carbohydrates—the US Department of Energy’s ‘Top 10’ revisited,” Green Chem. 12(4), 539-554. DOI: 10.1039/B922014C
Cao, X., Teong, S. P., Wu, D., Yi, G., Su, H., and Zhang, Y. (2015). “An enzyme mimic ammonium polymer as a single catalyst for glucose dehydration to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural,” Green Chem. 17(4), 2348-2352. DOI: 10.1039/C4GC02488E
Charmot, A., and Katz, A. (2010). “Unexpected phosphate salt-catalyzed hydrolysis of glycosidic bonds in model disaccharides: Cellobiose and maltose,” J. Catal. 276(1), 1-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2010.08.006
Chuntanapum, A., Yong, T. L.-K., Miyake, S., and Matsumura, Y. (2008). “Behavior of 5-HMF in subcritical and supercritical water,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 47(9), 2956-2962. DOI: 10.1021/ie0715658
Daorattanachai, P., Khemthong, P., Viriya-empikul, N., Laosiripojana, N., and Faungnawakij, K. (2012). “Conversion of fructose, glucose, and cellulose to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural by alkaline earth phosphate catalysts in hot compressed water,” Carbohyd. Res. 363, 58-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.carres.2012.09.022
Deuss, P. J., Barta, K., and de Vries, J. G. (2014). “Homogeneous catalysis for the conversion of biomass and biomass-derived platform chemicals,” Catal. Sci. Technol. 4(5), 1174-1196. DOI: 10.1039/C3CY01058A
Dutta, A., Patra, A. K., Dutta, S., Saha, B., and Bhaumik, A. (2012). “Hierarchically porous titanium phosphate nanoparticles: An efficient solid acid catalyst for microwave assisted conversion of biomass and carbohydrates into 5-hydroxymethylfurfural,” J. Mater. Chem. 22(28), 14094-14100. DOI: 10.1039/C2JM30623A
Dutta, A., Gupta, D., Patra, A. K., Saha, B., and Bhaumik, A. (2014). “Synthesis of 5-hydroxymethylfurural from carbohydrates using large-pore mesoporous tin phosphate,” ChemSusChem7(3), 925-933. DOI: 10.1002/cssc.201300766
Hu, S., Zhang, Z., Song, J., Zhou, Y., and Han, B. (2009). “Efficient conversion of glucose into 5-hydroxymethylfurfural catalyzed by a common Lewis acid SnCl4 in an ionic liquid,” Green Chem.11(11), 1746-1749. DOI: 10.1039/B914601F
Hu, L., Sun, Y., and Lin, L. (2012). “Efficient conversion of glucose into 5-hydroxymethylfurfural by chromium(III) chloride in inexpensive ionic liquid,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 51(3), 1099-1104. DOI: 10.1021/ie202174f
Huang, R., Qi, W., Su, R., and He, Z. (2010). “Integrating enzymatic and acid catalysis to convert glucose into 5-hydroxymethylfurfural,” Chem Commun. 46(7), 1115-1117. DOI: 10.1039/B921306F
Jain, A., Shore, A. M., Jonnalagadda, S. C., Ramanujachary, K. V., and Mugweru, A. (2015). “Conversion of fructose, glucose and sucrose to 5-hydroxymethyl-2-furfural over mesoporous zirconium phosphate catalyst,” Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 489, 72-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2014.10.020
Jiménez-Morales, I., Teckchandani-Ortiz, A., Santamaría-González, J., Maireles-Torres, P., and Jiménez-López, A. (2014). “Selective dehydration of glucose to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural on acidic mesoporous tantalum phosphate,” Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 144, 22-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.07.002
Kim, B., Jeong, J., Lee, D., Kim, S., Yoon, H. J., Lee, Y. S., and Cho, J. K. (2011). “Direct transformation of cellulose into 5-hydroxymethyl-2-furfural using a combination of metal chlorides in imidazolium ionic liquid,” Green Chem. 13(6), 1503-1506. DOI: 10.1039/C1GC15152E
Lai, L., and Zhang, Y. (2010). “The effect of imidazolium ionic liquid on the dehydration of fructose to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, and a room temperature catalytic system,” ChemSusChem 3(11), 1257-1259. DOI: 10.1002/cssc.201000201
Ma, H., Zhou, B., Li, Y., and Argyropoulos, D. S. (2012). “Conversion of fructose to 5-hydroxymethyl-furfural with a functionalized ionic liquid,” BioResources 7(1), 533-544. DOI: 10.15376/biores.7.1.533-544
Ma, H., Long, J. X., Wang, F. R., Wang, L. F., and Li, X. H. (2015a). “Conversion of cellulose to butyl levulinate in bio-butanol medium catalyzed by acidic ionic liquids,” Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin. 31(5), 973-979. DOI: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201503171
Ma, H., Wang, F., Yu, Y., Wang, L., and Li, X. (2015b). “Autocatalytic production of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural from fructose-based carbohydrates in a biphasic system and its purification,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 54(10), 2657-2666. DOI: 10.1021/ie504791x
McNeff, C. V., Nowlan, D. T., McNeff, L. C., Yan, B., and Fedie, R. L. (2010). “Continuous production of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural from simple and complex carbohydrates,” Appl. Catal. A: Gen.384(1-2), 65-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2010.06.008
Nakajima, K., Baba, Y., Noma, R., Kitano, M., Kondo, J. N., Hayashi, S., and Hara, M. (2011). “Nb2O5·nH2O as a heterogeneous catalyst with water-tolerant Lewis acid sites,” J. Am. Chem. Soc.133(12), 4224-4227. DOI: 10.1021/ja110482r
Ordomsky, V. V., Sushkevich, V. L., Schouten, J. C., van der Schaaf, J., and Nijhuis, T. A. (2013). “Glucose dehydration to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural over phosphate catalysts,” J. Catal. 300, 37-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2012.12.028
Peng, W. H., Lee, Y. Y., Wu, C., and Wu, K. C. W. (2012). “Acid–base bi-functionalized, large-pored mesoporous silica nanoparticles for cooperative catalysis of one-pot cellulose-to-HMF conversion,” J. Mater. Chem. 22(43), 23181-23185. DOI: 10.1039/C2JM35391A
Petrus, L., and Noordermeer, M. A. (2006). “Biomass to biofuels, a chemical perspective,” Green Chem. 8(10), 861-867. DOI: 10.1039/B605036K
Román-Leshkov, Y., and Dumesic, J. A. (2009). “Solvent effects on fructose dehydration to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in biphasic systems saturated with inorganic salts,” Top. Catal. 52(3), 297-303. DOI: 10.1007/s11244-008-9166-0
Rosatella, A. A., Simeonov, S. P., Frade, R. F. M., and Afonso, C. A. M. (2011). “5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) as a building block platform: Biological properties, synthesis and synthetic applications,” Green Chem. 13(4), 754-793. DOI: 10.1039/C0GC00401D
Song, J., Fan, H., Ma, J., and Han, B. (2013). “Conversion of glucose and cellulose into value-added products in water and ionic liquids,” Green Chem. 15(10), 2619-2635. DOI: 10.1039/C3GC41141A
Ståhlberg, T., Rodriguez-Rodriguez, S., Fristrup, P., and Riisager, A. (2011). “Metal-free dehydration of glucose to 5-(hydroxymethyl)furfural in ionic liquids with boric acid as a promoter,” Chem. Eur. J.17(5), 1456-1464. DOI: 10.1002/chem.201002171
Takagaki, A., Ohara, M., Nishimura, S., and Ebitani, K. (2009). “A one-pot reaction for biorefinery: combination of solid acid and base catalysts for direct production of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural from saccharides,” Chem. Commun. (41), 6276-6278. DOI: 10.1039/B914087E
Teong, S. P., Yi, G., and Zhang, Y. (2014). “Hydroxymethylfurfural production from bioresources: past, present and future,” Green Chem. 16(4), 2015-2026. DOI: 10.1039/C3GC42018C
van Putten, R.-J., van der Waal, J. C., de Jong, E., Rasrendra, C. B., Heeres, H. J., and de Vries, J. G. (2013). “Hydroxymethylfurfural, a versatile platform chemical made from renewable resources,” Chem. Rev. 113(3), 1499-1597. DOI: 10.1021/cr300182k
Werpy, T., Petersen, G., Aden, A., Bozell, J., Holladay, J., White, J., Manheim, A., Eliot, D., Lasure, L., and Jones, S. (2004). “Top value added chemicals from biomass. Volume 1-Results of screening for potential candidates from sugars and synthesis gas,” Defense Technical Information Center, U. S. Department of Defense.
Yan, K., Wu, X., An, X., and Xie, X. (2013). “Facile synthesis of reusable CoAl-hydrotalcite catalyst for dehydration of biomass-derived fructose into platform chemical 5-hydroxymethylfurfural,” Chem. Eng. Commun. 201(4), 456-465. DOI: 10.1080/00986445.2013.775646
Yan, K., Wu, G., Lafleur, T., and Jarvis, C. (2014). “Production, properties and catalytic hydrogenation of furfural to fuel additives and value-added chemicals,” Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 38, 663-676. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.003
Zhang, Z., Wang, Q., Xie, H., Liu, W., and Zhao, Z. K. (2011). “Catalytic conversion of carbohydrates into 5-hydroxymethylfurfural by germanium(IV) chloride in ionic liquids,” ChemSusChem 4(1), 131-138. DOI: 10.1002/cssc.201000279
Zhang, M., Su, K., Song, H., Li, Z., and Cheng, B. (2015). “The excellent performance of amorphous Cr2O3, SnO2, SrO and graphene oxide-ferric oxide in glucose conversion into 5-HMF,” Catal. Commun. 69, 76-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.catcom.2015.05.024
Zhao, H., Holladay, J. E., Brown, H., and Zhang, Z. C. (2007). “Metal chlorides in ionic liquid solvents convert sugars to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural,” Science 316(5831), 1597-1600. DOI: 10.1126/science.1141199
Article submitted: November 2, 2015; Peer review completed: December 8, 2015; Revised version received and accepted: December 29, 2015; Published: January 19, 2016.
DOI: 10.15376/biores.11.1.2152-2165