Abstract
This paper proposes a furniture design method combining Kansei engineering (KE) and shape grammar (SG), to explore how the diagonal ridge elements of classical Suzhou-style buildings can be applied to furniture design and to explain how the styling elements match the cultural imagery in furniture products. Suzhou-style armchairs and cultural elements of diagonal ridges were collected, the most suitable armchairs were selected for incorporating such elements, and their shapes were deconstructed along with characteristic interpretations. A factor bank of diagonal ridge elements was constructed, first through Kansei word selection and evaluation experiments, and then through factor analysis which determined the main cultural elements of the design. The shape grammar theory was applied to design and innovate the selected armchair samples, achieving three design solutions. The solutions were then comprehensively evaluated, and the optimal one was used for the final physical product. The results of the study showed that users had clear subjective feelings about the design incorporating diagonal ridge elements, with their Kansei on three aspects: aesthetic style, decorative complexity, and structural balance. The approach used in this work blends furniture products with cultural imagery on diagonal ridges, providing a feasible methodological reference and an empirical case for cultural sustainability through furniture design.
Download PDF
Full Article
An Innovative Application of Diagonal Ridge Elements of Classical Suzhou-style Buildings to Furniture Design Based on Kansei Engineering and Shape Grammar
Yin Jing,a Yongsheng Cheng,a,* Sheng Yu,b and Jiaye Lin a
This paper proposes a furniture design method combining Kansei engineering (KE) and shape grammar (SG), to explore how the diagonal ridge elements of classical Suzhou-style buildings can be applied to furniture design and to explain how the styling elements match the cultural imagery in furniture products. Suzhou-style armchairs and cultural elements of diagonal ridges were collected, the most suitable armchairs were selected for incorporating such elements, and their shapes were deconstructed along with characteristic interpretations. A factor bank of diagonal ridge elements was constructed, first through Kansei word selection and evaluation experiments, and then through factor analysis which determined the main cultural elements of the design. The shape grammar theory was applied to design and innovate the selected armchair samples, achieving three design solutions. The solutions were then comprehensively evaluated, and the optimal one was used for the final physical product. The results of the study showed that users had clear subjective feelings about the design incorporating diagonal ridge elements, with their Kansei on three aspects: aesthetic style, decorative complexity, and structural balance. The approach used in this work blends furniture products with cultural imagery on diagonal ridges, providing a feasible methodological reference and an empirical case for cultural sustainability through furniture design.
DOI: 10.15376/biores.19.3.5549-5567
Keywords: Diagonal ridge elements; Kansei engineering; Shape grammar; Furniture design
Contact information: a: School of Design and Innovation, Xiamen University Tan Kah Kee College, Zhangzhou, 363123, China; b: School of the English Language and Culture, Xiamen University Tan Kah Kee College, Zhangzhou, 363123, China; *Corresponding author: cysdesign@163.com
As an important part of traditional Chinese furniture culture, Suzhou-style furniture carries rich historical and cultural values. This style of furniture has been studied from the aspects of historical background, Suzhou-style armchairs, varieties and shapes, deconstruction, fabrication methods, artistic aesthetics, and symbolic semantics, aiming at blending traditional Chinese furniture with modern design philosophy. For example, Pu (1999) delineated the boundary between Suzhou-style and Ming-style furniture by delving into the historical background of Suzhou furniture in the Ming and Qing dynasties and by substantially exemplifying the varieties, forms, and the late-stage evolution of Suzhou-style armchairs. Hu and Chandhasa (2023) further studied the construction of Suzhou-style armchairs and reproduced the rigorous fabrication process of Suzhou-style armchairs with an official’s hat chair as a case study. Some have also delved into integrating the aesthetic demands of users into the design of the furniture, by recounting how, in the late Ming Dynasty, literati framed furniture design concepts and artisans integrated them into fabrication (Xiao and Xue 2015; Jie and Xin 2017).
However, the urgent need for cultural sustainability and continuous improvement of the material living standards have given an added boost to people’s pursuit of quality, aesthetics (Christian and Schumann 2020), and cultural elements of furniture products. Thus, in China the design of such products is evolving towards an integration of traditional Chinese culture. Despite the competitive advantages of Suzhou-style furniture in the Ming Dynasty, the traditional handicraft industry now faces dilemmas (Fan and Feng 2019). A key issue is, therefore, how to accurately match both styling elements and cultural imagery in furniture products (Xu and Pan 2023), establish communication between products and users, and accurately make furniture products. To address the above problems, researchers have tried to introduce Kansei engineering (KE) and shape grammar (SG) in furniture product design, illuminating how practical and innovative they are in the fusion of traditional Chinese culture with modern designs of Chinese armchairs, Arhat beds (a Chinese type of bed with a low back and sides), and Ming-style stools.
Kansei engineering (KE) is a method that translates consumers’ affective needs and preferences into specific design parameters (Nagamachi 1986, 1995, 1997). By studying the target users’ affective responses to products (Chen et al. 2015; Li et al. 2021), such as emotions, feelings, and intuition, KE quantifies these subjective feelings (Huo et al. 2023) into design indexes. Such indexes guide the product design process, thus stronger attraction and higher market competitiveness of products (Barravecchia et al. 2020). Many scholars have employed KE in the study of furniture design. For example, Zhang (2019) conducted a symbolic semantics study on Suzhou-style furniture, in which she established the relationship between functions of furniture design and symbolic affective semantics. Liu et al. (2021) explored the intrinsic connection between Kansei imagery and shape design elements of Ming-style Luohan beds, providing a methodological basis for quantifying the Kansei imagery embedded in shape design features of traditional furniture. Lin et al. (2024) performed Kansei semantics experiments on Ming-type, Qing-type, and modern Chinese-style furniture, whereby they found that consumers considered the Qing-type furniture more ornate and personalized, and modern Chinese-style furniture more modern and streamlined. An et al. (2022) finalized the style of screens by quantitatively studying the Kansei images and linear patterns of traditional Chinese wooden screens. Moreover, Zhou et al. (2023) combined user perception with grey correlation analysis, in an effort to establish a scientific and effective design method. KE bridges the gap between consumers’ affective experience and product design, so that the design process is not only based on technical and functional needs, but also on affective needs (Nagamachi 1995; Coronado et al. 2020).
Shape Grammar (SG) is a design reasoning method that focuses on shape operations. Originally proposed by Stiny and Gips (1971), who applied it to painting and sculpture and then defined by Stiny (1980), SG has extended to innovative visual and product designs (Hsiao and Chen 1997; Lee and Tang 2009; Ang et al. 2013; Wortmann and Stouffs 2018; Mata et al. 2019; El-Mahdy 2022). The core concept of SG is to find out the hidden rules of shape composition and then streamline and refine this shape, so that the new graphs creatively retain the characteristics of the original (Cui and Tang 2013). Hence, scholars have also availed of shape grammar (SG) in furniture design. For instance, Xue and Chen (2024) integrated, with the help of SG, new cultural elements from other fields and realized the cross-field integration of wooden architecture and wooden furniture, demonstrating the possibility and practicality of cultural crossover and sustainability. In a study on Chinese stools, Qu et al. (2023) proposed an integrated way of design and evaluation that combined SG, KANO model, and entropy weighting, shedding light on how to integrate regional cultural symbols into the design of Chinese furniture. Also using SG, Fu et al. (2022) incorporated elements of Jiangxi Exorcism Masks into their self-established bank of stool elements, thus upgrading the original design. Moreover, combining SG with eye-movement technology, Zhao et al. (2023) extracted elements of cultural imagery of Tibetan Duomu Kettles and applied the elements to furniture product design, paving the way for blending ethnic artifacts with modern furniture design. Furthermore, based on SG and other methods, Yu (2023) achieved digital sustainability of the intangible cultural heritage of the “Wu Leno” (silk fabric with a light texture) weaving technique in Suzhou.
The above studies have deeply explored the symbolic semantics and Kansei imagery of traditional furniture. Utilizing methods such as SG and KE, these studies have provided rich theoretical and practical approaches to, or implications for, traditional Chinese furniture design, and they have made cultural crossover and innovative integration more possible. While the existing studies promote furniture design, there have been relatively few studies on the integration of architectural elements into furniture product design. The present study therefore makes this attempt.
Using KE and SG, this study elaborates on how diagonal ridge elements of classical Suzhou-style buildings can be fused into the design of armchairs. This is first because armchairs are a common piece of furniture in these buildings and second, the buildings are a quintessential part of the globally renowned, culture-loaded, and sublimely crafted classical Suzhou gardens (a UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage Site)—a microcosm of the natural world, incorporating such basic elements as water, stones, plants, and various types of buildings of literary and poetic significance. Transplanting the culture-loaded diagonal ridge elements into armchairs will therefore help to bring the culture alive, and this innovative product design may well cater to users.
The whole study involved four stages.
Stage 1: Before the research, the specific subject was defined and the methods were determined. Next, samples of cultural motifs on diagonal ridges of classical Suzhou-style buildings and types of Suzhou-style armchairs were systematically collected and analyzed. This process involved extensive literature review and fieldwork to ensure the diversity and representativeness of the samples. Then, a questionnaire was designed and distributed. Finally, teachers of design and furniture design practitioners gathered opinions to select the most suitable armchair carriers for incorporating elements of the motifs. This stage laid the foundation for subsequent design and development.
Stage 2: The diagonal ridge motifs obtained from the field research were screened and produced into collections of stimulus samples. These collections were used in subsequent KE studies to assess the visual and affective impacts of different design elements. In addition, this phase also included the collection and screening of Kansei words to extract, from relevant literature and expert interviews, key terms describing the affective impact of diagonal ridge elements. Following that, experiments on Kansei semantic evaluation were conducted, and factor analysis methods were used to process the experimental data, so as to identify the design elements that can most touch users’ Kansei. A comprehensive factor bank was built, accordingly.
Stage 3: Based on SG, key elements were extracted from the factor bank, and in-depth logical derivation of these elements was carried out. This process involved reinterpretation and application of traditional cultural elements through modern design methods, to ensure that the design solutions reflect the cultural characteristics of the diagonal ridges and meet the aesthetic and functional needs of modern furniture. Ultimately, these theoretical derivations and design practices were combined to form innovative furniture design solutions.
Stage 4: The final stage of the study focused on assessing the Kansei needs of the new designs and on verifying their market acceptance. A semantic differential scale was employed for target users to evaluate the affective responses of the design solutions. Based on the assessment results, the design solution with the best feedback was selected for refinement, and subsequently, a physical model was fabricated. The research process framework is shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. The research process framework
Data Collection and Analysis
Diagonal ridge elements
Classical Suzhou-style buildings are featured by well-shaped high roofs, unique South-Yangze-River gatehouse style, and winding layout, thus creating a sense of implicit beauty (Ma 2018). On the roofs, there are diagonal ridges, which are the upturned part of the flying eaves. On such ridges, skilled craftsmen would make important, bizarrely shaped decorations of animals and/ or plants, for the sake of good luck. The diagonal ridge is made of stacked bricks and tiles (Fig. 2), categorized into the simple Shuiqiang Faqiang (gradually upturned diagonal ridge without a corner sub-ridge) and the complex Nenqiang Faqiang (steeply upturned diagonal ridge with a corner sub-ridge diagonally supported by a main corner ridge) by the different practices of wood-structure diagonal corner (Hou and Hou 2014).
Fig. 2. (a) Deconstruction of Shuiqiang Faqiang and (b) Nenqiang Faqiang
Suzhou-style furniture
According to The National Intangible Cultural Heritage List of China (Zhang 2007), Suzhou-style furniture is defined as furniture delicately made of hardwood such as sandalwood (Pterocarpus santalinus), Huanghuali (D. hainanensis), and Jichimu (Millettia laurentii, Senna siamea, and Millettia leucantha Kurz) by skilled craftsmen in Suzhou and the neighboring South-Yangze-River regions after the middle of the Ming Dynasty. For accuracy and rationality, this study explicitly defines this style of furniture as armchairs with distinctive Suzhou characteristics in Ming and Qing dynasties, excluding the late Qing furniture varieties influenced by the Cantonese and Western styles (Mazurkewich 2016). According to Pu (1999), Suzhou-style furniture can be divided into seven categories: armchairs, stools, large tables (zhuo), small tables (ji), beds, cupboards, and screen frames. At different stages of historical development, furniture from all over the Ming and Qing dynasties, influenced by environment, conditions, customs, and lifestyle, showed a wide range of varieties and forms. In particular, the Suzhou-style chair can, according to functional and structural characteristics, be divided into two categories: armchairs and backrest chairs. The armchair category is further divided into: official’s hat (Yoke-back Armchairs with Protruding Ends or “Guanmaoyi”), literati, rose, straight back, horseshoe back, hook-headed back, pen shaft, and screen back; the backrest chairs include lamp hanger, single-back, pen-stem, and screen-back types (Mazurkewich 2016). This means that Suzhou-style armchairs fall into twelve subcategories in total.
To select the most suitable chair carrier for diagonal ridge elements, a questionnaire was distributed to design faculty members and furniture design practitioners, of whom four had been in the profession for 5 to 10 years, and six for over 10 years. The subjects were asked to score how each sub-category matched the structural characteristics of diagonal ridge elements. Results showed that the most suitable one for cultural integration was the highest-scoring “official’s hat” (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3. Deconstruction of “official’s hat” armchair
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Drawing and Coding Stimulus Samples
For diverse patterns and fine details of ridge elements, a survey team systemically photographed diagonal ridge elements at garden sites in Suzhou. The photographs were precisely outlined by drawing software, to clarify the outlines and characteristics of each structure. The photographs and the drawings were then categorized and numbered according to four types—assemblage, plant, animal, and artifact—to establish a bank of stimulus samples (Fig. 4).
Experiments on Kansei Evaluation
Selecting Kansei words
Adjective pairs were collected both online and offline. Literature on Suzhou-style armchairs (journals and e-books etc.) were accessed online; experts and scholars in this profession were interviewed offline. The adjective pairs were first screened and permutated, and a total of 30 groups of related words were collected. Then, a questionnaire about evaluating representative samples of Suzhou-style armchairs using Kansei words was filled out by ten experts. After that, the frequencies of the words chosen by the experts were sequenced, and semantically similar ones were deleted. Finally, six groups of vocabulary were obtained: ancient vs. modern; elegant vs. vulgar; complex vs. streamlined; symmetrical vs. asymmetrical; ornate vs. plain; and delicate vs. slapdash.
Questionnaire design and evaluation
Many analytical studies on KE have used the 5-point “Kansei” scale (Tama et al. 2015; Zuo and Yang 2020; Hsiao and Chen 2020; Chen 2023; Du et al. 2024), with each group of Kansei at the two sides. The closer the score is to 0, the weaker the semantic strength is, and conversely, the higher the score is, the stronger the semantic strength is. Take “ancient vs. modern” for example. “-2” refers to “very much ancient”, “-1” to “quite ancient”, “0” to “neither ancient nor modern”, “1” to “quite modern’, and “2” to “very much modern”.
Fig. 4. Stimulus sample chart and their serial numbers
Due to the highly specialized content of the questionnaire and the large volume of the survey (consisting of 20 samples that each contains 6 questions, totaling 120 decision points), participants were likely to feel agitated or exhausted during the answering process. For the quality of questionnaire responses, the number of questionnaires distributed was controlled within a reasonable range. At the same time, to ensure prudent responses, raise the return rate, and improve the accuracy of the valid questionnaires, the respondents were provided with sufficient time to answer the questionnaires, and when necessary, with professional assistance. Considering the need to express Kansei words for chair products, the authors selected the survey respondents based on the following criteria. First, those who gave constant attention to furniture shopping platforms or offline furniture shops and had purchased furniture products in the last six months; second, those who had at least a four-year college education, to ensure that they can, to some extent, understand and appreciate furniture design, materials, technology, and graphic patterns; third, those who mainly lived in or around urban areas, since they had a unique aesthetic concept and were also the main buyers of furniture products. As a result, the participants were 5 design teachers, 5 designers, and 30 buyers of Chinese furniture. A total of 40 questionnaires were distributed, 34 valid questionnaires were returned (return rate=85%), and a cumulative total of 4,080 ratings were obtained.
SPSS software was used to analyze the mean values of the valid ratings on the 20 samples, and the results are shown in Table 1.
Most perceptual evaluations of B1 and B20 were significantly oriented towards “ancient and streamlined”; B2 towards “elegant”; B3, B4, and B13 towards “complex and asymmetrical”; B5 towards “ancient and asymmetrical”; B6 towards “symmetrical and plain”; B7 towards “elegant and delicate”; B8 and B19 towards “ancient and plain”; B9 towards “elegant and asymmetrical”; B10 towards “delicate and simple”; B11 towards “delicate”; B12 towards “complex”; B14 towards “symmetrical and streamlined”; B15 and B17 towards “ancient”; B16 and B18 towards “ancient and slapdash”. The above analysis revealed that “ancient”, “elegant”, and “plain” were the common characteristics of some of the samples, which can provide some reference for furniture design.
Table 1. Mean Values of Kansei Words
A calculation of the absolute value of the difference between the mean and the median 0 of Kansei adjective pairs led to their extreme difference values. The larger the value of the extreme difference, the closer the subjective feeling to the Kansei words. Patterned samples corresponding to the absolute extreme difference value of each pair were selected as the cultural elements for this design scheme. As shown in Table 2, the frequency of the maximum difference corresponding to B9 was relatively high, while the frequency of the minimum difference corresponding to the B13 sample was relatively high. To ensure the diversity of the design elements, B6, B9, B12, and B15, which had the largest absolute values of the maximum difference, were finally selected. Since perceptions of these four were more in line with the corresponding words, they were selected as the cultural elements of this design.
Table 2. Absolute Values
Factor analysis
To further experimentally derive users’ Kansei cognition of the samples, an exploratory factor analysis of the mean values of Kansei words was made using SPSS software. KMO and Bartlett’s test results yielded a KMO value of 0.637 (>0.6), indicating that the correlation between the data is strong and can be factor-analyzed. Through principal component analysis, three main factors were extracted with eigenvalues of 3.439, 1.345, and 0.601, respectively, and their corresponding explained variance ratios were 57.309%, 22.419%, and 10.011%. The total contribution of these three factors reached 89.74% (Table 3). The results showed little loss in the interpretation of the raw data, showing that the main information of the 6 pairs of Kansei words can be better reflected by utilizing these three common factors.
Three pairs of Kansei words – “ancient vs. modern”, “delicate vs. slapdash”, and “elegant vs. vulgar”—had large loadings on factor 1, indicating great explanatory power of factor 1 on the variables represented by these three pairs. From the perspective of modeling design, factor 1 was named “the Aesthetic Style Factor” based on the meaning of the variables. Factor 2 consisted of two pairs— “complex vs. streamlined” and “ornate vs. plain”—and was named “the Decorative Complexity Factor”. Factor 3 consisted of one pair— “symmetrical vs. asymmetrical”—and was named “the Structural Balance Factor”.
Establishing a Factor Bank of Diagonal Ridge Elements
According to Table 2, the perceptions of B6, B9, B12, and B15 samples were more in line with the corresponding Kansei words, and therefore they were selected as the cultural elements for extraction and interpretation. Since the complicated diagonal ridge elements could not be directly applied to this design, representative patterns of each target element were deconstructed in the early stage, and a factor bank of diagonal ridge elements was set up (Fig. 5).
Table 3. Explained Variance Ratios
Table 4. Post-Rotation Factor Loading Coefficients
Table 5. The Factor Bank of Diagonal Ridge Elements