NC State
BioResources
Bikovens, O., Roze, L., Pranovich, A., Reunanen, M., and Telysheva, G. (2013). "Chemical composition of lipophilic extractives from grey alder (Alnus incana)," BioRes. 8(1), 350-357.

Abstract

The chemical composition of the lipophilic extractives in the hexane extracts from grey alder bark, knotwood, and cones has been investigated by gas chromatography and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The efficiency of two extraction methods was compared. The highest amount of lipophilic extractives (about 9% of o.d. material) was observed in grey alder cone, while the lowest (about 3%) was found in knotwood. The three different morphological parts of alder showed significant differences not only in the content but also in composition of extractives, namely fatty acids, triglycerides, and triterpenes. The main identified compounds were triterpenoids (lupen-3-one, lupeol, betulone, betulinol, and betulinic acid) in bark, and triglycerides in cones. The major group in knotwood was free fatty acids (mainly linoleic acid, 18:2).


Download PDF

Full Article

Chemical Composition of Lipophilic Extractives from Grey Alder (Alnus incana)

Oskars Bikovens,a Liga Roze,a,b Andrey Pranovich,c Markku Reunanen,c and Galina Telysheva a,*

The chemical composition of the lipophilic extractives in the hexane extracts from grey alder bark, knotwood, and cones has been investigated by gas chromatography and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The efficiency of two extraction methods was compared. The highest amount of lipophilic extractives (about 9% of o.d. material) was observed in grey alder cone, while the lowest (about 3%) was found in knotwood. The three different morphological parts of alder showed significant differences not only in the content but also in composition of extractives, namely fatty acids, triglycerides, and triterpenes. The main identified compounds were triterpenoids (lupen-3-one, lupeol, betulone, betulinol, and betulinic acid) in bark, and triglycerides in cones. The major group in knotwood was free fatty acids (mainly linoleic acid, 18:2).

Keywords: Grey alder; Bark; Cones; Knotwood; Lipophilic extractives; Lupane triterpenoids

Contact information: a: Latvian State Institute of Wood Chemistry, Laboratory of Lignin Chemistry, Riga, Latvia; b: University of Latvia, Faculty of Chemistry, Riga, Latvia; c: Åbo Akademi University, Laboratory of Wood and Paper Chemistry, Turku, Finland; *Corresponding author: ligno@edi.lv

INTRODUCTION

Alnus incana (L.) Moench. (Betulaceae family), commonly known as grey alder, is a deciduous tree that is widely distributed in northern Europe. The stands of grey alder comprise 9.8% of the total forest area of Latvia (Latvian Central Statistical Bureau 2012). In the course of processing grey alder, huge amounts of logging waste in forestry (branches with foliage and cones), and wood mechanical processing wastes (bark, sawdust etc.) are obtained. Bark content varies from 2 to 4% up to 10% of tree biomass, depending on tree species and age. A majority of these wastes is used as a low calorific fuel, and only a small part is used for further processing. However, they could be a potential source of valuable green chemicals, including biologically active compounds. For example, it is possible to exploit high-value low molecular weight compounds, such as phytosterols (Fernandes and Cabral 2007) and lignans (Pietarinen et al. 2006) from by-products of the industrial processing (bark, knotwood, etc.). The importance of biologically active natural compounds and plant potential as a source of green chemicals has received fresh appreciation in recent years. Investigation in this area has become one of the most active research fields (Li and Vederas 2009).

Various parts of some alders, such as bark, flowers, cone, and leaves, have been used in folk medicine as remedies for fever, hemorrhage, and alcoholism (Tung et al. 2010). The most characteristic feature of the Alnus genus is the occurrence of large quantities of diarylheptanoids and their glycosides in different morphological parts of the tree. Earlier it has already been explored and reported that there is a great potential to use grey alder bark as a source of green chemicals, namely, hydrophilic polyphenols – diarylheptanoids and condensed tannins (Felfoldi-Gava et al. 2012; Telysheva et al. 2011). The predominant diarylheptanoid in grey alder bark is oregonin, and its concentration can reach ca. 7% based on o.d. matter (Telysheva et al. 2011). However, for isolation of the mentioned hydrophilic polyphenols, a substantial amount of lipophilic extractives can also be obtained as a by-product. In the biorefinery context, it is necessary to consider the opportunity for application of lipophilic extractives in order to minimize waste streams.

The composition and amount of the extractives are dependent on tree species, morphological part of the tree, tree age, season, and location of tree in the forest. The extractives consist of mixtures of various components, from relatively low-molar-mass fatty acids to the higher molar-mass sterol esters and triglycerides. Various types of non-polar plant secondary metabolites including free fatty acids, triterpenoids, sterols, and stilbenes have been found in stem wood, bark, flowers, and leaves of different Alnus species (Phan et al. 2011; Stutz and Burris 1951; Suga et al. 1972; Tori et al. 1995). It is known that physical properties and chemical composition of tree knots are different from those of stem wood. The composition of lipophilic extractives of grey alder knots has not been reported in detail before. Despite the wide distribution of grey alder, the number of studies of chemical composition of lipophilic extractives in its various morphological parts is low and fragmentary.

The aims of the present work are to analyze and compare the amount and chemical composition of lipophilic extractives in different morphological parts of grey alder, i.e. bark, cones, and living knotwood, using gas-chromatography (GC) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) before and after alkaline hydrolysis, in order to detect free and esterified components.

EXPERIMENTAL

Materials

Four healthy grey alder (Alnus incana) trees were felled in the central part of Latvia, Ogre district (N latitude 56° 49′, E longitude 24° 36′) in October 2010, at the age of approximately 30 years. The alder cones were randomly handpicked from the branches felled. The knotwood of living branches were sawn out from stems at the height of 3 to 6 m. Average branches diameter at the stem base was 3 to 4 cm. Stem bark was sampled from the same trees as knotwood.

All samples were air-dried at ambient temperature and ground before extraction using a Wiley mill to pass a 420 μm sieve.

Methods

Extraction

All powdered samples (5 g) were extracted with n-hexane using two different extraction methods: Soxhlet and accelerated solvent extraction (ASE). The Soxhlet extraction was performed at ambient pressure for 8 h. ASE300 extractor (Dionex Corp.) was used for extraction with n-hexane at temperature 90°C, pressure 13.8 MPa, 3×5 min static cycles under nitrogen atmosphere. The hexane extracts were evaporated to dryness, and the extracts were weighed. Gravimetrical amounts were reported as weight percent (%) and calculated on an oven-dried matter (o.d.m.) basis.

Alkaline hydrolysis and derivatization

Alkaline hydrolysis of evaporated lipophilic extractives was performed using 0.5 M KOH solution in 90% aqueous ethanol. The solutions were allowed to stand for 5 h at 70°C. After this, distilled water was added. The solutions were acidified to pH ca. 3 with 30% H3PO4. The acid and neutral components were extracted three times with methyl tert-butyl ether. The organic fractions were combined and evaporated (Ekman 1983).

After evaporation, aliquots of hydrolyzed and non-hydrolyzed hexane extracts (ca. 0.5 mg) were silylated with 120 µL of pyridine:N,O-bis-trimethylsilyl trifluoroacet-amide: trimethyl chlorosilane mixture (1:4:1 v/v/v) and kept at 70°C for 45 minutes. Then the sample was cooled down to room temperature before GC-MS analysis. The silylated derivatives were analyzed using GC-FID and GC-MS before and after hydrolysis as described below.

GC-FID and GC-MS analysis

Silylated fatty acids, fatty alcohols, sterols, and fatty acid monoglycerides were analyzed with a Perkin Elmer AutoSystem XL Gas Chromatograph with a flame ionization detector (GC-FID) using a 25 m x 0.20 mm i.d. column coated with cross-linked methyl polysiloxane (HP-1) with a film thickness of 0.11 µm (Ekman and Holmbom 1989). Cholesterol, 1,3-dihexadecanoyl-2-(cis-9-octadecenoyl)glycerol, heneicosanoic acid, and cholesteryl heptadecanoate were used as internal standards. No FID correction factors were used. Sterol esters, di-, and tri-glycerides were analyzed on a Perkin Elmer Clarus 500 Gas Chromatograph using a 6 m x 0.53 mm i.d. DB-1 column covered with a film of 0.15 µm thickness (Örså and Holmbom 1994). The limit of quantification was about 0.01 mg/g. Therefore, compounds present in samples at lower amounts could be detected only qualitatively, and their presence is designed as “trace” in the Table 2. Identification of individual components was performed using GC with a mass spectrometric detector (HP 6890-5973 GC-MSD instrument) and a similar 25 m HP-1 GC column as described above for analysis of the silylated components. The compounds were identified as silylated derivatives, by comparing their retention times and mass spectra with the GC-MS spectral library, and data from the literature (Ekman 1983). All results, given in mg/g, are calculated on an oven-dried matter (o.d.m.) basis.

All quantitative analysis were performed in triplicate, and the variability between analyses was lower than 5%.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The yields of hexane extracts obtained with Soxhlet and ASE extraction are compared in Table 1. Both showed similar results; however, according to Shen and Shao (2005), it could be expected that the Soxhlet method will give higher extraction efficiency for non-polar compounds. The highest gravimetric amount of lipophilic extractives (> 9% o.d.m.) was obtained from grey alder cones. It was found to be two times higher than other parts (Table 1). The stem wood contained lower amounts of extractives (0.9% o.d.m.) than knotwood, bark, and cones; therefore the chemical composition of stem wood lipophilic extractives was not analyzed in detail in the present study.

Table 1. Yield of Lipophilic Extractives from Alnus incana (% of o.d.m. ± Sn)

* n.d. – not determined

The chemical composition of the hexane extracts showed significant differences in different parts of the alder. A chromatogram of the hexane extract is presented in Fig. 1, and qualitative and quantitative composition is shown in Table 2. Triterpenoids, sterol esters, fatty acids, and triglycerides were the main groups.

Fig. 1. GC chromatogram of lipophilic extractives of bark, knotwood, and cones of Alnus incana (short column, 6m). Internal standards: Std 1 = heneicosanoic acid, Std 2 = cholesterol, Std 3 = cholesterol heptadecanoate, Std 4 = 1,3-dihexadecanoyl-2-(cis-9-octadecenoyl)glycerol

The triglycerides are the main storage lipids in plants, and they were accumulated in the cones. Pentacyclic lupane-type triterpenoids predominated in the extract of bark. The amount of free fatty acids was significantly higher in the extract of knotwood. Other compounds such as fatty alcohols and alkanes were present in small amounts in all samples.

Table 2. Chemical Composition of Hexane Extracts of Different Morphological Parts of Alnus incana (g/kg of o.d.m.)

* – were determined on short (6 m) column. Rt. – diglycerides: 15.6 min, triglycerides: 19.5-21 min.

The major groups of compounds identified in the bark lipophilic extracts were lupane-type triterpenoids (lupeol [lup-20(29)-en-3β-ol], lupen-3-one, betulinol [lup-20(29)-ene-3β,28-diol], betulone, and betulinic acid), sterol esters, and fatty acids, followed by minor amounts of diglycerides and aliphatic alcohols. The chemical composition profile of grey alder bark lipophilic extract was similar to that previously reported for common alder (Alnus glutinosa) (Felfoldi-Gava et al. 2009). However, the yield of lipophilic extractives (ca. 4.5%, Table 1) found for A. incana bark was higher in comparison with values (ca. 2.3% and 3.5%) reported for A. glutinosa (Felfoldi-Gava et al. 2009, 2012).

The knotwood extract contained the highest amounts of free fatty acids: ca. 80% of all identified compounds (Table 2). The short-chain fatty acids (C14-C20) predom-inated over the long-chain fatty acids (C22-C26). Octadecadienoic or linoleic acid was the dominating fatty acid. The profile of fatty acids in grey alder knotwood was similar with the composition in trees of the Betulaceae family relative to fatty acid composition (Freire et al. 2006). Various glycerides were the second largest group of compounds identified in lipophilic extract of knotwood.

The quantitative characteristics of lipophilic extractives of grey alder cone showed that triglycerides were the major group of compounds. Triglycerides constituted about 60% of all GC-eluted and identified compounds in the grey alder cones. Triterpenoids was the second most abundant group of compounds, accounting for about one-fifth part of all identified lipophilic compound of grey alder cones. Chemical composition of alder cone and bark triterpenes were similar, but cones contained slightly larger amounts of lupen-3-one and lupane than the bark.

Fig. 2. Major groups of compounds in the hexane extract of Alnus incana before (BH) and after (AH) alkaline hydrolysis (mg/g of o.d.m.)

All extracts were hydrolyzed in order to estimate the concentration of esterified compounds. A large increase in the total amount of free fatty acids detected by GC-MS was the result of alkaline hydrolysis of esters. Fatty alcohols represented a small portion of the total extractives analyzed by GC-MS before and after hydrolysis. These results provide evidence of the presence of significant amounts of esterified compounds, such as di- and triglycerides and also sterol esters, in the original extracts.

The total amount of pentacyclic lupane-type triterpenoids in bark and cones were almost the same (1.5 to 1.6 g/kg). They are well known as biologically active compounds (Jagan and Chinthalapally 2012; Wal et al. 2011). Triterpenoid content in grey alder bark and cones is lower in comparison with values reported for barks of industrially important Betula (up to 92 g/kg of lupeol) (Diouf et al. 2009) and Eucalyptus species (4.5 to 21.6 g/kg) (Domingues et al. 2011), but taking into account that grey alder bark contain significant amounts of valuable diarylheptanoids and tannins, it could be possible to develop further processing to obtain triterpenoids from grey alder bark in the context of bark biorefinery with extraction of value-added diarylheptanoids and tannins (Telysheva et al. 2011).

The obtained results create background for future development of grey alder bark biorefinery with additional usage of isolated extractives for their possible application in medicine, cosmetics, and as bioactive agents in the pharmaceutical industry.

CONCLUSIONS

The yields of the hexane extractives from various morphological parts of Alnus incana were found to differ significantly. The highest content of these extractives (about 9% of o.d. material) was observed in the cones, while the lowest (about 3%) was found in knotwood.

The main group of lipophilic extracts found in the cones was triglycerides, whereas the main group in knotwood extract was free fatty acids (mainly, octadeca-dienoic or linoleic acid). The dominant groups identified in the bark lipophilic extract were triterpenoids: lupen-3-one, lupeol, betulone, betulinol, and betulinic acid. Sterol esters, fatty acids, di-, tri-glycerides, and aliphatic alcohols were found in minor amounts.

The bark could represent a prospective raw material for producing valuable chemicals. Pentacyclic lupane-type triterpenoids, known as high potential biological active substances, could be obtained as by-products of diarylheptanoid and/or tannin extraction from alder bark.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The research was financially supported by Latvian National Programme Nr. 2010.10-4/VPP5 subproject “High value added functional products and chemicals from bark” and the European Social Fund within the project “Support for Doctoral Studies at University of Latvia” No 2009/0138/1DP/1.1.2.1.2/09/IPIA/VIAA/004.

REFERENCES CITED

Diouf, P.N., Stevanovic, T., and Boutin. Y. (2009). “The effect of extraction process on polyphenol content, triterpene composition and bioactivity of yellow birch (Betula alleghaniensisBritton) extracts,” Ind. Crops Prod. 30, 297-303.

Domingues, R. M. A., Patinha, D. J. S., Sousa, G. D. A., Villaverde, J. J., Silva, C. M., Freire, C. S. R., Silvestre, A. J. D., and Pascoal Neto, C. (2011). “Eucalyptus biomass residues from agro-forest and pulping industries as sources of high-value triterpenic compounds,” Cellul. Chem. Technol. 45, 475-481.

Ekman, R. (1983). “The suberin monomers and tritermenoids from the outer bark of Betula verrucosa Ehrh.,” Holzforschung 37, 205-211.

Ekman, R., and Holmbom, B. (1989). “Analysis by gas chromatography of the wood extractives in pulp and water samples from mechanical pulping of spruce,” Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J.4, 16-24.

Felfoldi-Gava, A., Szarka, S., Simandi, B., Blazics, B., Simon, B., and Kery, A. (2012) “Supercritical fluid extraction of Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn.,” J. Supercritical Fluids 61, 55-61.

Felfoldi-Gava, A., Simandi, B., Plander, S., Szarka S., Szoke, E., and Kery, A. (2009) “Betulaceae and Platanaceae plants as alternative sources of selected lupane-type

triterpenes. Their composition profile and betulin content,” Acta Chromatographica 21(4), 671- 681.

Freire, C. S. R., Pinto, P. C. R., Santiago, A. S., Silvestre, A. J. D., Evtuguin, D. V., and Neto, C. P. (2006). “Comparative study of lipophilic extractives of hardwoods and corresponding ECF bleached kraft pulps,” BioResources 1(1), 3-17.

Jagan, P. M. R., and Chinthalapally, R. V. (2012). “Triterpenoids for cancer prevention and treatment: Current status and future prospects,” Current Pharm. Biotechnol. 13(1), 147-155.

Latvian Central Statistical Bureau Data Base. http://data.csb.gov.lv/. 21.05.2012.

Li, J.W.H. and Vederas, J.C. (2009). “Drug discovery and natural products: end of an era or an endless frontier?” Science 325(5937), 161-165.

Phan, M. G., Thi, T. C. T, Phan, T. S., Matsunami, K., and Otsuka, H. (2011). “A new diarylheptanoid and a rare dammarane triterpenoid from Alnus nepalensis,” Chem. Natur. Compounds 47(5), 735-737.

Pietarinen, S. P., Willför, S. M., Ahotupa, M. O., Hemming, J. E., and Holmbom, B. R. (2006). “Knotwood and bark extracts: Strong antioxidants from waste materials,” J. Wood Sci.52(5), 436-444.

Shen, J. C., and Shao, X. G. (2005). “A comparison of accelerated solvent extraction, Soxhlet extraction, and ultrasonic-assisted extraction for analysis of terpenoids and sterols in tobacco,” Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 383(6), 1003-1008.

Stutz, R. E., and Burris, R. H. (1951). “Photosynthesis and metabolism of organic acids in higher plants,” Plant Physiol. 26(2), 226-243.

Suga, T., Iwata, N., and Asakawa, Y. (1972). “Chemical constituents of the male flower of Alnus pendula (Betulaceae),” Bull. Chem. Soc. Japan 45(7), 2058-2060.

Telysheva, G., Dizhbite, T., Bikovens, O., Ponomarenko, J., Janceva S., and Krasilnikova J. (2011). “Structure and antioxidant activity of diarylheptanoids extracted from bark of grey alder (Alnus incana) and potential of biorefinery-based bark processing of European trees,” Holzforschung 65(4), 623-629.

Tori, M., Hashimoto, A., Hirose, K., and Asakawa Y. (1995). “Diarylheptanoids, flavonoids, stilbenoids, sesquiterpenoids and a phenanthrene from Alnus Maximowiczii,” Phytochemistry 40(4), 1263-1264.

Tung, N. H., Ra, J. C., Sohn, D. H., and Kim, Y. H. (2010). “A new diarylheptanoid from the bark of Alnus japonica,” J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res. 12(10), 921-924.

Wal, P., Wal, A., Sharma, G., and Rai, A. K. (2011). “Biological activities of lupeol,” Syst. Rev. Pharm. 2(2), 96-103.

Örså, F., and Holmbom, B. (1994). “A convenient method for the determination of wood extractives in papermaking process waters and effluents,” J. Pulp Pap. Sci. 20, J361-J366.

Article submitted: May 28, 2012; Peer review completed: July 11, 2012; Revised version received and accepted: November 23, 2012; Published: November 28, 2012.