Cushion stiffness of upholstered wooden seat foundations when subjected to human sitting forces

Abstract

The effects of the tensile elastic properties of fabrics used as cushion covers, foam thicknesses of cushion cores, seat bases as the support of an upholstered wooden furniture seat foundation, and sitting areas of subjects were studied relative to the load-deformation behavior of cushions situated on wooden seat base frames when subjected to human sitting forces. The experimental results indicated that the sitting area of a subject, fabric tensile elastic constant, and foam thickness had significant effects on the cushion stiffness, but the seat base type did not. The sitting area of a subject had the greatest effect on the cushion stiffness constants, followed by the fabric tensile elastic constant and foam thickness. A regression technique was proposed to derive a power equation for the estimation of the cushion stiffness using the parameters investigated in this study.

Full Article

Cushion Stiffness of Upholstered Wooden Seat Foundations When Subjected to Human Sitting Forces

Min Li,^a,b Xiaoling Zhou,^b Zhihui Wu,^a,* and Jilei Zhang ^b,*

The effects of the tensile elastic properties of fabrics used as cushion covers, foam thicknesses of cushion cores, seat bases as the support of an upholstered wooden furniture seat foundation, and sitting areas of subjects were studied relative to the load-deformation behavior of cushions situated on wooden seat base frames when subjected to human sitting forces. The experimental results indicated that the sitting area of a subject, fabric tensile elastic constant, and foam thickness had significant effects on the cushion stiffness, but the seat base type did not. The sitting area of a subject had the greatest effect on the cushion stiffness constants, followed by the fabric tensile elastic constant and foam thickness. A regression technique was proposed to derive a power equation for the estimation of the cushion stiffness using the parameters investigated in this study.

Keywords: Fabric tensile elastic property; Cushion compressive stiffness; Sitting forces; Upholstered wooden seat foundation; Sitting area

Contact information: a: College of Furnishings and Industrial Design, Nanjing Forestry University, 159 Longpan Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210037, China; b: Department of Sustainable Bioproducts, Mississippi State University, 201 Locksley Way, Mississippi State, MS, 39762-9820, USA;

* Corresponding authors: wzh550@sina.com; jz27@msstate.edu

INTRODUCTION

Humans use wooden furniture throughout their lives for many different purposes, including eating, sleeping, working, and resting. As such, this furniture should feature both an optimum design and maintain all of its structural properties while in use (Jucienė and Vobolis 2012). Cushioning is one of the most important parts of an upholstered wooden seat because it can affect the sitting experience in terms of the sitting comfort, such as the feeling of softness or hardness of the seat, experience of the seat, etc. (Bennington 1985; Helander et al. 1987). Comfort is often a concern in seat design. For an upholstered wooden seat, comfort refers to the static comfort, which is the sitting impression of the seated occupants (Ebe and Griffin 2001). The human static sitting comfort of a seat is related to the basic properties of a seat itself, such as the shape, size, and stiffness (Bennington 1985; Grujicic et al. 2009). Measuring the stiffness of a cushion is the most common way to evaluate the comfort of an upholstered seat (Grujicic et al. 2009).

The stiffness of a seat cushion, which consists of foam as its padding material and is covered with fabric or leather materials, can be affected by the tensile elastic property of the fabric cover materials, i.e., the tensile load-extension behavior and compressive stiffness property of the core foam materials. It is common in the manufacturing sector to use a fixed cover size to enclose core foam blocks. Therefore, variations caused by the tensile elastic properties of the different cover materials can result in an inconsistent cushion stiffness and further impact the sitting experience. Recently, upholstered furniture manufacturers have been experiencing quality issues related to differences in the cushion performance caused by variations in the fabric tensile property. Manufacturers would like to understand how cushion stiffness is affected by the elastic properties of the fabric used.

Limited literature is available on the effects of the tensile elastic properties of the cover materials on the cushion stiffness in upholstered wooden seats subjected to human sitting forces. Generally, the compression properties of cushion materials are measured with a mechanical testing machine (ASTM D5034-95 2003; ASTM D3574-11 2011). However, cushion stiffness is an important parameter used to evaluate the human sitting experience. Because of different motion mechanisms, the mechanical testing machine cannot exactly simulate human sitting movements. Therefore, the machine load force should be replaced by a human sitting force when studying cushion stiffness as it relates to the human sitting experience.

Lee and Ferraiuolo (1993) reported that the sitting comfort of a seat was affected by the foam thickness and stiffness. Xu et al. (2015) investigated the effects of the compressive load magnitude, cover, and core materials on the force-deformation-time behavior of seat cushions commonly used in upholstered furniture. It was concluded that changing the cover material from leather to a fabric had no remarkable effect on the elastic constant of the tested cushion materials, but it increased the viscosity and delayed the elastic-deformation-related damping constants. There has been no tensile elastic property data reported for leather and fabric materials. In Hu (2014), it was demonstrated that the load-deformation behavior of cushion materials was noticeably affected by the loading head size. This implied that the contact area should be considered in cushion stiffness studies that are employing human sitting forces. Swearingen et al. (1962) investigated the relationship between sitting area and human subject body weight through human subjects sitting tests and concluded that each tested human subject yielded their only unique area-weight curve (i.e., each human subject yielding a different area-weight curve), even after the sitting load reached to human subject body weight, if continuously loading the subject with extra dead weight. This indicated that the sitting area is the most significant factor, rather than human height and weight. Moreover, Li (2017) showed that the seat base type had a remarkable effect on the sitting experience and overall seat deformation performance.

The main objective of this study was to investigate the effect of the fabric cover tensile elastic constants on the load-deformation behavior of the cushion in upholstered wooden seats subjected to human sitting loads. The specific objectives were to: 1) evaluate the effects of the fabric tensile elastic constants on the cushion stiffness, 2) evaluate the effects of different foam thicknesses as core materials on the cushion stiffness, 3) evaluate the effects of the seat base type on the cushion stiffness, 4) evaluate the effects of the sitting area of a subject on the cushion stiffness, and 5) propose a regression technique to derive an empirical equation for predicting the stiffness of seat cushions that takes into consideration various factors in upholstered wooden seat foundations.

EXPERIMENTAL

Experiment Design

A 3 × 3 × 3 × 2 completely factorial experiment was designed to study the stiffness of cushions when seat foundations were subjected to sitting forces from human subjects. The four factors were the fabric tensile elastic constant in the warp direction (18.88 N/cm, 69.47 N/cm, and 206.85 N/cm), foam thickness (12.7 cm, 14.0 cm, and 15.2 cm), sitting area of a subject (1025 cm², 1237 cm², and 1497 cm²), and seat base type (panel, spring). Each of the three participants sat three times (Chorin et al. 2015) for each of the 54 experimental combinations to determine the variations that occurred during sitting, including variations in the human body weight center, seated location, and sitting speed.

Participants

Three healthy human subjects were selected in this experiment to represent three sitting areas (1025 cm², 1237 cm², and 1497 cm²). These areas were calculated by multiplying the hip width by the sitting depth. The popliteal height, which is defined as the vertical distance from the underside of the foot to the underside of the thigh at the knees, was used to adjust the sitting heights of the subjects to the same level. Ethical approval was obtained from the Mississippi State University Institutional Review Board. Written informed consents were received from all of the participants.

Table 1. Summary of the Anthropometric Measurements of the Participants

Materials

Seat foundation

The wooden seat foundation of upholstered furniture usually consists of a wooden base frame with a solid panel as a support (Fig. 1a) or a top surface area installed with springs (Fig. 1b). Foam cushions are generally covered with fabric or leather materials (Fig. 1c). Figure 1 shows the configurations and dimensions of the two wooden seat bases, spring and panel-top, that were used in this experiment. Holes were drilled in the supporting panel of the solid surface seat base frame (Fig. 1a) to allow air to escape from a tested cushion. Five evenly spaced Standard Wire Gauge #8 flat sinuous springs (Flexsteel Industries Inc, Starkville, MS, USA) were installed on the top of the spring type seat base frame (Fig. 1b).

The 51-cm² polyurethane foam blocks used in this experiment had a density of 28 kg/m³ and 25% indentation force deflection of 169 N (ASTM D3574-11 2011). Three types of polyester woven fabrics were used for the cushion covers in this experiment. A typical woven fabric structure has two thread orientations, filling (or weft) and warp (Barber 1991). The warp direction is the lengthwise or longitudinal thread in a fabric roll, while the filling direction is the transverse thread or yarn drawn through the warp yarns to create the fabric (Lomov et al. 2006). Figure 1d shows that a cushion cover consisted of four pieces: top and bottom square pieces, each sized 51 cm × 51 cm; and two narrow side pieces, where the short piece was for the zip side and the long piece covered the other three sides. All of the pieces had a 1.3-cm margin. The top/bottom, short side, and long side pieces had tensile elastic constants of 18.88 N/cm, 69.47 N/cm, and 206.85 N/cm in the warp direction (16.99 N/cm, 43.32 N/cm, and 118.82 N/cm in the filling direction), respectively (ASTM D5034-95 2003; Zhou 2016). The coefficient of correlation between the warp and filling elastic constants was 0.9994, which indicated that the elastic constant of these three fabrics in the warp direction had a strong positive correlation with that in the filling direction. Therefore, only three levels of elastic constants in the fabric warp direction were used in the experimental design when considering the fabric tensile property effect. All of the foam blocks, with different thicknesses, seat bases, and sewed covers, were prepared and provided by a local upholstery furniture manufacturer (Lane Furniture, Tupelo, MS, USA).

Fig. 1. Illustration of the seat foundation components used in this study: (a) solid panel base frame; (b) flat spring base frame; (c) cushion; and (d) fabric cover

Methods

Figure 2 shows the seat foundation with four load cells (PT Global, LPX-250, Auckland, NZ) attached to the bottom of each of the foundation legs, and two linear position transducers (Unimeasure PA-40-N20-D1S-10T, Corvallis, OR, USA) with their line ends attached to the centers of the tested cushion top (Tag 1) and middle spring of the seat base (Tag 2). A National Instruments SCXI-1000 system (Austin, USA) with two 1102B modules (each using a 1303 interface) simultaneously recorded the voltage outputs of the load cells and transducers at a rate of 100 Hz. A height adjustable footrest platform in front of the seat foundation was used to adjust the seat height for each participant, i.e., the vertical distance from the top surface of the seat foundation to the footrest platform surface, to match the participant popliteal height.