NC State
BioResources
Kuzmin, A. M., Ayrilmis, N., Özdemir, F., and Kanat, G. (2023). “Effect of content and particle size of used beverage carton pieces on the properties of HDPE composites,” BioResources 18(2), 2815-2825.

Abstract

This study investigated the tensile properties and thermal behavior of virgin and hot press molded HDPE composites filled with different particle size and content of used beverage cartons which were the Tetra Pak® cartons. The mechanical properties of the composites were positively influenced by particle size of the used beverage carton, such that the smallest particle size gave the highest tensile strength and tensile modulus. The tensile strength of the specimens decreased with increasing filler content (40 to 70 wt%), while the tensile modulus rose. Furthermore, the filler size and its content affected the thermal behavior of the specimens. Calorimetry analysis of composite specimens showed that melting temperature and enthalpy values of virgin HDPE and recycled-HDPE decreased with increasing Tetra Pak® content. In all composite groups produced by adding Tetra Pak®, the degree of crystallinity decreased as a function of Tetra Pak® addition compared to the pure HDPE. Increasing particle size adversely affected the crystallization degree, which decreased with increasing particle size while the HDPE maintained its crystalline form. As for the recycled-HDPE composites, the degree of crystallization was reduced by increasing the Tetra Pak® content, but this was still noticeably higher than that of the HDPE.


Download PDF

Full Article

Effect of Content and Particle Size of Used Beverage Carton Pieces on the Properties of HDPE Composites

Anton Michailovich Kuzmin,a Nadir Ayrilmis,b Ferhat Özdemir,c and Gürdal Kanat d,*

This study investigated the tensile properties and thermal behavior of virgin and hot press molded HDPE composites filled with different particle size and content of used beverage cartons which were the Tetra Pak® cartons. The mechanical properties of the composites were positively influenced by particle size of the used beverage carton, such that the smallest particle size gave the highest tensile strength and tensile modulus. The tensile strength of the specimens decreased with increasing filler content (40 to 70 wt%), while the tensile modulus rose. Furthermore, the filler size and its content affected the thermal behavior of the specimens. Calorimetry analysis of composite specimens showed that melting temperature and enthalpy values of virgin HDPE and recycled-HDPE decreased with increasing Tetra Pak® content. In all composite groups produced by adding Tetra Pak®, the degree of crystallinity decreased as a function of Tetra Pak® addition compared to the pure HDPE. Increasing particle size adversely affected the crystallization degree, which decreased with increasing particle size while the HDPE maintained its crystalline form. As for the recycled-HDPE composites, the degree of crystallization was reduced by increasing the Tetra Pak® content, but this was still noticeably higher than that of the HDPE.

DOI: 10.15376/biores.18.2.2815-2825

Keywords: Tetra Pak; Filler; Thermal behavior; Strength; Particle size; Filler content

Contact information: a: Assoc. Prof. Dr., Institute of Mechanics and Power Engineering, National Research Mordovia State University, Bolshevistskaya st., 68, 430005, Saransk, Republic of Mordovia, Russia; b: Prof. Dr., Department of Wood Mechanics and Technology, Forestry Faculty, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Bahcekoy, Sariyer, 34473, Istanbul, Turkey; c: Assoc. Prof. Dr., Department of Wood Chemistry and Technology, Faculty of Forestry, Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, Onikisubat, 46050, Kahramanmaras, Turkey; d: Assoc. Prof. Dr., Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Yildiz Technical University, 34220, Esenler, Istanbul, Turkey;

* Corresponding author: kanat@yildiz.edu.tr

INTRODUCTION

Paper and cardboard packaging is the largest proportion by weight with 33.2%, followed by flexible plastics 25.5%, rigid plastics 18.7%, metal 12.1%, glass 5.8%, 4.7 other packaging materials (Fernandez 2022). Recently, in addition to the virgin thermoplastics, the use of multilayer beverage cartons (Tetra Pak®) is composed of three materials organized in six layers: paper (75 wt%), low density polyethylene (LDPE, 20 wt%), and aluminum (5 wt%) (Ayrilmis et al. 2008). However, the amount of their waste has increased more and more. A thin aluminum sheet is also incorporated in the composition to improve UV resistance and oxygen barrier for aseptic cartons (Avella et al. 2009). Several studies were published on the utilization of used beverage carton in the production of high value-added products (Ayrilmis et al. 2008, 2013a; Selim et al. 2010; Umezuruike 2013; Yilgor et al. 2014; Bekhta et al. 2016; Robertson 2021; Bal 2022). One of the potential applications of the used Tetra Pak® cartons is as a filler in polymer composites. Natural fibers have noticeable advantages as filler in the thermoplastics such as low cost, good tensile properties, renewability, low density, and low abrasive effect to the metal parts in the extruder or injection machine (Rohit and Dixit 2016).

The use of used beverage cartons as filler in thermoplastics was investigated by several researchers (Ayrilmis et al. 2008; Sanchez-Cadena et al. 2013; Bekhta et al. 2016; Rohit and Dixit 2016; Robertson 2021). The results of these studies showed that the particles of the used beverage cartons could be successfully used as filler in thermoplastic composites (Bektas et al. 2005; Avella et al. 2009; Ebadi et al. 2016, 2018). However, the effect of particle size of the used beverage cartons was not investigated. Previous studies reported that particle size of filler affects the mechanical properties of the polymer composites (Fu et al. 2008; Aldousiri et al. 2013; Deepak et al. 2019; Delviawan et al. 2019; Aranda-García et al. 2020; Hubbe and Grigsby 2020; Sinha et al. 2020; Kuzmin et al. 2022).

This study focused on the effect of used beverage carton content (Tetra Pak®) and its particle size on the water absorption and tensile properties of the HDPE composites. The differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and morphological analysis of the specimens were also investigated. Different amounts of the Tetra Pak® filler (40 to 70 wt%) and three different particle sizes were studied in the experiments. High amount of the Tetra Pak® filler was used in the study because it was aimed to be processed by extrusion and used for decking and siding applications. Such products require high filling (40 to 70%), unlike injection molding, where 10 to 20% filling is sufficient. Moreover, high filler ratio reduces the cost of the composite, by replacing the expensive polymer matrix HDPE.

EXPERIMENTAL

As polymer matrix, virgin HDPE granules (grade: 273-83) manufactured by Kazanorgsintez PJSC company, Russia (density: 0.95 g/cm3; melt flow rate: 0.5 g/10 min at 190 °C and a load of 50 N; yield stress at tensile: 22.6 MPa; tensile elongation: 700%) were used. In addition to the virgin polymer, recycled HDPE samples obtained from the used plastic bottles were used in the experiments (density: 0.94 g/cm3, melt flow rate 0.9 g/10 min). The used beverage cartons (Tetra Pak™) served as filler in the HDPE composites. After washing in warm water and drying, the beverage products were chipped in a rotary knife chipper. Then, the particles were ground in a mill with three knives. The resulting particles as filler were sieved through screening machine and then classified three different size which were <630 μm, 630 to 1000 μm, and > 1000.

Compounding of the components was carried out on a laboratory rotary batch mixer Hakke Rheomix 600 OS with roller rotors. The mixing temperature, rotor speed, and the mixing time were 150 °C, 50 rpm, and 10 min, respectively. The resulting mixture was compressed into a thin panel on a Gibitre™ hydraulic hot-press at a temperature of 150 °C and a pressure of 3 MPa. The amount of the filler in the HDPE polymer matrix was gradually increased from 40 to 70 wt% (by 10 wt% increment). The experimental design is given in Table 1. The tensile test specimens in the form of a dog bone were punched out from the thin panels with dimensions of 200 mm x 200 mm x 1 mm.

Determination of Tensile Properties of the Composite

Tensile testing was carried out on a universal testing machine (Gotech UAI-7000 M) with a testing speed of 1 mm/min at a temperature of 23±1°C according to ISO 527 standard. The water absorption of the specimens with a size of 3 mm x 3 mm x 1 mm was determined by exposure in water for 24 h at the room temperature. The density of the composites was measured on an H-200L density meter with an ultra-high resolution of 0.001 g/cm3.

Table 1. Experimental Design

DSC Analysis

Melting and crystallization behavior of the composite specimens produced by adding Tetra Pak® into HDPE in different sizes (630, 1000, and ˃1000 μm) and in different ratios (40%, 50%, 60%, and 70%) were determined on Perkin Elmer-8000 device by heat flow method. Its calibration was performed with zinc (Zn), indium (In) and tin (Sn) metals. DSC analysis was performed according to the ASTM D3418 standard. Amounts of 7 to 10 mg of the composite specimen were weighed and put into a pan. First, the specimens were heated up to 200 °C with a heating rate of 10 °C and when the temperature reached 200 °C, it was kept for 2 min. Then, the specimens were cooled to 10 °C with a cooling rate of 10 °C /min to achieve dynamic crystallization. After waiting for 2 min, the atmosphere was heated up to 200 °C with the same heating rate. All these processes were applied at a flow rate of 50 mL/min in nitrogen environment to prevent oxidation effect. The degree of the crystallization was determined using the enthalpy value obtained from the second melting graph curve in the Eq. 1 (Hristov and Vasileva 2003),

Xc(%) = (ΔHm/ΔHom) × 100 (1)

where ΔHm is the melting enthalpy (J/g) value calculated from the curve obtained during the second melting, and ΔHom is the melting enthalpy of the 100% crystalline form of HDPE (289 J/g).

Morphological Analysis

The evaluation of dispersion and distribution of Tetra Pak® particles in the polymer matrix composite was carried out by SEM analysis. The specimens were first immersed in liquid nitrogen and then broken. The broken surface was covered with gold coating by applying the spraying method. Clear SEM images were obtained because the gold-plated surface increased the electrical conductivity. A JEOL Neo Scope JSM-5000 brand SEM with an acceleration voltage of 10 kV was used for the images.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Tensile Properties

The tensile strength, tensile modulus, and elongation at break of the composites are given in Table 2. As expected, the tensile modulus of the specimens improved with increasing amount of the Tetra Pak® filler. The tensile modulus of the specimens was greatly increased by the increased amount of the Tetra Pak® filler while the tensile strength moderately decreased. For example, the tensile strength, tensile modulus, and elongation at break of the specimens with 40 wt% Tetra Pak® particles were 17.2, 1370, and 2.8 MPa, respectively, while they were found to be 14.1, 2350, and 0.7 MPa when the amount of the Tetra Pak® content reached to 70 wt% in the HDPE matrix. The results of the tensile modulus showed that the modulus of the composite was strongly affected by the modulus of each constituent. The addition of a rigid material into the polymer, for example cellulose fibers, enhances the stiffness of polymer. The Tetra Pak® particles improved the stress transfer from the HDPE to the reinforcing material which was the particles as well the deflection of the composites.

Table 2. Water Absorption and Mechanical Properties of the HDPE Composites with Different Size and Content of the Tetra Pak® Filler

The decrease in the particle size increased the tensile strength and tensile modulus at the same loading level of the Tetra Pak®. The tensile strength of the specimens decreased as a function of the increasing particle content due to the fact that the polymer matrix was not enough to bond the Tetra Pak® particles as a binder. Similarly, the amount of the HDPE matrix as an adhesive was not sufficient for the interfacial bond when the number of the Tetra Pak® particles increased. This was due to the fact that overall surface area of the smaller particles was higher than that of the larger particles. According to the results of the tensile properties, it can be said that the best results were found in the Tetra Pak® size which was less than 630 μm.

The elongation at break of the specimens decreased as a function of increasing Tetra Pak® filler. The reduction in the elongation at break of the specimens having a higher content of the Tetra Pak® filler may be explained by the low elongation of Tetra Pak® filler that restricted the flow of HDPE matrix. Tetra Pak® filler contains aluminum foil and paper layer. The ductility of the HDPE composites with Tetra Pak® filler was noticeably decreased.

Water absorption of the biocomposites increased from 1.1 to 4.6% when the amount of the Tetra Pak® filler content increased from 40 to 70 wt% in the HDPE (Table 2). This result was expected because the filler contained the paper layer prepared from wood pulp. The addition of the Tetra Pak® filler into the HDPE matrix increased the water permeability. This behavior depended on the Tetra Pak® content and its particle size. Higher water absorption of the HDPE with a high amount of the particles of the used beverage carton reflected that the lignocellulosic fibers with the hydroxyl groups were not well encapsulated by the polymer matrix. Some of the lignocellulosic fibers were easily accessible to water. The lower water absorption of the composites with a low amount of the used beverage carton could be because the fibers were fully covered by the melted thermoplastic material, which protected them from water. The increased particle size of the Tetra Pak® increased the water absorption of the HDPE composites at all the loading levels. For example, at the 50 wt% content of the Tetra Pak®, the water absorption of the composites having a size of lower than 630 μm Tetra Pak® was 1.2%, while it was 2.1% for the composites with a size of higher than 1000 μm of Tetra Pak®. When the loading level of the Tetra Pak® filler was increased in the HDPE, the total surface area of the particles increased, causing more of the hydroxyl groups to be exposed to the water. The hydrophilic nature of the natural fibers proportionally increased the water absorption of the composites with higher Tetra Pak® loading.

Fig. 1. SEM images of HDPE/Tetra Pak® composites. A) 40 wt% filler content. B) 70 wt% filler content (SEM magnification x60).

The HDPE has no hydrophilic character because of its non-polar hydrophobic nature. Previous studies reported that the increase in the loading level of fillers above a certain level in the polymer matrix reduced the tensile strength of the thermoplastic composites due to the poor interfacial bonding between the filler and the HDPE matrix (Ayrilmis et al. 2008, 2013b; Tufan and Ayrilmis 2016). Furthermore, the increased number of microgaps in the HDPE composites as a function of increasing amount of the Tetra Pak® filler caused higher water absorption. This was confirmed by the SEM images. The SEM micrographs of the HDPE composites produced from the lowest (40 wt%) and highest (70 wt%) particle content of the Tetra Pak® are shown in Fig. 1. The number of microgaps increased with the amount of the Tetra Pak® particles in the HDPE matrix (Fig 1B).

The physical and mechanical properties of the composites produced from Tetra Pak® filler and recycled HDPE are given in Table 3. The size of the Tetra Pak® filler was more than 1000 μm. The tensile modulus of the specimens increased with the addition of the filler while the tensile strength decreased. Especially, when the amount of the particle was increased from 60 wt% to 70 wt%, a considerable increase in the tensile modulus of the specimens was determined. This can be explained by the fact that the tensile modulus of the wood fibers is significantly higher than that of the HDPE (Ayrilmis and Jarusombuti 2011).

The tensile properties of the composites produced with the virgin HDPE were higher than those of the specimens produced with the recycled HDPE. Water absorption in the specimens with the recycled HDPE was higher than the composites containing the virgin HDPE.

Table 3. Recycled HDPE Composites with Tetra Pak® Particles

DSC Analysis

The DSC data of the composites produced by adding Tetra Pak® with 630 μm dimensions are given in Table 4. The DSC analysis of composites produced by adding 40 to 70% of Tetra Pak® filler into the HDPE (particle size: 630, 1000, and ˃1000 μm) and recycled HDPE (particle size: ˃1000 μm) were performed. Melting and cooling curves were obtained in the DSC diagrams. The melting and crystallization peaks of these curves are presented in Figs. 2 to 4. The crystal form formation of the composites took place in the usual way, and no new crystal form was formed. There were differences between melting and crystallization temperature peaks depending on particle sizes. Therefore, the results were evaluated according to particle size. Cold crystallization starts (Tc onset), end (Tc end set), peak (Tc), cold crystallization enthalpy (ΔHc), melting temperature (Tm), melting enthalpy (ΔHm), and crystallization degree (Xc) of composites determined.

When the amount of the Tetra Pak was increased from 40 to 70 wt%, the values of the melting temperature (Tm) (132.8-131.7 °C) and melting enthalpy (ΔHm) values (199.7 to 97.6 J g-1) decreased. Especially, when the amount of the Tetra Pak increased from 60 wt% to 70 wt% in the HDPE matrix, the enthalpy value of cold crystallization (ΔHc) and enthalpy value of melting (ΔHm) decreased sharply (Table 4). The degree of crystallization decreased from 69.1 to 33.8% with the addition of 40% and 70% Tetra Pak, respectively. However, cold crystallization temperature peak values (114.6 to 115.7 °C) increased.

Table 4. DSC Data of HDPE Composites with Tetra Pak® Particles

Note: Tc onset: cold crystallization peak onset temperature, Tc peak: cold crystallization peak maximum temperature, ΔHc: enthalpy value of cold crystallization, Tm: melting temperature, ΔHm: enthalpy value of melting, Xc: crystallinity degree

Fig. 2. DSC diagram of HDPE-Tetra Pak (particle size 630 μm) composites: (a) melting and (b) crystallization diagram

Fig. 3. DSC diagram of HDPE-Tetra Pak (particle size 1000 μm) composites: (a) melting and (b) crystallization diagram

Fig. 4. DSC diagram of recycled HDPE-Tetra Pak (particle size ˃1000 μm) composites: (a) melting and (b) crystallization diagram

The DSC data obtained by adding 1000 μm Tetra Pak® are given in Table 4. Similar results were obtained with increasing particle size. As a result of increasing the addition of Tetra Pak® from 40% to 70%, Tm (132.5 to 130.7 °C), ΔHm (184 to 85.9 J g-1), ΔHc (186.1 to 116.4 °C), and Xc (63.7% to 29.7%) decreased.

DSC data obtained by recycled HDPE are given in Table 5. The results in the test samples produced from recycled HDPE with the addition of Tetra Pak® with particle sizes >1000 μm showed similar trends to the results of samples with particle sizes of 630 and 1000 μm. However, the values of all parameters were found to be higher in certain proportions in recycled HDPE specimens. By increasing the amount of Tetra Pak® addition from 40% to 70%, the values of Tm (133.9 to 133.5 °C), ΔHm (216.3 to 129.8 J g-1), ΔHc (231.5 to 132.9 J g-1), and Xc (74.8% to 44.9%) decreased. Similarly, Tc values (116.8 to 117.3 °C) increased, similar to the samples with 600 and 1000 μm sizes.

Depending on the increase in Tetra Pak® content, melting temperature and enthalpy values of the HDPE and recycled HDPE decreased. In all the composite groups produced by adding Tetra Pak®, the degree of crystallinity decreased as a function of Tetra Pak® addition as compared to the pure HDPE. The fiber fraction containing Tetra Pak® had an inhibitory influence on the crystallization of the polymer matrix (Colom et al. 2000; Stark and Matuana 2004). The reason was the dilution effect with the increase of Tetra Pak® content added to HDPE and recycled HDPE matrix (Amash and Zugenmaier 2000). The Tc increased slightly for all particle sizes.

Table 5. DSC data of Recycled HDPE/Tetra Pak® Composites

Note: Tc onset: cold crystallization peak onset temperature, Tc peak: cold crystallization peak maximum temperature, ΔHc: enthalpy value of cold crystallization, Tm: melting temperature, ΔHm: enthalpy value of melting, Xc: crystallinity degree.

The Tetra Pak® content caused this increase by acting as a heterogeneous nucleation within the HDPE and recycled HDPE matrix (Bouafif et al. 2009; Huang et al. 2015). In all specimens, the decrease in the Xc and ΔHc values with the increase of Tetra Pak® content and size was noteworthy. The melting and crystallization values of the DSC diagrams depending on the particle sizes and Tetra Pak® content are given in Table 5.

CONCLUSIONS

  1. The increasing content of the Tetra Pak® filler in the high-density polyethylene (HDPE) composites improved the tensile modulus while the tensile strength decreased. The particle size also had an impact on the tensile properties of the specimens. The tensile strength and modulus of the specimens decreased with decreasing particle size at the same loading level of the Tetra Pak® filler.
  2. As the Tetra Pak® content increased, the melting temperature of the composite decreased but the crystallization temperature increased. The degree of crystallization decreased with increasing Tetra Pak® content. Increasing particle size negatively affected the crystallization degree and caused it to decrease. However, it was important that the HDPE maintained its crystalline form. In the recycled HDPE composites, the degree of crystallization decreased as the Tetra Pak® content increased, but this value was still noticeably higher than that of the crystallization degree of the HDPE.
  3. The best tensile properties were found using Tetra Pak® with a size of less than 630 μm. The virgin HDPE showed better mechanical performance than recycled HDPE.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Data Availability Statement

Data available on request from the authors.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

REFERENCES CITED

Aldousiri, B., Alajmi M., and Shalwan, A. (2013). “Mechanical properties of palm fibre reinforced recycled HDPE,” Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. Article ID 508179. DOI: 10.1155/2013/508179

Amash, A., and Zugenmaier, P. (2000). “Morphology and properties of isotropic and oriented samples of cellulose fibre–polypropylene composites,” Polymer 41(4), 1589-1596. DOI: 10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00273-6

Aranda-García, F. J., González-Pérez, M. M., Robledo-Ortiz, J. R., Sedano-de la Rosa, C., Espinoza, K., Ramirez-Arreola, D. E. (2020). “Influence of processing time on physical and mechanical properties of composite boards made of recycled multilayer containers and HDPE,” J. Mater Cycles Waste Management 22(6), 2020-2028. DOI: 10.1007/s10163-020-01092-5

Avella, M., Avolio, R., Bonadies, I., Carfagna, C., Errico, M. E., and Gentile, G. (2009). “Recycled multilayer cartons as cellulose source in HDPE-based composites: compatibilization and structure-properties relationships,” Journal Applied Polymer Science 114(5), 2978-2985. DOI: 10.1002/app.30913

Ayrilmis, N., Candan, Z., and Hiziroglu, S. (2008). “Physical and mechanical properties of cardboard panels made from used beverage carton with veneer overlay,” Materials and Design 29(10), 1897-1903. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.04.030

Ayrilmis, N., and Jarusombuti, S. (2011). “Flat pressed wood plastic composite as an alternative to conventional wood-based panels,” Journal of Composite Materials 45(1), 103-112. DOI: 10.1177/0021998310371546

Ayrilmis, N., Kaymakci, A., Akbulut, T., and Elmas, G. M. (2013a). “Mechanical performance of composites based on wastes of polyethylene aluminum and lignocellulosics,” Composites Part B: Engineering 47, 150-154. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.10.019

Ayrilmis, N., Kaymakci, A., and Ozdemir, F. (2013b). “Physical, mechanical, and thermal properties of polypropylene composites filled with walnut shell flour,” J. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 19, 908-914. DOI:10.1016/j.jiec.2012.11.006

Bal, B. (2022). “Mechanical properties of wood-plastic composites produced with recycled polyethylene, used Tetra Pak® boxes, and wood flour,” BioResources 17(4), 6569-6577.

Bekhta, P., Lyutyy P., Hiziroglu S., Ortynska G. (2016). “Properties of composite panels made from tetra-pak and polyethylene waste material,” Journal of Polymers and Environment 24(2), 159-165. DOI: 10.1007/s10924-016-0758-7

Bektas, I., Guler C and Nacar M. (2005). “The manufacture of particleboards using sunflower stalks (Helianthus annuus L.) and poplar wood (Populus alba L.),” Journal of Composite Materials 39(5), 467-473. DOI: 10.1177/0021998305047098

Bouafif, H., Koubaa, A., Perré, P., Cloutier, A., and Riedl, B. (2009). “Wood particle/ high- density polyethylene composites: Thermal sensitivity and nucleating ability of wood particles,” J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 113(1), 593-600. DOI: 10.1002/app.30129

Colom, X., Canavate, J., Pagès, P., Saurina, J., and Carrasco, F. (2000). “Changes in crystallinity of the HDPE matrix in composites with cellulosic fiber using DSC and FTIR,” J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 9(10), 818-830. DOI: 10.1177/073168440001901003

Deepak, D., Goyal, N., Rana, P., and Gupta, V. K. (2019). “Effect of varying reinforcement content on the mechanical properties of hemp-recycled HDPE composites,” Mater. Today: Proc. 18, 5286-5291. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.07.552

Delviawan, A., Kojima, Y., Kobori, H., Suzuki, S., Aoki, K., and Ogoe, S. (2019). “The effect of wood particle size distribution on the mechanical properties of wood–plastic composite,” J Wood Sci. 65, article 67. DOI: 10.1186/s10086-019-1846-9

Ebadi, M., Farsi, M., Narchin, P., and Madhoushi, M. (2016). “The effect of beverage storage packets (Tetra Pak™) waste on mechanical properties of wood-plastic composites,” Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials 29(12), 1601-1610. DOI: 10.1177/0892705715618745

Ebadi, M., Farsi, M., and Narchin, P. (2018). “Some of the physical and mechanical properties of composites made from Tetra Pak™/LDPE,” Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials 31(8), 1054-1065. DOI: 10.1177/0892705717734597

Fernandez, L. (2022). “Packaging market shares worldwide 2019, by material,” Statista Inc., New York, USA (https://www.statista.com/statistics/271601/packaging-materials-in-the-global-packaging-market-since-2003/) Accessed 10 February 2023

Fu, S. Y., Lauke, B., and Mai, Y. W. (2008). “Effects of particle size, article/matrix interface adhesion and particle loading on mechanical properties of particulate-polymer composites,” Composites Part B: Engineering 39(6), 933-961. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2008.01.002

Hristov, V., and Vasileva, S. (2003). “Dynamic mechanical and thermal properties of modified poly (propylene) wood fiber composites,” Macromolecular Materials and Engineering 288(10), 798-806. DOI: 10.1002/mame.200300110

Huang, L., Wang, H., and Wang, Q. (2015). “Influence of β nucleating agent on the crystallization and mechanical properties of pp/wood flour composites,” Polymer Materials Science and Engineering 31(1), 83- 87.

Hubbe, M. A., and Grigsby, W. (2020). “From nanocellulose to wood particles: A review of particle size vs. the properties of plastic composites reinforced with cellulose-based entities,” BioResources 15(1), 2030-2081. DOI: 10.15376/biores.15.1.2030-2081

Kuzmin, A. M., Ayrilmis, N., and Chalganov, D. K. (2022). “Development of thermoplastic composite tube from HDPE/barley straw fibers using extrusion,” Method Key Engineering Materials 910, 478-483. DOI: 10.4028/p-1amod0

Robertson, G. L. (2021). “Recycling of aseptic beverage cartons: A review,” Recycling 6(1), 20. DOI: 10.3390/recycling6010020

Rohit, K. D., and Dixit, S. (2016). “A review-future aspect of natural fiber reinforced composite,” Polym. Renew. Resour. 7(2), 43-59. DOI: 10.1177/2041247916007002

Sanchez-Cadena, L. E., Alvarado-Tenorio, B., Romo-Uribe, A., Campillo, B., Flores, O., Yao, H. (2013). “Hot-pressed boards based on recycled high-density polyethylene Tetrapack: Mechanical properties and fracture behavior,” Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites 32(23), 1779-1792. DOI: 10.1177/0731684413493.

Selim, S., Ayrilmis, N., and Candan, Z. (2010). “Fungicide and insecticide properties of cardboard panels made from used beverage carton with veneer overlay,” African Journal of Agricultural Research 5(2), 159-165. DOI: 10.5897/AJAR09.592

Sinha, A. K., Narang, H. K., and Bhattachary, S. (2020). “Mechanical properties of hybrid polymer composites: A review,” Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 42, 431. DOI: 10.1007/s40430-020-02517-w

Stark, N. M., and Matuana, L. M. (2004). “Surface chemistry changes of weathered HDPE/wood-flour composites studied by XPS and FTIR spectroscopy,” Polymer Degradation and Stability 86(1), 1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2003.11.002

Tufan, M., and Ayrilmis, N. (2016). “Potential use of hazelnut husk in recycled high density polyethylene composites,” BioResources 11(3), 7476-7489. DOI: 10.15376/biores.11.3.7476-7489

Umezuruike, L. O. (2013). “A review on the role of packaging in securing food system: Adding value to food products and reducing losses and waste,” African Journal of Agricultural Research 8(22), 2621-2630. DOI: 10.5897/AJAR2013.6931

Yilgor, N., Köse, C., Terzi, E., Figen, A. K., Ibach, R., Kartal, S. N., and Pişkin, S. (2014). “Degradation behavior and accelerated weathering of composite boards pro-duced from waste Tetra Pak ® packaging materials,” BioResources 9(3), 4784-4807.

Article submitted: December 28, 2022; Peer review completed: January 21, 2023; Revised version received and accepted: February 14, 2023; Published: February 23, 2023.

DOI: 10.15376/biores.18.2.2815-2825