NC State
BioResources
Lan, H., Zhang, H., Yang, D., Liu, J., Tang, G., and Zhang, H. (2018). "Effects of pH on biological treatment of paper mill white water with the addition of dominant bacteria," BioRes. 13(3), 6757-6765.

Abstract

Virgibacillus pantothenticus, Bacillus cereus, and B. subtilis were screened from an activated sludge that had become acclimated to white water in the laboratory. The effects of the pH on the ability of biological treatment to reduce the biological oxygen demand of white water was studied for three dominant bacteria. The pH ranged from 4 to 8, and the optimum treatment efficiencies for white water treatments with the single dominant bacterium V. pantothenticus, B. cereus, and B. subtilis occurred at pH values of 5, 6, and 6, respectively. The results also indicated that the best treatment effect was achieved at a hydraulic retention time of 14 h. When each dominate species was tested under their optimum pH value and hydraulic retention time, the chemical oxygen demand removal rate was 67.7%, 77%, and 75.4%; the electrical conductivity decreased by 0.18 mS/cm, 0.93 mS/cm, and 0.51 mS/cm; and the cationic demand decreased by 69.7%, 70.0%, and 70.9% for V. pantothenticus, B. cereus, and B. subtilis, respectively. These results are helpful for promoting the practical application of dominant bacteria in white water treatment.


Download PDF

Full Article

Effects of pH on Biological Treatment of Paper Mill White Water with the Addition of Dominant Bacteria

Huixia Lan,a,* Hao Zhang,a Da Yang,a Jianbo Liu,a Guowu Tang,b and Heng Zhang c,d

Virgibacillus pantothenticusBacillus cereus, and B. subtilis were screened from an activated sludge that had become acclimated to white water in the laboratory. The effects of the pH on the ability of biological treatment to reduce the biological oxygen demand of white water was studied for three dominant bacteria. The pH ranged from 4 to 8, and the optimum treatment efficiencies for white water treatments with the single dominant bacterium V. pantothenticus, B. cereus, and B. subtilis occurred at pH values of 5, 6, and 6, respectively. The results also indicated that the best treatment effect was achieved at a hydraulic retention time of 14 h. When each dominate species was tested under their optimum pH value and hydraulic retention time, the chemical oxygen demand removal rate was 67.7%, 77%, and 75.4%; the electrical conductivity decreased by 0.18 mS/cm, 0.93 mS/cm, and 0.51 mS/cm; and the cationic demand decreased by 69.7%, 70.0%, and 70.9% for V. pantothenticus, B. cereus, and B. subtilis, respectively. These results are helpful for promoting the practical application of dominant bacteria in white water treatment.

Keywords: White water; pH; Dominant bacteria; Virgibacillus pantothenticus; Bacillus cereus; Bacillus subtilis

Contact information: a: College of Environment and Safety Engineering of Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266042, China; b: School of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Shandong Normal University, Jinan250014, China; c: Key Laboratory of Biomass Energy and Materials of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing 210042, China; d: College of Marine Science and Biological Engineering, Qingdao University of Science & Technology, Qingdao 266042, China;

* Corresponding author: lanhuixia@163.com

INTRODUCTION

White water mainly contains fines, fibers, fillers, adhesives, dry strength agents, sizing agents, and non-soluble substances. The complex components lead to poor biodegradability of white water (Pokhrel and Viraraghavan 2004; Latorre et al. 2007; Toczyłowska-Mamińska 2017). Considering economic and environmental protections, the closed circulation of white water in papermaking is an ideal way for water source conservation. However, it can generate adverse impacts. For example, the anionic waste and lipophilic extractives can increase remarkably (Bengtsson et al. 2008), a large amount of foam can be formed (Karikallio et al. 2011), and toxic and inflammable gases can be produced. Therefore, to achieve zero wastewater discharge, an efficient white water purification technology is important. Commonly used white water recycling technologies include physicochemical and biological methods, with the biological method being an important white water treatment technology (Buyukkamaci and Koken 2010; Mänttäri et al. 2015; Kamali et al. 2016).

Currently, the dominant bacteria have aroused wide concern of researchers, because they have special degradation ability to the refractory organics. The addition of dominant bacteria into an aerobic activated sludge system makes efficient utilization and degradation of organic pollutants in the industrial wastewater possible, and thus the quality of the effluent is enhanced and the concentration of the suspended matter in the effluent is reduced. Therefore, the effect of treatment on white water can be improved to a certain extent. Studies on dominant bacteria technology have been done. Shi et al (2012) introduced marine halophilic bacteria into an intermittently aerated biological filter (IABF) to enhance the bioaugmentation. Their findings demonstrated that the removal efficiencies of chemical oxygen demand (COD), total nitrogen, and total phosphorus were increased by about 8.6%, 15.7%, and 17.3%, respectively. So the introduction of marine halophilic bacteria can enhance the activity of biofilm.

The pH is one of the most important control parameters for sewage treatment. It directly affects the growth and metabolism of microorganisms and the activity of biological enzymes. The pH values required for the treatment of wastewater differ with the microorganism (Maspolim et al. 2015; Yuan et al. 2016). Kikot et al. (2010) studied the effect of the pH on the growth of a mesophilic sulfate-reducing strain isolated from the effluent from a tannery. It was found that the pH had a noticeable effect on the sulfate reduction. When the pH decreased from 7 to 5, the activity of the sulfate reducing strains and communities were inhibited. Liang et al. (2013) found that controlling the pH was crucial for removing nutrients during wastewater treatment via a combination of Chlorella vulgaris and Bacillus licheniformis. When the pH was 7, higher removal efficiencies of NH4+ (86%) and total phosphorus (TP) (93%) were achieved. However, algal cells were severely damaged by a low pH value (3.5). It has been reported that maintaining the pH value between 6.4 and 7.0 inhibited the activity of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and mitigated N2O production (Law et al. 2011). However, a maximum N2O production was achieved at a pH of 8.0. Therefore, the pH is vitally important in the wastewater treatment process via dominant bacteria. Therefore, even if the dominant bacteria play an important role in the biochemical treatment system, once the pH value is not adjusted properly, it will cause negative effects and waste resources.

In this study, Virgibacillus pantothenticusB. cereus, and B. subtilis were isolated and purified in a laboratory. They exerted their functions in the degradation of lignin and fiber in white water. To maximize the effect of the treatment, the effect of the pH on white water treatment via a single dominant bacterium was studied.

EXPERIMENTAL

Materials

White water was obtained from alkaline hydrogen peroxide mechanical pulp obtained from a paper mill in Shandong Province, China. The COD and BOD5 of the white water were approximately 1320 mg/L and 450 to 500 mg/L. The cationic demand was approximately 510 µeq/L. The electrical conductivity was approximately 1894 µs/cm, and the pH was 7.64. The aerobic activated sludge comes from secondary settling tank of sewage treatment station in paper mill. The dominant bacteria were screened in the laboratory from aerobic activated sludge domesticated with the white water.

Methods

Analysis methods

The conductivity was measured with a DDS-11C type conductivity meter (Shengke Instrument Equipment Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China). The oxygen concentration for the calculation of the chemical oxygen demand (CODCr) was determined with a COD analyzer (DR1010, HACH, Loveland, CO, U.S.). The pH was determined with a pH meter (PHS-3C type, Yoke Instrument Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China). The cationic demand was measured with a streaming current detector (PCD-03, BTG Ltd., Eclépens, Switzerland). The standard cation titration solution was polydiallyldimethylammonium chloride (pDADAMC), after diluting 100 times, with a charge density of 104 µeq/L. White water was diluted 10 times, and the volume of water sample was 10 mL. The cationic demand was obtained via Eq. 1,

 (1)

where CD is the cationic demand (µeq/L), V1 is the volume of the standard cation liquid used as the titrant (L), C is the charge density of the diluted standard cation titration solution (104µeq/L), and V2 is the volume of water sample (L). 10 is the dilution multiple.

Experimental methods

Five groups with 60 mg of pure microbial inoculum and 200 mL of white water were added to 250-mL conical bottles. The pH of the bottles was adjusted to 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 via 2 M sulfuric acid. Then, the five reactions were simultaneously placed into a 30 °C water bath. Samples were collected every 1 h or 2 h, and the CODCr, conductivity, and cationic demand were measured for each sample.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Effect of the pH on the COD Removal Rate

For different pH values (4 to 8), the COD removal rates of V. pantothenticusB. cereus, and B. subtilis are shown in Fig. 1.

Figure 1 shows that the maximum COD removal rate was achieved at a pH of 5 and 6 for V. pantothenticus, with COD removal rates of 28.2% and 26.2% after 2 h, and 67.7% and 66.0% after 14 h, respectively. The treatment was effective for the reaction with a pH of 6 for B. cereus and B. subtilis, as well. The COD removal rates after 2 h were 24.1% and 30.5%, and the COD removal rates after 14 h were 77% and 75.4% for B. cereus and B. subtilis, respectively.

During the primary treatment stage, the low amounts of molecular organic acids, alcohols, phenols, and other compounds in the white water were decomposed via the dominant bacteria. However, over a short period of time, the microbes did not rapidly decompose the polycyclic aromatic compounds and other long chain macromolecular organic compounds in the white water. As the reaction time increased, the macromolecular compounds were slowly decomposed into smaller molecules via the microbes and a series of reactions, such as ring-opening and breaking. The COD removal rate gradually stabilized at 14 h. Figure 1 shows that the COD removal rates for the extreme pH conditions (pH values of 4 and 8) were remarkably lower than those for the median pH values. This was because the components of the bacteria had different sensitivities to acidic and alkaline conditions. For example, DNA and adenine ribonucleotides in bacteria are more sensitive to acid (Huang et al. 2016; Kunacheva et al. 2017). Under acidic conditions, the chemical bonds of the DNA were broken, the spatial conformation of the double helix was destroyed, the genetic information was changed, the synthesis of gene expression was blocked, and the life activity of the microorganism was disturbed or even stopped. Under alkaline conditions, the phospholipids, an important component of cellular membranes, were easily hydrolyzed, which changed the structure, fluidity, and selective permeability of the membrane. This impeded the transportation of substances and hindered the normal life activities of the microbes. The structure of the bacterial RNA was also easily destroyed under alkaline conditions, which affected the growth and metabolism of the microorganisms and made the COD removal rate worse.

Fig. 1. Effect of the pH on the COD removal rates of (A) V. pantothenticus, (B) B. cereus, and (C) B. subtilis

On the other hand, microbial treatment of white water was essentially due to enzyme produced by microorganisms. Virgibacillus pantothenticusBacillus cereus, and B. subtilis could synthesize laccase and pectinase in vivo and degrade the pollutants in white water by bioenzyme. However, under the condition of peracid or peralkali, the activity of cell membrane proteins would be inhibited, thus affecting the normal absorption and transport of nutrients, which was not conducive to the synthesis of enzymes and COD removal. Consequently, it had been shown by experiment that adding three dominant bacteria to activated sludge and adjusting pH value of 5 to 6 in actual white water treatment can obviously increase the treatment effect.

Effect of pH on the Conductivity

The effects of the pH on the conductivity of the effluent treated via the dominant bacteria are shown in Fig. 2.

Within the range of investigated pH values, the conductivity increased at first and then decreased over time. When the pH values were 5 and 6, the conductivity reached maximum values of 6.46 mS/cm and 6.34 mS/cm, respectively, at 5 h with the dominant bacterium V. pantothenticus. The conductivity increased by 24.2% and 21.9%, respectively, compared with the initial conductivity (5.20 mS/cm). Subsequently, the conductivity showed a downward trend. The conductivity values decreased to 5.02 mS/cm and 5.08 mS/cm at a pH of 5 and 6 at 14 h, which was a decrease of 22.3% and 19.9%, respectively, compared with the peak conductivity. Compared with the initial conductivity, the values decreased by 0.18 mS/cm and 0.12 mS/cm, respectively. The conductivity variation with B. cereus was the largest at pH values of 5 and 6.

Fig. 2. Effect of the pH on the conductivity of the effluent treated by (A) V. pantothenticus, (B) B. cereus, and (C) B. subtilis

In the initial stage, the polycyclic aromatic compounds and other long chain macromolecular substances in the white water were converted into small molecules via ring opening and chain scission reactions through the action of the dominant bacteria (Li et al. 2017). For example, some lignin derivatives were decomposed into short chain fatty acids, phenols, and alcohols, which could produce hydrogen ions and negative ions, contributing to the increase in the conductivity value. As the treatment time increased, a portion of these small molecules were consumed by the dominant bacteria and converted into large molecular components of the cells, which led to bacterial growth. The other portion of the small molecules were completely decomposed into water and CO2, which generated energy for bacterial growth. The CO2 entered the air as a gas, and this led to a decrease in the conductivity. Therefore, the degradation efficiency of the macromolecular organic compounds in white water could be reflected by an increasing conductivity in the initial stage; meanwhile, the conductivity decreased in subsequent stages, which reflected the utilization and mineralization efficiency of the intermediate products of the small molecules via the dominant bacteria. For V. pantothenticus and B. cereus, when the pH values were 5 and 6, respectively, the mineralization efficiencies of the compounds were the highest. For B. subtilis, the treatment effect was the highest when the pH was 6.

Effect of the pH on the Cationic Demand

Fig. 3. Effect of the pH on the cationic demand of the effluent treated by (A) V. pantothenticus, (B) B. cereus, and (C) B. subtilis

The effects of the pH on the cationic demand of the effluent treated by V. pantothenticusB. cereus, and B. subtilis are shown in Fig. 3. The cationic demand decreased with time. With an increase in the pH, the cationic demand of the effluent decreased at first and then increased. For V. pantothenticus, when the pH was 5 and 6, the cationic demand values were the smallest. The cationic demand values were 165 µeq/L and 180 µeq/L at 14 h and decreased by 69.7% and 67.0% at pH values of 5 and 6, respectively, when compared with the initial value (545 µeq/L). When the pH value was 6 for B. cereus and B. subtilis, the cationic demand reduction rates were the fastest and decreased to 120 µeq/L and 160 µeq/L at 14 h, respectively. Compared with the initial values (570 µeq/L and 550 µeq/L), the cationic demand values were decreased by 79.0% and 70.9% for B. cereus and B. subtilis, respectively.

In the treatment process, the negative colloidal substances in the waste water were decomposed into small molecular substances by the microorganisms. The anionic waste and cationic demand were continuously reduced. In this experiment, when the pH values were 5 and 6, the treatment efficiency of the anionic waste was the best for all three dominant bacteria with a minimum cationic demand value. Under peracid or peralkaline conditions, the structure of the protein is broken and the enzyme in the microorganism is deactivated, which leads to a halt of the normal life activity and death of a microorganism. Hence, for the three dominant bacteria, the microbial activity and treatment effects decreased when the pH was 4 and 8. Consequently, the optimum pH values of the three dominant bacteria were basically the same, which is beneficial for the growth of flora. Therefore, in the actual white water treatment, the pH value should be adjusted to the range of 5 to 6, so that the dominant bacteria can grow and metabolize better and exert the function of co-metabolism greatly, making the treatment effect of mixed bacteria be much higher than that of single strain.

CONCLUSIONS

  1. In this experiment, white water was treated via a single dominant bacterium and the results indicated that the optimum metabolic pH values for V. pantothenticusB. cereus, and B. subtilis were 5, 6, and 6, respectively.
  2. Under these conditions, the treatment effect was the best with maximum variation in the conductivity and a minimum cationic demand. After 14 h of treatment, the CODCr removal rate was 67.7%, 77.0%, and 75.4%, the electrical conductivity decreased by 0.18 mS/cm, 0.93 mS/cm, and 0.51 mS/cm, and the cationic demand decreased by 69.7%, 79.0%, and 70.9% for V. pantothenticusB. cereus, and B. subtilis, respectively.
  3. The optimum pH values of the three dominant bacteria were basically the same, which is beneficial for the growth of flora in the actual white water treatment. Thus, it was advantageous to maximize the effect of treatment.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors are grateful for support from the Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (ZR2017MC032 and ZR2016DL01), the open fund of the Key Laboratory of Biomass Energy and Materials of Jiangsu Province (JSBEM201808), and the Science and Technology Major Project (Emerging industries) of Shandong Province (2015ZDXX0403B03).

REFERENCES CITED

Bengtsson, S., Werker, A., Christensson, M., and Welander, T. (2008). “Production of polyhydroxyalkanoates by activated sludge treating a paper mill wastewater,” Bioresour. Technol.99(3), 509-516. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.020

Buyukkamaci, N., and Koken, E. (2010). “Economic evaluation of alternative wastewater treatment plant options for pulp and paper industry,” Sci. Total Environ. 408(24), 6070-6078. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.08.045

Huang, H., Chen, Y., Zheng, X., Su, Y., Wan, R., and Yang, S. (2016). “Distribution of tetracycline resistance genes in anaerobic treatment of waste sludge: The role of pH in regulating tetracycline resistant bacteria and horizontal gene transfer,” Bioresour. Technol. 218, 1284-1289. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.07.097

Kamali, M., Gameiro, T., Costa, M. E. V., and Capela, L. (2016). “Anaerobic digestion of pulp and paper mill wastes – An overview of the developments and improvement opportunities,” Chem. Eng. J. 298, 162-182. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.03.119

Karikallio, H., Mäki-Fränti, P., and Suhonen, N. (2011). “Competition in the global pulp and paper industries – An evaluation based on three approaches,” J. Forest Econ. 17(1), 91-104. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfe.2010.09.004

Kikot, P., Viera, M., Mignone, C., and Donati, E. (2010). “Study of the effect of pH and dissolved heavy metals on the growth of sulfate-reducing bacteria by a fractional factorial design,” Hydrometallurgy 104(3-4), 494-500. DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2010.02.026

Kunacheva, C., Soh, Y. N. A., and Stuckey, D. C. (2017). “Effect of feed pH on reactor performance and production of soluble microbial products (SMPs) in a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor,” Chem. Eng. J. 320, 135-143. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.03.018

Latorre, A., Malmqvist, A., Lacorte, S., Welander, T., and Barceló, D. (2007). “Evaluation of the treatment efficiencies of paper mill whitewaters in terms of organic composition and toxicity,” Environ. Pollut. 147(3), 648-655. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2006.09.015

Law, Y., Lant, P., and Yuan, Z. (2011). “The effect of pH on N2O production under aerobic conditions in a partial nitritation system,” Water Res. 45(18), 5934-5944. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.08.055

Liang, Z., Liu, Y., Ge, F., Xu, Y., Tao, N., Peng, F., and Wong, M. (2013). “Efficiency assessment and pH effect in removing nitrogen and phosphorus by algae-bacteria combined system of Chlorella vulgaris and Bacillus licheniformis,” Chemosphere 92(10), 1383-1389. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.05.014

Li, S. X., Li, M. F., Yu, P., Fan, Y. M., Shou, J. N., and Sun, R. C. (2017). “Valorization of bamboo by γ-valerolactone/acid/water to produce digestible cellulose, degraded sugars and lignin,” Bioresour. Technol. 230, 90-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.01.041

Mänttäri, M., Kallioinen, M., and Nyström, M. (2015). “Membrane technologies for water treatment and reuse in the pulp and paper industries,” in: Advances in Membrane Technologies for Water Treatment: Materials, Processes and Applications, A. Basile, A. Cassano, and N. K. Rastogi (eds.), Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, UK, pp. 581-603.

Maspolim, Y., Zhou, Y., Guo, C., Xiao, K., and Ng, W. J. (2015). “The effect of pH on solubilization of organic matter and microbial community structures in sludge fermentation,” Bioresour. Technol. 190, 289-298. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.04.087

Pokhrel, D., and Viraraghavan, T. (2004). “Treatment of pulp and paper mill wastewater-A review,” Sci. Total Environ. 333(1-3), 37-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.05.017

Shi, K., Zhou, W., Zhao, H., and Zhang, Y. (2012). “Performance of halophilic marine bacteria inocula on nutrient removal from hypersaline wastewater in an intermittently aerated biological filter,” Bioresour. Technol. 113(4), 280-287. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.01.117

Sun, H., Zhao, H., Bai, B., Chen, Y., Yang, Q., and Peng, Y. (2015). “Advanced removal of organic and nitrogen from ammonium-rich landfill leachate using an anaerobic-aerobic system,” Chinese J. Chem. Eng. 23(6), 1047-1051. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjche.2014.03.007

Toczyłowska-Mamińska, R. (2017). “Limits and perspectives of pulp and paper industry wastewater treatment – A review,” Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 78, 764-772. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.021

Yuan, H., Chen, Y., Dai, X., and Zhu, N. (2016). “Kinetics and microbial community analysis of sludge anaerobic digestion based on micro-direct current treatment under different initial pH values,” Energy 116(Part 1), 677-686. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.10.004

Article submitted: May 12, 2018; Peer review completed: June 28, 2018; Revised version received: July 16, 2018; Accepted: July 17, 2018; Published: July 20, 2018.

DOI: 10.15376/biores.13.3.6757-6765