NC State
BioResources
Park, C.-Y., Choi, C. -H., Lee, J.-H., Kim, S., Park, K.-W., and Cho, J. H. (2013). "Evaluation of formaldehyde emissions and combustion behaviors of wood-based composites subjected to different surface finishing methods," BioRes. 8(4), 5515-5523.

Abstract

To use wood-based panels as a final product, they must undergo surface finishing via various processes, such as low pressure laminate (LPL), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), coating paper (CP), direct coating (DC), or veneer overlay/UV coating (VO-UVC). Tests were conducted to look for any reduction of formaldehyde emissions and in combustion behaviors with the use of five different surface finishing methods. To determine formaldehyde emissions, the desiccator method was used according to the Korean Standard KS M 1998. The combustion behaviors of wood-based panels were investigated using a cone calorimeter. The formaldehyde emissions of VO-UVC were lower than those of the other methods. In the burning tests, the heat release rate (HRR) with DC was higher than that with the other methods. The mass loss rate (MLR) when the product with DC was burned was higher than that for the other finishing materials.


Download PDF

Full Article

Evaluation of Formaldehyde Emissions and Combustion Behaviors of Wood-Based Composites Subjected to Different Surface Finishing Methods

Chang-Young Park,a Chang-Ho Choi,a Jeong-Hun Lee,b Sumin Kim,b,* Kyung-Won Park,c and Jeong Ho Cho d

To use wood-based panels as a final product, they must undergo surface finishing via various processes, such as low pressure laminate (LPL), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), coating paper (CP), direct coating (DC), or veneer overlay/UV coating (VO-UVC). Tests were conducted to look for any reduction of formaldehyde emissions and in combustion behaviors with the use of five different surface finishing methods. To determine formaldehyde emissions, the desiccator method was used according to the Korean Standard KS M 1998. The combustion behaviors of wood-based panels were investigated using a cone calorimeter. The formaldehyde emissions of VO-UVC were lower than those of the other methods. In the burning tests, the heat release rate (HRR) with DC was higher than that with the other methods. The mass loss rate (MLR) when the product with DC was burned was higher than that for the other finishing materials.

Keywords: Surface finishing method; Wood composite material; Burning behavior; Cone calorimeter; Formaldehyde; Desiccator

Contact information: a: Department of Architecture Engineering, Kwangwoon University, Seoul 139-701, Korea; b: School of Architecture, Soongsil University, Seoul 156-743, Korea; c: Department of Chemical Engineering, Soongsil University, Seoul 156-743, Korea; d: SKKU Advanced Institute of Nanotechnology (SAINT) and Center for Human Interface Nano Technology (HINT), School of Chemical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 440-746, Korea; *Corresponding author: skim@ssu.ac.kr

INTRODUCTION

People spend almost 90% of their time indoors, which presents a higher risk from the inhalation of pollutants than outdoor time does. In recent years many people have been complaining of symptoms of illness such as headaches, irritation of the nose, nausea, skin disorders, and fatigue after spending some time in new buildings or newly renovated housing in recent years (Menzies and Bourbeau 1997; Jang et al. 2004; Jo and Sohn 2009). Sick building syndrome (SBS) is a serious problem, with poor air quality caused by indoor contaminants in the home and the workplace (Menzies and Bourbeau 1997; Hodgson 2002; Kim and Kim 2006). SBS symptoms that are experienced by a building’s occupants may be caused by volatile organic compounds and formaldehyde (Franck 1986; Kjærgaard et al. 1990; Andersson et al. 1997; Choi et al. 2009), which are known to be emitted from building materials and furnishings (Zhang and Xu 2003; James and Yang 2005).

Wood-based panels are widely used in the manufacture of furniture, flooring, housing, and in other industrial products. These consumer products contain formalde-hyde-based resin that emits formaldehyde, which is toxic and is associated with possible health hazards, such as irritation of the eyes and upper respiratory tract. This problem can be an obstacle to the acceptance of these wood-based panels by the public, given the prevailing climate of environmental awareness and concern. As a result, the European and Northern American governments have imposed regulations limiting the emission of formaldehyde from building materials and from materials used in the manufacture of furniture and fittings (Kawouras et al. 1998; Kim et al. 2010; Yu and Kim 2012).

Before they can be used as furnishing materials, wood-based panels have to be treated to match the specific requirements of their final use. Therefore, finishing-treatment methods that produce an overlay or coating, such as paints, prints, varnishes, veneers, laminates, impregnated papers, and finishing foils, are used to reduce the absorption of water and humidity and to resist release of harmful gases (Vansteenkiste 1981). Interior fittings and furniture manufacturers commonly use surfacing materials for decorating fiberboard. These materials are manufactured as uniform, flat panels that provide excellent surfaces for the application of coating materials (Nemli and Çolakoǧlu 2005; Kim and Kim 2006). These surface materials, such as decorative vinyl film and melamine-impregnated paper, can lower the formaldehyde emission concentration from wood-based panels (Grigoriou 1987; Kim 2010; An et al. 2011).

One of the main limitations for the use of wood-based panels is its flammability. The lowered flammability of wood-based panels enables them to be used in high-performance applications. Therefore, restrictions have increasingly been placed on the burning of wood materials. The chemical treatment of wood with flame retardants (FR) is the most common way to improve its fire performance (Grexa et al. 2003). The combustion behaviors of wood-based panels are evaluated using a cone calorimeter. The cone calorimeter is a newly developed instrument for measuring the heat release and smoke emission behavior from a burning surface and analyzing the combustion products when a constant flow of air is provided to a confined space (Bin 2003; Yimin et al. 2005).

In this study, formaldehyde emissions were evaluated while seeking a low-emission method among the various possible surface finishing methods. In addition, the cone calorimeter test was conducted to examine the fire resistance performance of various surface finishing methods.

EXPERIMENTAL

Materials

Medium density fiberboard (MDF) and particleboard (PB) panels, which are commonly used as furniture materials in residential buildings in Korea, were chosen for this study. The panels were purchased at a panel retailer. The panel samples were 18 mm thick and were cut to proper size for each experiment. The detailed specifications of the samples are shown in Table 1, and the values are the averages.

To determine the variations in formaldehyde emissions and combustion behaviors depending on the surface finishing method, we investigated low pressure laminates (LPL), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), coating paper (CP), direct coating (DC), and veneer overlay & UV coating (VO-UVC) for wood-based panels. These five are representative of the methods usually used for furnishing materials in Korea. The characteristics of the various surface finishing methods are described in Table 2.

Table 1. Detailed Specifications of the Samples

Table 2. Characteristics of Various Surface Finishing Methods

Formaldehyde Emissions Measured by Desiccator Methods

Formaldehyde emissions from the MDF and PB were determined using a desiccator method according to the Korean standard KS M 1998. The desiccator test was used to determine the quantity of formaldehyde emitted from the building boards and was carried out using a 10-L glass desiccator. The quantity of formaldehyde emitted was determined from the concentration of formaldehyde absorbed in the distilled or deionized water when the test pieces of the specified surface area were placed in a desiccator filled with a specified amount of distilled or deionized water after 24 h had elapsed. The sample surface areas were 1800 mm2, as specified by the Korean standard KS M 1998. Throughout the 24 h, the temperature of the dry oven containing the desiccators was set to 20 °C.

The formaldehyde concentrations were evaluated as the average values of two set of specimens. The differences of each result should not be more than 20% of the average values of two set of specimens. Otherwise, the test should be repeated again from the beginning. In the formaldehyde emission tests, the reference boards with three types of grade were tested. Various wood-based panels were selected by different emission rates, and various surface finishing methods were applied. The results were analyzed compared to reference board. The grades according to the results of desiccator method are as follows: E0 grade (< 0.5 mg/L), E1 grade (0.5 to 1.5mg/L), and E2 grade (> 1.5 mg/L).

Cone Calorimeter

The cone calorimeter is recognized worldwide as one of the most acceptable devices for fire testing. To confirm the combustion behavior of the panels, specimens of dimensions 100 mm × 100 mm × 18 mm thickness were fabricated. The experimental results were calculated based on the average of the results of three experiments for each test.

All the experiments were conducted by placing the specimens in the same holder in a horizontal position under the cone heater with 50 kWm−2 of heat flux. In the cone calorimeter test, the heat release rate (HRR), total heat rate (THR), mass loss rate (MLR), ignition time, and flame-out time were investigated. The cone calorimeter test was conducted according to the ISO-5660-1 standard. Figure 1 shows the appearances of the specimens and the cone calorimeter test.