NC State
BioResources
An, Q., Shi, W., He, Y., Hao, W., Ma, K., Chen, X., Yang, J., Yan, X., Bian, L., Li, C., and Han, M. (2021). "Evaluation of the capacity of laccase secretion of four novel isolated white-rot fungal strains in submerged fermentation with lignocellulosic biomass," BioResources, 16(4), 6706-6722.

Abstract

The capacity of novel isolated white-rot fungi secreting laccase was evaluated for various kinds of lignocellulosic biomass in submerged fermentation. The laccase secreted by Neofomitella fumosipora Han 386 and Pleurotus pulmonarius Han 527 was significantly faster than that by Coriolopsis trogii Han 751 and Coriolopsis sanguinaria An 282. Maximum laccase from N. fumosipora Han 386 on the four kinds of lignocellulosic biomass tested appeared on the first day. This phenomenon indicated that N. fumosipora Han 386 secreted laccase rapidly compared with other tested strains in this study and showed the superiority in the rate of secreting laccase. Based on the maximum laccase activity, the ability of secreting laccase of C. sanguinaria An 282 was superior to other tested novel isolated strains. On the whole, N. fumosipora Han 386 and P. pulmonarius Han 527 preferred Toona sinensis to produce laccase, C. trogii Han 751 preferred to produce laccase on Populus beijingensis, and C. sanguinaria An 282 grown on Sorghum straw was more suitable for secreting laccase. The results will be helpful for developing bioprocesses using various kinds of lignocellulosic biomass for lignocellulolytic enzyme production and enlarging the number of laccase producing strains for industrial application.


Download PDF

Full Article

Evaluation of the Capacity of Laccase Secretion of Four Novel Isolated White-rot Fungal Strains in Submerged Fermentation with Lignocellulosic Biomass

Qi An,a,b Wen-Yi Shi,a Yi-Xuan He,a Wen-Yao Hao,a Kai-Yue Ma,a Xi Chen,a Xun-You Yan,a,b Lu-Sen Bian,d Cong-Sheng Li,a,* and Mei-Ling Han a,b,c,*

The capacity of novel isolated white-rot fungi secreting laccase was evaluated for various kinds of lignocellulosic biomass in submerged fermentation. The laccase secreted by Neofomitella fumosipora Han 386 and Pleurotus pulmonarius Han 527 was significantly faster than that by Coriolopsis trogii Han 751 and Coriolopsis sanguinaria An 282. Maximum laccase from N. fumosipora Han 386 on the four kinds of lignocellulosic biomass tested appeared on the first day. This phenomenon indicated that N. fumosipora Han 386 secreted laccase rapidly compared with other tested strains in this study and showed the superiority in the rate of secreting laccase. Based on the maximum laccase activity, the ability of secreting laccase of C. sanguinaria An 282 was superior to other tested novel isolated strains. On the whole, N. fumosipora Han 386 and P. pulmonarius Han 527 preferred Toona sinensis to produce laccase, C. trogii Han 751 preferred to produce laccase on Populus beijingensis, and C. sanguinaria An 282 grown on Sorghum straw was more suitable for secreting laccase. The results will be helpful for developing bioprocesses using various kinds of lignocellulosic biomass for lignocellulolytic enzyme production and enlarging the number of laccase producing strains for industrial application.

Keywords: Capacity of laccase secretion; Novel isolated strains; White-rot fungi; Lignocellulosic biomass; Submerged fermentation

Contact information: a: College of Life Science, Langfang Normal University, Langfang 065000, Hebei, China; b: Technical Innovation Center for Utilization of Edible and Medicinal Fungi in Hebei Province, Langfang 065000, Hebei, China; c: Edible and Medicinal Fungi Research and Development Center of Universities/Colleges in Hebei Province, Langfang 065000, Hebei, China; d: Experimental Centre of Forestry in North China, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 102300, China;

* Corresponding author: licongsheng_110@163.com; meilinghan309@163.com

INTRODUCTION

Enzymes enable a process of biological catalysis that has a rapid rate of conversion in biochemical reactions. Therefore, enzymes usually play an important role in various aspects of biotechnology and industry. Using enzymes has many advantages compared with the pure chemical method, i.e., rapid and high catalytic efficiency, user-friendly control, high substrate specificity, extensive substrate range, energy saving, mild reaction process, and no toxicity (Senthivelan et al. 2016). Generally, enzymes are protein in nature, and they have the ability to degrade multiple types of complex substances into other intermediate metabolites. Therefore, enzymes are beneficial catalysts for green and ecological industrial applications, which can effectively achieve cleaner production. In recent years, basidiomycetes have been extensively studied by researchers to isolate new organisms that can secrete lignocellulosic decomposing enzymes with superior properties for industrial application (Senthivelan et al. 2016; An et al. 2018, 2020a,b; Han et al. 2020b). The major enzymes related to lignin degradation ability of white-rot fungi are lignin peroxidase, manganese peroxidase, versatile peroxidase, and laccase. Laccases (EC 1.10.3.2, p-diphenol: dioxygen oxido-reductases), an interesting oxidase among various enzymes, are biologically important enzymes that belong to the group of copper oxidases and are useful as green enzymes for cleaner industrial application to reduce the environmental pollution (Ba and Kumar 2017; Agrawal et al. 2018; Bilal et al. 2019). Laccase can oxidize a variety of substrates, containing aromatic and non-aromatic compounds, by degrading them into smaller components that help to reduce molecular oxygen to water (Yang et al. 2015; Zerva et al. 2019). Because laccase has numerous applications in various fields, such as biosensors, improving fiber properties, DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) labeling, immunochemical assay, fuels, biodegradation of wastes, synthesis of organic molecules, pulp bleaching in the paper industry, baking industry, stabilization of wine, and nanobiotechnology, it has attracted attention from researchers worldwide for further intensive studies (Arora and Sharma 2010; Strong and Claus 2011; Senthivelan et al. 2016; Mate and Alcalde 2017; Agrawal et al. 2018; Su et al. 2018; Becker and Wittmann 2019; Singh and Arya 2019; Unuofin et al. 2019a; Zerva et al. 2019).

Usually, laccase activity secreted by fungi could be affected by many factors, e.g., carbon/nitrogen source, metal ion, and species (Metreveli et al. 2017; Filipe et al. 2019; Rajavat et al. 2020). Because the efficient biotechnological applications require large amounts of low-cost enzymes, the appropriate approaches for this purpose are to develop new strains with high production of laccase and utilize the potential of lignocellulosic biomass (Rodrigues et al. 2019; An et al. 2020a). Meanwhile, the selection of suitable lignocellulosic biomass for fungal growth and the synthesis of specified enzymes is an important link in the development of biotechnology.

Lignocellulosic biomass is the most abundant renewable carbon source on earth, and it has attracted considerable interest for the production of second-generation biofuels and value-added chemicals (Guerriero et al. 2016; Haldar et al. 2016; Kumar et al. 2016). Agricultural and forestry residues, industrial and municipal wastes, and energy crops, usually considered as lignocellulosic materials, have great potential to help reduce the production cost of biofuels and value-added chemicals (Agrawal et al. 2018; Sharma et al. 2019). Producing enzymes with lignocellulosic biomass is an effective, environmentally friendly, attractive, and economical method (Medouni-Haroune et al. 2017). Various types of agricultural and forestry residues, such as corn stover, corncob, cottonseed hull, leaves, sawdust, straw, and sugar cane bagasse, are widely used in research of laccase. It is valuable to find more low-cost lignocellulosic biomass for the production of laccase by fungi. The main methods used for fermentation with various kinds of lignocellulosic biomass are conventional solid-state fermentation (SSF), conventional submerged fermentation (SmF), and solid pre-fermentation followed by submerged fermentation (An et al. 2016b). The advantage of submerged fermentation is that it is easy to manipulate and expand the scale of production. In addition, the research on laccase production by white-rot fungi has focused on several genera, such as Ganoderma, Trametes, Pleurotus, Lentinus, Flammulina, and Lentinula (An et al. 2016a,b; Guo et al. 2017; Gupta and Jana 2018; Sadeghian-Abadi et al. 2019; Han et al. 2020b; Xu et al. 2020). Finding more new strains with the ability of secreting laccase is necessary.

The goal of the present study was to evaluate the capacity of four novel isolated white-rot fungi secreting laccase on various kinds of lignocellulosic biomass in submerged fermentation. Among the four white-rot fungi, Han 386 and Han 751 showed discoloration on guaiacol selective medium and the ratio of colony diameters (d1) to photochramic laps (d2) is less than 1 (d1/d2 < 1) (data not shown). The other fungi, Han 527 and An 282, were of the genera Pleurotus and Coriolopsis, which are considered as excellent laccase producers (Agrawal and Shahi 2017). Hence, the results from this study will be helpful for developing bioprocesses using various kinds of lignocellulosic biomass for lignocellulolytic enzyme production and enlarging the number of laccase producing strains for industrial application. At the same, the selection of suitable lignocellulosic biomass for novel isolated species secreting laccase has also been investigated.

EXPERIMENTAL

Materials

Fungus strain

Four newly isolated fungal strains, Han 386, Han 527, Han 751, and An 282, were used to compare the capacity of laccase secretion in this study. Han 386 was isolated from Tianluhu Forest Park, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, China. Han 527 was isolated from Tuoliang National Nature Reserve, Shijiazhuang City, Hebei Province, China. Han 751 was isolated from Maojingba National Nature Reserve, Chengde City, Hebei Province, China. An 282 was isolated from Daweishan Nature Reserve, Pingbian County, Honghe Prefecture, Yunnan Province, China. These strains were isolated on malt extract agar (MEA) medium (g/L, glucose 10, malt extract 20, KH2PO4 3, and agar 20) and purified on complete yeast medium (CYM) (g/L, glucose 20, peptone 2, yeast extract 2, MgSO4·7H2O 0.5, K2HPO4·3H2O 1, KH2PO4 0.46, and agar 15). They were maintained by subculturing them on CYM by incubating the cultures at 26 °C for 7 days. Then, these strains were kept at 4 °C in the College of Life Science, Langfang Normal University, Langfang City, Hebei Province, China. These strains were used in this study due to their ability to grow on wood in nature.

Lignocellulosic biomass collection and treatment

Populus beijingensis and Toona sinensis were obtained from Langfang City (Hebei Province, China), while Salix babylonica and Sorghum straw were obtained from Chengde City (Hebei Province, China). All lignocellulosic biomass were milled. The particle passed through the 20-mesh screen and were retained on the 60-mesh screen, then air-dried.

Methods

Identification of the fungus

Mycelia of Han 386, Han 527, Han 751, and An 282 for DNA extraction were grown on CYM. After 7 days, mycelium was scraped using a clean surgical blade from the surface of the Petri plates cultivated microorganisms. The cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) rapid plant genome extraction kit-DN14 (Aidlab Biotechnologies Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) was used for extracting genomic DNA, and the extraction process was followed the instruction with some modifications (Han et al. 2016, 2020a). Internally transcribing spacer (ITS) regions of ribosomal DNA (rDNA) from Han 386, Han 527, and Han 751 were amplified in this study with primer pairs ITS5 and ITS4 (Han et al. 2016), while the primers used for amplifying the ITS of An 282 were ITS1 and ITS4.

The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) schedule was carried according to Han et al. (2020a,b). Then, the PCR products were purified and sequenced by Beijing Genomics Institute (Beijing, China). Finally, the ITS sequences of above four strains were deposited to GenBank. Phylogenetic analysis followed Han et al. (2016). PAUP* version 4.0b10 (Swofford 2002) was used to perform maximum parsimony analysis. Trees were inferred using the heuristic search option with TBR branch swapping and 1000 random sequence additions. Clade robustness was assessed using a bootstrap (BT) analysis with 1000 replicates (Felsenstein 1985).

Inoculum preparation

All tested white-rot fungi were incubated at 26 °C on CYM agar medium. After 8 days, inoculants with a diameter of 5 mm were made using a hole punch. Then, 5 inoculants were added into 250-mL flasks containing 100 mL of CYM without agar and cultured on a rotary shaker with a speed of 150 rpm at 26 °C. After 7 days, cultures were gently homogenized (2 min, 5000 rpm) with a laboratory blender under sterile conditions. These homogenized suspensions were used as an inoculum.

Submerged fermentation

Erlenmeyer flasks (250 mL) containing 1 g Populus beijingensis were soaked with 100 mL of solution (g/L, MgSO4·7H2O 0.5, K2HPO4·3H2O 1, KH2PO4 0.46) and autoclaved at 121 °C for 30 min. After autoclaving, the Erlenmeyer flasks were inoculated with 3 mL of the inoculum mentioned above and incubated at 26 °C under rotary conditions with a speed of 150 rpm for various time periods.

Sampling of crude enzyme

For obtaining the crude enzyme liquid, fermentation liquor in each inoculated flask at different growth times was filtered using Whatman No. 1 filter paper to remove the mycelia and lignocellulosic biomass, then centrifuged at 4 °C and 12000 rpm for 20 min. The supernatant was used for the laccase assay.

Determination of enzyme activity

Laccase activity was determined with an iMarkTM Microplate Absorbance Reader (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) by monitoring the increase in absorbance at 415 nm according to the methods of An et al. (2020b). One unit of laccase activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to oxidize 1 µmol of 2,2’-azinobis-[3-ethyltiazoline-6-sulfonate] (ABTS) per min at pH 4.2.

Data analysis

Results were the mean values and standard deviations of three independent experiments. Two-way analysis was applied to determine the significant differences and a p-value less than the level of 0.05 indicated that the results were statistically significant. The analysis of statistical tests used the software SPSS 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The software Origin 2016 (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA) was used for generating the colorful figures.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Identification of Novel Isolated Strains

Four novel isolated white-rot fungi strains used to produce laccase were classified and identified based on their nucleotide sequences. The ITS sequence number submitted to GenBank of Han 386, Han 527, Han 751, and An 282 strains was MW547890, MW547891, MW547892, and MW547893, respectively. According to the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1) inferred from ITS sequences, tested strains Han 386, Han 527, Han 751, and An 282 belonged to 3 genera and 4 species, and identified as Neofomitella fumosipora (Corner) Y.C. Dai, Hai J. Li & Vlasák, Pleurotus pulmonarius (Fr.) Quél., Coriolopsis trogii (Berk.) Domański, and Coriolopsis sanguinaria (Klotzsch) Teng, respectively.

Fig. 1. Maximum parsimony strict consensus tree illustrating the phylogeny of four novel isolated white-rot fungal strains based on ITS sequences. Branches are labeled with parsimony bootstrap proportions ≥ 50%.

Results of Statistical Analysis

As shown in Table 1, species and lignocellulosic biomass significantly affected the laccase production throughout the fermentation phase (P < 0.001). Meanwhile, the effect of species with lignocellulosic biomass interactions on laccase production was also significant (P < 0.001).

Evaluation the Capacity of Laccase Secretion of Four Novel Isolated Fungal Strains

Laccase activity could be affected by many factors, including pH, metal ions, organic and inorganic compounds, temperature, fermentation method, and co-culture (Songulashvili et al. 2011; Sun et al. 2012; Kuhar and Papinutti 2014; Qin et al. 2019; Sharma et al. 2019; Lira-Perez et al. 2020; Han et al. 2021). Meanwhile, different species or strains belonging to the same species significantly affected laccase activity (Elisashvili et al. 2008; Janusz et al. 2015; An et al. 2016a; Han et al. 2017, 2018; Ikubar et al. 2018; An et al. 2020a, 2020b; Han et al. 2020b). There are many kinds of wild white-rot fungi in nature, and most of them grow on tree stumps of rotting or fallen trees, which causes the white decay of the trees. In the process of growth, white-rot fungi can secrete extracellular enzymes to degrade macromolecules and complex lignocellulose into small molecules for their own growth and reproduction (An et al. 2016b; Pinar et al. 2017; Filipe et al. 2019; Leite et al. 2019; Rajavat et al. 2020). Therefore, it is necessary to collect, isolate, and purify new laccase producing strains in their natural habitat. However, the study on laccase of the novel isolated white-rot fungal strains used in this article had hardly been reported previously. Therefore, it is important to evaluate the laccase secretion capacity of these strains, not only to develop new laccase producing strains, but also to lay a foundation for the production of high-quality laccase.

Table 1. Two-way ANOVA to Examine the Effects of Species, Lignocellulosic Biomass, and Species × Lignocellulosic Biomass Interactions on Laccase Activity

Generally speaking, the ability of secreting laccase from four novel isolated strains Neofomitella fumosipora Han 386, Pleurotus pulmonarius Han 527, Coriolopsis trogii Han 751, and Coriolopsis sanguinaria An 282 on different lignocellulosic biomass was different (Figs. 2 through 5). Moreover, the trend of laccase activity of N. fumosipora Han 386 and P. pulmonarius Han 527 was similar, and the trend of laccase activity of C. trogii Han 751 and C. sanguinaria An 282 was similar. Laccase activity of N. fumosipora Han 386 on Sorghum straw, Populus beijingensis, Toona sinensis, and Salix babylonica was 68.72 ± 0.30 U/L, 73.34 ± 0.63 U/L, 115.43 ± 1.59 U/L, and 48.42 ± 0.92 U/L on the 1st day, respectively (Fig. 2). Laccase activity of P. pulmonarius Han 527 on Sorghum straw, Populus beijingensis, Toona sinensis, and Salix babylonica was 14.57 ± 1.40 U/L, 21.00 ± 1.06 U/L, 53.35 ± 2.35 U/L, and 18.28 ± 1.71 U/L on the 1st day (Fig. 3).

Fig. 2. Laccase activity from Neofomitella fumosipora Han 386 grown on Populus beijingensis, Toona sinensis, Salix babylonica, and Sorghum straw in submerged fermentation. Average values were taken through three individual parallel measurements.

Fig. 3. Laccase activity from Pleurotus pulmonarius Han 527 grown on Populus beijingensis, Toona sinensis, Salix babylonica, and Sorghum straw in submerged fermentation. Average values were taken through three individual parallel measurements.

Fig. 4. Laccase activity from Coriolopsis trogii Han 751 grown on Populus beijingensis, Toona sinensis, Salix babylonica, and Sorghum straw in submerged fermentation. Average values were taken through three individual parallel measurements.

Fig. 5. Laccase activity from Coriolopsis sanguinaria An 282 grown on Populus beijingensis, Toona sinensis, Salix babylonica, and Sorghum straw in submerged fermentation. Average values were taken through three individual parallel measurements.

Laccase activity of C. trogii Han 751 on Sorghum straw, Populus beijingensis, Toona sinensis, and Salix babylonica was 0.90 ± 0.00 U/L, 3.11 ± 0.17 U/L, 11.35 ± 0.92 U/L, and 3.62 ± 0.30 U/L on the 1st day, respectively (Fig. 4). Laccase activity of C. sanguinaria An 282 on Sorghum straw, Populus beijingensis, Toona sinensis, and Salix babylonica was 1.51 ± 0.00 U/L, 8.04 ± 0.17 U/L, 21.80 ± 0.97 U/L, and 3.62 ± 0.30 U/L on the 1st day (Fig. 5). Obviously, the laccase secreted by N. fumosipora Han 386 and P. pulmonarius Han 527 was significantly faster than that by C. trogii Han 751 and C. sanguinaria An 282 (Figs. 2 through 5). Meanwhile, the time of maximum laccase from N. fumosipora Han 386 on four kinds of lignocellulosic biomass tested occurred on the 1st day. To some extent, this phenomenon also indicated that N. fumosipora Han 386 secreted laccase rapidly compared to other tested strains in this study and showed the superiority in the rate of secreting laccase. In other previous studies of laccase from white rot fungi, it was rare to see a case of maximum laccase activity on the 1st day; most occurred after the 4th day via optimized treatment (Elissetche et al. 2007; Elisashvili et al. 2008; Songulashvili et al. 2008; Elisashvili and Kachlishvili 2009; Hilden et al. 2013; Moiseenko et al. 2018; Rodrigues et al. 2019; Sharma et al. 2019; An et al. 2020b; Han et al. 2020b). Based on this, the N. fumosipora Han 386 strain secreted laccase rapidly and showed great application prospects in various fields. Furthermore, the ability of N. fumosipora to secrete laccase was the not reported until now. Maximum laccase activity from P. pulmonarius Han 527 on Sorghum straw, Populus beijingensis, and Toona sinensis appeared on the 2nd day, while, on Salix babylonica it appeared on the third day (Fig. 3). Obviously, P. pulmonarius Han 527 also secreted laccase more rapidly than C. trogii Han 751 and C. sanguinaria An 282 strain (Figs. 3 through 5). A previous study indicated that maximum laccase activity of P. ostreatus CY 568 and CCEF 99 on poplar sawdust appeared on the 5th day and the 9th day (Han et al. 2020b). The time of maximum laccase activity from CCEF 89, CY 568, CCMSSC 00322, and CCMSSC 00406 on cottonseed hull was on the 6th day, 7th day, 6th day, and 7th day, respectively (An et al. 2020b). Thus, P. pulmonarius Han 527 could reach the peak of laccase activity in a short time compared to the P. ostreatus strains. Maximum laccase activity of another two strains, C. trogii Han 751 and C. sanguinaria An 282, belonging to the same genus of Coriolopsis, appeared after the 6th day (Figs. 4 and 5). The average 7-day activity of laccase from Trichoderma asperellum MR1, T. virens UKM1, T. viride MMS3, Aspergillus niger EFB1, A. awamori MMS4, and A. fumigatus SK1 on oil palm frond petiole was 3.08 ± 0.75 IU/g, 8.30 ± 0.92 IU/g, 2.30 ± 0.66 IU/g, 0.97 ± 0.90 IU/g, 1.03 ± 0.92 IU/g, and 3.13 ± 0.68 IU/g, respectively (Ikubar et al. 2018). Therefore, different strains belonging to the same species have various abilities of secreting laccase. The highest laccase from novel isolated strain Pseudolagarobasidium sp. PP17-33 was 5.841 U/g observed from oil palm wastes on solid-state fermentation (Thamvithayakorn et al. 2019). The maximum laccase activity from novel isolated white-rot fungi N. fumosipora Han 386, P. pulmonarius Han 527, C. trogii Han 751, and C. sanguinaria An 282 was 115.43 ± 1.59 U/L, 54.05 ± 0.76 U/L, 134.72 ± 3.55 U/L, and 208.36 ± 1.49 U/L (Table 2). Thus, the results were good for a certain strain based on the laccase activity of the tested novel strains under simple conditions.

When sorghum straw was used as the growth lignocellulosic biomass, the maximum laccase activity of C. sanguinaria An 282 was 208.36 ± 1.49 U/L, which was nearly 3.03-fold, 4.08-fold, and 3.76-fold more than that of N. fumosipora Han 386, P. pulmonarius Han 527, and C. trogii Han 751. Maximum laccase activity from C. trogii Han 751 grown on Populus beijingensis was 134.72 ± 3.55 U/L, which was higher than that from N. fumosipora Han 386, P. pulmonarius Han 527, and C. sanguinaria An 282, by nearly 1.84-fold, 3.09-fold, and 2.27-fold, respectively. When Toona sinensis was used as the growth lignocellulosic biomass, maximum laccase activity of N. fumosipora Han 386 was 115.43 ± 1.59 U/L, nearly 2.14-fold, 1.60-fold, and 2.79-fold more than that of P. pulmonarius Han 527, C. trogii Han 751, and C. sanguinaria An 282. Maximum laccase activity from C. sanguinaria An 282 with Salix babylonica as the growth lignocellulosic biomass was 98.65 ± 8.80 U/L, which was higher than that of N. fumosipora Han 386, P. pulmonarius Han 527, and C. trogii Han 751, by nearly 2.04-fold, 1.90-fold, and 1.22-fold, respectively. This phenomenon indicated that each white-rot fungus was different in the degree of adaptation to the lignocellulosic biomass. Certainly, similar phenomenon was confirmed by previous studies (Metreveli et al. 2017; Huang et al. 2019).

Overall, four novel isolated strains showed their unique capacity of secreting laccase. Among them, N. fumosipora Han 386 and P. pulmonarius Han 527 could reach their peak of laccase activity in shortened time. While, based on the maximum laccase activity, the ability of secreting laccase of C. sanguinaria An 282 was superior to the other tested strains. Every white-rot fungus was different in the degree of adaptation to the lignocellulosic biomass.

Table 2. Maximum Laccase Production, Lignocellulosic Biomass, and Time of Four Tested Fungi

Evaluation of the Effect of Lignocellulosic Biomass on Laccase Activity

Agroindustrial residues provide substantial, economic, and renewable natural biological resources for large-scale, profitable biofuel production and types of chemical products including industrial biocatalysts (Birhanli and Yesilada 2013; Ikubar et al. 2018; Unuofin et al. 2019b; Agrawal and Verma 2020). Due to these advantages, more studies have focused on the effects of various lignocellulosic materials on laccase secretion of fungi or bacteria, especially white-rot fungi, in recent years (Simonic et al. 2010; Singh et al. 2010; Srinivasan et al. 2019; Thamvithayakorn et al. 2019; Unuofin et al. 2019b; Atilano-Camino et al. 2020; Shanmugam et al. 2020). Thus, sorghum straw, Populus beijingensis, Toona sinensis, and Salix babylonica were used to grow white-rot fungi producing laccase.

Maximum laccase activity of Neofomitella fumosipora Han 386 on sorghum straw, Populus beijingensis, Toona sinensis, and Salix babylonica was 68.72 ± 0.30 U/L, 73.34 ± 0.63 U/L, 115.43 ± 1.59 U/L, and 48.42 ± 0.92 U/L, respectively, and the time that the maximum was observed was on the 1st day (Fig. 2). Therefore, the maximum laccase activity on Toona sinensis was higher than that on sorghum straw, Populus beijingensis, and Salix babylonica, by nearly 1.68-fold, 1.57-fold, and 2.38-fold. The trend of laccase activity from N. fumosipora Han 386 on these lignocellulosic biomasses was similar and maintained low levels after the 3rd day (Fig. 2). In brief, four types of lignocellulosic biomass could promote the rapid secretion of laccase by N. fumosipora Han 386, especially the lignocellulosic biomass of Toona sinensis. Similar to N. fumosipora Han 386, Pleurotus pulmonarius Han 527 could rapidly secrete laccase at the beginning of the whole fermentation stage (Fig. 3). Maximum laccase activity of P. pulmonarius Han 527 on Toona sinensis was 54.05 ± 0.76 U/L, which was nearly 1.06-fold, 1.24-fold, and 1.04-fold higher than that on sorghum straw, Populus beijingensis, and Salix babylonica (Table 2). The maximum laccase activity on Toona sinensis, sorghum straw, Populus beijingensis, and Salix babylonica appeared on the 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, and 3rd day, respectively. Thus, these tested lignocellulosic biomasses were helpful to accelerate the production of laccase by P. pulmonarius Han 527, especially Toona sinensis. Different from N. fumosipora Han 386 and P. pulmonarius Han 527, the enzyme production of Coriolopsis trogii Han 751 mainly concentrated in the middle and late period, after approximately 5 days (Fig. 4). Maximum laccase activity of C. trogii Han 751 on Sorghum straw, Populus beijingensis, Toona sinensis, and Salix babylonica was 55.35 ± 0.76 U/L (on the 8th day), 134.72 ± 3.55 U/L (on the 10th day), 72.03 ± 3.06 U/L (on the 10th day), and 80.97 ± 2.53 U/L (on the 8th day), respectively. Thus, C. trogii Han 751 preferred to produce laccase on Populus beijingensis compared with the other three tested lignocellulosic biomass. The enzyme production trend of Coriolopsis sanguinaria An 282 was similar on the four kinds of lignocellulosic biomass (Fig. 5). Maximum laccase activity of C. sanguinaria An 282 on sorghum straw was 208.36 ± 1.49 U/L, which was higher than that on Populus beijingensis, Toona sinensis, and Salix babylonica by nearly 3.52-fold, 5.03-fold, and 2.11-fold, respectively (Table 2). It can be seen that C. sanguinaria An 282 preferred to produce laccase by fermentation on sorghum straw compared with Populus beijingensis, Toona sinensis, and Salix babylonica. Elisashvili et al. (2008) reported that laccase activity of P. tuber-regium IBB 624 and Lentinus edodes IBB 123 grown on tree leaves was higher than that on wheat straw. Laccase activity of F. trogii using olive oil mill wastewater as an inducer was higher than cheese factory wastewater used as an inducer (Boran and Yesilada 2011). Compared with growing on powdered wheat straw, a powdered walnut shell was more suitable for Funalia trogii or Trametes versicolor secreting laccase (Birhanli and Yeşilada 2013). A previous study indicated that P. ostreatus and Flammulina velutipes strains fermented on cottonseed hull produced laccase better than on corncob or poplar wood (An et al. 2020b). Maximum laccase activity of P. ostreatus CCEF 99 grown on poplar sawdust was lower than that on corncob, and maximum laccase activity of P. ostreatus CY 568 grown on poplar sawdust was higher than that on corncob (Han et al. 2020b). All these studies also showed that different fungi preferred different substrates for laccase enzyme production. Meanwhile, these studies also indicate that different contents of lignin could affect laccase activity, but there is no clear linear relationship between lignin content and laccase activity. And, present study showed a similar result.

Overall, N. fumosipora Han 386 and P. pulmonarius Han 527 preferred Toona sinensis to produce laccase, C. trogii Han 751 preferred to produce laccase on Populus beijingensis, and C. sanguinaria An 282 grown on sorghum straw was more suitable for secreting laccase.

CONCLUSIONS

  1. The biosynthetic potential in secreting enzymes of white-rot fungi was highly correlated with different species. The laccase secreted by N. fumosipora Han 386 and P. pulmonarius Han 527 was significantly faster than that by C. trogii Han 751 and C. sanguinaria An 282.
  2. The ability of N. fumosipora to secrete laccase was not reported until now. Maximum laccase from N. fumosipora Han 386 on the tested four kinds of lignocellulosic biomass appeared on the 1st day. To some extent, this phenomenon indicated that N. fumosipora Han 386 secreted laccase rapidly comparing with other tested strains in this study and showed the superiority in the rate of secreting laccase.
  3. Based on the maximum laccase activity, the ability of secreting laccase of C. sanguinaria An 282 was superior to the other tested novel isolated strains.
  4. Different fungi preferred different lignocellulosic biomass for laccase enzyme production. Overall, N. fumosipora Han 386 and P. pulmonarius Han 527 preferred Toona sinensis to produce laccase, C. trogii Han 751 preferred to produce laccase on Populus beijingensis, and C. sanguinaria An 282 grown on sorghum straw was more suitable for secreting laccase.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31900009), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Universities in Hebei Province (JYQ201901), the Top-notch Youth Project of Colleges and Universities in Hebei Province (BJ2019007), Science Technology Research and Guidance Project of Colleges and Universities in Hebei Province (Z2019001), and the Top-notch Youth Project of Langfang City, China.

REFERENCES CITED

Agrawal, K., Chaturvedi, V., and Verma, P. (2018). “Fungal laccase discovered but yet undiscovered,” Bioresour. Bioprocess. 5, article no. 4. DOI: 10.1186/s40643-018-0190-z

Agrawal, K., and Verma, P. (2020). “Production optimization of yellow laccase from Stropharia sp. ITCC 8422 and enzyme-mediated depolymerization and hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass for biorefinery application,” Biomass Convers. Biorefin. Online. DOI: 10.1007/s13399-020-00869-w

Agrawal, N., and Shahi, S. K. (2017). “Degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (pyrene) using novel fungal strain Coriolopsis byrsina strain APC5,” Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 122, 69-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2017.04.024

An, Q., Han, M. L., Wu, X. J., Si, J., Cui, B. K., Dai, Y. C., and Wu, B. (2016a). “Laccase production among medicinal mushrooms from the Genus Flammulina (Agaricomycetes) under different treatments in submerged fermentation,” Int. J. Med. Mushrooms 18(11), 1049-1059. DOI: 10.1615/IntJMedMushrooms.v18.i11.90

An, Q., Han, M. L., Bian, L. S., Han, Z. C., Han, N., Xiao, Y. F., and Zhang, F. B. (2020a). “Enhanced laccase activity of white rot fungi induced by different metal ions under submerged fermentation,” BioResources 15(4), 8369-8383. DOI: 10.15376/biores.15.4.8369-8383

An, Q., Ma, H. F., Han, M. L., Si, J., and Dai, Y. C. (2018). “Effects of different induction media as inducers on laccase activities of Pleurotus ostreatus strains in submerged fermentation,” BioResources 13(1), 1143-1156. DOI: 10.15376/biores.13.1.1143-1156

An, Q., Qiao, J., Bian, L. S., Han, M. L., Yan, X. Y., Liu, Z. Z., and Xie, C. Y. (2020b). “Comparative study on laccase activity of white rot fungi under submerged fermentation with different lignocellulosic wastes,” BioResources 15(4), 9166-9179. DOI: 10.15376/biores.15.4.9166-9179

An, Q., Wu, X. J., Han, M. L., Cui, B. K., He, S. H., Dai, Y. C., and Si, J. (2016b). “Sequential solid-state and submerged cultivation of white rot fungus Pleurotus ostreatus on lignocellulosic biomass for the activity of lignocellulolytic enzymes,” BioResources 11(4), 8791-8805. DOI: 10.15376/biores.11.4.8791-8805

Arora, D. S., and Sharma, R. K. (2010). “Ligninolytic fungal laccases and their biotechnological applications,” Appl. Biochem. Biotech. 160, 1760-1788. DOI: 10.1007/s12010-009-8676-y

Atilano-Camino, M. M., Alvarez-Valencia, L. H., Garcia-Gonzalez, A., and Garcia-Reyes, R. B. (2020). “Improving laccase production from Trametes versicolor using lignocellulosic residues as cosubstrates and evaluation of enzymes for blue wastewater biodegradation,” J. Environ. Manage. 275, Article ID 111231. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111231

Ba, S., and Kumar, V. V. (2017). “Recent developments in the use of tyrosinase and laccase in environmental applications,” Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 37(7), 819-832. DOI: 10.1080/07388551.2016.1261081

Becker, J., and Wittmann, C. (2019). “A field of dreams: Lignin valorization into chemicals, materials, fuels, and health-care products,” Biotechnol. Adv. 37(6), Article ID 107360. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.02.016

Bilal, M., Rasheed, T., Nabeel, F., Iqbal, H. M. N., and Zhao, Y. (2019). “Hazardous contaminants in the environment and their laccase-assisted degradation – A review,” J. Environ. Manage. 234, 253-264. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.001

Birhanli, E., and Yeşilada, Ö. (2013). “The utilization of lignocellulosic wastes for laccase production under semisolid-state and submerged fermentation conditions,” Turk. J. Biol. 37(4), 450-456. DOI: 10.3906/biy-1211-25

Boran, F., and Yesilada, O. (2011). “Enhanced production of laccase by fungi under solid substrate fermentation condition,” BioResources 6(4), 4404-4416.

Elisashvili, V., and Kachlishvili, E. (2009). “Physiological regulation of laccase and manganese peroxidase production by white-rot Basidiomycetes,” J. Biotechnol. 144(1), 37-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2009.06.020

Elisashvili, V., Penninckx, M., Kachlishvili, E., Tsiklauri, N., Metreveli, E., Kharziani, T., and Kvesitadze, G. (2008). “Lentinus edodes and Pleurotus species lignocellulolytic enzymes activity in submerged and solid-state fermentation of lignocellulosic wastes of different composition,” Bioresource Technol. 99(3), 457-462. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.011

Elissetche, J. P., Ferraz, A., Freer, J., and Rodríguez, J. (2007). “Enzymes produced by Ganoderma australe growing on wood and in submerged cultures,” World J. Microb. Biot. 23, Article number 429. DOI: 10.1007/s11274-006-9243-0

Felsenstein, J. (1985). “Confidence intervals on phylogenetics: An approach using bootstrap,” Evolution 39, 783-791. DOI: 10.2307/2408678

Filipe, D., Fernandes, H., Castro, C., Peres, H., Oliva-Teles, A., Belo, I., and Salgado, J. M. (2019). “Improved lignocellulolytic enzyme production and antioxidant extraction using solid-state fermentation of olive pomace mixed with winery waste,” Biofuel. Bioprod. Bior. 14(1), 78-91. DOI: 10.1002/bbb.2073

Guerriero, G., Hausman, J. F., Strauss, J., Ertan, H., and Siddiqui, K. S. (2016). “Lignocellulosic biomass: Biosynthesis, degradation, and industrial utilization,” Eng. Life Sci. 16(1), 1-16. DOI: 10.1002/elsc.201400196

Guo, C., Zhao, L., Wang, F., Lu, J., Ding, Z., and Shi, G. (2017). “Beta-carotene from yeasts enhances laccase production of Pleurotus eryngii var. ferulae in co-culture,” Front. Microbiol. 8, article no. 1101. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01101

Gupta, A., and Jana, A. K. (2018). “Effects of wheat straw solid contents in fermentation media on utilization of soluble/insoluble nutrient, fungal growth and laccase production,” 3 Biotech 8(1), article no. 35. DOI: 10.1007/s13205-017-1054-5

Haldar, D., Sen, D., and Gayen, K. (2016). “A review on the production of fermentable sugars from lignocellulosic biomass through conventional and enzymatic route – A comparison,” Int. J. Green Energy 13(12), 1232-1253. DOI: 10.1080/15435075.2016.1181075

Han, M. L., An, Q., Fu, W. X., Cheng, X., Bu, T., and Li, W. J. (2020a). “Morphological characteristics and phylogenetic analyses reveal Antrodia yunnanensis sp. nov. (Polyporales, Basidiomycota) from China,” Phytotaxa 460(1), 1-11. DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.460.1.1

Han, M. L., An, Q., He, S. F., Zhang, X. L., Zhang, M. H., Gao, X. H., Wu, Q., and Bian, L. S. (2020b). “Solid-state fermentation on poplar sawdust and corncob wastes for lignocellulolytic enzymes by different Pleurotus ostreatus strains,” BioResources 15(3), 4982-4995. DOI: 10.15376/biores.15.3.4982-4995

Han, M. L., An, Q., Wu, X. J., Zheng, F., and Si, J. (2017). “Effects of different lignocellulose as inducers on laccase activities of Pleurotus ostreatus in submerged fermentation,” Mycosystema 36(3), 349-357. DOI: 10.13346/j.mycosystema.160055

Han, M. L., Chen, Y. Y., Shen, L. L., Song, J., Vlasák, J., Dai, Y. C., and Cui, B. K. (2016). “Taxonomy and phylogeny of the brown-rot fungi: Fomitopsis and its related genera,” Fungal Divers 80, 343-373. DOI: 10.1007/s13225-016-0364-y

Han, M. L., Du, J., An, Q., and Li, C. S. (2018). “Effects of different culture substrate on laccase activities of Pleurotus ostreatus under different fermentation conditions,” Mycosystema 37(8), 1100-1108. DOI: 10.13346/j.mycosystema.180064

Han, M. L., Yang, J., Liu, Z. Y., Wang, C. R., Chen, S. Y., Han, N., Hao, W. Y., An, Q., and Dai, Y. C. (2021). “Evaluation of laccase activities by three newly isolated fungal species in submerged fermentation with single or mixed lignocellulosic wastes,” Front. Microbiol. 12, article no. 682679. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.682679

Hilden, K., Makela, M. R., Lankinen, P., and Lundell, T. (2013). “Agaricus bisporus and related Agaricus species on lignocellulose: Production of manganese peroxidase and multicopper oxidases,” Fungal Genet. Biol. 55, 32-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.fgb.2013.02.002

Huang, L., Sun, N., Ban, L., Wang, Y., and Yang, H. (2019). “Ability of different edible fungi to degrade crop straw,” AMB Express 9(1), article no. 4. DOI: 10.1186/s13568-018-0731-z

Ikubar, M. R. M., Manan, M. A., Salleh, M. M., and Yahya, A. (2018). “Solid-state fermentation of oil palm frond petiole for lignin peroxidase and xylanase-rich cocktail production,” 3 Biotech 8(5), article no. 259. DOI: 10.1007/s13205-018-1268-1

Janusz, G., Czuryło, A., Frąc, M., Rola, B., Sulej, J., Pawlik, A., Siwulski, M., and Rogalski, J. (2015). “Laccase production and metabolic diversity among Flammulina velutipes strains,” World J. Microb. Biot. 31(1), 121-133. DOI: 10.1007/s11274-014-1769-y

Kuhar, F., and Papinutti, L. (2014). “Optimization of laccase production by two strains of Ganoderma lucidum using phenolic and metallic inducers,” Rev. Argent. Microbiol. 46(2), 144-149. DOI: 10.1016/S0325-7541(14)70063-X

Kumar, R., Tabatabaei, M., Karimi, K., and Horvath, I. S. (2016). “Recent updates on lignocellulosic biomass derived ethanol – A review,” Biofuel Res. J. 3(1), 347-356. DOI: 10.18331/BRJ2016.3.1.4

Leite, P., Silva, C., Salgado J. M., and Belo, I. (2019). “Simultaneous production of lignocellulolytic enzymes and extraction of antioxidant compounds by solid-state fermentation of agro-industrial wastes,” Ind. Crop. Prod. 137, 315-322. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.04.044

Lira-Perez, J., Rodriguez-Vazquez, R., and Chan-Cupul, W. (2020). “Effect of fungal co-cultures on ligninolytic enzyme activities, H2O2 production, and orange G discoloration,” Prep. Biochem. Biotech. 50(6), 607-618. DOI: 10.1080/10826068.2020.1721534

Mate, D. M., and Alcalde, M. (2017). “Laccase: A multi-purpose biocatalyst at the forefront of biotechnology,” Microb. Biotechnol. 10(6), 1457-1467. DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.12422

Medouni-Haroune, L., Zaidi, F., Medouni-Adrar, S., Roussos S., Azzouz S., Desseaux, V., and Kecha, M. (2017). “Selective isolation and screening of actinobacteria strains producing lignocellulolytic enzymes using olive pomace as substrate,” Iranian J. Biotechnol 15(1), 74-77. DOI: 10.15171/ijb.1278

Metreveli, E., Kachlishvili, E., Singer, S. W., and Elisashvili, V. (2017). “Alteration of white-rot basidiomycetes cellulase and xylanase activities in the submerged co-cultivation and optimization of enzyme production by Irpex lacteus and Schizophyllum commune,” Bioresource Technol. 241, 652-660. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.05.148

Moiseenko, K. V., Savinova, O. S., Vasina, D. V., Kononikhin, A. S., Tyazhelova, T. V., and Fedorova, T. V. (2018). “Laccase isoenzymes of Trametes hirsuta LE-BIN072: degradation of industrial dyes and secretion under the different induction conditions,” Appl. Biochem. Micro+. 54(9), 834-841. DOI: 10.1134/S0003683818090090

Pinar, O., Karaosmanoğlu, K., Sayar, N. A., Kula, C., Kazan, D., and Sayar, A. A. (2017). “Assessment of hazelnut husk as a lignocellulosic feedstock for the production of fermentable sugars and lignocellulolytic enzymes,” 3 Biotech 7, article no. 367. DOI: 10.1007/s13205-017-1002-4

Qin, P., Wu, Y., Adil, B., Wang, J., Gu, Y., Yu, X., Zhao, K., Zhang, X., Ma, M., Chen, Q., et al. (2019). “Optimization of laccase from Ganoderma lucidum decolorizing remazol Brilliant Blue R and Glac1 as main laccase-contributing gene,” Molecules 24(21), article ID 3914. DOI: 10.3390/molecules24213914

Rajavat, A. S., Rai, S., Pandiyan, K., Kushwaha, P., Choudhary, P., Kumar, M., Chakdar, H., Singh, A., Karthikeyan, N., Bagul, S. Y., et al. (2020). “Sustainable use of the spent mushroom substrate of Pleurotus florida for production of lignocellulolytic enzymes,” J. Basic Microb. 60(2), 173-184. DOI: 10.1002/jobm.201900382

Rodrigues, E. M., Karp, S. G., Malucelli, L. C., Helm, C. V., and Alvarez, T. M. (2019). “Evaluation of laccase production by Ganoderma lucidum in submerged and solid-state fermentation using different inducers,” J. Basic Microb. 59(8), 784-791. DOI: 10.1002/jobm.201900084

Sadeghian-Abadi, S., Rezaei, S., Yousefi-Mokri, M., and Faramarzi, M. A. (2019). “Enhanced production, one-step affinity purification, and characterization of laccase from solid-state culture of Lentinus tigrinus and delignification of pistachio shell by free and immobilized enzyme,” J. Environ. Manage. 244, 235-246. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.058

Senthivelan, T., Kanagaraj, J., and Panda, R. C. (2016). “Recent trends in fungal laccase for various industrial applications: An eco-friendly approach – A review,” Biotechnol. Bioproc. E. 21(1), 19-38. DOI: 10.1007/s12257-015-0278-7

Shanmugam, S., Krishnaswamy, S., Chandrababu, R., Veerabagu, U., Pugazhendhi, A., and Mathimani, T. (2020). “Optimal immobilization of Trichoderma asperellum laccase on polymer coated Fe3O4@SiO2 nanoparticles for enhanced biohydrogen production from delignified lignocellulosic biomass,” Fuel 273, article ID 117777. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117777

Sharma, A., Jain, K. K., Srivastava, A., Shrivastava, B., Thakur, V. V., Jain, R. K., and Kuhad, R. C. (2019). “Potential of in situ SSF laccase produced from Ganoderma lucidum RCK 2011 in biobleaching of paper pulp,” Bioproc. Biosyst. Eng. 42(3), 367-377. DOI: 10.1007/s00449-018-2041-x

Simonic, J., Vukojevic, J., Stajic, M., and Glamoclija, J. M. (2010). “Intraspecific diversity within Ganoderma lucidum in the production of laccase and Mn-oxidizing peroxidases during plant residues fermentation,” Appl. Biochem. Biotech. 162(2), 408-415. DOI 10.1007/s12010-009-8833-3

Singh, A., Bajar, S., Bishnoi, N. R., and Singh, N. (2010). “Laccase production by Aspergillus heteromorphus using distillery spent wash and lignocellulosic biomass,” J. Hazard. Mater. 176(1-3), 1079-1082. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.10.120

Singh, G., and Arya, S. K. (2019). “Utility of laccase in pulp and paper industry: A progressive step towards the green technology,” Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 134, 1070-1084. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.05.168

Songulashvili, G. G., Elisashvili, V. I., Wasser, S. P., Hadar, Y., and Nevo, E. (2008). “Effect of the carbon source and inoculum preparation method on laccase and manganese peroxidase production in submerged cultivation by the medicinal mushroom Ganoderma lucidum (W. Curt.: Fr.) P. Karst. (Aphyllophoromycetideae),” Int. J. Med. Mushrooms 10(1), 79-86. DOI: 10.1615/IntJMedMushr.v10.i1.100

Songulashvili, G., Jimenez-Tobon, G., Jaspers, C., and Penninckx, M. J. (2011). “High production of laccase by Ganoderma lucidum 447 in submerged cultivation on ethanol production residue supplemented with Cu2+,” Mycosphere 2(4), 507-513.

Srinivasan, P., Selvankumar, T., Kamala-Kannan, S., Mythili, R., Sengottaiyan, A., Govarthanan, M., Senthilkumar, B., and Selvam, K. (2019). “Production and purification of laccase by Bacillus sp. using millet husks and its pesticide degradation application,” 3 Biotech 9(11), article no. 396. DOI: 10.1007/s13205-019-1900-8

Strong, P. J., and Claus, H. (2011). “Laccase: A review of its past and its future in bioremediation,” Crit. Rev. Env. Sci. Tec. 41(4), 373-434. DOI: 10.1080/10643380902945706

Su, J., Fu, J., Wang, Q., Silva, C., and Cavaco-Paulo, A. (2018). “Laccase: A green catalyst for the biosynthesis of poly-phenols,” Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 38(2), 294-307. DOI: 10.1080/07388551.2017.1354353

Sun, J., Peng, R. H., Xiong, A. S., Tian, Y., Zhao, W., Xu, H., Liu, D. T., Chen, J. M., and Yao, Q. H. (2012). “Secretory expression and characterization of a soluble laccase from the Ganoderma lucidum strain 7071-9 in Pichia pastoris,” Mol. Biol. Rep. 39(4), 3807-3814. DOI: 10.1007/s11033-011-1158-7

Swofford, D. L. (2002). “PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods),” Version 4.0b10. Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.

Thamvithayakorn, P., Phosri, C., Pisutpaisal, N., Krajangsang, S., Whalley, A. J. S., and Suwannasai, N. (2019). “Utilization of oil palm decanter cake for valuable laccase and manganese peroxidase enzyme production from a novel white-rot fungus, Pseudolagarobasidium sp. PP17-33,” 3 Biotech 9(11), article no. 417. DOI: 10.1007/s13205-019-1945-8

Unuofin, J. O., Okoh, A. I., and Nwodo, U. U. (2019a). “Aptitude of oxidative enzymes for treatment of wastewater pollutants: A laccase perspective,” Molecules 24(11), article no. 2064. DOI: 10.3390/molecules24112064

Unuofin, J. O., Okoh, A. I., and Nwodo, U. U. (2019b). “Utilization of agroindustrial wastes for the production of laccase by Achromobacter xylosoxidans HWN16 and Bordetella bronchiseptica HSO16,” J. Environ. Manage. 231, 222-231. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.016

Xu, S., Wang, F., Fu, Y., Li, D., Sun, X., Li, C., Song, B., and Li, Y. (2020). “Effects of mixed agro-residues (corn crop waste) on lignin-degrading enzyme activities, growth, and quality of Lentinula edodes,” RSC Adv. 10(17), 9798-9807. DOI: 10.1039/c9ra10405d

Yang, J., Ng, T. B., Lin, J., and Ye, X. (2015). “A novel laccase from basidiomycete Cerrena sp.: Cloning, heterologous expression, and characterization,” Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 77, 344-349. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.03.028

Zerva, A., Simic, S., Topakas, E., and Nikodinovic-Runic, J. (2019). “Applications of microbial laccases: Patent review of the past decade (2009-2019),” Catalysts 9(12), article no. 1023. DOI: 10.3390/catal9121023

Article submitted: February 1, 2021; Peer review completed: May 8, 2021; Revised version received and accepted: August 8, 2021; Published: August 11, 2021.

DOI: 10.15376/biores.16.4.6706-6722