Morphological and mechanical characterization of electrospun polylactic acid and microcrystalline cellulose

Abstract

The goal of this work was to develop a composite material, a membrane, based on polylactic acid (PLA) reinforced with cellulose microcrystalline (MCC). Membranes based on PLA were fabricated using electrospinning. The fabrication parameters, fiber morphology, and mechanical properties were analyzed. For fabrication, 12 mL of solution (12%, weight basis, of PLA in chloroform) was used and three different injector-collector distances and three voltages were employed. The fiber morphology was observed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). To fabricate reinforced membranes using microcrystalline cellulose (MCC), an amount of 1.0%, 3.0%, and 5.0% of MCC, based on the polymer mass, was used. The MCC distribution was observed using SEM. The membranes were tested via tensile and tearing tests according to the corresponding ASTM D882-12 (2012) and ASTM D1938-14 (2014). It was observed that plain fibers tended to form, depending on the injector-collector distances. Additionally, microfiber porosity was observed, which was attributed to the solvent evaporation. Moreover, the addition of 1% of MCC was translated into an important increase of tensile strength, which in some cases reached a 476% increase; similar effects were observed in the tear test results.

Full Article

Morphological and Mechanical Characterization of Electrospun Polylactic Acid and Microcrystalline Cellulose

Alexander Gaitán,* and William Gacitúa

The goal of this work was to develop a composite material, a membrane, based on polylactic acid (PLA) reinforced with cellulose microcrystalline (MCC). Membranes based on PLA were fabricated using electrospinning. The fabrication parameters, fiber morphology, and mechanical properties were analyzed. For fabrication, 12 mL of solution (12%, weight basis, of PLA in chloroform) was used and three different injector-collector distances and three voltages were employed. The fiber morphology was observed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). To fabricate reinforced membranes using microcrystalline cellulose (MCC), an amount of 1.0%, 3.0%, and 5.0% of MCC, based on the polymer mass, was used. The MCC distribution was observed using SEM. The membranes were tested via tensile and tearing tests according to the corresponding ASTM D882-12 (2012) and ASTM D1938-14 (2014). It was observed that plain fibers tended to form, depending on the injector-collector distances. Additionally, microfiber porosity was observed, which was attributed to the solvent evaporation. Moreover, the addition of 1% of MCC was translated into an important increase of tensile strength, which in some cases reached a 476% increase; similar effects were observed in the tear test results.

Keywords: Polylactic acid; Microcrystal cellulose; Electrospinning; Mechanical properties; morphology; Porosity

Contact information: Department of Wood Engineering, Center of Biomaterials and Nanotechnology, University of Bío-Bío, Concepción 4030000, Chile; *Corresponding author: alexgaitanb@gmail.com

INTRODUCTION

Obtaining fibers and membranes based on polymers is an interesting subject of study because it shows important possibilities of application in the food, pharmaceutical, and biomedical industries (Stanger et al. 2005). One of the more widely used procedures to manufacturer fibers is the electrospinning technique that recently has achieved advances on an industrial scale (Mitchell 2015). The electrospinning technique is an electrostatic process where a polymeric solution is exposed to produce fibers that can be different sizes, from nanometers to micrometers (Frenot and Chronaki 2003). To obtain fibers, a syringe is loaded with a polymeric solution that is subsequently placed in a bomb where the solution flow can be controlled.

The injector’s tip is exposed to a potential difference; once a drop of the solution comes out of the injector’s tip, its superficial tension is defeated due to the current electric charge that allows the formation of a Taylor cone. Therefore, the increase of the electric potential causes the formation of a micro-fiber from the Taylor’s cone to the fiber collector ( Ramakrishna et al. 2005).

The solvent, which is used to prepare the polymeric solution at the moment of the fiber formation, evaporates because of the electric potential. The fabrication parameters to be controlled to accomplish the correct fibers formation are fabrication voltage, solution viscosity, and distance from the injector’s tip or syringe to the collector (Bhardwaj and Kundu 2010; Rezaei et al. 2015). This technique is presented as an important alternative for the manufacturing of biomaterials.

Currently, the use of materials with less environmental impact is preferable, and biopolymers are an important alternative to the packing industry. These materials show interesting qualities of degradation and safety. Biopolymers share similar characteristics to conventional polymers (Niaounakis 2006). Within the group of these materials, polylactic acid (PLA), which can be compared to polyethylene terephthalate (PET) because it is a hydrophobic polymer, is a polymer that has been subjected to study by many researchers. The PLA is derived from lactic acid, and is thermostatic and compostable, produced from renewable resources, and originated from materials with a high content of starch or sugar such as corn, sugarcane, potatoes, etc. (Serna et al. 2011).

To improve the physical and mechanical properties of biopolymers, they may be reinforced with other materials, lignocellulosic in origin, such as fibers, particles, and nanoparticles. The result of this combination is a composite or biocomposite material of matrix-fiber hybrid properties (Gurunathan et al. 2015).

A biocomposite is made up of environmentally friendly raw materials whose physical mechanical processes vary because of the use of reinforcement material (Mohanty et al. 2000). Therefore, microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) can have potential use as reinforcement in biocomposite material because it is derived from renewable and environmentally friendly resources (Mathew et al. 2005, 2006). The MCC is derived from cellulose, reinforcing a great variety of vegetal species; they are sub products of α-cellulose extracted from wood pulp (Ardizzone et al. 1999). To obtain MCC, the cell wall of the fibers is divided into pieces whose sizes do not exceed a pair of microns in length. These segments are subjected to a controlled acid hydrolysis that results in two portions, one soluble in acid and the other insoluble. The insoluble fragment corresponds to approximately 17% (dry base) of microcrystal cellulose (MCC). The MCC is insoluble in water or organic solvents and is physically a fine, white, odorless powder (Das et al. 2010).

As previously stated, when biocomposites based on biopolymers are produced, it is important to ensure that the resulting material is eco-friendly and comes from renewable resources. Accordingly, PLA can be enhanced in its mechanical properties when it is reinforced with MCC. Diverse research has shown advances in this subject, developing biocomposites based on PLA reinforced with MCC and fabricated by means of techniques such as casting and extrusion processes. Previous research shows that the mechanical properties of PLA are effectively improved by the addition of microcrystals of cellulose (Petersson and Oksman 2006; Haafiz et al. 2013; Murphy and Collins 2016).

The objective of this study was to develop a composite material based on PLA reinforced with MCC. A morphological analysis was performed and then related to the fabrication parameters of the electrospinning process. Furthermore, the reinforcement contribution was observed on the mechanical properties of the final membrane. Using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), the composite and the fibers formed during the fabrication process were studied; the fibers’ diameter, malformation, and flaws were also analyzed. The MCC dispersion in the membrane of fibers was also examined. Tensile and tear propagation resistance tests were performed according the ASTM standards ASTM D882 (2012) and ASTM D1938 (2014).

EXPERIMENTAL

Materials

Polylactic acid (Natureworks® 2002D; Morgan S.A, Santiago, Chile) with a molecular weight of 200,000 g/mol, density of 1.24 g/cm³, glass transition temperature (Tg) of 58 C, and melting point (Tm) of 153 C was used. The MCC supplied by Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany) had a grain size that measured from 1 m to 160 m, density of 1.5 g/cm³, and was used as a reinforcement. The chloroform and analytical grade acetone used were supplied by Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany).

Methods

Preparation of PLA, PLA-MCC solutions, and electrospinning

A total of 12 mL of solution was prepared, where 12% weight basis corresponded to PLA and 88% to the solvent (Buschle et al. 2007). The proportion by volume of the solvent chloroform/acetone was 2 to 1 (Dong et al. 2011). The PLA in pellets were dissolved in chloroform for 12 h, then acetone was added and homogenized on a magnetic plate for 1 h at room temperature. This solution was subsequently loaded in a syringe with a 0.8 mm injector of nozzle inner diameter and mounted in the electrospinning instrument (INOVENSO NE-300; Inovenso Ltd., Istanbul, Turkey) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Set up of electrospinning apparatus, configuration of ascendant vertical fabrication

The electrospinning equipment was calibrated with three fabrication distances and voltages. The distances from the injector to collector were 15 cm, 18 cm, and 20 cm. The voltages used were 22 kV, 24 kV, and 26 kV. The solution flow was estimated at 0.2 mL/h (Haroosh et al. 2011). The collector used was a drum rotatory collector (Inovenso Ltd., Istanbul, Turkey).

Fig. 2. Microcrystalline cellulose

The PLA-MCC solution was prepared as previously described with the addition of MCC in 1%, 3%, and 5% based on polymer weight. The MCC are shown in Fig. 2. After homogenization of PLA and acetone, the corresponding MCC for each experiment was added and then homogenized continuously for 1 h at room temperature. Once well mixed, the solution was loaded in a syringe and then into the electrospinning machine.

Morphological characterization

The morphology of the membranes and distribution of MCC were observed using a JEOL JSM- 6610LV SEM (Jeol Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) with an accelerating voltage of 5 kV, where the samples were previously gold coated for 30 s (Denton Vacuum, New York, USA). The fiber diameter in the membrane was measured using ImageJ- Image Processing and Analysis in Java software (National Institutes of Health, version 1.46r, Bethesda, MD, USA).

Mechanical characterization

The tensile and tear strengths of the membranes were measured with a universal testing machine (Model Z020; Zwick Roell, Zwick Roell Group, Ulm, Germany). The tensile tests were performed in accordance to the ASTM D882 (2012) standard. Tear propagation resistance tests were performed in accordance to the ASTM D1938-14 (2014) standard.

Statistical analysis

The mechanical properties were analyzed using a factorial general design with two factors and two response variables: Tensile strength (MPa) and Tear propagation resistance (N) (Table 1). An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed with a level of confidence ∝ = 0.05. The software Design Expert (Stat-Ease, version 10, Minneapolis, USA) was used.

Table 1. Design of the Experiment

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Morphology

The membrane fibers’ morphology has been found to have a dependence on the manufacturing voltage and injector-collector distance (Zhenyu and Ce 2013). Additionally, these variables, as well as the impulse of the incoming fibers to the collector, have influence on the fiber’s diameter (Ki et al. 2005). The SEM images for membranes manufactured with an injector-collector distance of 15 cm and voltages of 22 kV, 24 kV, and 26 kV (Fig. 3), displayed ribbon-shaped microfibers, flat wide microfibers, and thick polymeric layers. The latter could have been the result of a collision between the microfiber and the collector due to the short injector-collector distance and the strong attractive force generated by the electrostatic field allowing fiber flaws (Wu et al. 2010). As expected, an increasing voltage resulted in a reduction in the fibers’ diameter, where the higher Coulomb force and the stronger electric field encouraged a further microfiber stretching (Megelski et al. 2002).

Fig. 3. SEM images of membranes manufactured based on PLA using electrospinning with 15 cm injector- collector distance and voltages: a) 22 kV; b) 24 kV; and c) 26 kV