Abstract
Drought is an environmental stress that can negatively influence growth and productivity of fruit trees because it decreases the photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance and raises the rate of water loss from the plant surfaces. Therefore, this study investigated the soil application of biochar individually or in combination with the spraying of boron, silicon, and molybdenum relative to the growth attributes, fruit drop percentages, yield, and fruit quality of Le Conte pear trees grown under drought stress. The trees were fertilized by biochar at 0, 1, and 2 kg per tree individually or in combination with the foliar spraying with 0 mg B2O3 + 0 mg SiO2 + 0 mg MoO2, 10 mg B2O3 + 25 mg SiO2 + 25 mg MoO2, 20 mg B2O3 + 50 mg SiO2 + 50 mg MoO2 and 30 mg B2O3 + 75 mg SiO2 + 75 mg MoO2 at start of February, start of March and start of April, compared to untreated trees (control). The results showed that the soil addition of biochar or spraying of nano fertilizers individually or in combinations improved the vegetative growth, productivity and fruit quality, and leaf mineral content, meanwhile they reduced the fruit drop. The best results were obtained by the application of 2 kg biochar combined with 30 mg B2O3 + 75 mg SiO2 + 75 mg MoO2, which was superior to other applied treatments in the two seasons.
Download PDF
Full Article
Pear Performance as Affected by the Application of Some Nano Fertilizers in Combination with Biochar as a Biostimulant Under Drought Conditions
Khalid F. Almutairi,a,* Krzysztof Górnik,b Ragheb M. Eladly,c and Walid F. A. Mosa d
Drought is an environmental stress that can negatively influence growth and productivity of fruit trees because it decreases the photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance and raises the rate of water loss from the plant surfaces. Therefore, this study investigated the soil application of biochar individually or in combination with the spraying of boron, silicon, and molybdenum relative to the growth attributes, fruit drop percentages, yield, and fruit quality of Le Conte pear trees grown under drought stress. The trees were fertilized by biochar at 0, 1, and 2 kg per tree individually or in combination with the foliar spraying with 0 mg B2O3 + 0 mg SiO2 + 0 mg MoO2, 10 mg B2O3 + 25 mg SiO2 + 25 mg MoO2, 20 mg B2O3 + 50 mg SiO2 + 50 mg MoO2 and 30 mg B2O3 + 75 mg SiO2 + 75 mg MoO2 at start of February, start of March and start of April, compared to untreated trees (control). The results showed that the soil addition of biochar or spraying of nano fertilizers individually or in combinations improved the vegetive growth, productivity and fruit quality, and leaf mineral content, meanwhile they reduced the fruit drop. The best results were obtained by the application of 2 kg biochar combined with 30 mg B2O3 + 75 mg SiO2 + 75 mg MoO2, which was superior to other applied treatments in the two seasons.
DOI: 10.15376/biores.19.4.9131-9157
Keywords: Fruit drop; Fruit quality; Nutritional status; Pyrus communis
Contact information: a: Department of Plant Production, College of Food Science and Agriculture, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia; b: The National Institute of Horticultural Research, Konstytucji 3 Maja 1/3, 96-100 Skierniewice, Poland; c: Department of Soil and Agricultural Chemistry, Faculty of Agriculture, Saba Basha, Alexandria University, Egypt; d: Plant Production Department (Horticulture-Pomology), Faculty of Agriculture, Saba Basha, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21531, Egypt; *Corresponding Authors: almutairik@ksu.edu.sa; walidmosa@alexu.edu.eg
INTRODUCTION
Pear (Pyrus communis L.) is a member of Rosaceae and its growing area, as of 2022, in Egypt was 5209 hectare which produced 77643.1 ton (FAO 2022). As drought stress intensifies and prolongs, there is a reduction in net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and the transpiration rate (Ghanbary et al. 2017). Additionally, drought reduces the size of fruits leading to reducing their marketable values (Lopez et al. 2012), the efficacy of water usage by plants, mobility and absorption of nutrients, and the growth of roots (Almutairi et al. 2023). Brodribb and McAdam (2017) stated that plants can withstand water stress by decreasing their stomatal conductance, which lowers water outflow, and by developing more effective root systems, which increase water uptake (Kumar et al. 2019). The productivity of the trees is frequently restricted by unfavorable weather, inadequate crop nutrition, inadequate pollination, early fruit drop, and low fruit quality (Katayama et al. 2019; Trueman et al. 2022).
Biochar is a solid that is created when biomass is thermochemically converted in an oxygen-limited atmosphere (García et al. 2021). Furthermore, biochar is an eco-friendly method used to improve the chemical and physical properties of soil, including pH levels, cation exchange capacity, bulk density, pore size distribution, soil structure, water retention capacity, and resilience to climate change (Oliveira et al. 2017; Godlewska et al. 2021) and consequently improve the quality attributes of the products (Medyńska-Juraszek et al. 2021). Besides, it can prevent losses of nutritional elements through leakage and improve the bioavailability of soil nutrients (Chen et al. 2021). In addition, it is used to increase water conservation, nutrient content, plant growth, crop yield, and quality characteristics (Brtnicky et al. 2021; Joseph et al. 2021) by improving the cation exchange power and nitrogen content in soil (Adekiya et al. 2020), as well as increasing the microbes’ activity in the soil (Khadem et al. 2021).
Nano fertilizers have become eco-friendly alternatives and a promising option in the production of horticultural crops because of the high cost and potential harm of conventional fertilizers and to increase nutrient-use efficacy (Morab et al. 2021). Furthermore, because of their small size and high surface area-to-volume ratio, nano fertilisers have the potential to greatly increase the productivity and quality of fruit trees (Kumar et al. 2023; Periakaruppan et al. 2023).
Boron (B) plays a crucial role in various plant functions, including hormone transport, pollen germination, the directional growth of pollen tubes, the synthesis of protein, transportation of sugar, and the metabolism of carbohydrate (Hänsch and Mendel 2009), as well as nucleic acid and indole acetic acid (Shireen et al. 2018). Boron deficiency in plants causes delayed pollen germination, pollen tube development, flowering, and fruit setting (Brdar-Jokanović 2020), impacting metabolic pathways and leading to decreased shoot development, fruit set %, quality of fruits, and modifying the composition of fruit from nutrients (Özenç and Bender Özenç 2015; Davarpanah et al. 2016). Pandey and Gupta (2013) reported that low levels of B negatively affect microsporogenesis, leading to a decrease in the production, size, and viability of pollen grains. Shaban et al. (2019) reported that the foliar application of boron effectively enhanced the nutritional status of mango plants by increasing the concentrations of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium in the leaves and it also boosted chlorophyll and carbohydrate levels, as well as improved the carbon-to-nitrogen ratio. The spraying of boron greatly improved the fruit set percentages as a result of increasing the development of pollen tube growth (Williams and Reese 2019). Additionally, Sharafi and Raina (2021) documented that B is a crucial essential element for fertilization because it increases the pollen grain germination rate and the development of the pollen tube. Meanwhile, its lack minimizes the elasticity of pollen-tube cell walls and inhibits the pollen-tube development.
After oxygen, silicon (Si) is an effective nutrient for plants because it regulates the minerals uptake under adverse climatic conditions (Elsheery et al. 2020), and it is important for ameliorating plant development (López-Pérez et al. 2018). Si promotes the absorption of nutrients and water, which boosts cell division and the production of plant pigments, while also improving the plant’s resilience to abiotic stresses including nutrient imbalances and drought (Coskun et al. 2016). Besides, Si enhances drought tolerance by improving water absorption, sustaining nutrient balance, reducing water loss from leaves, and boosting the rate of photosynthesis (Zhu and Gong 2014). Additionally, Peris-Felipo et al. (2020) reported that Si is helpful in increasing pollen grain fertility, fruit productivity, fruit content from sugars, and the shelf life of strawberries. By decreasing Na+ uptake, the external application of Si-NPs at 150 mg L−1 on bananas improved K+ uptake, photosynthesis, and stomatal conductance (Mahmoud et al. 2020).
Molybdenum (Mo) is an essential micronutrient for plants (Imran et al. 2019; Siddiqui et al. 2021). Its deficiency causes a decline in leaf chlorophyll content, growth, fruit quality and yield in various crops (Liu et al. 2020), and nutritional content (Li et al. 2017), and in the growth of taproots and lateral roots (Gao et al. 2016). It is an element that is required in small amounts for plant development and growth, and it is an essential component of nitrate reductase and nitrogenase, and for the nitrates’ assimilation in the soil (Cecílio-Filho et al. 2019). Shoaib et al. (2020) stated that Mo is necessary for the fixation of nitrogen, which benefits plant performance. A deficiency in Mo can result in the buildup of nitrate within plants (Moussa et al. 2022), and nitrogenous mineral fertilizers are well known to increase their weight and productivity (Bekele et al. 2019).
This study investigated the role of the addition of biochar to the soil singly or combined with the spraying of boron + silicon + molybdenum nano particles in reducing the fruit drop and consequently improving the productivity and fruit quality of pear cv. ‘Le Conte’.
EXPERIMENTAL
Location, Applied Treatments, and Experimental Design
The experiment was conducted in 2022 and 2023 on 8-year-old pear trees budded on Pyrus betulifolia rootstock. Trees were planted at 4×4 meters in sandy soil under drip irrigation, in the Nubaria region, El-Beheira governorate, Egypt. The physicochemical analysis of the experimental soil in Table 1 was done as previously outlined by Sparks et al. (2020).
Table 1. Analysis of the Soil of the Experiment
Table 2. Composition of the Used Biochar in the Experiment
Sixty uniform trees (five trees /replicates for each treatment) were chosen randomly and were approximately the same growth and size. They were subjected to the same horticultural practices applied in the orchard during the two testing years. The trees were fertilized by biochar at 0, 1, and 2 kg/tree in mid of January 2022 and 2023 seasons as the main factor. The pear trees were also sprayed with nanoparticles from boron (B2O3) at 0, 10, 20 and 30 mg/L, SiO2 at 0, 25, 50, and 75 mg/L; molybdenum (MoO2) at 0, 25, 50 and 75 mg/L three times at start of February, start of March (full bloom) and start of April, comparing the treated trees to not treated trees (control) as the submain factor. The applied treatments are listed in Table 3.
Table 3. Soil Addition of Biochar Individually or in Combination with the Spraying of Some Nano Fertilizers
These treatments were examined by investigating their impact on the subsequent parameters:
Vegetative Parameters
At the end of the vegetative time, shoot length in cm and the shoot thickness was measured by using a vernier caliper. Leaf total chlorophyll (SPAD) was measured in the fresh leaves using a Minolta chlorophyll meter (SPAD – 502; Konica Minolta, Osaka, Japan) by taking 10 readings from the mature leaves in the middle part of the shoots around the trees. The average leaf area (cm²) was determined using an equation adapted from (Demirsoy 2009; Mosa et al. 2022a),
LA = 0.70 (L × W) – 1.06 (1)
where LA is a leaf area, L is leaf length, and W is leaf width.
Flower Number, Fruit Set, and Fruit Drop Percentages
Four branches from each side of each replicate (tree) were chosen and labelled carefully at the start of the vegetative season, the number of flowers was accounted and then the fruit set % was calculated according to the following Eq. 2.
(2)
Fruit drop (%) was estimated by calculating the difference between the number of set fruits and the dropped fruits using Eq. 3.
(3)
Fruit yield
At July 2022 and 2023 seasons, the yield in kg for each tree was weighted and then by multiplying the yield of each tree by the number of the trees in hectare to calculate the yield of hectare in ton.
Fruit Quality
Fruit physical characteristics
Ten fruits were randomly selected from each replicate (tree). The average of their weight (g), fruit length, and fruit diameter were measured using an electric balance and a vernier caliper gauge. Fruit firmness (lb/inch²) was determined using a Magness and Taylor pressure tester equipped with a 7/18-inch plunger by using the hand refractometer (ATAGO Co. LTD., Tokyo, Japan). Fruit size (cm³) was assessed by measuring the volume of displaced water after immersing the fruit.
Fruit chemical characteristics
Total soluble solids percentages were measured. Ascorbic acid content (VC) in the juice was assessed through titration with 2,6-dichloro phenol-indo-phenol and expressed in milligrams per 100 mL of juice. Total and reducing sugars were quantified calorimetrically using the Nelson arsenate-molybdate colourimetric method (Nielsen 2010). Non-reduced sugars percentages are the difference between total sugars and reduced sugars. Fruit acidity, measured as a percentage and quantified in terms of malic acid content, was assessed in fruit juice using a titration method with 0.1 N sodium hydroxide, and phenolphthalein was used as an indicator (AOAC 2005).
Estimating the mineral content in the pear leaves
From the middle part of the shoots, 30 leaves were taken from each tree (Arrobas et al. 2018) to determine the leaf macronutrients such as nitrogen, phosphorous, and potassium, as well as leaf micronutrients from iron, zinc, manganese, and boron. After the leaves were thoroughly cleaned with tap and distilled water, they were dried at 70 °C in an oven until they reached a constant weight, and last they were ground into a fine powder, and then they were digested by using H2SO4 and H2O2. The leaf content from nitrogen was measured by using the micro-Kjeldahl method (Wang et al. 2016), phosphorus by using the Vanadomolybdate method (Weiwei et al. 2017), and potassium by using the flame photometer (SKZ International Co., Ltd., Jinan Shandong, China) (Chapman 2021).
Microbial biomass in soil
The biomass carbon measurement methods followed the procedures outlined by Vance et al. (1987). Each soil sample was divided into six 17.5 g replicates. Three of these replicates were subjected to chloroform fumigation for 24 h. Following chloroform removal, carbon was extracted from both fumigated and unfumigated samples using 0.5 M K2SO4 solution for one hour on an end-over-end shaker. Subsequently, the samples were sequentially filtered through Whatman filter grade 42 paper. The resulting supernatant was then analyzed at 280 nm using a compact spectrophotometer.
Estimation of the available nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium
Available phosphorus was extracted using 0.5 N NaHCO3 following the protocol by Song et al. (2019). The phosphorus content in the NaHCO3 extract was determined calorimetrically using the ascorbic acid-molybdenum blue method, with measurements taken at a wavelength of 406 nm (Cho and Nielsen 2017). Available nitrogen was determined calorimetrically using the Nessler method (Jeong et al. 2013). For estimating available potassium, soil samples were extracted with 1 N ammonium acetate extractant at pH 7.0, and the available potassium was measured using a flame photometer following the method detailed by Jackson (2005).
Statistical Analysis
The obtained results were subjected to statistical analysis using Split Plot Design by using CoHort Software (Pacific Grove, CA, USA). The least significant difference at 0.05% (LSD0.05) was used to compare the means of treatments (Snedecor 2021). One-Way ANOVA in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) was used to analyze the data regarding microbial biomass and available nutrients in the soil and Duncan’s test was used at 0.05 to compare between the means of the treatments.
RESULTS
Vegetative Growth
The addition of biochar to the soil combined with the spraying of nano-fertilizers increased the shoot length, shoot diameter, leaf area, and leaf chlorophyll content in pear (Table 4). The most significant impact resulted from the application of T12 in comparison to the control. Additionally, T11 and T8 were also effective in improving the measured growth vegetative attributes compared to the treatments that were used during the two seasons. There are no significant differences between the influence of T12 and the influence of T11 on shoot length, diameter, and leaf chlorophyll.
Fruit Set, Fruit Drop Percentages, and Fruit Number
T12 treatment significantly raised percentage of fruit set and fruit number rather than the other treatments that were used during the two seasons (Figs. 1, 2 and 3). The treatments of T11 and T8 also noticeably improved the percentages of fruit set, and the number of fruits in contrast to the other treatments. On the opposite side, these treatments greatly lessened the fruit drop percentages on the opposite of control treatment effect.
Fruit Yield
The results indicated that T12 led to a significant increase in fruit yields, either in kilograms per tree or tons per hectare, and this treatment resulted in the highest productivity compared to the other treatments applied in both seasons (Figs. 4 and 5). Besides, the soil application of T 11 and T 8 respectively, which raised the yield.
Fruit Quality
Fruit physical characteristics
Tables 5 and 6 highlight that the use of T12 significantly enhanced fruit weight, size, length, and diameter rather than the other treatments applied across both seasons. Additionally, T11 treatment slightly outperformed the other applied treatments. Fruit firmness was improved by the usage of T12, which was the superior treatment. The treatments of T11, T8 and T7 also improved the fruit firmness compared to control. The spraying of T4 and T3 positively improved fruit firmness in comparison with non-treated trees.
Fruit chemical characteristics
The soil application of T12 significantly improved the fruit content from TSS percentage and vitamin C in the second season (Table 7). The differences between the influence of the treatments of T12, T11, T8, and T7 in the first seasons was so slight not enough to be significant. The fruit content from acidity was significantly reduced when T12 and T11 were applied. The highest fruit acidity % was markedly noticed in the treatments of control, T2, T5 and T9.
Table 4. Effect of the Soil Addition of Biochar in Combination with the Spraying of Some Nano Fertilizers on the Shoot Length, Shoot Diameter, Leaf Area, and Leaf Chlorophyll in ‘Le Conte’ Pear Trees during the 2022 and 2023 Seasons
Note: The treatments sharing the same letters are not significantly different at the 0.05 level of significance.
Fig. 1. Effect of the soil addition of biochar in combination with the spraying of some nano fertilizers on fruit set percentages in ‘Le Conte’ pear trees during the 2022 and 2023 seasons
Fig. 2. Effect of the soil addition of biochar in combination with the spraying of some nano fertilizers on fruit drop percentages in ‘Le Conte’ pear trees during the 2022 and 2023 seasons
Fig. 3. Effect of the soil addition of biochar in combination with the spraying of some nano fertilizers on fruit number in ‘Le Conte’ pear trees during the 2022 and 2023 seasons
Fig. 4. Effect of the soil addition of biochar in combination with the spraying of some nano fertilizers on the fruit yield in kg per tree in ‘Le Conte’ pear trees during the 2022 and 2023 seasons
Fig. 5. Effect of the soil addition of biochar in combination with the spraying of some nano fertilizers on the fruit yield in ton per hectare in ‘Le Conte’ pear trees during the 2022 and 2023 seasons
Table 5. Effect of the Soil Addition of Biochar in Combination with the Spraying of Some Nano Fertilizers on the Fruit Weight and Fruit Firmness in ‘Le Conte’ Pear Trees during the 2022 and 2023 Seasons