Abstract
Research on nanoparticles (NPs) is gaining increasing popularity as a way to enhance abiotic stress tolerance and improve crop productivity. This study assessed the effects of foliar spray of selenium NPs (Se NPs) and selenium/copper oxide nanoparticles (Se/CuO NPs) at 50 and 100 ppm on the growth and biochemical characteristics of Zea mays L. plants grown under saline stress conditions (100 mM). Se NPs and Se/CuO NPs were analyzed by energy dispersive X-ray, transmission electron microscopy, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analyses. The Se NPs and Se/CuO NPs were found to have an average particle size of 135.2 and 75.1 nm using the ImageJ tool. Shoot and root lengths, chlorophyll levels, protein, phenols, and flavonoids were all investigated in this study. Plant growth and chlorophyll concentration dropped under salt stress but were improved with the application of Se and Se/CuO NPs. The enzymes catalase, superoxide dismutase, and glutathione reductase exhibited the highest values at 100 ppm of Se/CuO NPs, of 74.4, 132.1, and 43.2 mmol/g, respectively. Se and Se/CuO NPs reduced stress and increased chlorophyll. ZnO-NPs improved maize plants’ resistance to the unfavorable effects of saline soils. Finally, plant metabolism and abiotic stress tolerance were improved by Se and Se/CuO NPs.
Download PDF
Full Article
Physiological and Biochemical Processes in the Exogenous Administration of Selenium Nanoparticles and Selenium/Copper Oxide Nanocomposite to Reduce Salt Stress in Zea mays L.
Research on nanoparticles (NPs) is gaining increasing popularity as a way to enhance abiotic stress tolerance and improve crop productivity. This study assessed the effects of foliar spray of selenium NPs (Se NPs) and selenium/copper oxide nanoparticles (Se/CuO NPs) at 50 and 100 ppm on the growth and biochemical characteristics of Zea mays L. plants grown under saline stress conditions (100 mM). Se NPs and Se/CuO NPs were analyzed by energy dispersive X-ray, transmission electron microscopy, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analyses. The Se NPs and Se/CuO NPs were found to have an average particle size of 135.2 and 75.1 nm using the ImageJ tool. Shoot and root lengths, chlorophyll levels, protein, phenols, and flavonoids were all investigated in this study. Plant growth and chlorophyll concentration dropped under salt stress but were improved with the application of Se and Se/CuO NPs. The enzymes catalase, superoxide dismutase, and glutathione reductase exhibited the highest values at 100 ppm of Se/CuO NPs, of 74.4, 132.1, and 43.2 mmol/g, respectively. Se and Se/CuO NPs reduced stress and increased chlorophyll. ZnO-NPs improved maize plants’ resistance to the unfavorable effects of saline soils. Finally, plant metabolism and abiotic stress tolerance were improved by Se and Se/CuO NPs.
DOI: 10.15376/biores.20.4.10487-10503
Keywords: Salinity stress; Maize plants; Se CuO NPs; Antioxidant enzymes
Contact information: Department of Biology, College of Science, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), P. O. Box: 90950, Riyadh 11623, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia;
* Corresponding author: BSAlammari@imamu.edu.sa
INTRODUCTION
Salinity stress is a significant issue in crop production and a crucial limiting factor on a global scale. In dry and semi-arid regions of the world, salinity is the most prevalent abiotic stressor (Hussain et al. 2019). Plants’ morpho-physiological characteristics are negatively impacted by salinity, which lowers their production. Osmotic stress brought on by salinity reduces plant growth and productivity in irrigated areas. Plants under salinity stress experience changes in their ability to absorb water and disturbances in their ionic composition (Ayub et al. 2021). An overabundance of salt in the soil causes early leaf senescence by decreasing the area of the leaf and the amount of chlorophyll, which lowers photosynthetic activity (Nawaz et al. 2019).
Following rice and wheat, maize (Zea mays L.) is the third most significant cereal crop in the world. It is cultivated worldwide and exhibits higher genetic diversity among cereals due to its strong nutritional value. Numerous abiotic stressors negatively impact maize crop productivity (Revilla et al. 2022). One of the eight necessary micronutrients, copper (Cu) plays a crucial role in the formation of metalloproteins by regulating enzyme activity as a cofactor. It plays a key function in controlling the combination of several macromolecules that are essential to plant metabolism, such as respiration, photosynthesis, and various defensive mechanisms against abiotic stressors (Lodde et al. 2021). Chlorophyll concentration and seed dormancy are two aspects of plant growth and development that copper is crucial for regulating (Wang et al. 2021). Nanomaterials have recently gained traction across various fields as a solution to numerous environmental, medical, and agricultural issues (Alsalamah et al. 2023b; Qanash et al. 2023; Alghonaim et al. 2024; Amin et al. 2025).
Several studies have demonstrated that nanoparticles (NPs) may exert toxic and stress-inducing effects on biological systems (Wu et al. 2023; Yadav et al. 2023). The extent of these toxicological impacts depends on multiple parameters, including particle size, methods of synthesis, concentration, surface charge, and exposure time (Abdelghany et al. 2018). Despite their diverse and beneficial biological functions, it is essential to establish a balance between their positive and adverse effects to ensure safe utilization. Consequently, refining synthesis techniques and employing appropriate surface modifications are key approaches to mitigate NP toxicity (Sanità et al. 2020). Notably, low concentrations of selenium (Se) and copper oxide (CuO) nanoparticles have been reported to promote plant growth and alleviate stress responses (Hernández-Hernández et al. 2019).
Microorganism and plant extract synthesis has drawn a lot of interest as a sustainable, environmentally friendly method of producing a variety of NPs. (Alghonaim et al. 2025). Surface charge, chemical reactivity, and gradual, regulated, and sufficient release are characteristics that set nanomaterials apart from bulk materials (Otari et al. 2024). The presence of nanoparticles will increase the concentrations of related ions in the nearby soil (Chen 2018).
Joudeh and Linke (2022) attributed the action of Se in plants to the control of photosynthesis and the antioxidant defense system. The photosynthetic rate was considerably decreased by salt stress, but the foliar spray containing CuO-NPs enhanced growth and photosynthetic characteristics of maize plants (Shafiq et al. 2024). CuO nanoparticles can improve nutrient uptake and boost plant growth at low concentrations, but at high concentrations, they can cause phytotoxicity, which reduces growth and yield by causing oxidative stress, DNA damage, and disruption of physiological processes like photosynthesis and enzyme activity.
CuO NPs can also build up in soil and plant tissues, which could be harmful to human health because of the food chain (Ibrahim et al. 2022). Aside from its use in agricultural domains to treat salinity stress of maize plants, the current study sought to synthesize Se and Se/CuO NPs in doped form for the first time, utilizing extract from Ficus religiosa fruit. It also examined the effects of this foliar application on the plants’ biochemistry, morphology, and phenolic compounds under salinity stress. Also, the phenolic profile was assessed using HPLC under different treatments.
EXPERIMENTAL
Ficus religiosa Fruit Extract
After being cleansed with distilled deionized water, the Ficus religiosa fruits were allowed to dry for five days at room temperature in the shade. After that, 100 mL of double-distilled deionized water and 5 g of the plant powder were heated for 20 min at 70 °C. This solution was kept at 4 °C after being further filtered via Whatman No. 1 filter paper.
Production of Se and CuO/Se NPs via Biogenesis
A total of 20 mL of the extract and 100 mL of 10 mM Na2SeO3 were combined to create SeNPs. The reaction took place in a darkened atmosphere with continuous magnetic stirring, and it was magnetically stirred at 1200 rpm for a full day at room temperature. Se-NPs are collected and dehydrated for a variety of studies (Soliman et al. 2024). To create CuO/Se NPs, 0.01 mM of copper sulfate and 1 mM of sodium selenite were utilized. The synthesis procedure was finished by heating a stock solution of both precursor salts in an equal volume of 60 mL for 10 min at 80 °C. Using a magnetic stirrer, 30 mL of plant extract was constantly stirred for 1 h at 40 °C. Black green of the bimetallic CuO/Se NP precipitates replaced the pale red color of the extract. Following a 20-min centrifugation at 10,000 rpm to collect the NPs, they were meticulously cleaned three times in double-distilled deionized water to get rid of any remaining plant organic residue. It was then dried using hot air (Alsalamah et al. 2023b).
Characterization of Se and Se/CuO NPs
A JEM-2100 PLUS electron microscope (JEOL, Japan) operating at 200 kV with a LaB6 source was used to analyze Se/CuO NPs utilizing transmission electron microscopy (TEM) pictures and selected area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns. The assigned active groups of the active compounds that contribute to the generation of NPs were investigated using FTIR. The crystallinity, size of the crystallites, and lattice of the generated Se and Se/CuO NPs were measured using Shimadzu equipment (Shimadzu XRD-6000 lists, SSI, Japan). Additionally, the Scherer equation, D = 0.9 λ / β cosθ, was used to determine the particle size of NPs. Then, d-spacing (dhkl = λ / (2sin θ)), micro-strain (ε = β / 4tan θ), and dislocation density (δ = 1/D2) were calculated (Tables 1 and 2).
Effects of Spraying Se and Se/CuO NPs at Varying Concentrations on Zea mays L. Plants
Zea mays L. (variety Giza 321) seeds were utilized in the present investigation. A field experiment was conducted using sandy loam soil. The experiment’s treatments were divided into six groups. The groups were as follows: 1: control, which was irrigated with fresh water; 2: irrigated with saline water (100 mM of NaCl); 3 and 4: spray irrigated with 100 mM of NaCl with 50 and 100 ppm of Se NPs, respectively; 5 and 6: spray irrigated with 100 mM of NaCl with 50 and 100 ppm of Se/CuO NPs. Morphology measurements included the shoot and root lengths. Chlorophyll a, b, a+b, and carotenoids of leaves, also phenol, and protein of shoots were determined, and leaves’ antioxidant enzymes were all included in the biochemical studies. Additionally, phenolic compounds of the control, salinity group, and salinity group in the presence of Se NPs and Se/CuO NPs (100 ppm) were estimated by HPLC. All these analyses were conducted 90 days after sowing. Biochemical investigations and controlled growth measures were conducted to gain a deeper understanding of the effects of these elements, which are discussed in more detail in the sections that follow.
Determination of Pigment, Protein, and Phenol Contents
One gram of fresh leaves was used to assess pigment contents (chlorophyll a, b, a+b, and carotenoids) using the method described by Lichtenthaler et al. (1981). To remove the water-soluble proteins, the plant shoots were dried at 60 °C until a consistent dry weight was achieved. A cone was filled with 1 g of dried shoot powder that had been finely powdered. Then, 5 mL of 2% phenol water and 10 mL of distilled water were mixed. After the reaction mixture was filtered, the filtrate was diluted with distilled water to adjust its final volume to 50 mL. Protein contents were determined in accordance with Lowry et al. (1951). The method outlined by Diaz and Martin (1972) was used to measure the total phenolic compounds (mg/100 g of dry weight).
Determination of Antioxidant Enzymes
Catalase
Following the manufacturer’s instructions, a catalase analysis kit (Biodignostics Co.) was used to measure the amount of catalase present. To put it briefly, for 30 min, the cells were lysed on ice. For 3 min, cell lysates were exposed to H2O2. The leftover H2O2 was then mixed with a substrate to create N-4-antipyryl-3-chloro-5-sulfonate-p-benzoquinonemonoimine, which has a maximum absorbance at 540 nm. Using a spectrophotometer (Biosystem 310 plus; Biosystems, Spain), the breakdown of H2O2 was measured to estimate the catalase activity. The Bradford Method was used to measure the amount of protein (Selim et al. 2024).
Superoxide dismutase
Measuring the SOD enzyme’s suppression of nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) photoreduction allowed for the determination of SOD activity. The reaction mixture had a final volume of 3.0 mL and contained 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH7.6), 0.1 mM EDTA, 50 mM sodium carbonate, 12 mM L-methionine, 50 μM NBT, 10 μM riboflavin, and 100 μL of crude extract. Crude extract was absent from a control reaction. For 15 min at room temperature, the reaction mixture was exposed to white light to perform the SOD reaction. Following a 15-min incubation period, a spectrophotometer (Biosystem 310 plus; Biosystems, Spain), was used to measure absorbance at 560 nm. An enzyme’s ability to block the photochemical degradation of NBT by 50% was referred to as one unit (U) of SOD activity (Aebi 1983).
Glutathione reductase
The sample solution was a total of 200 μL; 100 μL of 2.1 mM NADPH, 100 μL of 6 mM 5,5-dithio-bis-2-nitrobenzoic acid (DTNB), 20 μL of glutathione reductase, and 125 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.5) and 6.3 mM EDTA were included in the 1 mL reaction mixtures. Changes in optical density were monitored at 25 °C and 412 nm.
HPLC Analysis of Phenolic Compounds
Phenolic compounds of the control, salinity group, and salinity group in the presence of Se NPs and Se/CuO NPs (100 ppm) were estimated by HPLC. An Agilent 1260 series instrument was used for HPLC analysis. Using a Zorbax Eclipse Plus C8 column (4.6 mm x 250 mm i.d., 5 μm), the separation was performed. At a flow rate of 0.9 mL/min, the mobile phase was made up of water (A) and 0.05% trifluoroacetic acid in acetonitrile (B). The following is the sequential linear gradient programming of the mobile phase: 82% A; 0 to 1 min; 82% A; 75% A; 75% A; 11 to 18 min; 60% A; 82% A; 18 to 22 min; 22 to 24 min; 82% A). The monitoring wavelength was 280 nm for the multi-wavelength detector. Five microliters (μL) were the injection volume for every sample solution. At 40 °C, the column temperature was kept constant (Alsalamah et al. 2023a).
Analytical Statistics
Utilizing Minitab 18 (Minitab LLC, State College, PA, USA), statistical evaluation was computed. Post hoc analyses were conducted using Tukey’s test (honest significant difference), with a significance level of p < 0.05 and 3 replicates (n = 3).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Characterization of Se and Se/CuO NPs
A TEM image and SAED patterns are displayed for Se and Se/CuO NPs in Fig. 1 (a,d) and (b,e), respectively. The TEM picture of the NPs showed semispherical and aggregated spherical forms. The Se and Se/CuO NPs were found to have an average particle size of 135.17 and 75.1 nm using the ImageJ tool. Figure 1b, e also displays the SAED patterns of the Se and Se/CuO samples. The SAED patterns of this material reveal polycrystalline concentric rings with diffraction spots. A protective shell forms around the particles in the Se/CuO sample due to the high concentration of phytochemicals from plant extract, altering their size and shape (Elkady et al. 2025).
Fig. 1. TEM images (a, d), SAED patterns (b, e), and FTIR (c, f) of CuO, Se, and CuO/Se samples, respectively
The XRD patterns of the Se and Se/CuO NPs are displayed in Fig. 2a and b, respectively. The production of monoclinic CuO nanoparticles and trigonal Se nanoparticles, which matched JCPDS cards No. 80-1268 and 006-0362, respectively, was shown by the XRD pattern for Se and Se/CuO NPs (Vinu et al. 2021). Further supporting the Se and Se/CuO NPs’ crystallinity were a few distinct peaks in the XRD pattern (Fig. 2 and Table 1). The peaks at 23.8°, 29.9°, 33.2°, 41.2°, 43.8°, 45.4°, 48.3°, 51.8°, 56.4°, and 66.1°, respectively, are identified by the hkl Miller indices as belonging to crystal planes 100, 101, 032, 110, 102, 111, 200, 414, 201, and 210 Crystalline Se (COD9008579, 9008581, and JCPDS card No. 06–362) (Safaei et al. 2022).
At 43.3°, 50.6°, and 74.2°, another set of 2θ peaks appeared in the XRD spectrum shown in Fig. 2; these angles correspondingly matched the Miller indices of 111, 200, and 220 Crystalline CuO (which matched JCPDS cards No. 80-1268). The phytochemicals in plant extract may be the source of additional impurity peaks. According to the Scherer equation, the average particle size of the Se and Se/CuO NPs was 16.7 and 46.2 nm, which was somewhat smaller than the TEM measurement. For smaller nanoparticles, TEM revealed a strong correlation between the size of the crystallite and the corresponding particle size (Munawar et al. 2024).
Fig. 2. XRD of Se (a)and Se/CuO NPs(b)
The fruit extract functions as a capping and stabilizing agent to produce metal NPs from the metal ions, resulting in vibrations and stretching peaks that are visible in the FTIR spectrum (Fig. 1c, f). Alcohols and phenols’ O-H stretching vibrations were detected at 3407 and 3422 cm−1 (Demir et al. 2018). The C-N stretching of aromatic amine groups and the N-O symmetric stretching of nitro compounds are associated with the absorption bands at 1352 and 1349 cm−1 in Se NPs, and Se/CuO NPs, respectively (Rastogi and Arunachalam 2012).
Table 1. XRD Parameters for Se NPs
Table 2. XRD Parameters for Se/CuO NPs
The spectra of nanoparticles include all of these functional groups, as shown in Fig. 1c, f. However, as mentioned, interactions between Se and CuO nanoparticles may result in pre-shift and post-shift in peaks (Thirupathi et al. 2024). Se and Se/CuO nanocomposites’ structural and morphological properties dictate their efficacy in biological systems as mentioned in other scientific papers (Abdelhady et al. 2024; Rasheed et al. 2024). The size, shape, crystallinity, and surface chemistry of particles are meticulously designed to enhance their bioavailability, cell targeting, and therapeutic efficacy.
Shoot and Root Lengths of Maize Plants in Response to Se or Se/CuO NPs
Salinity significantly impacted several physio-biochemical characteristics, including photosynthetic activity and biomass production. Although plants responded differently to salt stress, it had detrimental cellular impacts on entire plants (Rahman et al. 2021). Plants attempt to increase their tolerance under stress by changing their physiological and biochemical functions. Turgor losses have frequently been seen in saline environments, which can have fatal consequences for plant growth because they create hypertonic conditions around the cell. The use of nanoparticles is essential in agriculture to prevent salt stress because it either improves antioxidant production or slows the synthesis of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Al-Rajhi et al. 2022). Figure 3 shows that the salinity at 100 mM showed significant decrease in shoot and root lengths of maize plants. Se NPs at 100 ppm and Se/CuO at 50 and 100 ppm appeared to have significantly improved these morphological parameters compared to the salinity group. Depending on the plant species, age, and metal nanoparticle concentration, several studies have found that applying nanoparticles improves the quality of various crops, including citrus fruit juice (Shani et al. 2023), as well as cucumber, tomato, mustard, Arabidopsis, and maize crops, which helps them adapt to varying environmental conditions (Wu et al. 2023). Prior research demonstrated that CuO-NPs made plants more resilient to biotic and abiotic stressors (Yadav et al. 2023). Shoot, root, and growth were all extremely sensitive to salinity stress, which severely damaged the leaves’ mesophyll area and reduced the biomass production of maize plants (Abbasi et al. 2015). Another study found that the application of mixed nanoparticles of Se and Zn was especially successful in bringing physiological and biochemical parameters back to levels that were close to normal in rice plants under salinity stress. These gains included increases of 46.3% in plant height, and 70.5% in root length (Mishra et al. 2025).
Fig. 3. Shoot and root lengths of maize plants under salinity stress in response to Se and Se/CuO NPs
Pigments, Protein, and Phenol Contents
Data in Table 3 indicate that salinity caused a significant decrease in pigment and protein content, but there appeared to be an increase in phenol contents. Through increasing the rate of photosynthesis and subsequently lengthening the shoots and roots, foliar application of Se and Se/CuO NPs is essential for improving vegetative growth. Salinity-induced oxidative stress has been linked to adverse effects on plant growth, physio-biochemical processes, anatomical features, metabolic processes, and enzyme activity. The thickness of cell walls of resistant types is greatly increased by high salt concentrations, which also increases chloroplasts and intercellular gaps (Arif et al. 2020).
Table 3. Effect of Se and Se/CuO on Pigments, Protein, and Phenols Contents of Maize Plants Under Salinity Stress
Se/CuO NPs at 100 ppm caused an increased value of chlorophyll a, b, a+b, carotenoids and protein contents by 188.0, 83.1, 111.6, 70.2, and 47.4% compared to the salinity group. Another study by Vishwakarma et al. (2018) demonstrated that the total protein content distributed in tomato shoots and roots was considerably enhanced by foliar treatment with CuO-NPs.
Antioxidant Enzymes
Data in Table 4 indicate that both salinity and Se or Se/CuO nanoparticles caused a significant increase in antioxidant enzymes (catalase, superoxide dismutase, and glutathione reductase). Se/CuO NPs at 100 ppm showed the higher activity of catalase, superoxide dismutase, and glutathione reductase enzymes of 68.1, 66.3, and 245.2 mmol/g, respectively, compared to the control group. Through the enhancement of their antioxidant system, nanoparticles help plants become more resilient to oxidative stress. Antioxidative defense systems, such as SOD, and catalase, are activated in response to oxidative stress caused by nanoparticles. Low oxidative stress caused by low nanoparticle concentrations in plants results in a reduction in antioxidant activity (Sharma et al. 2019).
Table 4. Effect of Se and Se/CuO on Antioxidant Enzymes (Catalase, Superoxide Dismutase, and Glutathione Reductase) of Maize Plants Under Salinity Stress
Phenolic and Flavonoid Compounds of Maize Plants Under Different Treatments
Table 5 and Fig. 4 indicate the impact of salinity in the presence or absence of Se or Se/CuO NPs at 100 ppm on phenolic compounds of maize plants using HPLC. Salinity at 100 mM caused a decrease in gallic acid, chlorogenic acid, ellagic acid, ferulic acid, naringenin, daidzein, Quercetin, cinnamic acid, and kaempferol contents. In the same trend, under salinity, phenolic compounds concentration, such as gallic, syringic, and p-coumaric acids, vanillic, and caffeic acids, increased in grape plants, which have played a significant part in salinity tolerance (Mohammadkhani 2018). The highest total phenolic compound content in Glaux maritima was found to be between 50 and 100 mM of salinity stress (Pungin et al. 2023).
Fig. 4. HPLC for the detection of phenolic compounds in Zea mays leaves at different treatments: (a) Control, (b) Salinity group, (c, d) Salinity group treated with 100 ppm of Se and Se/CuO NPs
Table 5. Effects of Se and Se/CuO NPs on Phenolic Compounds on Zea mays L. Based on HPLC Analysis
In the present study, Se NPs at 100 ppm had the highest values of catechin, syringic acid, and quercetin. Se/CuO NPs at 100 ppm appeared to have the highest values of naringenin, daidzein, kaempferol, and hesperetin. To fend off ROS, plants employ their receptors to identify danger and trigger a natural defense mechanism. One of these defense mechanisms is the buildup of specific protective secondary metabolites, including terpenes, alkaloids, and phenolic compounds (PCs). Particularly, PCs function as strong antioxidants and are necessary for the plant to survive salt stress. The plants’ endurance, competitiveness, tenacity, and survival against salinity stress are ensured by enhanced PC synthesis (Reetu et al. 2023). Because phenolic compounds have potent antioxidant activity, their accumulation is one of the nonenzymatic antioxidant defense mechanisms that shield plants from harm caused by ROS. In another study on garlic bulbs, it was found that the nanoparticles effectively increased the levels of flavonoids and total phenolic compounds, while Se NPs promoted these substances, particularly at 0.5 ppm (El-Saber 2021).
CONCLUSIONS
- Plant metabolism and resistance to salinity stress were improved by Se and Se/CuO nanoparticle (NPs).
- Significantly, the morphological characteristics (shoot and root lengths) and biochemical traits (pigment contents, protein, and carbohydrates) of the 100 ppm of Se/Cu group under salinity stress were similar to those of the control group.
- According to the current analysis, plant development was negatively impacted by salinity. In fact, the results demonstrated that salinity had a detrimental effect on a variety of physiological markers, such as total protein, total phenolic content, carotenoid content, and total chlorophyll content.
- The foliar spray of selenium and selenium/copper oxide nanoparticles helped maize plants overcome the salt stress by enhancing the previously mentioned metrics.
Therefore, the negative effects of salt may be lessened by applying Se and Se/CuO-NPs topically at particular crop phenological stages. To ascertain the concentration of nanoparticle suspensions and their use at various phenological stages, further investigation is necessary.
Abbreviations List
Phenolic compounds (PCs), Superoxide dismutase (SOD), Nanoparticles (NPs), Salinity stress (SS), Reactive oxygen species (ROS)
Funding
This work was supported and funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU) (grant number IMSIU-DDRSP2501).
REFERENCES CITED
Abbasi, G. H., Akhtar, J., Ahmad, R., Jamil, M., Anwar-ul-Haq, M., Ali, S., and Ijaz, M. (2015). “Potassium application mitigates salt stress differentially at different growth stages in tolerant and sensitive maize hybrids.” Plant Growth Regulation 76(1), 111-125. DOI: 10.1007/s10725-015-0050-1
Abdelghany, T. M., Al-Rajhi, A. M., Al Abboud, M. A., Alawlaqi, M. M., Ganash Magdah, A., Helmy, E. A., and Mabrouk, A. S. (2018). “Recent advances in green synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their applications: About future directions. A review,” BioNanoScience 8, 5-16. DOI: 10.1007/s12668-017-0413-3
Abdelhady, M. A., Abdelghany, T. M., Mohamed, S. H., and Abdelhamed, S. A. (2024). “Biological application of zinc oxide nanoparticles created by green method.” Egyptian Journal of Soil Science 64(3), 757-775. DOI: 10.21608/ejss.2024.272650.1731
Aebi, H. E. (1983). “Catalase,” in: Methods of Enzymatic Analysis, H. U. Bergmeyer (Ed.), Verlag Chemie Weinheim, Germany, pp. 273-286.
Alghonaim, M. I., Alsalamah, S. A., Bazaid, A. S., and Abdelghany, T. M. (2024). “Biosynthesis of CuO@ Au NPs and its formulated into biopolymers carboxymethyl cellulose and chitosan: Characterizations, antimicrobial, anticancer and antioxidant properties,” Waste and biomass valorization 15(9), 5191-5204. DOI: 10.1007/s12649-024-02469-5
Alghonaim, M. I., Alsalamah, S. A., Mohammad, A. M., and Abdelghany, T. M. (2025). “Green synthesis of bimetallic Se@TiO2NPs and their formulation into biopolymers and their utilization as antimicrobial, anti-diabetic, antioxidant, and healing agent in vitro,” Biomass Conv. Bioref. 15, 6767–6779. DOI:10.1007/s13399-024-05451-2
Al-Rajhi, A. M. H., Yahya, R., Bakri, M. M., Yahya R., and Abdelghany, T. M. (2022). “In situ green synthesis of Cu-doped ZnO based polymers nanocomposite with studying antimicrobial, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities,” Appl. Biol. Chem. 65, article 35. DOI: 10.1186/s13765-022-00702-0
Alsalamah, S. A., Alghonaim, M. I., Jusstaniah, M., and Abdelghany, T. M., (2023a). “Anti-yeasts antioxidant and healing properties of henna pre-treated by moist heat and molecular docking of its major constituents, chlorogenic and ellagic acids, with Candida albicans and Geotrichum candidum proteins,” Life 13(9), article 1839. DOI: 10.3390/life13091839
Alsalamah, S. A., Alghonaim, M. I., Mohammad, A. M., and Abdel Ghany, T. M. (2023b). “Algal biomass extract as mediator for copper oxide nanoparticle synthesis: Applications in control of fungal, bacterial growth, and photocatalytic degradations of dyes,” BioResources 18(4), 7474-7489. DOI: 10.15376/biores.18.4.7474-7489
Amin, M. A., Algamdi, N. A., Waznah, M. S., Bukhari, D. A., Alsharif, S. M., Alkhayri, F., Abdel-Nasser, M., and Fouda, A. (2025). “An insight into antimicrobial, antioxidant, anticancer, and antidiabetic activities of trimetallic Se/ZnO/CuO nanoalloys fabricated by aqueous extract of Nitraria retusa,” Journal of Cluster Science 36(1), 1-15. DOI: 10.1007/s10876-024-02742-6
Arif, Y., Singh, P., Siddiqui, H., Bajguz, A., and Hayat, S. (2020). “Salinity induced physiological and biochemical changes in plants: An omic approach towards salt stress tolerance,” Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 156, 64-77. DOI:10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.08.042
Ayub, M., Ashraf, M. Y., Kausar, A., Saleem, S., Anwar, S., Altay, V., and Ozturk, M. (2021). “Growth and physio-biochemical responses of maize (Zea mays L.) to drought and heat stresses,” Plant Biosystems-An International Journal Dealing with all Aspects of Plant Biology 155(3), 535-542. DOI: 10.1080/11263504.2020.1762785
Chen, H. (2018). “Metal based nanoparticles in agricultural system: Behavior, transport, and interaction with plants,” Chemical Speciation & Bioavailability 30(1), 123-134. DOI: 10.1080/09542299.2018.1520050
Demir, D., Bölgen, N., and Vaseashta, A. (2018). “Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Lantana camara leaf extract and their use as mercury (II) ion sensor,” in: Advanced Nanotechnologies for Detection and Defence against CBRN Agents, Springer, Amsterdam, pp. 427-433. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-024-1298-7_42
Diaz, D. H., and Martin, G. C. (1972). “Peach seed dormancy in relation to endogenous inhibitors and applied growth substances,” Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 97(5), 651-654. DOI: 10.21273/JASHS.97.5.651
Elkady, F. M., Badr, B. M., Saied, E., Hashem, A. H., Abdel-Maksoud, M. A., Fatima, S., Malik, A., Aufy, M., Hussein, A. M., Abdulrahman, M. S., et al. (2025). “Green biosynthesis of bimetallic copper oxide-selenium nanoparticles using leaf extract of Lagenaria siceraria: Antibacterial, anti-virulence activities against multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa,” International Journal of Nanomedicine 20, 4705-4727. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S497494
El-Saber, M. (2021). “Effect of biosynthesized Zn and Se nanoparticles on the productivity and active constituents of garlic subjected to saline stress,” Egyptian Journal of Desert Research 71(1), 99-128. DOI:10.21608/ejdr.2021.81793.1085
Hernández-Hernández, H., Quiterio-Gutiérrez, T., Cadenas-Pliego, G., Ortega-Ortiz, H., Hernández-Fuentes, A. D., Cabrera de la Fuente, M., Valdés-Reyna, J., and Juárez-Maldonado, A. (2019). “Impact of selenium and copper nanoparticles on yield, antioxidant system, and fruit quality of tomato plants,” Plants (Basel) 8(10), article 355. DOI: 10.3390/plants8100355
Hussain, S., Shaukat, M., Ashraf, M., Zhu, C., Jin, Q., and Zhang, J. (2019). “Salinity stress in arid and semi-arid climates: Effects and management in field crops,” in: Climate Change and Agriculture, IntechOpen, London, UK. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.87982
Ibrahim, A. S., Ali, G. A., Hassanein, A., Attia, A. M., and Marzouk, E. R. (2022). “Toxicity and uptake of CuO nanoparticles: Evaluation of an emerging nanofertilizer on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plant,” Sustainability 14(9), article 4914. DOI: 10.3390/su14094914
Joudeh, N., and Linke, D. (2022). “Nanoparticle classification, physicochemical properties, characterization, and applications: A comprehensive review for biologists,” Journal of Nanobiotechnology 20, article 262. DOI: 10.1186/s12951-022-01477-8
Lichtenthaler, H. K., Buschmann, C., Döll, M., Fietz, H.-J., Bach, T., Kozel, U., Meier, D., and Rahmsdorf, U. (1981). “Photosynthetic activity, chloroplast ultrastructure, and leaf characteristics of high-light and low-light plants and of sun and shade leaves,” Photosynthesis Research 2(2), 115-141. DOI: 10.1007/BF00028752
Lodde, V., Morandini, P., Costa, A., Murgia, I., and Ezquer, I. (2021). “cROStalk for life: Uncovering ROS signaling in plants and animal systems, from gametogenesis to early embryonic development,” Genes 12(4), article 525. DOI: 10.3390/genes12040525
Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L., and Randall, R. J. (1951). “Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 193(1), 265-275. DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)52451-6
Mishra, M., Afzal, S., Yadav, R., Singh, N. K., and Zarbakhsh, S. (2025). “Salinity stress amelioration through selenium and zinc oxide nanoparticles in rice,” Scientific Reports 15(1), article 27554. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-12106-3
Mohammadkhani, N. (2018). “Effects of salinity on phenolic compounds in tolerant and sensitive grapes,” Poljoprivreda i Sumarstvo 64(2), 73-86. DOI: 10.17707/AgricultForest.64.2.05
Munawar, F., Kaniawati, K., Handayani, R., Sukma, A., Yudanegara, A., and Sp, S. W. (2024). “Eco-innovation adoption in emerging markets: Analyzing managerial and environmental factors in Indonesian SMEs,” Journal of Enterprise and Development (JED) 6(2), 514-526. DOI: 10.20414/jed.v6i2.11124
Nawaz, M., Ashraf, M. Y., Khan, A., and Nawaz, F. (2021). “Salicylic acid–and ascorbic acid–induced salt tolerance in mung bean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) accompanied by oxidative defense mechanisms,” Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 21(3), 2057-2071. DOI: 10.1007/s42729-021-00502-3
Otari, S., Bapat, V. A., Lakkakula, J., Kadam, U. S., and Suprasanna, P. (2024). “Advancements in bionanotechnological applications for climate-smart agriculture and food production,” Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology 57, article 103117. DOI: 10.1016/j.bcab.2024.103117
Pungin, A., Lartseva, L., Loskutnikova, V., Shakhov, V., Popova, E., Skrypnik, L., and Krol, O. (2023). “Effect of salinity stress on phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity in halophytes Spergularia marina (L.) Griseb. and Glaux maritima L. cultured in vitro,” Plants 12(9), article 1905. DOI: 10.3390/plants12091905
Qanash, H., Bazaid, A. S., Alharazi, T., Barnawi, H., Alotaibi, K., Shater, A. R. M., and Abdelghany, T. M. (2023). “Bioenvironmental applications of myco-created bioactive zinc oxide nanoparticle-doped selenium oxide nanoparticles,” Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 2023, 1-12. DOI: 10.1007/s13399-023-03809-6
Rasheed, R, Bhat, A, Singh, B, and Tian, F. (2024). “Biogenic synthesis of selenium and copper oxide nanoparticles and inhibitory effect against multi-drug resistant biofilm-forming bacterial pathogens,” Biomedicines 12(5), article 994. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12050994.
Reetu, Tomar, M., Kumar, M., and Seva Nayak, D. (2023). “Role of phenolic metabolites in salinity stress management in plants,” in: Plant Phenolics in Abiotic Stress Management, Springer Nature Singapore, pp. 353-368. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-6426-8_16
Revilla, P., Alves, M. L., Andelković, V., Balconi, C., Dinis, I., Mendes-Moreira, P., Redaelli, R., de Galarreta, J. I. R., Patto, M. C. V., Žilić, S. et al. (2022). “Traditional foods from maize (Zea mays L.) in Europe,” Frontiers in Nutrition 8, article 683399. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2021.683399
Safaei, M., Mozaffari, H. R., Moradpoor, H., Imani, M. M., Sharifi, R., and Golshah, A. (2022). “Optimization of green synthesis of selenium nanoparticles and evaluation of their antifungal activity against oral Candida albicans infection,” Advances in Materials Science and Engineering 2022(1), article 1376998. DOI: 10.1155/2022/1376998
Sanità, G., Carrese, B., and Lamberti, A. (2020). “Nanoparticle surface functionalization: How to improve biocompatibility and cellular internalization,” Front. Mol. Biosci. 7, article 587012. DOI:10.3389/fmolb.2020.587012.
Selim, S., Alruwaili, Y. S., Ejaz, H., Abdalla, A. E., Almuhayawi, M. S., Nagshabandi, M. K., Tarabulsi, M. K., Al Jaouni, S. K., Bazuhair, M. A., and Abdelghany T. M. (2024). “Estimation and action mechanisms of cinnamon bark via oxidative enzymes and ultrastructures as antimicrobial, anti-biofilm, antioxidant, anti-Diabetic, and anticancer agents,” BioResources 19(4), 7019-7041. DOI: 10.15376/biores.19.4.7019-7041
Shafiq, H., Shani, M. Y., Ashraf, M. Y., De Mastro, F., Cocozza, C., Abbas, S., Ali, N., Nisa, Z., Tahir, A., Iqbal, M., et al. (2024). “Copper oxide nanoparticles induced growth and physio-biochemical changes in maize (Zea mays L.) in saline soil,” Plants 13(8), article 1080. DOI: 10.3390/plants13081080
Shani, M. Y., Ahmed, S. R., Ashraf, M. Y., Khan, Z., Cocozza, C., De Mastro, F., Gul, N, Pervaiz, S., Abbas S., Nawaz, H., et al. (2023). “Nano-biochar suspension mediated alterations in yield and juice quality of Kinnow (Citrus reticulata L.),” Horticulturae 9(5), article 521. DOI: 10.3390/horticulturae9050521
Sharma, S., Singh, V. K., Kumar, A., and Mallubhotla, S. (2019). “Effect of nanoparticles on oxidative damage and antioxidant defense system in plants,” in: Molecular Plant Abiotic Stress: Biology and Biotechnology, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, USA, pp. 315-333. DOI: 10.1002/9781119463665.ch17
Thirupathi, B., Pongen, Y. L., Kaveriyappan, G. R., Dara, P. K., Rathinasamy, S., Vinayagam, S., Sundaram, T., Hyun, B. K., Durairaj, T., and Sekar, S. K. R. (2024). “Padina boergesenii mediated synthesis of Se-ZnO bimetallic nanoparticles for effective anticancer activity,” Frontiers in Microbiology 15, article 1358467. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1358467
Vinu, D., Govindaraju, K., Vasantharaja, R., Amreen Nisa, S., Kannan, M., and Vijai Anand, K. (2021). “Biogenic zinc oxide, copper oxide and selenium nanoparticles: Preparation, characterization and their anti-bacterial activity against Vibrio parahaemolyticus,” Journal of Nanostructure in Chemistry 11, 271-286. DOI: 10.1007/s40097-020-00365-7
Vishwakarma, K., Upadhyay, N., Kumar, N., Tripathi, D. K., Chauhan, D. K., Sharma, S., and Sahi, S. (2018). “Potential applications and avenues of nanotechnology in sustainable agriculture,” in: Nanomaterials in Plants, Algae, and Microorganisms, Academic Press of Elsevier, London, UK, pp. 473-500. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-811487-2.00021-9
Wang, H., An, T., Huang, D., Liu, R., Xu, B., Zhang, S, and Chen, Y. (2021). “Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbioses alleviating salt stress in maize is associated with a decline in root-to-leaf gradient of Na⁺/K⁺ ratio,” BMC Plant Biology 21(1), article 457. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-021-03237-6
Wu, Q., Fan, C., Wang, H., Han, Y., Tai, F., Wu, J., Li, H., and He, R. (2023). “Biphasic impacts of graphite-derived engineering carbon-based nanomaterials on plant performance: Effectiveness vs. nanotoxicity,” Advanced Agrochem 2(2), 113-126. DOI: 10.1016/j.aac.2023.01.001
Yadav, M., George, N., and Dwibedi, V. (2023). “Emergence of toxic trace elements in plant environment: Insights into potential of silica nanoparticles for mitigation of metal toxicity in plants,” Environmental Pollution 333, article ID 122112. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122112
Zhao, M. X., Wen, J. L., Wang, L., Wang, X. P., and Chen, T. S. (2019). “Intracellular catalase activity instead of glutathione level dominates the resistance of cells to reactive oxygen species,” Cell Stress Chaperones 24(3), 609-619. DOI: 10.1007/s12192-019-00993-1
Article submitted: September 1, 2025; Peer review completed: September 28, 2025; Revised version received: September 30, 2025; Accepted: October 9, 2025; Published: October 20, 2025.
DOI: 10.15376/biores.20.4.10487-10503