NC State
BioResources
Yahya, M., Lee, H. V., and Abd Hamid, S. B. (2015). "Preparation of nanocellulose via transition metal salt-catalyzed hydrolysis pathway," BioRes. 10(4), 7627-7639

Abstract

Nanocellulose was successfully prepared from microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) via nickel salt-catalyzed hydrolysis under mild reaction conditions of 45 °C for 15 min. The mild acid nickel salt-catalyzed hydrolysis was able to selectively depolymerize the amorphous regions of cellulose and retain its crystalline region, thus improving the crystallinity of the treated product at the nanoscale up to 80%. FTIR analysis confirmed that the basic cellulose structure of inorganic metal salt-treated products was maintained and that no derivative was formed. Furthermore, the synthesized Ni-treated nanocellulose (NTC) products appeared in the form of cluster fragments with spider-web-like appearance (fiber diameter of 10 to 60 nm and fiber length of 300 to 600 nm), thus providing aspect ratios in the range of 7.96 to 9.11. In addition, NTC products exhibited relatively higher thermal stability as compared to MCC because of the presence of high crystallinity phases and the absence of impurities (such as nitrate ions) on the nanocellulose surface. Thus, the present study concluded that nickel-based inorganic salt is an efficient and selective catalyst for the hydrolysis of MCC with high simplicity in operation and short preparation time.



Full Article

Preparation of Nanocellulose via Transition Metal Salt-Catalyzed Hydrolysis Pathway

Mazlita Yahya, Hwei Voon Lee,* and Sharifah Bee Abd Hamid

Nanocellulose was successfully prepared from microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) via nickel salt-catalyzed hydrolysis under mild reaction conditions of 45 °C for 15 min. The mild acid nickel salt-catalyzed hydrolysis was able to selectively depolymerize the amorphous regions of cellulose and retain its crystalline region, thus improving the crystallinity of the treated product at the nanoscale up to 80%. FTIR analysis confirmed that the basic cellulose structure of inorganic metal salt-treated products was maintained and that no derivative was formed. Furthermore, the synthesized Ni-treated nanocellulose (NTC) products appeared in the form of cluster fragments with spider-web-like appearance (fiber diameter of 10 to 60 nm and fiber length of 300 to 600 nm), thus providing aspect ratios in the range of 7.96 to 9.11. In addition, NTC products exhibited relatively higher thermal stability as compared to MCC because of the presence of high crystallinity phases and the absence of impurities (such as nitrate ions) on the nanocellulose surface. Thus, the present study concluded that nickel-based inorganic salt is an efficient and selective catalyst for the hydrolysis of MCC with high simplicity in operation and short preparation time.

Keywords: Cellulose nanocrystal; Depolymerization; Lignocellulosic biomass; Acid hydrolysis; Nanocellulose

Contact information: Nanotechnology & Catalysis Research Centre (NANOCAT), 3rd Floor, Block A, Institute of Postgraduate Studies (IPS), University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia;* Corresponding author: leehweivoon@um.edu.my

INTRODUCTION

Nanocellulose (NC) is a new class of biopolymer of nanoscale dimensions that is creating a revolution in biobased-materials for various industrial applications, such as personal care, chemical, foods, pharmaceuticals, and bio-composites. It is equipped with unique nanoscale characteristics, including high reinforcing strength and stiffness (comparable to Kevlar and steel), high surface area, unique optical properties, and hydrophilic/hydrophobic properties. Unlike other lightweight, high strength materials derived from fossil fuels, nanocellulose is biodegradable and renewable, making it a promising green alternative for further exploration by both research scientist and industry (Himmel et al. 2007; Lange 2007).

NC is prepared from inexpensive renewable lignocellulosic biomass (LCB), which consists of a large percentage of cellulose (40% to 50%), hemicellulose (20% to 30%), and lignin (0 to 20%). It can be generated as rod-like nanocrystalline cellulose (CNC) or longer cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs) from plant cell walls (Peng et al. 2011). Generally, nanopolymeric cellulose can be isolated via biological hydrolysis (enzyme) or chemical acid hydrolysis (strong acid) of the glycosidic bonds of cellulose fibers (Brinchi et al. 2013). However, isolation techniques are still problematic because of the presence of strong intra- and intermolecular hydrogen bonding and van der Waals forces linking the cellulose fiber network. This highly organized bonding can create a defensive barrier to protect the plant structure (Lindman et al. 2010). The enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials requires several days to digest the structural barriers before the hydrolysis process. In the case of strong acid treatment, hydronium ions can efficiently break down or attack intermolecular and intramolecular bonds in cellulose. This treatment is more effective in comparison to enzymatic treatment. However, the use of a strong acid is usually accompanied by over-degradation of cellulose and has drawbacks such as equipment corrosion. Thus, diluted or organic acids have been suggested for milder reactions, but such treatments have been found to be less effective in reacting to the plant’s structure (Lee et al. 2014).

Inorganic salts in the categories of trivalent (FeCl3, Fe2(SO4)3, Al(NO3)3), divalent (CaCl2, FeCl2, FeSO4), and monovalent (NaCl, KCl) have been considered by others as potential catalysts for hydrolysis treatment for several purposes: i) degradation of hemicellulose and cellulose in biomass (Liu et al. 2009; Zhao et al. 2011; Kamireddy et al. 2013; López-Linares et al. 2013); ii) conversion of cellulose to glucose (Zhang et al. 2015); and iii) extraction of micro- or nano-crystalline cellulose (Hamid et al. 2014; Lu et al. 2014; Li et al. 2015). It has been reported that the valence state of metal ion is the key factor to influence the hydrolysis efficiency, where acidic solution (H+) was generated during polarization between metal ions with water molecules (Kamireddy et al. 2013). A higher valence state will generate more H+ ions, which act effectively in the co-catalyzed acid hydrolysis reaction in the presence of metal ion.

At present, acid hydrolysis of cellulose is still considered to be the most efficient pathway for high-yield nanocellulose production. To achieve a technically feasible, selective, and controllable hydrolysis process, a transition metal-based catalyst can be used because of its mild acidity. Transition metal-based catalysts, such as an iron-based catalyst, were found to contain Lewis acid sites and can perform the hydrolysis of cellulose efficiently (Lee et al. 2014). Several studies have reported the use of iron-based inorganic salts (e.g., FeCl3) for hydrolysis of cellulose into nanocellulose. These research findings indicate that Fe3+ from the FeCl3-catalyzed hydrolysis can selectively diffuse into the amorphous regions of cellulose and promote the cleavage of glycosidic linkages of cellulose chains into smaller dimensions. Furthermore, the presence of an acidic medium (HCl) or ultrasonic-assisted treatment can act synergistically to improve the accessibility of metal ions for the hydrolysis process (Karim et al. 2014; Lu et al. 2014; Li et al. 2015).

In this study, a nickel-based inorganic salt with divalent (Ni2+) was selected as a hydrolysis catalyst for the selective depolymerisation of a cellulose model compound (microcrystalline cellulose, MCC) into nanocellulose. The Ni-catalyst contained both acidic and metallic active sites, which actively promote simultaneous hydrolysis and hydrogenation process. Yang’s research group successfully converted microcrystalline cellulose into sorbitol by nickel phosphides catalyst (Yang et al. 2012). Furthermore, He et al. (2012) reported the use of Ni-catalyst for selective cleavage of 4-O-5 ether bond (C-O) of aromatic ethers (diphenyl ether) via hydrolysis process to phenol product, verifying that the Ni center is the active site for C-O bond cleavage (He et al. 2012). To the best of our knowledge, no study had yet been conducted to investigate the preparation of nanocellulose via the Ni-salt hydrolysis pathway. The Ni-salt with various acid concentrations was prepared to study the efficiency of selective acid hydrolysis of the amorphous regions while retaining the crystalline regions of cellulose. Furthermore, physicochemical properties and structural changes of MCC and Ni-treated product were subsequently investigated.

EXPERIMENTAL

Materials

The cellulose model compound used was microcrystalline cellulose (MCC, Sigma-Aldrich, USA). The chemical reagents used were nickel (II) nitrate hexahydrate (Ni(NO3)2.6H2O, Systerm, Malaysia).

Methods

Preparation of nanocellulose

Microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) was added to prepare Ni-salt solutions with various concentrations (0.05, 0.5, and 1.0 M) at 45 °C, and the solution was stirred for 15 min. The pH values of the Ni-salt solutions at 0.05, 0.5, and 1.0 M were 6.3, 5.4, and 5.0, respectively. After hydrolysis, the treated product was repeatedly washed with deionized water until the medium reached neutrality (pH 7). Subsequently, the gelatinous product was dialyzed using a dialysis tube to completely remove the residue of Ni2+ or NOions attached to the surface of the product. The slurry was further treated with 40 kHz sonication for 40 min in a sonicator (WUC-A03H, DAIHAN, Korea) to disperse the nanofibers in water. Finally, the products were dried in a freeze dryer to obtain a fine white powder. The Ni-treated nanocellulose synthesized at Ni-salt concentrations of 0.05, 0.5, and 1.0 M was denoted NTC0.05, NTC0.5, and NTC1.0, respectively.

Characterization

X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the raw material (MCC), NTC0.05, NTC0.5, and NTC1.0 were obtained within a 2 range from 5 to 40° using a Shimadzu (Japan) diffractometer model XRD 6000, with CuKα radiation at an operating voltage of 2.7 kW. The crystallinity index (CrI) of samples was calculated based on the intensity between the (002) and (101) lattice diffraction peaks using Segal’s method (Segal et al. 1959) (Eq. 1). In this equation I002 represents both crystalline and amorphous region of cellulose (maximum intensity at 2 = 22°), while Iam represents only the amorphous phase (intensity of diffraction at 2 = 18°):

 (1)

The crystallite size was calculated based on the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of 002 reflections, which is by using Debye-Scherrer’s equation (Eq. 2),

 (2)

where D is the crystallite size for the (hkl) phase (nm), λ is the X-ray wavelength of radiation for CuKα (0.154 nm), βhkl is the full width at half maximum (FWHM) at (hkl) peak, and θ is the diffraction angle for the (hkl) phase. Generally, the strongest peak appeared at the XRD plane of 002, and this was selected for the measurement of crystallinity index and crystallite size.

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was performed using a Perkin Elmer (USA) spectrometer (Spectrum Two) in the range of 4000 to 500 cm-1 with a scanning resolution of 4 cm-1. Ground samples were mixed with potassium bromide (KBr) and then pressed into ultra-thin transparent pellets for analysis.

The dimensions of hydrolyzed celluloses (NTC0.05, NTC0.5, and NTC1.0) were determined using high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) analysis (JEOL JEM-2100F, USA) at an acceleration voltage of 200 kV. NFC samples diluted in ethanol (C2H5OH) were deposited on the surface of copper grids and allowed to dry at room temperature. Aspect ratios in terms of length to diameter (L/D) of treated samples (NTC0.05, NTC0.5, and NTC1.0) were determined based on the TEM measurement.

The surface morphology of the raw material (MCC) and treated samples were studied using field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM; FEI Quanta 200F, USA) operating at 10 kV and 100 Pa, i.e., low-vacuum conditions. The samples were mounted with conductive carbon tape and coated with 5 nm of gold before FESEM imaging.

Thermal analysis was performed using a thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA) Q-500 (TA Instruments, USA). One milligram of each sample was heated at 10 °C/min from 25 to 900 °C under nitrogen (N2) gas at a flow rate of 200 mL/min. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis was also carried out using a DSC Q2000 V24.4 (TA Instruments, USA) from room temperature to 400 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C/min under a nitrogen atmosphere at a flow rate of 50 mL/min. The experiment was performed by first heating, cooling, and second heating cycles.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

X-Ray Diffraction Analysis

Figure 1 shows the XRD profiles of MCC and NTC samples from various Ni-salt concentrations. All samples exhibited similar XRD patterns at diffraction peaks of 2 = 15°, 16°, 22.8°, and 35°, which can be attributed to the crystallographic planes 101, (10 [1 with combining macron] ), 021, 002, and 040, respectively (Park et al. 2010). This indicates that the raw material and hydrolyzed cellulose belonged to the cellulose Iβ structure (French 2014). Furthermore, the main crystal structure of MCC was retained and not altered during the Ni-salt catalyzed hydrolysis process. As the concentration of Ni-salt increased from 0.05 to 1.0 M, the intensity of the XRD diffraction plane at 002 increased, becoming higher than that of MCC. This indicated an increment of crystallinity index and crystalline size of Ni-treated nanocellulose were positively affected by hydrolysis process. Based on the crystallinity profile (Table 1), the crystallinity index of samples was in the order of MCC< NTC0.05 <NTC0.5 <NTC1.0, showing an approximately 5% increment from that of the raw material. The increase in crystallinity index of treated samples showed a significant removal of amorphous regions and increased exposure of the crystalline regions of cellulose (Dhepe and Fukuoka 2008). As for industrial applications, crystallinity of nanocellulose is an important factor determining its mechanical and thermal properties. Higher crystallinity in nanocellulose is generally associated with higher tensile strength, which is expected to be beneficial for producing high-strength composite materials (Bhatnagar and Sain 2005).

Fig. 1. X-ray diffraction patterns of (a) NTC1.0, (b) NTC0.5, (c) NTC0.05, and (d) MCC

As shown in Table 1, the crystallite size was increased after hydrolysis, following the order of MCC< NTC0.05< NTC0.5< NTC1.0. Similar cases in which the crystallite size was increased have been reported (Das et al. 2010; Sèbe et al. 2012; Shahabi-Ghahafarrokhi et al. 2015). It is believed that the cellulose with smaller crystallites with disorderly phases were easily degraded by high concentration of Ni-solution, which resulted in high exposure of thicker crystallite phases (Sèbe et al. 2012). Furthermore, the recrystallization of defective crystallites during the hydrolysis reaction may change the crystallite sizes of nanocellulose (Tang et al. 1996).

Table 1. Crystallinity Index (Crl) and Crystallite Sizes of MCC and NTCs at Various Nickel Salt Concentrations

Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)

The chemical functional groups of MCC, NTC0.05, NTC0.5, and NTC1.0 were studied using FTIR (Fig. 2). The four samples had similar FTIR patterns, which indicated that the chemical structure of synthesized nanocellulose remained unchanged after Ni-catalyzed hydrolysis. Furthermore, the absence of NO3 peaks at 1384 cm-1 indicated that the Ni-salt was completely removed during the washing and dialysis process (Smidt et al. 2005; Grube et al. 2006).

Fig. 2. FTIR spectra of MCC, NTC0.05, NTC0.5, and NTC1.0

The dominant peak in the region between 3700 and 3000 cm-1 is attributed to O-H stretching. A slight decrease in the peak intensity showed the disruption of intramolecular and intermolecular hydrogen bonding (Alemdar and Sain 2008; Yang et al. 2011).The FTIR peak at 2,800 cm-1 corresponds to the presence of C–H stretching vibration and –CH2–(C6)– bending vibration (Alemdar and Sain 2008; Yang et al. 2011). The weak intensity of the FTIR band at 1640 to 1645 cm-1 can be attributed to the cellulose-water interaction, i.e., the –OH bending of absorbed water. The chemical structure of C–O–C pyranose ring skeletal vibration of cellulose was observed in the FTIR peak at 1,050 cm-1 (Jahan et al. 2011). Furthermore, the absorption bands near 1058 to 1060 cm-1 can be attributed to C-O and C-H stretching vibrations, which confirms the presence of cellulose structures (cellulose I as cellulose Iβ). The increasing peak intensity of these groups indicated an increase in sample crystallinity (Man et al.2011; Zain et al. 2014). The peak at 885 cm-1 is attributed to the characteristic ß-glycosidic linkages between the glucose units of cellulose chains (Sun et al. 2004; Zhang et al. 2015).

Field-Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM)

The surface morphology of MCC and Ni-treated nanocellulose was determined using FESEM analysis (Fig. 3). At a low magnification of 100×, MCC appeared in the form of tangled rods with ribbon like structure resembling the structure of cellulose (Das et al. 2010). When observed at higher magnification (20000×), the MCC surface consisted of a uniform compact and aggregate arrangement, where individual crystals were interconnected in an agglomerated network. FESEM images of NTC0.05, NTC0.5, and NTC1.0 are shown in Figs. 3c-f. The Ni-treated products showed the significant changes of structure as compared to MCC, where the fibers were degraded into shorter and less orderly fragments with cracks on the surface (at low magnification). This confirmed the destruction of amorphous fraction remaining in MCC by means of mild Ni-hydrolysis, which turns the microcrystals into nanocrystals of cellulose. This finding was further supported by images with higher magnification (20000×) to observe the change of product surface. It was observed that the compact network of MCC was changed to spider-web-like networks with large amount of porous structures (Cao et al. 2013). As the Ni concentration increased, the Ni2+ ions diffused into the surface of cellulose fibers and attacked the glycosidic bonding of cellulose chains. This led to the breakage of the amorphous regions of cellulose fibers, resulting in smaller particle sizes and higher fibers’ porosity.

Fig. 3. FESEM images of (a) MCC (100×), (b) MCC (20000×), (c) NTC0.05 (100×), (d) NTC0.05 (20000×), (e) NTC0.5 (20000×), and (f) NTC1.0 (20000×)

Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

TEM images of Ni-treated nanocellulose with various Ni concentrations are shown in Fig. 4. The Ni-salt-catalyzed hydrolysis rendered individual cellulose nanocrystals in porous network with spider web-like structure (Fig. 4a-c). Furthermore, the nanocellulose are presented in fine diameter (10 to 60 nm) and length at 300 to 600 nm, which implied that the Ni ion successfully diffuse into the rigid structure of MCC and resulted in selective fragmentation of crystal into smaller sizes.

Fig. 4. TEM micrographs and Particle Size Distribution Profile of (a) NTC0.05, (b) NTC0.5, (c) NTC1.0, and (d) HTC

A comparison study was performed for both inorganic metal salt (Ni2+) and inorganic acid (H2SO4) catalyzed hydrolysis process. H2SO4-treated nanocellulose (HTC) was prepared via hydrolysis of 40 % of H2SO4 solution at 45 °C within 15 min (Fig. 4d). The TEM images clearly revealed the rice-shape structures of the cellulose crystals with nano-scale diameter (10 to 30 nm) and shorter length (60 to 100 nm). Besides, dimensional profiles of Ni-treated and H2SO4-treated nanocellulose samples were determined by studying the aspect ratio of length (L) to diameter (D): L/D (Table 2). The aspect ratio of prepared nanocellulose increases in the order HTC < NTC0.05 < NTC0.5 < NTC1.0. HTC rendered shorter length of nanocrystal while NTC showed fine width with controllable length of products. This indicated that Ni-inorganic salt capable to selectively control the hydrolysis as compared to sulphuric acid reaction although low acid concentration was used. Among three Ni-salt concentrations, NTC1.0 rendered the most efficient mild acidity for the selective depolymerization process, where the concentration of 1.0 M is equivalent to a pH of 5.0.

Table 2. Dimensional Profile of Prepared Nanocellulose

Thermogravimetric (TG) and Differential Thermogravimetric (DTG) Analysis

Figures 5a and b show that the thermal decomposition peaks with maximum weight loss for MCC, NTC0.05, NTC0.5, and NTC1.0 appeared at 313.21, 330.00, 331.91, and 332.74 °C, respectively. The nanocellulose product treated with the highest concentration of Ni solution (1M) had the highest thermal stability. According to the literature, the thermal stability of nanocellulose prepared by sulfuric acid hydrolysis of ionic liquids (composed of sulfate compounds) is lower than that of native cellulose (Wang et al. 2007; Chen et al. 2009; Fahma et al. 2010; Man et al. 2011). Sulfate content is thus one of the factors affecting the thermal stability of prepared nanocellulose. The presence of sulfate (residual H2SO4) adsorbed on the outer surfaces of cellulose hydroxyl crystals increases the reactivity of the material with increasing temperature, causing the decomposition of nanocellulose chains at low temperatures (Wang et al. 2007). In comparison, nanocellulose prepared by Ni-salt-catalyzed hydrolysis exhibits much higher thermal stability. This is due to the lesser amount of damage in the crystalline regions of cellulose structure under mild conditions. Thus, the high thermal stability of NTC1.0 means that it has many potential applications in composite materials that require high thermal stability.

Fig. 5. TGA and DTG spectra for MCC, NTC0.05, NTC0.5, and NTC1.0

Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) Analysis

The thermal properties of the raw material (MCC) and prepared nanocellulose were investigated to determine the glass transition temperature (Tg) and melting point (Tm) through differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis. Figure 6 shows sharp endothermic peaks for NTC0.05, NTC0.5, and NTC1.0, which can be attributed to the crystalline melting temperature (Tm) of the polymer. The Tmvalues for NTC1.0, NTC0.5, and NTC0.05 are 154.96, 150.02, and 149.39 °C, respectively, while the Tm value for MCC is 176.90 °C. This is due to the higher molecular weight of MCC, which restricts the mobility of grafted polymer chains compared to the free polymer chains of Ni-salt treated NTC products, suggesting a higher melting transition temperature is required (Lonnberg et al. 2011; Dufresne 2012). Furthermore, the DSC profile shows that NTC1.0 had the highest intensity endothermic peak, which indicates that a large amount of heat at this crystalline melting temperature is required for thermal transitions in the nanocellulose polymer. This result agrees well with those regarding the thermal stability and crystallinity, where the high crystallinity of NTC1.0 gave it high thermal stability with higher heat flow for phase transitions.

Fig. 6. DSC curves for NTC1.0, NTC0.5, NTC0.05, and MCC

CONCLUSIONS

  1. Nanocellulose was successfully synthesized via 1.0 M Ni-salt catalyzed hydrolysis of MCC.
  2. Based on the XRD and FTIR analysis, there was an absence of Ni-metal and NO3– ions after the washing and dialysis processes of nanocellulose, which provided them with a higher thermal stability as compared to MCC.
  3. The morphology of synthesized nanocellulose consisted of individual nanocrystals in web-like network with lengths ranging to several hundreds of nanometer (300 to 600 nm) and a narrow diameter distribution (10-60 nm), which means that they had a high surface area and porosity.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors are grateful for the financial support of the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI) e-Science Fund (grant number SF002-2015), University of Malaya, Postgraduate Research Grant Scheme PPP (PG079-2014B), and (HIR F-000032).

REFERENCES CITED

Alemdar, A., and Sain, M. (2008). “Isolation and characterization of nanofibers from agricultural residues – Wheat straw and soy hulls,” Bioresource Technology 99(6), 1664-1671. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.04.029

Brinchi, L., Cotana, F., Fortunati, E., and Kenny, J. (2013). “Production of nanocrystalline cellulose from lignocellulosic biomass: Technology and applications,” Carbohydrate Polymers 94(1), 154-169. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.01.033

Cao, X., Wang, X., Ding, B., Yu, J., and Sun, G. (2013). “Novel spider-web-like nanoporous networks based on jute cellulose nanowhiskers,” Carbohydrate Polymers 92(2), 2041-2047. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.11.085.

Chen, Y., Liu, C., Chang, P. R., Cao, X., and Anderson, D. P. (2009). “Bionanocomposites based on pea starch and cellulose nanowhiskers hydrolyzed from pea hull fibre: Effect of hydrolysis time,” Carbohydrate Polymers 76(4), 607-615. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.11.030

Das, K., Ray, D., Bandyopadhyay, N. R., and Sengupta, S. (2010). “Study of the properties of microcrystalline cellulose particles from different renewable resources by XRD, FTIR, nanoindentation, TGA and SEM,” Journal of Polymers and the Environment 18(3), 355-363. DOI:10.1007/s10924-010-0167-2

Dhepe, P. L., and Fukuoka, A. (2008). “Cellulose conversion under heterogeneous catalysis,” ChemSusChem 1(12), 969-975. DOI: 10.1002/cssc.200800129

Dufresne, A. (2012). Nanocellulose: From Nature to High Performance Tailored Materials. De Gruyter, Germany.

Fahma, F., Iwamoto, S., Hori, N., Iwata, T., and Takemura, A. (2010). “Isolation, preparation, and characterization of nanofibers from oil palm empty-fruit-bunch (OPEFB),” Cellulose 17(5), 977-985. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-010-9436-4

French, A. (2014). “Idealized powder diffraction patterns for cellulose polymorphs,” Cellulose 21(2), 885-896. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-013-0030-4

Grube, M., Lin, J. G., Lee, P. H., and Kokorevicha, S. (2006). “Evaluation of sewage sludge-based compost by FT-IR spectroscopy,” Geoderma 130(3-4), 324-333. DOI:10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.02.005

Hamid, S. B. A., Chowdhury, Z. Z., and Karim, M. Z. (2014). “Catalytic extraction of microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) from Elaeis guineensis using central composite design (CCD),” BioResources 9(4), 7403-7426.

He, J., Zhao, C., and Lercher, J. A. (2012). “Ni-catalyzed cleavage of aryl ethers in the aqueous phase,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 134(51), 20768-20775. DOI: 10.1021/ja309915e

Himmel, M. E., Ding, S.-Y., Johnson, D. K., Adney, W. S., Nimlos, M. R., Brady, J. W., and Foust, T. D. (2007). “Biomass recalcitrance: Engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production,” Science 315(5813), 804-807. DOI: 10.1126/science.1137016

Jahan, M. S., Saeed, A., He, Z., and Ni, Y. (2011). “Jute as raw material for the preparation of microcrystalline cellulose,” Cellulose 18(2), 451-459. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-010-9481-z

Kamireddy, S. R., Li, J., Tucker, M., Degenstein, J., and Ji, Y. (2013). “Effects and mechanism of metal chloride salts on pretreatment and enzymatic digestibility of corn stover,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 52(5), 1775-1782. DOI: 10.1021/ie3019609

Karim, M. Z., Chowdhury, Z. Z., Hamid, S. B. A., and Ali, M. E. (2014). “Statistical optimization for acid hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose and its physiochemical characterization by using metal ion catalyst,” Materials 7(10), 6982-6999. DOI: 10.3390/ma7106982

Lange, J. P. (2007). “Lignocellulose conversion: An introduction to chemistry, process and economics,” Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 1(1), 39-48. DOI: 10.1002/bbb.7

Lee, H., Hamid, S., and Zain, S. (2014). “Conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to nanocellulose: Structure and chemical process,” The Scientific World Journal 2014, 631013 PAGE #s. DOI: 10.1155/2014/631013

Li, J., Zhang, X., Zhang, M., Xiu, H., and He, H. (2015). “Ultrasonic enhanced acid hydrolysis selectivity of cellulose with HCl–FeCl3 as catalyst,” Carbohydrate Polymers 117, 917-922. DOI:10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.10.028

Lindman, B., Karlström, G., and Stigsson, L. (2010). “On the mechanism of dissolution of cellulose,” Journal of Molecular Liquids 156(1), 76-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2010.04.016

Liu, L., Sun, J., Cai, C., Wang, S., Pei, H., and Zhang, J. (2009). “Corn stover pretreatment by inorganic salts and its effects on hemicellulose and cellulose degradation,” Bioresource Technology 100(23), 5865-5871. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2009.06.048

Lonnberg, H., Larsson, K., Lindstrom, T., Hult, A., and Malmstrom, E. (2011). “Synthesis of polycaprolactone-grafted microfibrillated cellulose for use in novel bionanocomposites – Influence of the graft length on the mechanical properties,” ACS Applied Material Interfaces 3(5), 1426-1433. DOI: 10.1021/am2001828

López-Linares, J. C., Romero, I., Moya, M., Cara, C., Ruiz, E., and Castro, E. (2013). “Pretreatment of olive tree biomass with FeClprior enzymatic hydrolysis,” Bioresource Technology 128, 180-187. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.10.076

Lu, Q., Tang, L., Lin, F., Wang, S., Chen, Y., Chen, X., and Huang, B. (2014). “Preparation and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals via ultrasonication-assisted FeCl3-catalyzed hydrolysis,” Cellulose 21(5), 3497-3506. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-014-0376-2

Man, Z., Muhammad, N., Sarwono, A., Bustam, M. A., Kumar, M. V., and Rafiq, S. (2011). “Preparation of cellulose nanocrystals using an ionic liquid,” Journal of Polymers and the Environment 19(3), 726-731. DOI: 10.1007/s10924-011-0323-3

Park, S., Baker, J. O., Himmel, M. E., Parilla, P. A., and Johnson, D. K. (2010). “Research cellulose crystallinity index: Measurement techniques and their impact on interpreting cellulase performance,” Biotechnology for Biofuels 3(10) PAGE #s. DOI:10.1186/1754-6834-3-10

Peng, B. L., Dhar, N., Liu, H. L., and Tam, K. C. (2011). “Chemistry and applications of nanocrystalline cellulose and its derivatives: A nanotechnology perspective,” The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 89(5), 1191-1206. DOI: 10.1002/cjce.20554

Sèbe, G., Ham-Pichavant, F., Ibarboure, E., Koffi, A. L. C., and Tingaut, P. (2012). “Supramolecular structure characterization of cellulose II nanowhiskers produced by acid hydrolysis of cellulose I substrates,” Biomacromolecules 13(2), 570-578. DOI:10.1021/bm201777j

Segal, L., Creely, J., Martin, A., and Conrad, C. (1959). “An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-ray diffractometer,” Textile Research Journal 29(10), 786-794. DOI: 10.1177/004051755902901003

Shahabi-Ghahafarrokhi, I., Khodaiyan, F., Mousavi, M., and Yousefi, H. (2015). “Preparation and characterization of nanocellulose from beer industrial residues using acid hydrolysis/ultrasound,”Fibers and Polymers 16(3), 529-536. DOI:10.1007/s12221-015-0529-4

Smidt, E., Eckhardt, K. U., Lechner, P., Schulten, H. R., and Leinweber, P. (2005). “Characterization of different decomposition stages of biowaste using FT-IR spectroscopy and pyrolysis-field ionization mass spectrometry,” Biodegradation 16(1), 67-79. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-004-0430-8

Tang, L.-G., Hon, D. N. S., Pan, S.-H., Zhu, Y.-Q., Wang, Z., and Wang, Z.-Z. (1996). “Evaluation of microcrystalline cellulose. I. Changes in ultrastructural characteristics during preliminary acid hydrolysis,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science 59(3), 483-488. DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19960118)59:3<483::AID-APP13>3.0.CO;2-V

Wang, N., Ding, E., and Cheng, R. (2007). “Thermal degradation behaviors of spherical cellulose nanocrystals with sulfate groups,” Polymer 48(12), 3486-3493. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2007.03.062

Yang, P., Kobayashi, H., Hara, K., and Fukuoka, A. (2012). “Phase change of nickel phosphide catalysts in the conversion of cellulose into sorbitol,” ChemSusChem 5(5), 920-926. DOI:10.1002/cssc.201100498

Yang, Q., Pan, X., Huang, F., and Li, K. (2011). “Synthesis and characterization of cellulose fibers grafted with hyperbranched poly(3-methyl-3-oxetanemethanol),” Cellulose 18(6), 1611-1621. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-011-9587-y

Zain, N., Yusop, S., and Ahmad, I. (2014). “Preparation and characterization of cellulose and nanocellulose from pomelo (Citrus grandis) albedo,” Journal of Nutrition & Food Sciences 5, 334. DOI: 10.4172/2155-9600.1000334

Zhang, Y., Li, Q., Su, J., Lin, Y., Huang, Z., Lu, Y., Sun, G., Yang, M., Huang, A., Hu, H., and Zhu, Y. (2015). “A green and efficient technology for the degradation of cellulosic materials: Structure changes and enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis of natural cellulose pretreated by synergistic interaction of mechanical activation and metal salt,” Bioresource Technology 177, 176-181. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2014.11.085

Zhao, J., Zhang, H., Zheng, R., Lin, Z., and Huang, H. (2011). “The enhancement of pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover by FeSO4 pretreatment,” Biochemical Engineering Journal 56(3), 158-164. DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2011.06.002

Article submitted: April 16, 2015; Peer review completed: August 17, 2015; Revised version received: September 17, 2015; Accepted: September 19, 2015; Published: September 24, 2015.

DOI: 10.15376/biores.10.4.7627-7639