Abstract
Darwin stringybark (Eucalyptus tetrodonta) is one of Northern Australia’s most important commercial forest resources. The wood exhibits desirable wood properties including high strength, natural durability, and visual appeal. The production of engineered wood products (EWPs) such as glulam from this resource represents a significant commercial opportunity for the timber industry in northern Australia. However, a major challenge to overcome is the achievement of satisfactory glue bond performance. This study evaluated the effects of different surface machining preparations, adhesive types, and curing temperatures on the bonding characteristics of Darwin stringybark. The pre-gluing surface machining method significantly influenced the timber wettability, roughness, permeability and tensile shear strength of adhesive bonds. Planing resulted in the lowest wettability, roughness, and permeability, while bonded planed samples produced the poorest tensile shear strength. Alternative surface machining methods including face milling and sanding post-planing were shown to significantly improve the timber wettability, roughness, and permeability, and also to increase the tensile shear strength of bonded samples. The resorcinol formaldehyde adhesive resulted in slightly improved tensile shear strength in most cases compared to the polyurethane adhesive. There was no significant improvement in tensile shear strength with the use of elevated temperature curing.
Download PDF
Full Article
The Influence of Mechanical Surface Preparation Method, Adhesive Type, and Curing Temperature on the Bonding of Darwin Stringybark
William Leggate,a,b,* Robert L. McGavin,b,c Andrew Outhwaite,b Jack Dorries,b Rhianna Robinson,b Chandan Kumar,b Adam Faircloth,b and Mark Knackstedt a
Darwin stringybark (Eucalyptus tetrodonta) is one of Northern Australia’s most important commercial forest resources. The wood exhibits desirable wood properties including high strength, natural durability, and visual appeal. The production of engineered wood products (EWPs) such as glulam from this resource represents a significant commercial opportunity for the timber industry in northern Australia. However, a major challenge to overcome is the achievement of satisfactory glue bond performance. This study evaluated the effects of different surface machining preparations, adhesive types, and curing temperatures on the bonding characteristics of Darwin stringybark. The pre-gluing surface machining method significantly influenced the timber wettability, roughness, permeability and tensile shear strength of adhesive bonds. Planing resulted in the lowest wettability, roughness, and permeability, while bonded planed samples produced the poorest tensile shear strength. Alternative surface machining methods including face milling and sanding post-planing were shown to significantly improve the timber wettability, roughness, and permeability, and also to increase the tensile shear strength of bonded samples. The resorcinol formaldehyde adhesive resulted in slightly improved tensile shear strength in most cases compared to the polyurethane adhesive. There was no significant improvement in tensile shear strength with the use of elevated temperature curing.
Keywords: Wood surface machining; Wood wettability; Wood permeability; Wood adhesion; Wood roughness; Eucalyptus tetrodonta; Darwin stringybark
Contact information: a: Research School of Physics and Engineering, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia; b: Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Horticulture and Forestry Science, Salisbury Research Facility, 50 Evans Rd, Salisbury, Qld 4107, Australia; c: School of Civil Engineering, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, 4072, Australia;
* Corresponding author: william.leggate@daf.qld.gov.au
INTRODUCTION
The demand for and use of engineered wood products (EWPs) continues to increase globally as consumers are increasingly favouring sustainable, low-embodied energy building products that are straighter, more stable, and uniform in size, exceed the performance capabilities of traditional timber products, are lighter in weight and have certified structural performance with reduced variability (Leggate 2018; Leggate et al. 2020a; Market Research Future 2020).
The northern Australian timber industry is well placed to service a niche market for EWPs with performance properties that are superior to products manufactured from common commercial timber species on the international market. Australia’s native commercial timber species are dominated by the Eucalyptus and Corymbia species. Within these species, significant variation in wood properties exist; however, in general, Australia’s native forest timbers have an international reputation for being superior in mechanical performance and in many cases, have good to excellent natural durability. For example, the wood density of most native hardwood commercial timber species in northern Australia far exceeds the wood density of plantation softwood species. All of Australia’s plantation softwood species are regarded as non-durable; however, many of Australia’s native commercial timber species are considered to be durable, including a high representation within the durability class 1 and 2 categories (on a 1-4 scale with class 1 being the most durable [Australian standard AS 5604 (2005)]). Using timbers that have high natural durability and superior mechanical properties to manufacture high performance EWPs enables high-value markets to be accessed with greatly reduced competition from other internationally produced timber products.
However, at the same time, the northern Australian hardwood timber industry is challenged, with decreasing average log diameter and diminishing overall log quality. While the forest and forest product industries strive to gain the most value from the available resources, some traditional timber products are becoming increasingly difficult to supply from lower quality and smaller diameter logs. For example, large dimension sawn timber posts and beams, which have been traditionally the target, profitable sawn product range for Australia’s hardwood industry, are gradually less able to be produced. Instead, smaller board sizes are increasingly produced that more align with the available log resources. These products do not necessarily have the same market demand or attract the same premium prices. Indeed, the inability for the timber industry to reliably supply many of these traditional products has resulted in consumers seeking alternative products and in many cases, the timber industry are losing these once lucrative markets. To hold on to many traditional markets and to expand into new markets, EWPs that enable small section sawn boards to be glue-laminated together to form large dimension products such as post and beams are required.
While the durability and mechanical properties of northern Australian hardwoods are attractive for many lucrative markets, these same characteristics are also responsible for these timbers being very difficult to reliably glue. Several timber processors are currently trying to attain certification for glue-laminated products manufactured from spotted gum (Corymbia citriodora), Queensland’s highest volume hardwood timber species. Despite many years of effort, a reliable adhesive protocol is yet to be developed. Darwin stringybark (Eucalyptus tetrodonta) has been identified as an alternative timber species to pursue for EWPs. With a similar or slightly better structural performance and natural durability rating, this species may be less problematic to glue due to the less greasy nature of the wood when compared to spotted gum; however, preliminary industry trials suggest that improved protocols are required. The development of gluing protocols that enables Darwin stringybark to be used in structural laminated post and beams presents a real opportunity for the northern Australian timber industry.
Surface machining is a standard international timber industry practice used to size and prepare the wood laminates prior to gluing (Leggate et al. 2020a). The most typical method used internationally is planing of the wood surface immediately before gluing (Knorz et al. 2015). Surface machining prior to adhesive application has been shown to improve wood adhesion by increasing the wettability of the wood surface and improving adhesive penetration and bonding by: 1) activating the wood surface through the removal of extractives (which have migrated to the surface) and contaminants (e.g. dust and dirt); 2) creating micro-cracks and exposing wood cell lumens; 3) rupturing the molecular bonds between wood components creating open bonds which increases the number of active sites for the adhesive polar groups to bond to; 4) creating a flat surface allowing for a close fit between the two wood adherents, and 5) increasing the number of mechanical interlocking sites for the adhesive to bond with the wood (Vick 1999; Sernek 2002; Aydin 2004; Vella 2020; Leggate et al. 2020a).
Limited international studies have compared the benefits for wood adhesion after different mechanical surface preparation methods such as planing, sanding, face milling, and more recently scarification or incising (Hernández and Cool 2008a,b; Kläusler et al. 2014; Knorz et al. 2015; Vella et al. 2019; Vella 2020; Leggate et al. 2020a,b). Wood face milling is not currently used commercially in Australia and has not yet been adequately tested on Australian timbers as a means to improve wood adhesion (Leggate et al. 2020b). However, face milling is reported in some studies to produce better results for wood adhesion compared to conventional planing due to the cutting action (perpendicular to the grain) generating lower cutting forces and consequently lower sub-surface damage of the wood structure compared to conventional planing (cutting direction parallel to the grain) (Santoni and Pizzo 2011; Kläusler et al. 2014; Knorz et al. 2015). The lower cutting forces result from the lower strength of the wood in the transverse direction (de Moura et al. 2010; Knorz et al. 2015). As a result, sub-surface cell damage which results in the formation of a mechanically weak boundary layer that causes poor bond performance and failure is likely to be reduced with face milling (De Moura et al. 2010; Kläusler et al. 2014).
Follrich et al. (2010) reported increased tensile strength of bonds with increased surface roughness, although the findings regarding the influence of roughness on bonding performance are not fully consistent (Kläusler et al. 2014) with excessive roughness sometimes resulting in decreased bond strength. This was particularly so, if it is associated with crushed and damaged cells becoming prevalent that can lead to a mechanically weak boundary layer and also impeded adhesive penetration (Knorz et al. 2015). Previous research by Leggate et al. (2020a,b) indicates that face milling and sanding post-planing can improve the wettability and the permeability of spotted gum timber and also improve the tensile shear strength of spotted gum glued wood joints.
Apart from surface machining, other priority research areas being targeted to improve the adhesion of Darwin stringybark and spotted gum include investigations into optimal adhesive types and curing conditions. Historically, the most common adhesives used in the manufacture of glulam have been resorcinol formaldehyde (RF) and phenol resorcinol formaldehyde (PRF) (Vella et al. 2019). However, polyurethane adhesives such as 1C-PUR are increasingly replacing RF and PRF because of many advantages including faster curing properties, lack of formaldehyde emissions and a single component system that is supplied ready to use (Lehringer and Gabriel 2014; Vella et al. 2019). One reason that there has been limited use of PUR adhesives for hardwoods in Australia has been because of concerns over their suitability with higher density timbers. They have been traditionally used with lower density timbers and not yet adequately tested with northern Australian high-density hardwood timbers. Most adhesives used for glulam production are also cured during pressing at ambient temperature curing conditions. However, heating during curing of RF adhesives is thought to improve adhesive penetration and also support complete curing of the adhesive within the target press time.
This study investigates the effect of various surface machining preparation methods, adhesive types and curing temperatures on the bonding of Darwin stringybark sawn timber. Its primary aim is to contribute to the development of optimal adhesion protocols for this species for glulam production.
EXPERIMENTAL
Wood Sample Preparation
Twenty seasoned boards (nominally 100 mm × 25 mm) of native forest sourced Darwin stringybark were randomly selected from commercial packs of milled timber destined for products such as flooring and decking. A 25 mm long cross section was removed from the middle of each board for moisture content determination using the oven-dry method in accordance with Australian and New Zealand standard AS/NZS 1080.1 (2012).
Each board was ripped and docked to provide twelve pieces free of sapwood and defects, with dimensions of 30 mm ×11 mm × 400 mm (W × T × L). These pieces were then conditioned in a constant environment chamber set at 20 °C and 65% relative humidity (RH) (12% equilibrium moisture content [EMC]). After conditioning, 180 samples were randomly allocated to three different mechanical surface machining preparations providing 60 samples per machining treatment (Table 1).
Table 1. Mechanical Surface Machining Preparations
Face milling was undertaken using a Rotoles 400 D-S single side rotary planer manufactured by Ledinek (Hoče, Slovenia). This face milling approach has the rotary head and cutters positioned parallel to the machining surface with the drive shaft positioned perpendicular to the board surface (Fig. 1a). The cutting direction with face milling is primarily perpendicular to the grain (Knorz et al. 2015; Leggate et al. 2020b). Conventional planing was undertaken using a SCM Group Mini Max Formula SPI thickness planer (Rimini, Italy). The conventional planer has the cutter head drive shaft positioned parallel to the board surface (Fig. 1b). The cutting direction with conventional planing is primarily parallel to the grain (Knorz et al. 2015; Leggate et al. 2020b). Sanding used a SCM Group SANDYA 16/S M2 135 wide belt sander (Rimini, Italy).
Fig. 1. Machining preparation method comparison between (a) Rotoles face milling approach (Ledinek 2020) and (b) Conventional planing approach (CCOHS 2020)
During each surface machining process described in Table 1, 1.5 mm was removed from the upper and lower timber surface to reduce the thickness from 11 mm to 8 mm. Test samples were then prepared to the final dimension for wettability and roughness tests (30 mm × 8 mm × 50 mm [W × T × L]), permeability tests (24 mm [diameter] × 8 mm [T]), and lap shear pieces (20 mm × 8 mm × 80 mm [W × T × L]). Lap shear pieces combine as pairs for the manufacture of lap shear samples.
Wettability
The wettability of wood refers to an adherend’s ability to attract a liquid, such as an adhesive (Hovanec 2015). Adequate wetting of the surfaces of adherends is necessary to achieve a strong adhesive bond (Wellons 1980; River et al. 1991; Hovanec 2015; Leggate et al. 2020a). The wettability was determined by using the sessile drop method: by measuring the contact angle of a drop of pure water on the timber surface (Burch 2015; Leggate et al. 2020a). Testing followed the methodology adopted by Leggate et al. (2020a). Contact angle is the angle that the liquid forms with a solid, shown in Fig. 2 (Burch 2015; Leggate et al. 2020a). Since the tendency for a liquid to spread increases as contact angle decreases, the determination of contact angles is a useful inverse measure of wettability (Zisman 1964; Leggate et al. 2020a). In order to compare the change in timber wettability with time elapsed since surface machining, contact angles were measured at two time intervals: 0 minutes (therefore immediately after surface machining) and 15 minutes after surface preparation.
Fig. 2. Contact angle (θ) for a liquid droplet on a solid surface (Burch 2015)
An electronic pipette (Labco Electronic Pipettor, Labco Limited, Lampeter, Wales) was mounted on a stand so that the default position of the pipette tip was approximately 20 mm from the sample surface. The pipette could be moved vertically towards the sample surface to place a water droplet onto the sample surface but automatically retracted once manual control was released. A video camera (Samsung Galaxy A20, Samsung, Seoul, South Korea) was positioned approximately 10 mm in front of the sample and level with the timber surface. The camera was used to record the process of the droplet being applied and spreading on the sample surface. A clip-on macro lens (Apexel, APL-24XMH, Shenzen Apexel Technology Co. Ltd, Guangdong, China) was attached to the camera to provide adequate magnification of the droplet. The macro lens and camera combined provided approximately 50x magnification (21x from the macro lens and about 2.5x from the camera). The camera was securely mounted to prevent movement and vibration. A droplet of 1 µlitre water (HPLC-grade) was dispensed from the pipette per test. The pipette was manually repositioned towards the sample surface to aid dispensing and then immediately retracted once the droplet moved onto the sample surface. The process of the droplet dispensing and a minimum of ten seconds following were recorded by video.
For each sample, screenshots of the video were saved as images at specific times. The first image was taken once the pipette had applied the droplet on the surface (Fig. 3A), and then one image was taken per second for 10 seconds, providing a total of 11 contact angle images. These images were processed by the open-source software, ImageJ (IJ 1.46r) (U.S. National Institutes of Health, Maryland, USA) (Schneider et al. 2012) with the contact angle plugin (Lamour et al. 2010) (Fig. 3B). For each ImageJ measurement, two points were manually selected at the intersection of solid-liquid-air interfaces (marked by an arrow in Fig 3A) to define the baseline and four points along the drop profile. The ImageJ contact angle plugin then fitted the points with the sphere approximation or ellipse approximation and calculated the contact angle.
Fig. 3. Water droplet in contact with timber surface. (a) A drop of water on timber surface. (b) Same drop as in (a) processed with the ImageJ software (note the image is inversed as part of the processing).
The change in contact angle over time was assessed using the method adopted by Burch (2015) and Leggate et al. (2020a), where a wetting model was developed to quantify the change in contact angle over time. The wetting model is shown in Eq. 1,
where is the initial contact angle at time 0 sec, is the equilibrium contact angle (for our data, at the 10 second test time), t is time (seconds), and K is the constant intrinsic relative contact angle decrease rate (1/s). The K-value represents the rate at which a liquid spreads and penetrates across or into the wood substrate (Shi and Gardner 2001; Burch 2015; Leggate et al. 2020a). A high K-value represents a liquid that quickly spreads and/or penetrates into the wood surface, while a low K-value represents a liquid that slowly spreads and/or slowly penetrates into the wood surface. A K-value of zero represents no change between initial and equilibrium contact angles (Burch 2015). The nonlinear least square method was used to estimate the K-value of the nonlinear model using R studio (Baty et al. 2015; RStudio Team 2015). The contact angle values at time 0 s and at 10 s were assigned as initial and equilibrium contact angle, respectively. The initial value of K was assigned to 0.3 in the nls function. Contact angle and K-values were determined for sixty samples from each surface machining group.
Roughness
Surface roughness is the measurement of the small-scale variations in the height of a physical surface (Butler 2008). Surface roughness has been shown to have a major impact on the wettability, permeability, and bonding performance of wood (Hernández and Cool 2008a; Santoni and Pizzo 2011; Kläusler et al. 2014; Knorz et al. 2015; Qin et al. 2015; Jankowska et al. 2018; Leggate et al. 2020a,b). Surface roughness was measured using a Mitutoyo surface roughness meter (SJ-210, Mitutoyo America Corporation, Aurora, Illinois, USA). A single roughness profile was taken on the surface of 60 samples from each surface machining method. The traverse was completed perpendicular to the grain (Fig. 4) using the parameters outlined in Table 2. Each sample was secured to prevent any potential movement during the measurement process. The surface roughness meter calibration was confirmed every 20 measurements.
Fig. 4. Surface roughness assessments using the SJ-210 roughness meter
Table 2. Parameters Used for Surface Roughness Evaluation
From the surface roughness meter, the Ra value was extracted. The Ra is described as the arithmetic mean of the absolute values of the evaluation profile deviations (Yi) from the mean line. This method of calculating Ra was in accordance with ISO 4287 (1997) and is shown in Eq. 2,
(2)
Permeability
Permeability is a measure of the ease with which liquids and gases flow through a porous substance under the influence of a pressure gradient (Comstock 1968; Tesoro 1973; Milota et al. 1994; Leggate et al. 2019, 2020a). The permeability of wood influences many of its important processing and utilization properties including gluing, but also drying, preservation, wood modification systems, pulping, finishing, and even durability (Fogg 1968; Tesoro 1973; Hansmann et al. 2002; Zimmer et al. 2014; Leggate et al. 2019, 2020a). Wood permeability is one of the main controlling factors influencing the depth of adhesive penetration (Burch 2015; Hovanec 2015; Kumar and Pizzi 2019).
Sixty permeability samples were prepared from each surface machining group. Samples for permeability tests were 24 mm in diameter and 8 mm in thickness (flow direction). Each sample was coated with epoxy resin on its lateral surface in order to direct gas movement in the radial direction in order to measure only radial gas permeability. Radial gas permeability measurements were undertaken using a Porolux 1000 Porometer (1B-FT GmbH, Berlin, Germany). Samples were subjected to pressurized, atmospheric air until pressure reached the target pressure of 4000 millibars. All permeability measurements were recorded in less than 45 min after surface machining. Permeability was calculated in accordance with Darcy’s law as follows,
(3)
where Q, K, A, L, are the liquid or air volume flow rate (m3.s-1), permeability of wood (m2), area perpendicular to the liquid flow (m2), sample length in the direction of flow (m), dynamic viscosity of the liquid or air (Pa.s), and the pressure drop, respectively (Pa) (Kucerová 2012). Permeability was reported in millidarcy units (mD).
Lap Shear Sample Manufacture
Sixty lap shear samples were prepared for each of the three surface machining types following the principles of European Standard BS EN 205 (2016). Lap shear sample dimensions are shown in Fig. 5. The application of adhesive commenced within a maximum of 20 minutes from surface machining. The adhesive bonded overlap in the lap shear samples was 10 mm as per Fig. 5. Therefore, the resultant length of the bonded lap shear samples was 150 mm (Fig. 5). A one-component moisture-curing polyurethane (1C-PUR) adhesive (Jowat Jowapur 686.70) and a resorcinol formaldehyde (RF) (Hexion Sylvic R15 Resin and Hexion RP50 Paraformaldehyde Hardener mixed in a ratio of 4 parts resin to 1 part hardener) adhesive were both tested. These glue types are representative of typical glues targeted commercially in structural glulam production in Australia. In accordance with the technical data sheets for these adhesives, one third of the lap shears (20 pairs per surface machining treatment) had 1C-PUR applied at a spread rate of 250 grams per square metre (gsm) and the remaining lap shears (40 pairs per surface machining treatment) had RF adhesive applied at a spread rate of 350 gsm evenly spread over one side of the lap shear joint. Open assembly time was less than 30 seconds for both adhesives, and closed assembly time was 30 minutes for the RF adhesive samples and less than 5 minutes for the PUR adhesive samples.
Fig. 5. Lap shear sample dimensions
The lap shear samples were pressed at 0.8 MPa for 1C-PUR samples and 1 MPa for the RF samples. The 1C-PUR lap shear samples remained under press pressure for a minimum of 180 minutes in ambient conditions, whereas one half (20 pairs) of the RF samples were pressed for a minimum of 14 h in ambient conditions. The remaining half of the RF samples (20 pairs) were pressed at 1 MPa at an elevated temperature of 65 °C for a minimum of 6 h. After pressing, all lap shear samples were then conditioned in a constant environment chamber set at 30 °C and 67% RH (12% EMC) for a minimum of 7 days before tensile shear strength testing.
Tensile Shear Strength Test Method
Tensile shear strength is a measure of the shear strength of an adhesive bond in which two members are bonded in a lap joint, then pulled at both ends until the joint fails in shear (Gooch 2011). The determination of the tensile shear strength of lap joints was undertaken in accordance with the BS EN 205 (2016) standard. Lap shear tensile testing was conducted using a Shimadzu AG-X Universal Testing Machine (AG-100X; Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) configured with a crosshead displacement rate of 1.5 mm/min. The data were processed using Trapezium X single cycle software (Shimadzu Corporation, Version 1.5.1, Kyoto, Japan). The lap shear samples had a minimum of 40 mm of each end clamped into the jaws of the testing rig before being loaded in tension until sample failure (Fig. 6). The maximum force applied to reach failure was recorded. The tensile shear strength, (MPa) was then calculated using Eq. (4),
(4)
where is the applied maximum force (N), is the length of bonded test surface (mm), is the width of bonded test surface (mm).
Fig. 6. Lap shear tensile strength testing
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was carried out using GenStat v19 (VSN, Hemel Hempstead, United Kingdom). ANOVAs and pairwise comparisons using Fishers Protected Least Significant Differences testing were undertaken to compare treatment means when ANOVA showed significance in a factor. Because the different surface preparations, adhesive type and curing conditions were applied to sub-sections of the initial parent boards, it was appropriate to use randomized block analyses of the measured response variables with boards as blocks.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Moisture Content
The mean moisture content of the boards prior to sample preparation and testing was 13%, with a range from 11% to 14%. These results are within the typical moisture content range of dried hardwood timber intended for milled products such as flooring and decking, and also compatible with expected moisture content targets for hardwood feedstock intended for glulam production.
Wettability
Across all surface machining treatments and timeframes after surface machining, the contact angle decreased over the 10-second test period from mean values above 60° to 22° for combined data (Table 3, Figs. 7 and 8). This reflects the typical wetting process, which includes: the formation of a contact angle between the surface and the droplet, the spreading of the droplet on the surface, and then the penetration of the droplet into the sample (Leggate et al. 2020a). The contact angle also tended to significantly increase and consequently surface wettability decrease with increasing time after surface machining (p< 0.001) (Fig. 9 and Table 3), with the exception of the planed surface machining treatment, which showed minimal change between timeframes post machining. For the face milling and sanding post-planing treatments, contact angles were lower (wettability higher) at 0 minutes compared to 15 minutes after surface machining (Table 3 and Figs. 7 and 8). This has been observed in other studies and has been attributed to ‘ageing’ of the wood surface linked to physical and chemical modifications of the wood surface (Gardner et al. 1991; Sernek 2002; Gindl et al. 2004; Piao et al. 2010; Santoni and Pizzo 2011; Qin et al. 2015; Leggate et al. 2020a). According to Burch (2015), a material’s highest possible surface energy (therefore wettability) is obtained immediately following machining and exposure of a fresh surface. This reinforces the advantage of applying adhesive to the wood surface as soon as possible after surface machining.
When compared at the 10-second test time period, for both timeframes after surface machining, the highest mean contact angle and therefore the lowest surface wettability was recorded with the planing surface machining method (Table 3 and Figs. 7 and 8). For both 0 and 15 minutes after surface machining, face milling produced the lowest mean contact angle and therefore the highest surface wettability. The sanding post-planing also resulted in lower contact angles and higher wettability compared to planing. For 0 minutes after surface machining data, differences between the means for the three surface machining treatments were significantly different (p < 0.01), whereas for 15 minutes after surface machining, the planing had significantly lower wettability compared to face milling and sanding (p < 0.01). However, there were no significant differences between face milling and sanding. This result is comparable with studies on other species which report that the rougher surface produced by sanding or face milling improves the wettability of wood compared to planing (Stehr et al. 2001; Aydin 2004; Hernández and Cool 2008; Arnold 2010; Huang et al. 2012; Kläusler et al. 2014; Qin et al. 2015; Jankowska et al. 2018; Leggate et al. 2020a). Stehr et al. (2001) attributed the improved wettability of rougher surfaces to the increased surface area, which facilitates the movement and penetration of liquids due to capillary forces. Another explanation for the improved wettability with increased surface roughness is the greater exposure of hydrophilic active groups (hydroxyl groups) on the wood surface (Qin et al. 2015; Jankowska et al. 2018). The higher wettability of the face milling compared to the sanding post-planing may be due to the higher level of fibrillation that results from face milling. Fibrillation further increases the surface area which aids liquid wetting and penetration into the wood (Hernández and Cool 2008a).
The K-values shown in Table 3 represent the rate at which a liquid (in this case water) spreads and penetrates into the porous structure of wood (Huang et al. 2012; Leggate et al. 2020a). By knowing the K-value, spreading and penetration for a given liquid-solid system can be quantified and compared (Huang et al. 2012; Leggate et al. 2020a). Higher K-values indicate that the contact angle reaches equilibrium more rapidly and the liquid penetrates and spreads faster (increased wetting) (Huang et al. 2012). K-values are generally consistent with the contact angle data with, in most cases, lower K-values (therefore decreasing wettability of the surface) with increased time after surface machining. Lower K-values resulted with the planing treatment compared to the other surface machining methods. The highest K-values were produced with face milling. This result combined with achieving the lowest mean contact angle after the 10-second measurement period, indicates positive benefits of the face milling approach.
Table 3. Summary of Contact Angle Measurements