NC State
BioResources
Kang, N., Liu, Z., Hui, L.-F., Si, C.-L., Cui, L., Zhao, T., and Mao, S.-T. (2012). "Study on the optimum process of acid-catalytic ethanol pretreatment of Chinese triploid poplar to enhance sugar recovery by hydrolysis," BioRes. 7(1), 578-592.

Abstract

Organosolv pretreatment was applied to Chinese using the acid-catalysis ethanol method to enhance sugar recovery in enzymatic hydrolysis. A Box-Behnken design (BBD) was used to optimize the effect of temperature, ratio of wood to liquor, ethanol concentration, and holding time on the pretreatment process. All variables except for lignin content were found to significantly affect the cellulosic yield as well as crystallinity index (CrI). Quadratic polynomial equations were used to model on the cellulosic yield, CrI, and lignin content for a regression analysis, using response surface methodology (RSM). The optimum process of organosolv pretreatment of Chinese was found to be: temperature: 185 ºC, ratio of wood to liquor: 1 to 4.2, ethanol concentration: 45%, and holding time: 41 min. The solid pretreated under optimum process conditions was evaluated for bioconversion using enzymatic hydrolysis of the cellulose fraction to glucose. Approximately 87% of the total cellulose in the poplar was recovered as monomeric glucose after hydrolysis of the solid fraction.


Download PDF

Full Article

STUDY ON THE OPTIMUM PROCESS OF ACID-CATALYTIC ETHANOL PRETREATMENT OF CHINESE TRIPLOID POPLAR TO ENHANCE SUGAR RECOVERY BY HYDROLYSIS

Neng Kang,a Zhong Liu,a,* Lan-Feng Hui,a Chuan-Ling Si,a,b Li Cui,a Ting Zhao,a and Sheng-Tao Mao a

Organosolv pretreatment was applied to Chinese triploid poplar using the acid-catalysis ethanol method to enhance sugar recovery in enzymatic hydrolysis. A Box-Behnken design (BBD) was used to optimize the effect of temperature, ratio of wood to liquor, ethanol concentration, and holding time on the pretreatment process. All variables except for lignin content were found to significantly affect the cellulosic yield as well as crystallinity index (CrI). Quadratic polynomial equations were used to model on the cellulosic yield, CrI, and lignin content for a regression analysis, using response surface methodology (RSM). The optimum process of organosolv pretreatment of Chinese triploid poplar was found to be: temperature: 185 ºC, ratio of wood to liquor: 1 to 4.2, ethanol concentration: 45%, and holding time: 41 min. The solid pretreated under optimum process conditions was evaluated for bioconversion using enzymatic hydrolysis of the cellulose fraction to glucose. Approximately 87% of the total cellulose in the poplar was recovered as monomeric glucose after hydrolysis of the solid fraction.

Keywords: Chinese triploid poplar; Organosolv pretreatment; RSM; Enzymatic hydrolysis

Contact information: a: Tianjin Key Laboratory of Pulp and Paper, College of Material Science and Chemical Engineering, Tianjin University of Science and Technology, Tianjin 300457, China; b: State Kay Laboratory of Pulp and Paper Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China; * Corresponding author: mglz@tust.edu.cn

INTRODUCTION

Cellulosic ethanol, which has been the subject of significant technological progress (Lynd et al. 1996), is produced from lignocellulose biomass, which is a low-cost, plentiful feedstock that does not have the ethical concerns associated with the use of potential food resources (Rass-Hansen et al. 2007). Utilization of such agricultural residues for industrial products has potential advantages. It is even more important for countries that lack abundant wood fiber (Rainey et al. 2009).

The Chinese triploid poplar is characterized as fast-growing, moisture-loving, and shade-intolerant medium to large trees with a short life span. The chemical composition of poplar wood is characterized by its high cellulose content (over 50%) and low lignin content (about 20% or less), making it an attractive biomass for fermentable sugar production (Balatinecz and Kretschmann 2001).

Over the years a number of different methods, including un-catalyzed steam explosion, liquid hot water, and dilute acid have been developed for the pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass (Liu and Wyman 2005). The general idea of these methods is to remove or alter the hemicellulose or lignin, resulting in an increase of the surface area (Mosier et al. 2005). Additionally, most of these pretreatment methods require high-temperature or high-pressure reactions and the application of chemicals that may be toxic to the enzymes or the fermentative microorganisms. The removal of these toxic sub-stances is always costly and complicated.

Pretreatment processes utilizing organic solvents as cooking media have a long history and have achieved commercial or pre-commercial scale (Dahlmann and Schroeter 1990; Schroeter et al. 1991). The promise of value-added products from dissolved lignin and hemicelluloses has captured researchers’ attention. Ethanol has been used to separate the wood components in order to study them (Sousa et al. 1986). Aqueous ethanol penetrates easily into the structure of freshly cut softwoods and hardwoods (Kleinert 1975a). This results in practically uniform delignification. The fibre separation on ethanol-water pulping is related to the removal of both lignin and hemicellulose fractions. Today it is one of the most promising organic pretreatment chemicals. Generation of high-quality lignin and other potentially valuable co-products (e.g., furfural and acetic acid) from woody feedstocks may be critical to otherwise marginally cost-effective biorefinery schemes for fuel ethanol production (Pan et al., 2005). In many ethanol pretreatments studies small amounts of acids such as sulfuric acid have been used as catalysts (Liu et al. 2008). Delignification of wood by ethanolysis involves cleavage of lignin-lignin or lignin-carbohydrate linkages, or both, and is catalyzed by the presence of hydrogen or hydroxyl ions in the pulping liquor. Ethanol pretreatment has been shown to improve the efficiency of enzymatic hydrolysis of wood (Holtzapple and Humphrey 1984; Skachkov et al. 1991). Therefore, it is safe to believe that the organosolv pretreatment is a unique and promising process. However, there have been few reports on acid-catalytic ethanol pretreatment recently.

RSM is a statistical technique for the modeling and optimization of multiple variables. RSM determines optimum process conditions by combining experimental designs with interpolation by first- or second-order polynomial equations in a sequential testing procedure (Ferreira et al. 2009). RSM has already been successfully applied for the optimization of bioprocesses such as pretreatments (Li et al. 2010; Ma et al. 2009).

Temperature, ratio of wood to liquor, ethanol concentration, and holding time are primary factors of acid-catalysis ethanol pretreatment (Liu et al. 2008). The main factors that influence the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose in lignocellulosic feedstocks can be divided in two groups: enzyme-related and substrate-related factors. Substrate-related factors limiting enzymatic hydrolysis are directly connected to the pretreatment employed and mainly studied in this work. Cellulosic yield and lignin content are the main features affecting enzymatic saccharification (Liu et al. 2008).

Crystallinity is believed to be an important feature affecting enzymatic sacchari-fication of cellulose (Kumar et al. 2009). In order to systemically study the optimum process of organosolv pretreatment of Chinese triploid poplar, BBD was applied in this study to investigate the effects of factors on the cellulosic yield, as well as crystallinity index and lignin content. Changes of main chemical components and hydrolysis for pretreated material were also determined to evaluate the influence of organosolv pretreatment.

EXPERIMENTAL

Material

The Chinese triploid poplar used in this experiment was supplied by Beijing University of Forest. The size of the wood chips was about 30mm×25mm×10mm, and these were used after being stored for a month.

Organosolv Pretreatment

Acid-catalysis with ethanol was used for organosolv pretreatment. The cooking liquor was prepared by mixing water with industrial alcohol (concentration, 95%). Sulfuric acid (98%) was used as catalyst, with a dosage of 0.8%. All chemical reagents were analytically pure (Tianjin North Tianyi chemical reagents factory). 100 g (oven dry) of material was filled manually into each 1.5 L vessel of a four-vessel, rotating digester made by Shaanxi University of Science & Technology, Machinery works. After cooking, the vessels were cooled to room temperature in a water bath. Solids and liquor were then separated using nylon mesh. The pulp was washed with 400 mL aqueous ethanol (65%). The pulp was then washed 3 times with water. The washed pulp was homogenized in a pulp washer (L&W, Sweden) for 10 min and passed through a laboratory flat screen with 0.35 mm slits to remove rejects (non-defiberized woodchips and knots). The screened pulp comprises the solids fraction.

Design of Experiments

The range and levels of the independent variables studied were selected based on a preliminary study and are listed in Table 1. All variables at zero level constitute the center points, and the combination of each of the variables at either its lowest (-1.0) or highest (+1.0) level with the other variables at zero level constitute the axial points. Ranges of processing conditions mentioned above were chosen to provide pulp samples. In this study, a Box-Behnken design (BBD) was used to evaluate the main and interaction effects of the factors: temperature (A), ratio of wood to liquor (B), ethanol concentration (C), holding time (D) on the cellulosic yield, as well as CrI and lignin content. The range and levels of the variables investigated are given in Table 1, whereas the experimental designs with the observed responses and values for cellulosic yield, CrI, and lignin content are presented in Table 2. 29 experiments were performed according to Table 4 to optimize the parameters. Among them, 5 replications were at center points (Run 5, 11, 18, 21 and 24). A polynomial quadratic equation was fitted to evaluate the effect of each independent variable to the response:

 (1)

In this expression Y is the response; Xi and Xj are the coded independent variables, and β0βiβii, and βij are intercept, linear, quadratic, and interaction constant coefficients, respectively. Response surfaces were developed using the fitted quadratic polynomial equation obtained from regression analysis.

Table 1. Independent Variables Used in the BBD and Actual Factor Levels Corresponding to Coded Factor Levels

Table 2. Experimental Design and Results

Statistical Analysis

The response surfaces of the variables inside the experimental domain were analyzed using Design Expert software (Version 7.0, Stat-Ease Inc., Minneapolis, CA, USA). The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to estimate the statistical parameters.

Analytical Methods

The lignin content of the polar before and after pretreatment was determined using the following TAPPI standards: T 17 wd-70 for cellulose content, T 223 cm-01 for pentosans content, T 222 om-02 for lignin content, and T 211 om-02 for ash content.

An equation was used to evaluate the cellulosic yield:

 (2)

Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra of polar were obtained on an FT-IR spectrophotometer (FTIR-650,Tianjin Gangdong Sci.&Tech. Development Co., Ltd) using a KBr (Tianjin JinKe Institute of fine chemical Industry) disc. FTIR spectroscopy methods were used to investigate structural changes on materials and pretreated solids. In the scope of spectral analysis CrI had also been calculated by comparing two different band ratios:

 (3)

The band at 1429 cm-1 appears to be due to CH2 symmetrical bending and responds to changes in the environment of the C6 group, such as formation or breaking of an intra-molecular H-bond involving O6. The band at 893 cm-1 is the anomeric group frequency in cellulose and hemicellulose and is assigned due to motions of atoms attached to C1. It is sensitive to changes in the cellulose lattice type and amorphous cellulose (Nelson and O’Connor. 1964). In addition to visual examination of the spectra, Lateral Order Index (I1430/I897), which gives information about changes of crystallinity, was calculated.

Enzymatic Hydrolysis

Commercial cellulase was provided by Zaozhuang Jienuo Biotech. Corp., China, with a filter paper activity (FPA) of 43.5 FPU/g. Batch hydrolysis experiments were routinely conducted at 2% (w/w) cellulose consistency in 50 mL 100 mM sodium acetate buffer, pH 4.8, temperature 50 ºC, and an enzyme loading of 25 filter paper units of cellulose/g cellulose. Reaction mixtures were incubated at 160 rpm in a rotary shaker and sampled periodically for sugar analysis using Bio-sensing analyzer (SBA-40C, manufac-tured by Biology Institute of Shandong Academy of Sciences, China). Hydrolysis data are averages from duplicate experiments. The conversion of glucose was calculated with the following equation:

 (4)

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Chemical Composition of the Material

The amounts of the main components of the raw material are listed in Table 3. The chemical composition of poplar wood is characterized by its high cellulose content (50.18%) and low lignin content (19.75%), making it an attractive biomass for hydrolysis.

Table 3. Chemical Composition of the Material

Regression Analysis

Further optimization of the organosolv pretreatment was achieved by employing BBD of experiments. Data were analyzed using Design Expert software to yield analysis of variance (ANOVA), regression coefficients, and regression equation.

The polynomial equation, describing the cellulosic yield as a simultaneous function of the temperature (A), ratio of wood to liquor (B), ethanol concentration(C), and holding time (D) is presented as Eq. (5)

Y1=79.50+5.10*A-0.77*B+2.78*C+0.72*D+1.15*A*B-6.48*A*C-2.94*A*D+3.83*B*C+3.57*B*D-3.38*C*D+2.69*A2-3.21*B2-2.31*C2-3.38*D2 (5)

Table 4 shows the ANOVA for the fitted model. The model F value of 61.21 and the values of probability (P) > F (<0.0001) implies that the model was significant. The p-value of the adjusted model was lower than 0.0001, indicating that the model is statistically valid. And the p-values of A, C, A2, B2, C2, D2, AC, AD, BC, BD, and CD were all lower than 0.0001 demonstrating that they were the most significant factors, compared to the other ones, influencing the response. B, D, and AB were also significant factors with p-value lower than 0.05.

The coefficient of determination R2 for the model was 96.78%. The high R2 value specifies that the model obtained will be able to give a convincingly good estimate of response of the system within the range studied. The lack of fit test, which was not significant for the model, showed that the model satisfactorily fitted the data.

Table 4. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for Regression Equation

CrI is described as a simultaneous function of the temperature (A), ratio of wood to liquor (B), ethanol concentration(C), and holding time (D) in Eq. (6)

Y1=1.70+7.163*10-3*A-8.75*10-3*B-2.25*10-3*C-6.5*10-3*D+0.035*A*B- 0.047*A*C+0.037*A*D-7.75*10-3*B*C+0.012*B*D-0.02*C*D (6)

Table 5 gives the ANOVA for the fitted model. The model F value of 17.72 implies that the model was significant. And the p-values of A, AB, AC, AD were all lower than 0.0001. B, C, and CD were also significant factors with p-value lower than 0.05.

The coefficient of determination, R2 for the model was 83.90%. The lack of fit test was not significant for the model.

Table 5. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for Regression Equation

Lignin content is described as a simultaneous function of the temperature (A), ratio of wood to liquor (B), ethanol concentration(C), and holding time (D) in Eq. (7)

Y=8.24-1.71*A-0.52*B+0.15C-0.56*D (7)

Table 6. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for Regression Equation

The polynomial equation is a linear form, quadratic, and interaction constant coefficients are not significant. Table 6 reports the ANOVA for the fitted model. The model F value of 61.21 implies that the model was significant. And the p-values of A were all lower than 0.0001. B, D, and BC were also significant factors with p-value lower than 0.05. The coefficient of determination, R2 for the model was 86.41%. The lack of fit test was not significant for the model.

Model Analysis

The 3D response surfaces and the 2D contour plots of the responses using Eq. (2) for the cellulosic yield are respectively shown in Fig. 1 (A-E). To depict the interactive effects of independent variables on responses, two variables were varied in certain ranges while others were kept constant. Similarly, corresponding to Figs. 1 (A-E), the interactive effect between each two factors significantly influenced the cellulosic yield.

Fig. 1. 3D response surface displaying relative effect of two variables on cellulosic yield.

Central point: Temperature 175 oC, Liquor:Wood Ratio 1:6, Ethanol Concentration 55%, Time 45 min.

As shown in Fig. 1 (A), within the temperature range investigated, 165-185 oC, the cellulosic yield increased with increasing temperature, and the ratio of wood to liquor reached a maximum yield at 185 oC when ratio of wood to liquor reached 1:6. High temperature promoted delignification and removal of hemicellulose. Proper ratio of wood to liquor promoted penetration of ethanol, which was also helpful for delignification. But further increase in ratio of wood to liquor beyond 1:6 resulted in a decrease of cellulose yield because of dissolution of carbohydrate. The holding time showed a similar effect on cellulosic yield, and a maximum cellulose yield was observed at 41 min (Fig. 1 (B)). Longer time also led to dissolution of carbohydrate. As Fig. 1(D) shows, maximum cellulose yield was observed at 45% when the temperature was 185 oC. Low ethanol concentration, which generates higher hydrogen ion concentration (lower pH value) at the same dosage of H2SO4, promotes acid-catalyzed cleavage of β- and α-ether linkages in lignin (McDonough et al. 1993; Goyal et al. 1992), while higher temperature also leads to a decrease of cellulosic yield due to dissolution of carbohydrate (Kabel et al. 2007). Similarly, corresponding to Figs. 1(C), (E), and (F), the interactive effect between BC, BD and CD significantly influenced the cellulose yield. It supports previous studies that proper increasing severity of biomass-pretreatment could enhance cellulose yield (Liu et al. 2008).With the conditions becoming more severe, the removal of lignin and the dissolution of carbohydrate were accelerated.

Fig. 2. 3D response surface displaying relative effect of two variables on crystallinity index while other at center level. Central point: Temperature 175〬C, Liquor:Wood Ratio 1:6, Ethanol Concentration 55%, Time 45 min.

Various pretreatments can change cellulose crystal structures by disrupting inter- and intra-chain hydrogen bonding of cellulose fibrils (Mosier et al. 2005). Bands at 4000 cm-1, 2995 cm-1, 2900 cm-1, 1430cm-1, 1375 cm-1, and 900 cm-1 are especially sensitive to crystalline and amorphous regions. The band at 1429 cm-1 is assigned as “crystalline” and the band at 897 cm-1as “amorphous” (Nelson and O’Connor 1964).

The features of recovered poplar solids after acid-catalysis ethanol pretreatment were examined using Lateral Order Index and also compared to the corresponding untreated samples. Results show that sample obtained after the pretreatment had been altered significantly. The CrI for all samples was calculated, and the results are summarized in Table 2. The CrI of untreated material was 1.484, and after the pretreatment there was an observed increase in the CrI. This increase in CrI after pretreatment is consistent with the results reported by (Kumar et al. 2009), suggesting that the amorphous cellulose breaks down.

Relative effects of two variables on CrI are displayed by 3D response surface in Fig. 2. The CrI increased quickly with the increasing maximum temperature, but this tendency went in the opposite direction when the ethanol concentration reached approximately 55% (Fig. 2(A)). Amorphous cellulose broke down with the temperature increasing, and the CrI became higher. But with the removal of lignin and hemicellulose, there was a degradation of the cellulose that led to the CrI decreasing. Broadening of the band at 897 cm-1 reflects a higher amount of disordered structure. If a relative shift in the band at 1430 cm-1 from higher to lower frequencies is observed, this is a sign of the degradation processes of the cellulose (Kavkler et al. 2011). This decrease in cellulose crystallinity indicates that the recovered product is highly amorphous and therefore has an increase in cellulose surface accessibility and would theoretically enable more efficient cellulose hydrolysis. As shown in Fig. 2 (B), extending the ratio of wood to liquor and increasing temperature led to a decrease of CrI. Interestingly, when both of them were raised higher (beyond 175 oC and 1:6), the CrI increased again. Figure 2 (C&D) have the same situation with Fig. 2 (B). An explanation is that with the increase of ratio of wood to liquor or time, crystalline cellulose was converted to amorphous cellulose, which led to a decrease of CrI. When the temperature went higher, both the crystalline and amorphous cellulose broke down, though amorphous cellulose had a faster rate of decomposition, leading to the increase of CrI according to Equation (3).

As Fig. 3(A) shows, the lignin content decreased very fast as the temperature became higher. There was a less significant dropping trend with the increasing of the ratio of wood to liquor (Fig. 3(B)) and holding time (Fig. 3(D)), because higher temperature, larger ratio of wood to liquor, and longer time promote delignification. The slight increase in lignin yield in Fig 3(C) is probably due to promotion of lignin condensation reactions leading to reduced defibration. Another explanation is that the rate of defibration is faster than that of delignification. These might be the reasons the ethanol concentration and quadratic, and interaction constant coefficients are not significant.

Though less lignin content improved the efficiency of enzyme hydrolysis, a more severe condition led to a drop of cellulosic yield.

Based on an overall consideration of cellulosic yield, CrI, and lignin content, and taking both costs and efficiency into consideration, optimum process of organosolv pretreatment was extracted by design expert software through a graphical optimization.

Fig. 3. Effect of processing conditions on lignin content.

Optimization and Confirmation Experiments

Through a graphical optimization by design expert software, optimum process of organosolv pretreatment of poplar was found to be: temperature: 185 ºC, ratio of wood to liquor: 1 to 4.2, ethanol concentration: 45% and holding time: 41 min. Under these conditions, confirmation experiments were conducted in three replicates. The observed mean cellulosic yield, CrI and lignin content were found to be largely consistent with the predicted values. At the same time, the rationality and practicability of optimal conditions for organosolv pretreatment have been confirmed in this work.

Table 5. Verifized Results of the Model Equation

Enzyme Hydrolysis of Material and Pretreated Polar Solids

Enzymatic hydrolysis of both as-recieved and pretreated poplar solids under the optimum process to glucose was carried out to compare their cellulose digestibility. Figure 4 shows conversion of material and pretreated poplar to glucose at the same enzyme loading. Organosolv pretreatment poplar exhibited significantly higher saccharification kinetics, with conversion of glucose reaching 87.06% within 90 h, whereas the as-received material’s was only 8.97% over the same time interval. The loss of intra- and inter-molecular hydrogen bonding resulting in amorphous cellulose provides an enhanced surface area, leading to better enzyme accessibility and increased binding sites in recovered cellulose fibers (Li et al. 2010). Lignin could also act as a major obstacle to enzyme attack on cellulose and can irreversibly adsorb cellulase. Compared with the result of hybrid poplar (Pan et al. 2006), approximately 85% of the total cellulose in the untreated poplar was recovered as monomeric glucose after hydrolysis indicated that Chinese triploid poplar is an attractive biomass for hydrolysis by the pretreatment with lower ethanol concentration and shorter holding time.

Hydrolysis results clearly showed that soluble sugars were released faster and to a greater extent following the organosolv pretreatment. Additional reductions in enzyme loading, hydrolysis time, pH, and time are essential to promote the economy of biorefineries and need to be optimized further.

Fig. 4. Comparison of enzyme hydrolysis of both material and pretreated polar solids A: material B: pretreated polar

CONCLUSIONS

  1. Organosolv pretreatment (acid-catalytic ethanol method) of Chinese triploid poplar resulted in a high cellulose yield, low CrI, and low lignin content. These results were obtained when employing a relatively short holding time (41 min), low cooking temperature (185 ºC), ratio of wood to liquor (1:4.2), and ethanol concentration (45%) under the condition of acid dosage (0.8%). The pretreated solids under the optimum process conditions were shown to be susceptible to attack by a commercial cellulase preparation.
  2. Approximately 87% of the total cellulose in the poplar was recovered as monomeric glucose after hydrolysis of the solid fraction using enzyme loading, pH 4.8, temperature 50 ºC, and time of hydrolysis 90 h.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The financial support on this project by National Nature Science Foundation of China (NSFC, No. 31000283, 31000279, 21076160, 31170541), Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (No. NCET-10-0951), and the International Cooperation Project of Tianjin Nature Science Foundation (09ZCGHHZ00800) are greatly acknowledged.

REFERENCES CITED

Balatinecz, J. J., and Kretschmann, D. E. (2001). “Properties and utilization of poplar wood,” NRC, Research Press National Research, Council of Canada, On KIA OR6, Canada, pp. 277-291.

Dahlmann, G., and Schroeter, M. C. (1990). “The Organocell process: Pulping with the environment in mind,” Tappi J. 73(4), 237-240.

Ferreira, S., Duarte, A. P., Ribeiro, M. H. L., Queiroz, J. A., and Domingues, F. C. (2009). “Response surface optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis of Cistus ladanifer and Cytisus striatusfor bioethanol production,” Biochem. Eng. J. 45(3), 192-200.

Goh, C. S., Lee, K. T., and Bhatia, S. (2010). “Hot compressed water pretreatment of oil palm fronds to enhance glucose recovery for production of second generation bio-ethanol,”Bioresource Technol. 101(19), 7362-7367.

Goyal, G. C., Lora, J. H., Pye, E. K. (1992). “Autocatalyzed organosolv pulping of hardwoods-effect of pulping conditions on pulp properties and characteristics of soluble and residual lignin,” Tappi J. 75, 110-116.

Holtzapple, M. T., and Humphrey, A. E. (1984). “The effect of organosolv pretreatment on the enzymatic hydrolysis of poplar,” Biotech. Bioeng. 26(7), 670-676.

Kabel, M. A., Bos, G., Zeevalking, J., Voragen, A. G. J., and Schols, H. A. (2007). “Effect of pretreatment severity on xylan solubility and enzymatic breakdown of the remaining cellulose from wheat straw,” Bioresource Technol. 98(10), 2034-2042.

Kavkler, K., Gunde-Cimerman, N., Zalar, P., and Dem-Sard, A. (2011). “FTIR spectroscopy of biodegraded historical textiles,” Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 96(4), 574-580.

Kumar, R., Mago, G., Balan, V., and Wyman, C. E. (2009). “Physical and chemical characterizations of corn stover and poplar solids resulting from leading pretreatment technologies,” Bioresource Technol. 100(17), 3948-3962.

Li, C., Knierim, B., Manisseri, C., Arora, R., Scheller, H. V., Auer, M., Vogel, K. P., Simmons, B. A., and Singh, S. (2010). “Comparison of dilute acid and ionic liquid pretreatment of switchgrass: Biomass recalcitrance, delignification and enzymatic saccharification,” Bioresource Technol. 101(13), 4900-4906.

Liu, C. G., and Wyman, C. E. (2005). “Partial flow of compressed-hot water through corn stover to enhance hemicellulose sugar recovery and enzymatic digestibility of cellulose,” Bioresource Technol. 96(18), 1978-1985.

Liu, Z., Zhou, H., and Lu, Y. H. (2008). “Study on the optimum process of bioconversion of wheat straw to glucose,” Proceeding the Second International Papermaking & Environment Conference, Book A.129-133.

Lynd, L. R. (1996). “Overview and evaluation of fuel ethanol from cellulosic biomass: Technology, economics, the environment, and policy,” Annu. Rev. Energy Eviron. 21, 403-465.

Ma, H., Liu, W. W., Chen, X., Wu, Y. J., and Yu, Z. L. (2009). “Enhanced enzymatic saccharification of rice straw by microwave pretreatment,” Bioresource Technol. 100(3), 1279-1284.

McDonough, T. J. (1993) “The chemistry of organosolv delignification,” Tappi J.76, 186-193.

Mosier, N., Wyman, C., Dale, B., Elander, R., Lee, Y. Y., Holtzapple, M., and Ladisch, M. (2005). “Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass,”Bioresource Technol. 96(6), 673-686.

Nelson, M. L., and O’Connor, T. (1964). “Relation of certain infrared bands to cellulose crystallinity and crystallattice type. Part I. Spectra of lattice types I, II, III and of amorphous cellulose,” J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 8, 1311-1324.

Pan, X. J., Arato, C., Gilkes, N., Gregg, D., Mabee, W., Pye, K., Xiao, Z. Z., Zhang, X., and Saddler, J. (2005). “Biorefining of softwoods using ethanol organosolv pulping: Preliminary evaluation of process streams for manufacture of fuel-grade ethanol and co-products,” Biotechnol Bioeng. 90(4), 473-481.

Pan, X. J., Gilkes, N., Kadla, J., Pye, K., Saka, S., Gregg, D., Ehara, K., Xie, D., Lam, D., and Saddler J. (2006). “Bioconversion of hybrid poplar to ethanol and co-products using an organosolv fractionation process: Optimization of process yields,” Biotechnol Bioeng. 94, 851-861.

Rainey, T. J., Doherty, W. O. S., Martinez, D. M., Brown, R. J., and Kelson, N. A. (2009). “An experimental study of Australian sugarcane bagasse pulp permeability,” Appita J. 62(4), 296-302.

Rass-Hansen, J., Falsig, H., Jorgensen, B., and Christensen, C. H. (2007). “Bioethanol: Fuel or feedstock?” J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 82, 329-333.

Schroeter, M. C. (1991). “Possible lignin reactions in the organocell pulping process,” Tappi J. 74(10), 197-200.

Skachkov, V. M., Tanicheva, R. V., Mikhailov, G. S., Kozhevnikov, P. S., and Sokov, A. N. (1991). “Enzymolysis of oxygen-solvolysis pulp,” Gid. Les. Prom. 7, 4-5. (ABIPST 63:8527).

Sousa, M., Schuchardt, U., and Rodrigues, J. A. R. (1986). “Separation and identification of sugarcane bagasse constituents by the organosolv process,” Ciencia Cultura. 38(1), 181-188. (ABIPC 59:2016).

Article submitted: August 28, 2011; Peer review completed: October 5, 2011; Revised version received: October 25, 2011; Accepted: November 30, 2011; Published: December 2, 2011.