NC State
BioResources
Muthuramamoorthy, M., Aldalbahi, A., Alanzi, K. M. R., Pandiaraj, S., Karuppiah, P., Govindasami, P. (2024). “Production of low-cost lactic acid from dairy wastes and dates wastewater and bioactive silver-poly (lactic acid) nanocomposite for biological applications,” BioResources 19(3), 5632-5653.

Abstract

L-Lactic acid-producing Lactobacillus lactis and L. plantarum were isolated from date wastes. The fermentation process was optimized using a one-variable-at-a-time approach. Dairy wastewater and wastewater from the date industry were utilized as low-cost culture media to produce lactic acid. The selected two bacterial strains were co-cultured in wastewater medium to produce L-lactic acid and D-lactic acid. Lactic acid production was significantly improved by glucose (carbon source), yeast extract (nitrogen source), initial inoculum level, and polysorbate 80. A central composite design and response surface methodology were used to optimize the variables and their levels to improve lactic acid yield. The supplemented yeast extract, glucose, and polysorbate 80 improved lactic acid. The predicted variables and their levels for maximum lactic acid production were glucose (67.5 g/L), yeast extract (10.28 g/L), and polysorbate 80 (0.48 mL/L). The prepared nanocomposites exhibited antibacterial activity against foodborne bacterial pathogens. The structural properties of the silver-polylactic acid nano compost materials were determined. The characterized compost materials exhibited a peak absorption wavelength of 430 nm. The silver and poly(lactic acid) were characterized using X-ray diffraction analysis and were 30 to 50 nm in size.


Download PDF

Full Article

Production of Low-cost Lactic Acid from Dairy Wastes and Dates Wastewater for Bioactive Silver-Poly(lactic acid) Nanocomposite for Biological Applications

Muthumareeswaran Muthuramamoorthy,a,* Ali Aldalbahi,b Khwater Mishaal Radi Alanzi,b Saravanan Pandiaraj,c Ponmurugan Karuppiah,d and Periyasami Govindasami b

L-Lactic acid-producing Lactobacillus lactis and L. plantarum were isolated from date wastes. The fermentation process was optimized using a one-variable-at-a-time approach. Dairy wastewater and wastewater from the date industry were utilized as low-cost culture media to produce lactic acid. The selected two bacterial strains were co-cultured in wastewater medium to produce L-lactic acid and D-lactic acid. Lactic acid production was significantly improved by glucose (carbon source), yeast extract (nitrogen source), initial inoculum level, and polysorbate 80. A central composite design and response surface methodology were used to optimize the variables and their levels to improve lactic acid yield. The supplemented yeast extract, glucose, and polysorbate 80 improved lactic acid. The predicted variables and their levels for maximum lactic acid production were glucose (67.5 g/L), yeast extract (10.28 g/L), and polysorbate 80 (0.48 mL/L). The prepared nanocomposites exhibited antibacterial activity against foodborne bacterial pathogens. The structural properties of the silver-polylactic acid nano compost materials were determined. The characterized compost materials exhibited a peak absorption wavelength of 430 nm. The silver and poly(lactic acid) were characterized using X-ray diffraction analysis and were 30 to 50 nm in size.

DOI: 10.15376/biores.19.3.5632-5653

Keywords: Lactic acid bacteria; Lactic acid; Poly lactic acid; Silver-polylactic acid composite; Antibacterial

Contact information: a: King Abdullah Institute for Nanotechnology, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia; b: Department of Chemistry, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia; c: Department of Self-Development Skills, CFY Deanship, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; d: Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh – 11541, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; *Corresponding author: mramamoorthy@ksu.edu.sa

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION

Plastic production started in the late 1950s, and production has risen to about 8.3 to 9.1 million metric tons (Mt) globally (Pappa et al. 2021). These synthetic plastics are used in packing industries and are highly complicated to recycle. It has been estimated that more than 75% of prepared plastics accumulate in the soil environment or are discarded in landfills (Geyer et al. 2017). These plastics are slowly degraded, highly stable under environmental conditions, and form fragments of various sizes. The sizes of plastics range between 1 μm and 5 mm and are commonly termed microplastics. Microplastics are emerging pollutants that pose a serious threat to almost all living organisms in the environment. Microplastics are reported in sediments, oceans, sewage, and rivers (Huang et al. 2021). Emerging microplastic pollutants concern industrialists and scientists, leading to a focus to developing eco-friendly polymers, which could be completely degraded in the soil environment. In recent years, great interest has been devoted to the development of biodegradable polymers instead of traditional petroleum-based polymers (Kian et al. 2019). Many waste management strategies, including composting, reusing, and recycling, decrease plastic pollution in the environment. However, the production of eco-friendly biopolymers is an alternate method because this method utilizes polymers from waste biomass.

Polylactic acid (PLA) is considered an important biopolymer, and the production of PLA from biowastes may reduce pollution in the natural environment (Balla et al. 2021). PLA is produced from lactic acid (LA), and LA is obtained by microbial processing using potato, cassava starch, and corn (Kervran et al. 2022). PLA, a linear aliphatic polyester, is considered an alternative material in the packing industry (John et al. 2023). PLA-based bioplastic would be an excellent substitute for the existing conventional plastics in various applications. It is widely used in the food industry, and due to its exceptional properties, it is recommended for use in the textile, medical, and agriculture industries (Sanusi et al. 2021). Polylactic acid can be degraded slowly, resulting in the generation of microplastics; moreover, microplastics generated from PLA do not pose any toxic effects on living organisms or soils in the environment (Ainali et al. 2022). In humans, it is considered a non-toxic biopolymer; hence, it is widely used in biomedical and medical applications (Vlachopoulos et al. 2022). In the human body, PLA degrades slowly and is converted into a non-toxic LA (Beslikas et al. 2011). However, the use of PLA shows certain disadvantages, such as high permeability to vapour and gas, fragility, low thermal stability, and low melt strength, while its biodegradation rate is very low compared to waste biomass such as yard waste and food waste (Mayekar et al. 2020).

Polylactic acid can be prepared by two different methods (chemical and fermentation methods) (Wee et al. 2006). In the chemical method of PLA synthesis, petrochemical resources are utilized, followed by the supplementation of hydrogen cyanide (HCN) and lactic acid catalysts (Wee et al. 2006). In the case of the fermentation method, renewable resources can be utilized from natural sources, including carbohydrates in the culture medium, in the production of lactic acid (Jamshidian et al. 2010). To prepare PLA, the pure forms of D (-) lactic acid and L (+) lactic acid are important. In the chemical method, both D (-) and L (+) lactic acids are prepared simultaneously.  By contrast, in the fermentation process, only D (-) lactic acid or L (+) lactic acid is obtained (Wee et al. 2006). The advantages of PLA are its antimicrobial, biodegradability, and antioxidant activities (Jamshidian et al. 2010). The PLA is biodegradable and eco-friendly, and it can be degraded into carbon dioxide and water, which protects the environment from toxic pollutants. Anaerobic bacteria are utilized for the production of lactic acid (Ghaffar et al. 2014). Lactic acid bacteria utilize sugars such as lactose, glucose, and galactose without any heat generation. Batch fermentation and fed batch fermentation are more useful for the production of LA than continuous fermentation. In a continuous fermentation system, productivity is high under controlled pH and temperature (Ghaffar et al. 2014). Fungi and bacteria were utilized for the production of lactic acid; however, the productivity of LA is high in bacteria (Ghaffar et al. 2014). To decrease the production cost of lignocellulosic biomass, it was recommended due to sustainability and availability (Abdel-Rahman et al. 2011). The wastewater discharged from the dairy and date palm effluent pollutes the environment, and the disposal of waste poses a serious environmental threat. Considering the circular economy, the present study was performed to use dairy wastewater and date palm wastewater for the production of LA-L and LA-D lactic acids by lactic acid bacteria. Lactic acids and silver nanoparticles were used in the present work for preparation of PLA-silver nanocomposite materials. The formulated PLA-silver nanocomposite materials were characterized, and antimicrobial properties against food-borne bacterial pathogens were determined.

EXPERIMENTAL

Isolation of Bacteria from the Date Palm Waste

De Man, Rogosa, and Lactobacilli (MRS) agar was used for the isolation of lactobacilli from date palm waste. Briefly, 5 g of date palm waste was collected from the field food processing industry and blended mechanically (0.5 cm in length). It was ground with a pestle and mortar, and a 1 mL sample was inoculated into De Man, Rogosa, and Lactobacilli broth (MRS broth) and incubated for two days at 30 ± 1 °C. It was serially diluted and streaked onto MRS agar plates. The MRS agar plates were prepared using 8 mM sodium dihydrogen phosphate and 100 mM disodium hydrogen phosphate (pH 7.2). The plates were incubated for 48 h at 37 °C. A total of 12 lactic acid bacteria (LAB) were isolated from the date palm waste (Balasubramanian et al. 2021).

Lactic Acid Screening-modified MRS Agar Medium Method

The bacteria isolated from the MRS agar medium (12 bacteria) were streaked on a MRS agar medium containing 2.5% and 5% CaCO3. The plates were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. CaCO3 is used with MRS agar medium and is considered a neutralizing agent in LA production. The bacterial strain that showed a halo zone on MRS-modified medium was selected for fermentation (Zhang et al. 2020).

Lactic Acid Production and Assay

The isolated bacterial strain was inoculated into MRS broth medium and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. The culture medium is composed of (g/L): meat extract, 5; peptone from casein, 10; (+)-glucose, 20; yeast extract, 4; dipotassium hydrogen phosphate, 2.0; di-ammonium hydrogen citrate, 2.0; manganese sulphate, 0.04; magnesium sulphate, 0.2; and sodium acetate, 5.0, and polysorbate 80. The culture was incubated for 72 h, and LA production was determined every 24 h. After 24 h, it was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min. The amount of LA was determined using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Park and Chang 2017). It was equipped with a C18 column and connected to a photodiode detector. About 20 µL of sample was injected into the HPLC column, and the spectrum was monitored for 10 min. The amount of lactic acid in the sample was calculated using a lactic acid calibration curve. The column temperature was maintained at 65 °C, and 5 mM H2SO4 was used as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min.

Morphological, Biochemical and 16S rDNA Sequencing

One L-Lactic acid producing LAB strain (LAB04) and one potent D-Lactic acid producing strain (LAB09) were selected for optimized production of lactic acid in submerged fermentation. These two bacteria were subcultured continuously on MRS agar slants and stored at 2 to 8 °C, and for long-term storage, they were cultivated in MRS broth medium and stored in 20% glycerol at -20 °C. The isolates were grown on nutrient agar plates and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h.

The morphological and biochemical tests were performed and tentatively characterized as LAB. DNA was extracted from these LAB strains, and the purity was tested using a nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Ltd., Waltham, MA, USA). The universal primers (27F and 1429R) were used for the amplification of 16S rDNA. The amplified gene was sequenced and compared using the basic local alignment search tool, and gene bank accession numbers were assessed (Atif et al. 2020; Al-Dhabi et al. 2020).

Inoculum Preparation

The strains LAB04 and LAB09 were inoculated individually in an Erlenmeyer flask containing 100 mL of MRS broth medium (Himedia, Mumbai, India). The culture was incubated for 12 h, and cell density (colony-forming unit) (CFU/mL) was maintained between 10 × 106 and 10 × 107 CFU/mL. The cell density was determined by growing the cells on MRS agar plates (Wu et al. 2020).

Screening of Variables for the Production of LA

Lactic acid production was optimized using the traditional method. The strains LAB04 and LAB09 were used for LA production. In the one-variable approach method, five different variables (inoculums, carbon source, nitrogen source, and polysorbate 80) were selected. Carbon sources (50 g/L), such as sucrose, maltose, glucose, xylose, fructose, and lactose, were used, and beef extract, yeast extract, ammonium sulphate, and casein were used as nitrogen sources (25 g/L). Inoculum was tested at a 2 to 5% level, and polysorbate 80 was supplemented between 0.2 and 1.0%. The culture was incubated for 24 h at 37 °C, and the amount of LA was determined by the high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (ThermoFisher Scientific Ltd., Waltham, MA, USA) method. Three significant variables influencing LA production were selected for the central composite design.

Central Composite Design and Response Surface Methodology

Glucose (carbon source), yeast extract (nitrogen source), and polysorbate 80 (inducer) were selected to determine the optimum response to LA production based on the one-variable-at-a-time approach. The central composite design (CCD) was comprised of 20 runs for three variables (Marraiki et al. 2020). Two potent LAB strains (LAB04 and LAB09) were applied for the production of LA. The experiment was performed in triplicate, and an average value was computed for analysis of variance (ANOVA). Design Expert (Version 8.0, Minneapolis, MN, USA) software was used to design the experiments and analyze the data. The three selected factors were coded according to Eq .1,

(1)

The variables and their levels are provided in Table 1. The experiment was performed in a 250-mL Erlenmeyer flask containing 50 mL of culture medium, 50 g/L of calcium carbonate (to control pH), and 5% inoculum. The culture was incubated in an orbital shaker incubator at 130 rpm for 24 h at 37 °C. After 24 h, LA production was determined by the HPLC method.

Table 1. Analysis Of Variables Influence on Lactic Acid Production in Submerged Fermentation Using Lactic Acid Bacteria

Production of Lactic Acid in Fermenter

Batch fermentation was performed in a 7-L fermenter (Applikon, Delft, The Netherlands). The pH of the fermenter was maintained at 6.5 using NaOH (5 N), and a fermentation experiment was performed using milk wastewater and date processing wastewater. The milk wastewater was derived from cheese processing waste, and date wastewater was obtained from date syrup processing waste. Production of lactic acid in fermentation was performed using manual inoculation and sampling. The pH of the medium was controlled using 50 g/L CaCO3. The selected two bacterial strains were inoculated (0.400 to 0.500 OD at 600 nm). The total operating volume was 4 L, with 130 rpm, and a pH of 6.5. The temperature was automatically controlled. In the culture medium, the optimum levels of glucose, yeast extract, and polysorbate 80 were supplemented based on statistical optimization and experimental results. The experiment was performed for 48 h, and the sample was withdrawn from the fermenter. It was centrifuged at 5000 ×g for 10 min, and the culture filtrate was filtered using a 0.20 μm filter. The concentrated LA was stored at -20º for further studies. The amount of LA was determined, and the result was expressed as g LA/L.

Synthesis of Polylactic Acid (PLA) using LA

The PLA was prepared by the direct polycondensation method, as previously described. A white crystalline powder was obtained, and the final product was dissolved in chloroform. It was further purified in methanol, filtered, and dried at 60 °C under vacuum. The material was poured into clean Petri dishes, dried at 80 °C for 12 h, and the solvent was removed. Then, it was removed from the Petri dishes and maintained in desiccators for further chromatinization (Wang et al. 2009).

Preparation of Silver-PLA Nanocomposite Materials

Chloroform and dimethylformamide (DM)F were prepared at a 1:8 ratio (v/v), where the final concentration was 10%, and AgNO3 was added (1.6 g). The AgNO3/PLA suspension was continuously stirred for two days under an ice bath, and 10 mL of NaBH4 (aqueous solution) was added dropwise for 120 min. The Ag-NPs developed, and the stable Ag-NP colloid was obtained due to the interactions of the hydroxyl groups of the PLA (Roucoux et al. 2002). The colloid material was removed from the aqueous phase, and silver ions were removed by shaking. It was dried at room temperature, and the Ag/PLA-NC films were suspended in chloroform. It was dried using the solution-casting technique and used for further experiments (Lu et al. 2008).

Determination of Antibacterial Activity

The antibacterial activity of the prepared silver-PLA nanocomposite was in vitro tested against bacterial strains (Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 12600), Escherichia coli (ATCC 13706), Enterobacter aerogenes (ATCC 13048), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 25619)). Mueller-Hinton (MH) agar medium was prepared. Pathogenic strains cultivated in MH broth medium were swabbed on it. After 30 min, Ag/PLA-NC film was cut and placed on MH agar medium, incubated for 24 h at 37  °C, and the zone of inhibition analyzed (Atif et al. 2020). Chloroamphenicol was used as a positive control.

Characterization of Silver-PLA Material

The prepared Ag/PLA nanocomposite material was characterized by UV-visible spectroscopy (M/s. Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan), X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis (Model D8, M/s. Bruker, Germany), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (JSM‐7600F,M/s. Jeol Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The morphology of the Ag/PLA nanocomposites was determined using SEM, and XRD analysis was performed using a Philips, X’pert diffractometer that featured Cu Ka radiation. The degree of crystallinity, was calculated using Eq. 2:

χc = Ac / Ac + Aa (2)

where Ac=crystallized areas and Aa amorphous areas on the x-ray diffractogram.

UV-VIS spectra were performed using a UV-visible spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan). The scheme of PLA-silver nanocomposite materials preparation, analysis, and antimicrobial properties were depicted in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. PLA-silver nanocomposite materials preparation, analysis of composite materials and antimicrobial properties

Statistical Analysis

The amount of LA production was expressed as mean ± standard deviation, and the significance level was determined using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) software (Chicago, IL, USA).

RESULTS

Isolation of Lactic Acid Bacteria from the Date Palm Waste

A total of 12 LABs were isolated from the date palm waste. Among 12 bacterial strains, 10 isolates were Gram-positive and fermented glucose. These glucose hydrolyzing isolates released acid in the culture medium. The rapidly growing glucose hydrolyzing bacterial strains were selected for batch production of LA.

Batch Production of LA

The culture medium was centrifuged, and the filtered cell-free supernatant was used for the determination of LA. The HPLC spectrum of LA is depicted in Fig. 2. The LA is the major end product produced using available nutrients in the wastewater.  The isolated LAB strain, LAB04 produced L-lactic acid, and the strain LAB09 produced D-lactic acid. The amount of LA in the extract was determined using HPLC, and the result is described in Table 1. Bacterial biomass and LA production were found to be high in the LAB strains LAB04 and LAB09.

Fig. 2. High Performance Liquid Chromatography profile of lactic acid from the bacterial strains: (a) lactic acid standard, (b) sample

Table 1. Bacterial Biomass and LA Production by the LAB Strains Isolated from the Date Palm Waste

Table 2. Morphological and Biochemical Properties of LAB Strains Isolated from the Date Palm Waste

Morphological and Molecular Characters of LAB Strains

Colony morphology, biochemical analysis, and molecular characterization were performed for the two selected LAB strains for optimization. The morphological and biochemical characters of LA-producing LAB strains are described in Table 2 and Fig. 3. These two strains were characterized by 16S rDNA sequencing, and strain LAB04 was characterized as Lactobacillus lactis and strain LAB09 was determined to be L. plantarum.

Fig. 3. Growth of Lactobacillus lactis LAB04 (A) and Lactobacillus plantarum LAB09 (B) on nutrient agar plates. The plates were incubated at 37 ºC for 24 h and visible growth was observed.

Optimization of LA Production by Traditional Method

LAB04 and LAB09 were selected for optimization studies. The supplemented carbon sources in dairy wastewater and palm wastewater medium improved LA production (Fig. 4a) compared to the control (p<0.05). The supplemented nitrogen sources significantly influenced LA production (p<0.05) (Fig. 4b). Inoculum is one of the significant factors that directly affected LA production, and 4% was optimal for LA production (p<0.05) (Fig. 4c). The supplemented polysorbate 80 improved LA production (Fig. 4d).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Fig. 4. Effect of carbon (a), nitrogen (b), inoculums (c), and polysorbate 80 (d) on lactic acid production

Optimization of Lactic Acid Production Using Central Composite Design

A central composite design and response surface methodology were used to optimize the significant variables affecting LA fermentation. The designed coded values and response (LA production) for co-culture (LAB04 and LAB09) are shown in Table 3. The amount of LA in the culture medium varied significantly. The coded variables and variation in the response revealed the significance of optimization for LA production. Fisher’s test was performed to determine the significance level, and the model value was p <0.05, which showed statistical significance (Table 4). The independent variable polysorbate 80 exhibited a significant effect (p<0.05), and the model p value was 0.0004. The designed model was fitted to a quadratic model, and the model F-value was 11.18. The interactive effects (A2 and B2) are significant. The lack of fit F-value of this model was 1.86, and the coefficient estimate was positive for glucose and Tween-80. The decreased level of yeast extract could improve the LA yield. The R2 value of this model was 0.9, and the adjusted R2 model was 0.82. The final equation in terms of coded factors is as follows:

LA production = +92.98+3.72 × A-4.45 × B+14.96 × C+2.29 × A × B-5.04 × A × C+1.71 × B × C-33.44 × A2-16.79 × B2-12.34 × C2

Table 3. Central Composite Design and Response Surface Methodology on Lactic Acid Production

Table 4. ANOVA for Response Surface Quadratic Model for the Production of Lactic Acid

Figure 5 shows that a concentration of <20 g/L of yeast extract improved lactic acid. The increasing concentration of glucose improved LA production, and 75.4 g/L was optimum for LA production. Among the three variables, supplemented polysorbate 80 significantly improved LA production.

Fig. 5. Response surface graph shows the interactive effect between glucose and yeast extract (a), glucose and polysorbate 80 (b), and yeast extract and polysorbate 80 (c).

Production of Lactic Acid in a Fermenter

Batch fermentation was used to produce LA using the LAB strains LAB04 and LAB09. The selected bacterial strains utilized sugars from the milk wastewater and palm wastewater and converted them to LA. The supplemented optimized medium improved the yield twofold compared to the unoptimized medium. The productivity was improved in the optimized medium, but LA productivity declined after two days of fermentation, revealing a decrease in nutrients in the wastewater. The productivity was maximum after 20 h of culture (3.98 g/L/h).

Antibacterial Activity of Silver-PLA Nanocomposite Materials Against Food-Borne Bacterial Pathogens

The prepared silver-PLA nanocomposite exhibited antibacterial activity against food-borne bacterial pathogens such as S. aureus, E. coli, E. aerogenes, and P. aeruginosa. The zone of inhibition varied between 15 ± 2 and 21 ± 1 mm. The silver-PLA nanocomposite material showed maximum activity against E. coli (21 ± 1 mm zone of inhibition), and the least activity was observed against E. aerogenes (15 ± 2 mm zone of inhibition). It also showed activity against S. aureus (18 ± 2 mm zone of inhibition) and P. aeruginosa (17 ± 1 mm zone of inhibition) (Fig. 6a and b).

(a)

(b)

Fig. 6. Antibacterial activity ofSilver-PLA nanocomposite materials against food-borne bacterial pathogens. (a) Antibacterial activity was expressed as zone of inhibition (mm); (b) Antibacterial activity of silver-PLA nanocomposite materials on Mueller Hinton agar plates against bacteria.

Characterization of Silver-PLA Nanocomposites

The prepared Ag/PLA nanocomposite material was characterized by analytical methods. Figure 7 shows the relationship between the absorbance of the sample and the wavelength of the compost material. UV-vis absorption was performed within the wavelength range 300 to 800 nm for the prepared Ag/PLA nanocomposite material. The electronic transition of the Ag/PLA nanocomposite occurred in the visible region with λmax values ranging from 360 to 580 nm. The fabricated Ag/PLA nanocomposite film was broader in the visible range revealing that the PLA in the film contributed less to the overall UV absorption in the visible range. The XRD analysis was used to determine the crystal structure of the prepared silver-PLA nanocomposite material. The atomic arrangement revealed the presence of silver ions and PLA (Fig. 8) with various intensities.

Fig. 7. UV–visible absorbance spectra of Ag/PLA nano composite material

Fig. 8. X-ray diffraction analysis of prepared silver-PLA nanocomposite material

The XRD patterns of Ag/PLA nanocomposite material showed 32.4% crystallinity. As shown in Fig. 5, peaks reveal that the PLA-based composites were crystalline materials. The diffraction peak was observed at approximately 2θ=28°, and was ascribed to the crystal structure of PLA. Other intense peaks were detected at 32°, 47°, 56°, and 58°, indicating the characteristics of the composite materials. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of microstructures of the Ag/PLA nanocomposite films are described in Fig. 9. The nanocomposite materials were aggregated, with particle sizes ranging from 30 to 50 nm. The presence of aggregates indicated the incomplete dispersion of the nanoparticles in the film. Scanning electron microscopy study revealed small voids on the fractured surface of Ag/PLA nanocomposites.

Fig. 9. SEM Images of Ag/PLA nano composite material

DISCUSSION

A total of 12 LABs were screened and isolated for LA production by the MRS agar plate method. A clear zone was observed around the bacterial colony, which was considered LA-positive. It was found that 10 bacteria fermented glucose. All these 10 isolates were subjected to LA production, and the strains LAB04 and LAB09 showed significantly higher LA production than other strains. All the bacterial strains showed a decline in LA production after 48 h, which may be due to the reutilization of LA produced by bacteria (feedback mechanisms) (Xu and Xu 2014). Milk wastewater and date processing wastewater were used as the culture medium to produce LA. The production of low-cost LA to minimize the production cost of the product is an important issue in the fermentation bioprocess. The formulation of low-cost culture media must meet the industrial requirements to improve the growth of bacteria selected to produce LA. The low-cost culture media may improve product yield and biomass production; however, the toxic heavy metals or other effluents may affect the growth of bacteria. Hence, the selection of low-cost and non-toxic food processing wastes is an important approach in bioprocessing. Wastewater discharge from the fruit or food processing industries consists of various residues that favor bacterial biomass production (Sathya et al. 2023). Corn cobs and dairy wastewater (David et al. 2022), dairy wastewater (Moradi et al. 2023), and cassava wastewater (Coelho et al. 2010) were used to produce LA.

In this study, two LABs were selected to produce LA in submerged fermentation using dairy wastewater and palm wastewater. The LAB utilized available carbon and nitrogen sources from the wastewater for biomass conversion and metabolite production. Unlike other bacterial genera, LAB are fastidious bacteria with respect to available nutrients and growth. The MRS medium is considered an ideal culture medium to produce LA by LAB; however, its high cost and hazardous downstream processing make it unviable for commercial productions. In this study, the selected LAB strains (L. lactis and L. plantarum) were used for optimized production of LA. To improve the production of LA, carbon, nitrogen, and polysorbate 80 were supplemented. Lactic acid bacteria required sugars for lactic acid production. In addition, vitamins, minerals, nitrogen and inorganic compounds were useful for bacterial growth, maintenance, and lactic acid production. The fermentation capacity of the sugars varied based on bacteria. Hence, lactic acid production varied among bacteria (Zhang et al. 2020). In LAB, the optimal growth range varied based on strains, however 30 to 45 °C was reported as the optimal temperature. Likewise, pH was reported as a major factor influencing lactic acid production and the LAB can grow in pH values between 4 and 7. In LAB, lactic acid production was growth-associated and the pH value of the liquid medium decreased due to lactic acid production (Al-Dhabi et al. 2020). The supplemented carbon and nitrogen sources enhanced 1.1-fold LA production. Polysorbate 80 significantly improved the production of LA and glucose (carbon source), and yeast extract (nitrogen source) improved LA production. AristimuñoFicoseco et al. (2018) reported that glucose, yeast extract, Mg and Mn salts, sodium acetate, ammonium citrate, and polysorbate 80 are required for the growth of probiotic LAB. The supplemented maltose, sucrose, xylose, fructose, and lactose also improved the growth of LAB and LA production. In LAB, osmotic stress is one of the important factors, and increased concentrations of sugars affect bacterial growth (Linko and Javanainen 1996). However, in the current study, the microbial growth was not affected at higher concentrations of glucose (>50 g/L) in the culture medium. In the current study, the supplemented yeast extract significantly improved LA production. It has been reported that the C/N ratio significantly affects LA production (Wang et al. 2015).

Central composite design and response surface methodology were used for optimization of LA production using dairy wastewater and date wastewater. In the current study, the model P-value was less than 0.05, which shows that the designed model was statistically significant. The increased F-value and the p-value<0.05 were considered significant models (Law et al. 2020). The R2 value of the model shows the reliability of the designed model and is highly recommended, and a value >0.9 reflects good model quality (Jeong and Kim 2020). In response surface models, the differences in the adjusted R2 value should be less than 0.2, and the adjusted value obtained in the current study showed the reliability of the model design (Ying et al. 2020). In statistical optimization methods, the coefficient of variation (CV) is used to analyze the variance of the result, and a variance within 10% is recommended for any model design and is considered reliable and accurate (Kim and Yeom 2020). The adequate precision of the designed model was >4, which measures the signal-to-noise ratio. The increased adequate precision value indicated that the designed model is useful to study the designed space (Behera et al. 2018). The response surface method graph was used to analyze the interaction between selected variables (Sari et al. 2020).

The PLA was prepared by the direct polycondensation method, and the AgNO3/PLA nanocomposite material was characterized. The PLA production was performed by direct polycondensation (Kim and Woo 2002), the microwave-assisted single-step method (Nagahata et al. 2007), and the 2-step direct polycondensation process (Pivsa-Art et al. 2013). The prepared Ag/PLA nanocomposite material was characterized, and the λmax value was observed between 360 and 580 nm. The XRD analysis revealed crystallinity of composite materials. The particle size of the composite material ranged from 30 to 50 nm. Chen et al. (2012) observed the strongest diffraction peak for PLA at 2θ = 16°, which corresponds to the reflection of α-form crystals, which was similar without study. In addition to this peak, other intense peaks observed at 2θ =22°, 19° were strongly consistent with the crystal structure of the PLA sample. The present findings revealed that the addition of silver nanoparticles with PLA did not affect the crystallinity of the composite materials. The peak in the XRD spectrum revealed the crystallinity of the composite materials. The decreasing trend of crystallinity of composite was reported previously with increased addition of inorganic or organic silica with PLA. Wang et al. (2015) stated decreasing crystallinity of polyvinylamine (PVAm)/silica composite by increased addition of inorganic silica. Yan et al. (2007) reported decreased peak intensity due to the poor crystallized macromolecules in XRD analysis. The metastable and small crystals might be strongly confined by the rigid silica material, thus showing in the decreased degree of the composite. PLA and nanoparticles were used previously for the preparation of biodegradable polymer composite materials. The supplemented nanoparticles improved the physical and mechanical properties of biodegradable film and biological properties. Dorigato et al. (2012) reported the improved mechanical properties of PLA-silica nanoparticles. Ketabchi et al. (2016) applied cellulose nanoparticles with polylactic acid and reported improved mechanical properties. Pietrzykowska et al. (2020) prepared nanocomposites using polylactic acid and hydroxyapatite nanoparticles. Luo et al. (2009) prepared nanocomposites using poly(lactic acid) and functionalized TiO2 to improve their mechanical and biological properties.

The prepared silver-PLA nanocomposite exhibited antibacterial activity against food-borne Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. The antimicrobial properties of polylactic acid-silver nanoparticle nanocomposite were described previously, and the screened Escherichia coli were susceptible to nanocomposite material (Rashedi et al. 2020). Vidakis et al. (2020) reported significant antimicrobial activity of polylactic acid (PLA)-silver nanoparticle against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Khan et al. (2016) prepared silver nanoparticle-loaded hemp hurd/poly (lactic acid) materials and antibacterial activity was reported. The antibacterial mechanism of silver nanoparticle is that the nanoparticle might accumulate in the cytoplasmic membrane of bacteria, thus inducing membrane permeability; such alteration of plasma membrane function may lead to cell death (Rhim et al. 2013; Tsou et al. 2017).

CONCLUSIONS

  1. Dairy wastewater and date palm wastewater are rich sources of carbon, nitrogen, minerals, and other micronutrients.
  2. The present results suggest that wastewater could help reduce the production cost of lactic acid and can be considered as an alternate substrate.
  3. Response surface methodology improved lactic acid production (75.4 g/L).
  4. The co-culture of lactic acid bacteria produced lactic acid in the fermenter with an increased productivity.
  5. The prepared silver-PLA composite was effective against food borne bacterial pathogens.
  6. The silver-PLA nanocomposite material showed maximum activity against E. coli (21 ± 1 mm zone of inhibition), and S. aureus (18 ± 2 mm zone of inhibition).

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deputyship for Research & Innovation, “Ministry of Education” in Saudi Arabia for funding this research work through the project number (IFKSUDR_F143).

REFERENCES CITED

Abdel-Rahman, M. A., Tashiro, Y., and Sonomoto, K. (2011). “Lactic acid production from lignocellulose-derived sugars using lactic acid bacteria: Overview and limits,” Journal of Biotechnology 156(4), 286-301. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2011.06.017

Ainali, N. M., Kalaronis, D., Evgenidou, E., Kyzas, G. Z., Bobori, D. C., Kaloyianni, M., Yang, X., Bikiaris, D. N., and Lambropoulou, D. A. (2022). “Do poly(lactic acid) microplastics instigate a threat? A perception for their dynamic towards environmental pollution and toxicity,” Science of The Total Environment 832, article ID 155014. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155014

Al-Dhabi, N. A., Valan Arasu, M., Vijayaraghavan, P., Esmail, G. A., Duraipandiyan, V., Kim, Y. O., Kim, H., and Kim, H. J. (2020). “Probiotic and antioxidant potential of Lactobacillus reuteri LR12 and Lactobacillus lactis LL10 isolated from pineapple puree and quality analysis of pineapple-flavored goat milk yoghurt during storage,” Microorganisms 8(10), article 1461. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8101461

AristimuñoFicoseco, C., Mansilla, F. I., Maldonado, N. C., Miranda, H., Fatima Nader-Macias, M. E., and Vignolo, G. M. (2018). “Safety and growth optimization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from feedlot cattle for probiotic formula design,” Frontiers in Microbiology 9, article 2220. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02220

Atif, M., Ilavenil, S., Devanesan, S., AlSalhi, M. S., Choi, K. C., Vijayaraghavan, P., Alfuraydi, A. A., and Alanazi, N. F. (2020). “Essential oils of two medicinal plants and protective properties of jack fruits against the spoilage bacteria and fungi,” Industrial Crops and Products 147, article ID 112239. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112239

Balasubramanian, B., Soundharrajan, I., Al-Dhabi, N. A., Vijayaraghavan, P., Balasubramanian, K., Valan Arasu, M., and Choi, K. C. (2021). “Probiotic characteristics of Ligilactobacillus salivarius AS22 isolated from sheep dung and its application in corn-fox tail millet silage,” Applied Sciences 11(20), article 9447. DOI: 10.3390/app11209447

Balla, E., Daniilidis, V., Karlioti, G., Kalamas, T., Stefanidou, M., Bikiaris, N. D., Vlachopoulos, A., Koumentakou, I., and Bikiaris, D. N. (2021). “Poly(lactic acid): A versatile biobased polymer for the future with multifunctional properties—From monomer synthesis, polymerization techniques and molecular weight increase to PLA applications,” Polymers 13(11), article 1822. DOI: 10.3390/polym13111822

Behera, S. K., Meena, H., Chakraborty, S., and Meikap, B. C. (2018). “Application of response surface methodology (RSM) for optimization of leaching parameters for ash reduction from low-grade coal,” International Journal of Mining Science and Technology 28(4), 621-629. DOI:10.1016/j.ijmst.2018.04.014

Beslikas, T., Gigis, I., Goulios, V., Christoforides, J., Papageorgiou, G. Z., and Bikiaris, D. N. (2011). “Crystallization study and comparative in vitroin vivo hydrolysis of PLA reinforcement ligament,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 12(10), 6597-6618. DOI: 10.3390/ijms12106597

Chen, B.-K., Shih, C.-C., and Chen, A. F. (2012). “Ductile PLA nanocomposites with improved thermal stability,” Composites Part A: Applied Science & Manufacturing 43(12), 2289-2295. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.08.007

Coelho, L. F., Bolner de Lima, C. J., Bernardo, M. P., Alvarez, G. M., Contiero, J. (2010). “Improvement of L(+)-lactic acid production from cassava wastewater by Lactobacillus rhamnosus B 103,” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 90(11), 1944-1950. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.4039

David, A. N., Sewsynker-Sukai, Y., and Kana, E. G. (2022). “Co-valorization of corn cobs and dairy wastewater for simultaneous saccharification and lactic acid production: Process optimization and kinetic assessment,” Bioresource Technology 348, article ID 126815. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.126815

Dorigato, A., Sebastiani, M., Pegoretti, A., and Fambri, L. (2012). “Effect of silica nanoparticles on the mechanical performances of poly (lactic acid), “Journal of Polymers and the Environment 20, 713-725. DOI: 10.1007/s10924-012-0425-6

Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R., and Law, K. L. (2017). “Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made,” Science Advances 3(7), article ID e1700782. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1700782

Ghaffar, T., Irshad, M., Anwar, Z., Aqil, T., Zulifqar, Z., Tariq, A., Kamran, M., Ehsan, N., and Mehmood, S. (2014). “Recent trends in lactic acid biotechnology: A brief review on production to purification,” Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences 7(2), 222-229. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrras.2014.03.002

Huang, D., Tao, J., Cheng, M., Deng, R., Chen, S., Yin, L., and Li, R. (2021). “Microplastics and nanoplastics in the environment: Macroscopic transport and effects on creatures,” Journal of Hazardous Materials 407, article ID 124399. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124399

Jamshidian, M., Tehrany, E. A., Imran, M., Jacquot, M., and Desobry, S. (2010). “Poly-lactic acid: Production, applications, nanocomposites, and release studies,” Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 9(5), 552-571. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-4337.2010.00126.x

Jeong, G.-T., and Kim, S.-K. (2020). “Efficient conversion of glucosamine to ethyl levulinate catalyzed by methanesulfonic acid,” Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering 37(10), 1743-1750. DOI: 10.1007/s11814-020-0594-2

John, A., Črešnar, K. P., Bikiaris, D. N., and Zemljič, L. F. (2023). “Colloidal solutions as advanced coatings for active packaging development: Focus on PLA systems,” Polymers 15(2), article 273. DOI: 10.3390/polym15020273

Kervran, M., Vagner, C., Cochez, M., Ponçot, M., Saeb, M. R., and Vahabi, H. (2022). “Thermal degradation of polylactic acid (PLA)/polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) blends: A systematic review,” Polymer Degradation and Stability 201, article ID 109995. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2022.109995

Ketabchi, M. R., Khalid, M., Ratnam, C. T., and Walvekar, R. (2016). “Mechanical and thermal properties of polylactic acid composites reinforced with cellulose nanoparticles extracted from kenaf fibre,” Materials Research Express 3(12), article 125301. DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/3/12/125301

Khan, B. A., Chevali, V. S., Na, H., Zhu, J., Warner, P., and Wang, H. (2016). “Processing and properties of antibacterial silver nanoparticle-loaded hemp hurd/poly (lactic acid) biocomposites,” Composites Part B: Engineering 100, 10-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.022

Kian, L. K., Saba, N., Jawaid, M., and Sultan, M. T. H. (2019). “A review on processing techniques of bast fibers nanocellulose and its polylactic acid (PLA) nanocomposites,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 121, 1314-1328. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.09.040

Kim, J. Y., and Yeom, S. H. (2020). “Optimization of biodiesel production from waste coffee grounds by simultaneous lipid extraction and transesterification,” Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering 25(2), 320-326. DOI: 10.1007/s12257-019-0353-6

Kim, K. W., and Woo, S. I. (2002). “Synthesis of high-molecular-weight poly(l-lactic acid) by direct polycondensation,” Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics 203(15), 2245-2250. DOI: 10.1002/1521-3935(200211)203:15

Law, P. G., Sebran, N. H., Zawawi, A. Z., and Hussain, A. S. (2020). “Optimization study of biomass hydrogenation to ethylene glycol using response surface methodology,” Processes 8(5), article 588.DOI: 10.3390/pr8050588

Linko, Y. Y., and Javanainen, P. (1996). “Simultaneous liquefaction, saccharification, and lactic acid fermentation on barley starch,” Enzyme and Microbial Technology 19(2), 118-123. DOI: 10.1016/0141-0229(95)00189-1

Lu, D., Ren, Z., Zhou, T., Wang, S., and Lei, Z. (2008). “Synthesis and characterization of amphiphilic biodegradable poly(glutamic acid-co-lactic acid-co-glycolic acid) by direct polycondensation,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science 107(6), 3638-3643. DOI: 10.1002/app.27549

Luo, Y. B., Li, W. D., Wang, X. L., Xu, D. Y., and Wang, Y. Z. (2009). “Preparation and properties of nanocomposites based on poly(lactic acid) and functionalized TiO2,” Acta Materialia 57(11), 3182-3191. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.03.022

Marraiki, N., Vijayaraghavan, P., Elgorban, A. M., Deepa Dhas, D. S., Al-Rashed, S., andYassin, M. T. (2020). “Low cost feedstock for the production of endoglucanase in solid state fermentation by Trichoderma hamatum NGL1 using response surface methodology and saccharification efficacy,” Journal of King Saud University – Science 32(2), 1718-1724.DOI: 10.1016/j.jksus.2020.01.008.

Mayekar, P. C., Castro-Aguirre, E., Auras, R., Selke, S., and Narayan, R. (2020). “Effect of nano-clay and surfactant on the biodegradation of poly(lactic acid) films,” Polymers 12(2), article 311. DOI: 10.3390/polym12020311

Moradi, S., Zeraatpisheh, F., and Tabatabaee-Yazdi, F. (2023). “Investigation of lactic acid production in optimized dairy wastewater culture medium,” Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 13(16), 14837-14848. DOI: 10.1007/s13399-022-03230-5

Nagahata, R., Sano, D., Suzuki, H., and Takeuchi, K. (2007). “Microwave-assisted single-step synthesis of poly(lactic acid) by direct polycondensation of lactic acid,” Macromolecular Rapid Communications 28(4), 437-442. DOI: 10.1002/marc.200600715

Pappa, A., Papadimitriou-Tsantarliotou, A., Kaloyianni, M., Kastrinaki, G., Dailianis, S., Lambropoulou, D. A., Christodoulou, E., Kyzas, G. Z., and Bikiaris, D. N. (2021). “Insights into the toxicity of biomaterials microparticles with a combination of cellular and oxidative biomarkers,” Journal of Hazardous Materials 413, article ID 125335. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125335

Park, H. W., and Chang, Y. K. (2017). “Economically efficient synthesis of lactide using a solid catalyst,” Organic Process Research & Development 21(12), 1980-1984. DOI: 10.1021/acs.oprd.7b00264

Pietrzykowska, E., Romelczyk-Baishya, B., Wojnarowicz, J., Sokolova, M., Szlazak, K., Swieszkowski, W., Locs, J., and Lojkowski, W. (2020). “Preparation of a ceramic matrix composite made of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles and polylactic acid by consolidation of composite granules,” Nanomaterials 10(6), article 1060. DOI: 10.3390/nano10061060

Pivsa-Art, S., Tong-ngok, T., Junngam, S., Wongpajan, R., and Pivsa-Art, W. (2013). “Synthesis of poly(d-lactic acid) using a 2-steps direct polycondensation process,” Energy Procedia 34, 604-609. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.791.

Rashedi, S. M., Bakhsh, M. F. Y., Karimi, F., and Bakhsh, M. Y. (2020). “Effect of polylactic acid-silver nanoparticle nanocomposite on the kinetics of Escherichia coli growth,” International Journal of Biological Sciences and Technology 11(2), 7-17. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4128472

Rhim, J. W., Wang, L. F., and Hong, S. I. (2013). “Preparation and characterization of agar/silver nanoparticles composite films with antimicrobial activity,” Food Hydrocolloids 33(2), 327-335. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.04.002

Roucoux, A., Schulz, J., and Patin, H. (2002). “Reduced transition metal colloids:  A novel family of reusable catalysts?” Chemical Reviews 102(10), 3757-3778. DOI: 10.1021/cr010350j

Sanusi, O. M., Benelfellah, A., Bikiaris, D. N., and Aït Hocine, N. (2021). “Effect of rigid nanoparticles and preparation techniques on the performances of poly(lactic acid) nanocomposites: A review,” Polymers for Advanced Technologies 32(2), 444-460. DOI: 10.1002/pat.5104

Sari, C. N., Hertadi, R., Harahap, A. F. P., Ramadhan, M. Y. A., and Gozan, M. (2020). “Process optimization of palm oil mill effluent-based biosurfactant of Halomonasmeridiana BK-AB4 originated from BledugKuwumud volcano in Central Java for microbial enhanced oil recovery,” Processes 8(6), article 716. DOI: 10.3390/pr8060716

Sathya, R., Arasu, M. V., Al-Dhabi, N. A., Vijayaraghavan, P., Ilavenil, S., and Rejiniemon, T. S. (2023). “Towards sustainable wastewater treatment by biological methods – A challenges and advantages of recent technologies,” Urban Climate 47, article ID 101378.DOI: 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101378

Tsou, C. H., Yao, W. H., Lu, Y. C., Tsou, C. Y., Wu, C. S., Chen, J., Wang, R. Y., Su, C., Hung, W.-S., Guzman, M., and Suen, M. C. (2017). “Antibacterial property and cytotoxicity of a poly (lactic acid)/nanosilver-doped multiwall carbon nanotube nanocomposite,” Polymers 9(3), 100. DOI: 10.3390/polym9030100

Vidakis, N., Petousis, M., Velidakis, E., Liebscher, M., and Tzounis, L. (2020). “Three-dimensional printed antimicrobial objects of polylactic acid (PLA)-silver nanoparticle nanocomposite filaments produced by an in-situ reduction reactive melt mixing process,” Biomimetics 5(3), 42. DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics5030042

Vlachopoulos, A., Karlioti, G., Balla, E., Daniilidis, V., Kalamas, T., Stefanidou, M., Bikiaris, N. D., Christodoulou, E., Koumentakou, I., Karavas, E., et al. (2022). “Poly(lactic acid)-based microparticles for drug delivery applications: An overview of recent advances,” Pharmaceutics 14(2), article 359. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14020359

Wang, Z.-Y., Li, X.-W., Li, J.-N., Li, G.-M., and Tao, J.-Q. (2009). “Synthesis of poly(lactic acid)-poly(phenyl phosphate) via direct polycondensation and its characterization,” Journal of Polymer Research 16(3), 255-261. DOI: 10.1007/s10965-008-9224-0

Wang, Y., Tashiro, Y., and Sonomoto, K. (2015). “Fermentative production of lactic acid from renewable materials: Recent achievements, prospects, and limits,” Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering 119(1), 10-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2014.06.003

Wang, M., Wang, Z., Li, N., Liao, J., Zhao, S., Wang, J., and Wang, S. (2015). “Relationship between polymer–filler interfaces in separation layers and gas transport properties of mixed matrix composite membranes,” Journal of Membrane Science 495, 252-268. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.08.019

Wee, Y. J., Kim J. N., and Ryu, H. W. (2006). “Biotechnological production of lactic acid and its recent applications,” Food Technology and Biotechnology 44(2), 163-172.

Wu, X., Al Farraj, D. A., Rajaselvam, J., Alkufeidy, R. M., Vijayaraghavan, P., Alkubaisi, N. A., Agastian, P., and Alshammari, M. K. (2020). “Characterization of biofilm formed by multidrug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa DC-17 isolated from dental caries,” Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 27(11), 2955-2960. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.07.020.

Xu, K., and Xu, P. (2014). “Efficient production of l-lactic acid using co-feeding strategy based on cane molasses/glucose carbon sources,” Bioresource Technology 153, 23-29. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.11.057

Yan, S., Yin, J., Yang, J., and Chen, X. (2007). “Structural characteristics and thermal properties of plasticized poly (L-lactide)-silica nanocomposites synthesized by sol–gel method,” Materials Letters 61(13), 2683-2686. DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2006.10.023

Ying, T. Y., Raman, A. A. A., Bello, M. M., and Buthiyappan, A. (2020). “Magnetic graphene oxide-biomass activated carbon composite for dye removal,” Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering 37(12), 2179-2191. DOI: 10.1007/s11814-020-0628-9

Zhang, X., Ali Esmail, G., Fahad Alzeer, A., Valan Arasu, M., Vijayaraghavan, P., Choon Choi, K., and Abdullah Al-Dhabi, N. (2020). “Probiotic characteristics of Lactobacillus strains isolated from cheese and their antibacterial properties against gastrointestinal tract pathogens,” Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 27(12), 3505-3513. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.10.022

Article submitted: April 15, 2024; Peer review completed: June 8, 2024; Revised version received: June 12, 2024; Accepted: June 14, 2024; Published: July 2, 2024.

DOI: 10.15376/biores.19.3.5632-5653