Abstract
Formaldehyde-free tannin-based furanic foams were prepared by applying infrared radiation (IR) as an alternative energy source. Up to now, tannin-based rigid foams have been produced via heat conduction or microwave radiation energy. The present innovative heating system allows for the production of extra-light products with low density (≤ 50 kg/m³). The IR-produced lightweight tannin foams (IR-TF) exhibited similar properties to those made by hot pressing (HP-TF), but IR-TF can be synthesized with much shorter production time. Although microwave-produced foams (MW-TF) can be obtained with even shorter production times, the IR-TFs are much more homogeneous. Therefore, the IR radiation-based process resulted in the most suitable compromise between foam properties and production time. Overall, IR-TF showed very competitive structural characteristics, such as high homogeneity, high porosity, and limited orthotropicity, which was similar to that shown by the hot press-produced foams. The mechanical properties and material costs are rather similar, but the production time for IR-TF is considerably shorter.
Download PDF
Full Article
Infrared-Catalyzed Synthesis of Tannin-Furanic Foams
Gianluca Tondi,* Martin Link, Christian Kolbitsch, and Alexander Petutschnigg
Formaldehyde-free tannin-based furanic foams were prepared by applying infrared radiation (IR) as an alternative energy source. Up to now, tannin-based rigid foams have been produced viaheat conduction or microwave radiation energy. The present innovative heating system allows for the production of extra-light products with low density (≤ 50 kg/m³). The IR-produced lightweight tannin foams (IR-TF) exhibited similar properties to those made by hot pressing (HP-TF), but IR-TF can be synthesized with much shorter production time. Although microwave-produced foams (MW-TF) can be obtained with even shorter production times, the IR-TFs are much more homogeneous. Therefore, the IR radiation-based process resulted in the most suitable compromise between foam properties and production time. Overall, IR-TF showed very competitive structural characteristics, such as high homogeneity, high porosity, and limited orthotropicity, which was similar to that shown by the hot press-produced foams. The mechanical properties and material costs are rather similar, but the production time for IR-TF is considerably shorter.
Keywords: Formaldehyde-free; Tannin foams; Infrared beam; Light materials; Orthotropicity
Contact information: Department of Forest Product Technology & Timber Construction, Salzburg University of Applied Sciences, Marktstrasse 136a, 5431 Kuchl, Austria;
* Corresponding author: gianluca.tondi@fh-salzburg.ac.at
INTRODUCTION
During the previous century, petroleum-based plastic products have dominated the market, and at present, the need for such plastics has become indispensable. One of the fields that is dominated by oil-derived polymers is that of insulation materials, in which polystyrene and polyurethane play a major role. Due to limitations in the availability of petroleum, the price of plastics is continuously increasing, and this is causing the industry to consider more eco-compatible and sustainable alternatives (Jerez et al. 2007; Gonzalez-Gutierrez et al. 2010; Singh and Mohanty 2007; Siracusa et al. 2008; Imam et al.2008; Grigsby and Kadla 2013). In this context, some of the most intriguing materials developed in the last few years are tannin-based rigid foams (Tondi and Pizzi 2009) developed from the work of Meikleham and Pizzi (1994). These materials are constituted, for almost 70% of their skeleton, of condensed tannins (Tondi et al. 2009a) that are obtained by water extraction of wood (bark) chips and for around 20 to 25% of furanic derivatives obtainable by hydrolysis and dehydrogenation of hemicelluloses, which are particularly abundant in crops such as corn and sugar cane (Aguilar et al. 2002; Tong et al. 2010). The tannin foams have shown high performance in terms of thermal conductivity and fire resistance, as well as dimensional, chemical, and mechanical stability. However, tannin-based rigid foams have the main drawback of containing around 5% formaldehyde (Tondi et al. 2008; Pizzi et al. 2008). The presence of formaldehyde has significantly hindered the industrialization of tannin foams due to the fact that formaldehyde has been classified as a carcinogenic substance (IARC 2006).
This particular drawback has been recently overcome, and now tannin-furanic foams can be produced without formaldehyde as a hardening agent. Conduction heat via hot-plate presses (Link et al. 2011) or via radiative energy through microwaves (Kolbitsch et al. 2012), or increasing the amount of the furanic component (Basso et al. 2011) of tannin-furanic foams have been used; these alternative production methods have increased the market’s interest in these products, and their production has soared again (Link 2013).
In this paper, we present an additional alternative method for producing formaldehyde-free tannin foams by applying infrared radiation as the external energy source. An evaluation of the properties of the infrared-produced tannin foams is presented, and they are compared with other formaldehyde-free tannin foams.
EXPERIMENTAL
Materials
The chemicals used for the production of the formaldehyde-free tannin-furanic foams were as follows: Mimosa (Acacia mearnsii) tannin extract provided by Silva Chimica (Italy); furfuryl alcohol (FOH) (99%) from Merck; ethanol (99%) from Australco; and diethylether (99%) and sulfuric acid (32%) supplied by Roth. For some formulations wood chips of the core layer fraction for particleboads provided by Kaindl GmbH were also used.
The foams were synthesized in high-density foam, HDF (850 kg/m³), boxes of dimension 10 x 10 x 2.5 cm with external energy supplied by a Krelus-Mini (248 x 248 mm) infrared heater manufactured by Krelus (Hirschthal, Switzerland); the infrared energy was varied from 3.2 to 16 kW/m². The distance from the bottom of the box and the IR source was 12 cm, and the exposure time was varied from 180 to 300 s to ensure the correct development of the foam. Figure 1 shows the apparatus.
Fig. 1. Infrared radiation heating device
Methods
Sample production
The components of the formulations are described in Table 1. Blowing agents and furfuryl alcohol (FOH) were mixed in a beaker with the tannin powder and stirred until a homogenous viscous suspension was obtained. The catalyst was added and homogeneously stirred in a second step immediately before discharging the formulation into the HDF box. The latter was then placed in the sample compartment, which was exposed to the IR source at a distance of 8 cm.
Table 1. Overview of the Synthesized Formulations
* = 5 g wood chips added.
The energy of the infrared radiation was regulated according to the chemicals used for the production of the foams. The infrared radiation ranged between 3.2 and 16 kW/m², while the exposure time varied between 180 and 300 s. The temperatures reached during this process were dependent on the energy of the radiation and in every case between 120 and 200 °C.
After production, the samples were stabilized in a climate chamber at a temperature of 20 °C and 65% humidity for 24 h. The samples were successively cut into 50 x 50 x 20 mm pieces. These samples contained foam that was in direct contact with the HDF forming box; thus, only the inner core of the formed foam was tested.
Bulk density
The bulk density 
was determined according to DIN EN 323 after stabilization of the sample,
where m is the mass of the sample and l, w, and h are length, width and height, respectively.
Porosity
The porosity 
of the foam was calculated based on the bulk density of the material 
compared to the skeletal density
of the unblown polymer of 1590 kg/m³ (Tondi et al. 2009b) according to the following formula:
Density profile
The density profile was determined with a DenseLabX device from Electronic Wood Systems (EWS), with a step rate of 100 um along the thickness of the foam.
Microscopy investigation
The foams were cut parallel to the growing direction into 1.5-mm-thick slices and were fixed in a glass support prior to being analyzed with a Nikon eclipse E200 optical microscope. Each sample was observed at 10 and 50 times magnification.
The dimensions of the foam cells were estimated, selecting 50 cells randomly chosen from transversal slices of foam. The heights and thicknesses of the cells were measured. The degree of geometric orthotropicity was defined by the following formula,
where o is the degree of orthotropicity and h and t are the height and the thickness of the cell, respectively.
Homogeneity
The local homogeneity was optically evaluated according to the following classification: a value of 1 when the sample’s homogeneity was the highest, and a value of 5 when the sample was completely inhomogeneous.
Compression resistance
Foam compression tests were carried out with a Zwick Roell Z250 device in accordance with the DIN 52185 (1976) test method. Samples of each foam formulation were tested along the direction of foam growth by applying a compression rate of 2 mm/min. The test ended when the sample reached 75% of its original height. The maximum compressive strength 
was determined by use of the following equation, which represented the moment where the elastic behavior of the foam reached its maximum (i.e., collapse of the first layers of cells),
where Fmax is the maximum measured compression force and Ais the area of the foam sample subjected to the force.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The batch of samples whose properties are reported in Table 1 were evaluated for their intrinsic properties and for their mechanical behavior; these values were then compared with two formaldehyde-free tannin-based foams produced with a hot-press (HP-TF) or with the help of microwave radiation (MW-TF).
Figure 2 shows representative images of formaldehyde-free tannin foam prepared with the infrared radiation heating system.
Fig. 2. Formaldehyde-free tannin foam produced with infrared radiation heating system
Density and Porosity
Tannin foams produced by infrared radiation (IR-TF) exhibited a density between 50 and 200 kg/m³. This range of densities was similar to those obtained with the hot-press process and was slightly lower than that of microwave-produced foams. The porosity of the IR-TF varied between 87 and 97%. These values were comparable to the most common porous insulation foams that dominate the present market (Al-Homoud and Mohammad 2005).
However, the bulk density gives only a partial outlook of the distribution of mass with respect to the volume; the samples were therefore scanned with the DenseLabX device to evaluate the distribution of the mass along the height of each foam. In Fig. 3, the density profile of the infrared foam (solid line) produced with formulation B exposed at 16 kW/m² for 300 s is compared to similar foams produced with microwaves (dashed) and hot pressing (dotted).
Fig. 3. Density profile of infrared-produced tannin foam compared with similar foams produced with microwave radiation and hot press technology
The distribution of the polymer over the profile of the IR-TF was very similar to that of HP-TF. The cores of the samples were very homogeneous, while the external layers were denser because of the accumulation of mass that occurs during the process of foam formation. Infrared and hot-press production systems had the heating device positioned along the direction of growth of the foam, and the distribution of material was therefore similar. Conversely, the MW-TF specimens were produced with an energy source perpendicular to the growth of the foam, and the distribution of the mass was therefore dissimilar to that of the other two foams. In particular, the skeleton of the material is concentrated in the core because of the high amount of gasses produced during microwave heating. These gasses will then accumulate in the outer shell of the material resulting in lower density of the surface layers. Next, the materials were examined by optical microscopy to more completely characterize the mass distribution of the foams.
Microscopy
In Fig. 4, the foams produced with the three heating techniques are shown. Although the foams had similar densities (115 to 149 kg/m³), the foams had considerable differences in their observable structures.
 |