Abstract
The morphological changes of jack pine (Pinus banksiama) earlywood (EW) and latewood (LW) in thermomechanical pulping (TMP) were studied by light microscopy and scanning electronic microscopy. The results indicate that: under the mechanical forces in refining, the EW fibres tend to separate in the P/S1 interface, while separation of the LW fibres takes place commonly in the P/S1 and S1/S2 regions. The thick-walled LW fibres exhibit much more external fibrillation than the thin-walled EW. As a result, the LW fines contain more fibrillar component than EW fines. The EW fibers suffer more fiber cutting and splitting than the LW fibers. In addition, the thin-walled EW fibres show higher collapsibility and conformability than the LW counterparts.
Download PDF
Full Article
Morphological changes of Jack pine latewood and earlywood fibers in thermomechanical pulping
Fang Huang,a,* Robert Lanouette,b and Kwei-Nam Law b
The morphological changes of jack pine (Pinus banksiama) earlywood (EW) and latewood (LW) in thermomechanical pulping (TMP) were studied by light microscopy and scanning electronic microscopy. The results indicate that: under the mechanical forces in refining, the EW fibres tend to separate in the P/S1 interface, while separation of the LW fibres takes place commonly in the P/S1 and S1/S2 regions. The thick-walled LW fibres exhibit much more external fibrillation than the thin-walled EW. As a result, the LW fines contain more fibrillar component than EW fines. The EW fibers suffer more fiber cutting and splitting than the LW fibers. In addition, the thin-walled EW fibres show higher collapsibility and conformability than the LW counterparts.
Keywords: Jack Pine (Pinus banksiana); Earlywood; Latewood; Thermomechanical Pulping; Morphology
Contact information: a: School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA; b: Centre de recherche sur les matériaux lignocellulosiques, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, QC, G9A 5H7, Canada; *Corresponding author: fang.huang@ipst.gatech.edu
INTRODUCTION
Within a growth ring, the portion of the growth formed in the early season or spring is commonly designated as earlywood (EW), also called springwood, while the denser and hence frequently darker wood produced later in the growing season/summer is termed latewood (LW), or summerwood. EW cells have thinner cell walls when compared with those of LW. As a general rule, the difference between EW and LW in hardwood is not as distinguishable as that of softwood (Panshin et al. 1970). Studies (Larson 1960; Little et al. 1968; Funada et al. 2001) indicated that the presence of different concentrations of auxin (a growth regulator or hormone) in different stages of the growing season was the main factor controlling the formation of EW and LW. Cell division is faster in the early season due to the higher level of hormone in the cambial zone. The fast growth produces cells with large radial diameter, wide lumen, and thin walls. Because the level of hormone decreases later in the growing season, cell division slows down and the cell diameter gradually decreases, while the cell wall increases in thickness. This wood tissue is called LW. Besides the effect of auxin, other studies (Panshin et al. 1970) indicated that environmental factors, e.g., nutrients, water, temperature, and light also have indirect influences on the development of EW and LW.
Due to their morphological discrepancies, EW and LW fibers behave differently in refining, especially in thermomechanical pulping. Previous research indicated that the EW fibres are more flexible (Agut et al. 1987; Luner 1986; Hattula et al. 1988) and collapsible (Hartler et al. 1969; Uhmeier et al. 1996; Mohlin 1975; Smith et al. 1972; Hartler et al. 1970) than those of LW, the latter being stiffer and less collapsible. In refining, the LW fibres also exhibit a greater reduction in cell wall thickness. What’s more, the EW fibres tend to split, especially in the 1st stage of refining (Reme et al. 2001), and they require more refining energy to reach the same freeness compared to LW fibres (Murton et al. 2001). These findings indicate that EW and LW respond differently to mechanical actions. Due to this dissimilarity, the property of the final pulp or paper would depend on the proportion of EW and LW fibres in the furnish.
In spite of these findings, it remains unclear how these two types of wood tissue are transformed from solid wood into individual fibrous elements in refining. Although some progress has been made in understanding the refining mechanism, there is little published information regarding the breakdown mechanism of EW and LW in refining, especially in thermomechanical refining. In this study, the morphological changes of EW and LW fibers in different TMP pulp length fractions were studied by light microscopy, and the fiber cross-section characteristics were examined by scanning electronic microscopy (SEM). With the results obtained from this research, we could gain better understanding of the mechanical failures of these two types of wood tissue and will also help improve the quality of the pulps produced from Jack pine, an under-exploited and less desirable species among the Canadian forest resources. The expected results also have the potential to help us ameliorate refining efficiency.
EXPERIMENTAL
Materials
Logs of freshly felled Jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lam.) were used in this work. The Jack pine trees were taken from a 30-year-old plantation in the St. Maurice region of Quebec. The logs were sawn into disks about 2.5 cm thick in a longitudinal direction. The disks were then debarked manually by means of a chisel. Chips were prepared from the sapwood portion, excluding the heartwood to minimize the possible effects of its high extractive content on pulp properties. The EW and LW chips, approximately 2 to 3 cm in width and length, were also prepared manually using a chisel. The thickness of the chips varied depending on the width of the growth rings and the proportion of EW and LW in the growth increment. The separation of EW from LW was based on the difference in colour: LW in Jack pine was broader and much darker than the EW counterpart.
The cross-section features of EW and LW, such as cell wall thickness and lumen area were measured based on the method T263 sp-06 and ImageJ algorithm (National Institute of Health 2011). The fiber length of EW and LW were measured using light microscopy analysis on chemically macerated fibers (Lanouette et al. 2010).
Refining
A Sunds Defibrator 300 CD pilot plant (Metso Paper) was used for refining the chips, with a refining capacity of 2t/day. The models of this refiner rotor and stator plate are R3809BG and R3803, respectively. During the process, in which EW and LW chips were separately refined, the chips were pre-steamed atmospherically for 10 min and then screw-fed into a digester using a 2:1 compression ratio. The refining was carried out in two stages, as indicated in Table 1. The first-stage was pressurized at 160 ºC and the pulps were produced with a freeness of about 500 mL. The Canadian standard freeness (CSF) was measured following Tappi method T227 om-04. The primary pulps were refined atmospherically to a freeness range of 50 to 200 mL and the specific energies were recorded for the pulps at each freeness level. The 1st stage refining consistency is about 20 to 24%, while the 2nd stage is around 10 to 14%. In addition, the refiner plate clearance was different between the two stage refinings: 0.40 to 0.60 mm in the 1st stage refining while 0.25 to 0.50 mm for the 2nd stage refining. After refining, all the pulp samples were disintegrated by means of 90 ºC water to remove latency prior to further analysis (Bently et al. 1994).
Table 1. Refining Conditions
Fractionation of Pulps
The experimental second-stage pulps were fractionated in a Bauer-McNett classifier to obtain 6 fractions denoted as R14, R28, R48, R100, R200, and P200 (fines). The Bauer-McNett fibre classification is a commonly used method to characterize the fibre length distribution of mechanical pulps. The fibres in different Bauer-McNett fractions are morphologically different and have different effects on paper properties. For example, the R14 fraction contains long and stiff fibres, which have poor bonding characteristics. The fines (P200) fraction is comprised of flake-like particles and fibrils, which would strengthen the fibre network. Based on these reasons, it is necessary to fractionate the pulps before characterization.
Pulp Characterization
Each fibre fraction was characterized in terms of cell wall peeling, fibre breakage, fibre wall splitting, external fibrillation, and collapsibility. These analyses were conduc-ted by means of light microscopic analysis. The fiber samples were prepared as follows for the microscopy analysis: The pulp fibers were first stained with Toluidine Blue O (T161, Fisher Scientific Co.), and then mounted on microscope slides for observation using a Zeiss photomicroscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, LLC).The scanning electronic microscopy was used to study the fiber surface development and fiber cross-section deformation. The cross-section samples were prepared based on the resin-embedding method as discussed in a previous work by Huang et al. (2008).
Statistical Analysis
In an effort to obtain statistically sound results, at least 300 fibers per sample were measured. The standard error for each analysis was ±5%.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Physical Properties
The photomicrograph in Fig. 1 shows the cross-section morphology of jack pine EW and LW. As Table 2 indicates, the EW fibre has a thinner cell wall and larger lumen in comparison to the LW counterpart. The cell wall thickness of LW (4.75 µm) is more than 2 times that of EW (2.12 µm). The EW fibre has a greater outer perimeter and lumen area than LW, while the LW fibre has a larger cell wall area due to its thicker cell wall and smaller lumen. In addition, the LW fibre (3.55 mm) is longer than the EW fibre (3.34 mm). These findings are congruent with those reported earlier (Hatvani et al. 1999).
Fig. 1. Cross-section morphology of EW (left) and LW (right) of Jack pine (x200)
Table 2. Basic Properties of Jack Pine EW and LW Fibers
Refining Energy
Figure 2 shows the pulp freeness as a function of specific refining energy. Each freeness was triplicated, and the average value was reported. Figure 2 clearly shows that refining EW required more energy than refining LW to a given freeness. The EW was defibrated into pulp fibres with relatively little fibrillation when compared to the LW. As a result, EW pulp had higher freeness for a given energy consumption. This finding is in agreement with reports by other researchers (Murton et al. 2001).
Light Microscopy Analysis
Microscopic studies help acquire useful information on fibre development during refining. The major characteristics observed for each Bauer-McNett fraction of EW and LW are presented in a series of photomicrographs, as represented in Figs. 3 to 9. For the convenience of comparison in quality, LW and EW pulps employed in this study were the pulps with a freeness of 150 mL after the second stage refining.
Fig. 2. Freeness as a function of specific refining energy
The nature of the R14 fibres of LW (Fig. 3) ranged from fibre bundles to individual fibres with a large variation of surfaces properties, from a smooth surface to a completely exposed S2 layer. Some fibres have most of their outer layer removed, exposing the S2 layer while the others remained undisrupted.
Fig. 3 (A-D). Micrographs showing the surface characteristics of LW fibres in R14 fraction (x400)
(A): Complete fibrillation of S2;
(B): A partly peeled fibre (the whole surface has been peeled at different degrees);
(C): Compressed and twisted zone probably caused by the edges of refiner bars; (D): A twisted fibre;
(E and F): Localized peeling around the fibre; (G): Fibrillation of S2;
(H): A non-peeled fibre and completely peeled one.