Abstract
In a 16-month study addressing global agricultural soil heavy metal contamination, researchers explored plant-centered solutions using Jacaranda plants. The impact of different combinations of cadmium nitrate (40, 80, and 120 mg) and lead nitrate (400, 800, and 1200 mg/kg soil) were evaluated relative to Jacaranda’s remediation capabilities. Employing a randomized complete block design with 8 applications across 3 repetitions, the study assessed growth traits and chemical characteristics. Untreated plants showed higher growth values, contrasting with reduced values in plants exposed to elevated cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb) levels. For instance, the treatment with 120 mg Cd/kg soil + 1200 mg Pb/kg soil led to a 28% reduction in plant height, 13% in main stem diameter, 41% in branch number, and 35% in leaf area compared to the control. Despite these challenges, Jacaranda plants demonstrated resilience with a 100% survival rate. Plant organs showed increased Cd and Pb contents, with fallen leaves having lower metal content, mitigating pollution hazards. Post-planting, soil characteristics shifted, indicating Jacaranda‘s potential for Cd phytoextraction (BCF < 1 and, TF > 1) and Pb phytostabilization (BCF and TF < 1). The study establishes Jacaranda as a promising candidate for phytoremediation due to its resilience to elevated metal levels.
Download PDF
Full Article
Performance of Growth and Remediation Potency of Jacaranda mimosifolia in Cadmium and Lead Contaminated Soil
El-Sayed Mohamed El-Mahrouk,a Hayam M.A. Ebrahim,b Mohamed K. Gaber,c Mahmoud A. Aly,c Assem A. M. El-Naggar,b Péter Honfi,d,* Andrea Tilly-Mándy,d and Eman Abdelhakim Eisa d,e,*
In a 16-month study addressing global agricultural soil heavy metal contamination, researchers explored plant-centered solutions using Jacaranda plants. The impact of different combinations of cadmium nitrate (40, 80, and 120 mg) and lead nitrate (400, 800, and 1200 mg/kg soil) were evaluated relative to Jacaranda’s remediation capabilities. Employing a randomized complete block design with 8 applications across 3 repetitions, the study assessed growth traits and chemical characteristics. Untreated plants showed higher growth values, contrasting with reduced values in plants exposed to elevated cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb) levels. For instance, the treatment with 120 mg Cd/kg soil + 1200 mg Pb/kg soil led to a 28% reduction in plant height, 13% in main stem diameter, 41% in branch number, and 35% in leaf area compared to the control. Despite these challenges, Jacaranda plants demonstrated resilience with a 100% survival rate. Plant organs showed increased Cd and Pb contents, with fallen leaves having lower metal content, mitigating pollution hazards. Post-planting, soil characteristics shifted, indicating Jacaranda‘s potential for Cd phytoextraction (BCF < 1 and, TF > 1) and Pb phytostabilization (BCF and TF < 1). The study establishes Jacaranda as a promising candidate for phytoremediation due to its resilience to elevated metal levels.
DOI: 10.15376/biores.20.1.1547-1576
Keywords: Phytoremediation; Contamination; Cadmium; Lead; Jacaranda mimosifolia
Contact information: a: Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Kafrelsheikh University, Egypt. elsayedelmahrouk@gmail.com; b: Horticulture Research Institute Alex. Branch (Antoniadis), Egypt. Hana_1812@yahoo.com / dr.assem.elnaggar@gmail.com; c: Department of Plant Production, Faculty of Agriculture (Saba-Basha), Alexandria University, Egypt. m_kadry@alexu.edu.eg / D_mahmoud aly@hotmail.com; d: Department of Floriculture and Dendrology, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Science (MATE), 1118 Budapest, Hungary; honfi.peter@uni-mate.hu / tillyne.mandy.andrea@uni-mate.hu /abdelhakim.eman1@gmail.com; e: Botanical Gardens Research Department, Horticulture Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Giza 12619 and Egypt;
* Corresponding authors: honfi.peter@uni-mate.hu (P.H); abdelhakim.eman1@gmail.com (E.A.E)
INTRODUCTION
Soil pollution with excessive quantities of heavy metals (HMs) or trace elements is a significant global environmental issue. A significant quantity of toxic HMs is added to the environment by rapid industrialization, advanced agricultural approaches, and other anthropogenic activities. These cause various hazardous impacts on all living organisms, as well as changes in soil characteristics and biological activity (Manoj et al. 2020). The release of HMs via different utilizations in industry and agriculture increases the harm to habitat and human health related to exposure to these contaminated locations and dust (Khan et al. 2010). HMs are one of the most harmful elements in the soil because of their increasing level of persistence and toxicity to living organisms (Madanan et al. 2021). The harm caused by HMs, involving adsorption and distribution through the plant cells, is affected by their bioavailability in soil and different physiological activities in plants (e.g., stage of development or plant physiological age, exposure time, HMs levels in soil, and pH of soil) (Bhargava et al. 2012). Benavides et al. (2005) and Wang et al. (2008) documented that the majority of common visual effects of HMs phytotoxicity are the decline in photosynthesis and reduction in water and nutrient absorption, disturbance in respiration and nitrogen metabolism, leaf chlorosis, and growth inhibition.
Additionally, (HMs) generate oxidative stress by producing a large amount of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which leads to cell death through the peroxidation of membrane lipids, oxidation of proteins, inhibition of enzymes, and damage to nucleic acids. To alleviate the oxidative stress, plants employ the antioxidant system via alternation in antioxidative enzyme activities such as superoxide dismutase, ascorbate peroxidase, catalase, glutathione reductase, glutathione S-transferase and guaiacol peroxidase, as well as, the level of low molecular weight antioxidants including ascorbic acid, reduced glutathione, carotenoids, phenolics (Benavides et al. 2005; Hossain et al. 2012). The equilibrium between reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the antioxidant system is advantageous for plants, as they face challenges in adapting and surviving in unfavourable situations such as heavy metal (HM) contamination (He et al. 2011; Sharma et al. 2012).
Cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb) are well-known elements within the category of heavy metals (HMs). The industrial products containing Cd encompass paints and pigments, electroplating, plastics stabilizers, as well as the incineration of Cd-containing materials and phosphate fertilizers. At the same time, the Pb contamination sources include the emission from leaded petrol combustion, herbicides, manufacture of batteries, and pesticides (Saxena et al. 2020). A significant threat and/or toxicity can happen to plants, animals, and humans by food chain exposure of Cd and Pb, which can lodge into the ecosystem via a natural geological approach or by anthropogenic processes such as municipal and industrial wastes (Aziz et al. 2015; Sharma et al. 2023). Cadmium has stressful impacts on plants as the retardation of biomass production, soluble protein content, metabolism, enzymatic activities, and increasing ROS production (Ali et al. 2014a; Ef et al. 2015; Li et al. 2015). Also, Pb causes chlorosis, decreases seed germination, decreases plant growth and development of biomass, disturbs photosynthetic rate, reduces element and water absorption and transportation, reduces or alters membrane permeability, and generates excessive anomalous morphology and reactive oxygen species (ROS) in plants, while also inhibiting enzymatic activities in plant cells by interaction with their sulfhydryl groups (Ali et al. 2014b; Saxena et al. 2020).
Several approaches have been made to avoid the risks of HMs in polluted soil, such as contaminated site excavation and landfilling, soil flushing and washes, efficacy utilizing physiochemical techniques, and electrokinetic applications (Wuana and Okieimen 2011). Previously, Vangronsveld et al. (2009) documented that these methods are significantly costly and labor intensive, cause continuous changes in soil traits and decline of indigenous soil microflora.
One phytoremediation strategy is to discover plants that have tolerance against HMs and accumulate the MHs in their aerial organs with large biomass yield (Bhargava et al. 2012). In ideal cases, the goal is to accomplish this with no opposing impacts on growth (Ye et al. 2017). Great emphasis has been placed on the efficient application of trees in the remediation of HMs owing to their many good traits, e.g., rapid expansion combined with substantial crop output, a well-developed root system, convenient and cost-effective planting, and their aesthetically acceptable nature (Brunner et al. 2008; Luo et al. 2016).
Phytoremediation has been considered as an inexpensive option that does not require treatment or removal of the soil (Shrestha et al. 2019). Furthermore, phytoremediation enhances either physical soil characteristics or biological activities (Wan et al. 2016). Phytoremediation can be a cost-effective treatment method relative to ion substitution, solvent extraction, adsorption, oxidation-reduction, and reverse osmosis. Several studies were done on different plant species as promising candidates for the elements cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb). Phytoremediation has been carried out using poplar species, Schima superba, Salix species, Jatropha curcas, Chinese sweetgum, and Chinese fir (Wu et al. 2010; He et al. 2011; Bhargava et al. 2012; Dai et al. 2013; Chang et al. 2014; Drzewiecka et al. 2017; El-Mahrouk et al. 2019, 2020, 2021; Wang et al. 2022).
“Several factors affect plant remediation (Wang et al. 2020). These include physiochemical soil characteristics, the exudates from plants and microbes, and the bioaccessibility of heavy metals (HMs). The effectiveness of phytoremediation also depends on the capacity of plants to assimilate, adsorb, accumulate, translocate, or sequester various toxicological aspects of metals. (Wang et al. 2020). The plants reduce the soil HMs content via different ways of phytoextraction. This involves the plants absorbing HMs from the soil and accumulating them in their aboveground portions (Sebastiani et al. 2004). Phytostabilization is a process in which certain species stabilize the soil surface by accumulating heavy metals (HMs) in their roots (Marques et al. 2009). Additionally, rhizofiltration is HMs from water, or aqueous waste streams are uptook or adsorbed by the plant roots (Erakhrumen and Agbontalor 2007)
According to Sharma et al. (2023), it is necessary to find a new species that is used as a phytoremediator of HMs and comprehend the methods by which plant species exhibit resistance to a particular metal. A promising candidate is Jacaranda mimosifolia D. Don (Fam. Bignoniaceae). It was widely planted in tropics and subtropics regions (Gentry 1992). It has soft, delicate, fernlike, deciduous foliage, and can grow to be 25 to 40 feet tall with a larger spread (Zaouchi et al. 2015; Gilman et al. 2019).
Assessing the potential of a plant to contaminate the surrounding environment through leaf shedding in any phytoremediation scenario is advantageous. Plant species, element types, and concentration in the soil affect HM levels in either green or fallen leaves. The study of Rafati et al. (2011) found that Morus alba fallen leaves contain more Cr and Ni than green leaves, but Populus alba exhibited higher concentrations of cadmium (Cd) and chromium (Cr) compared to their green counterparts. El-Mahrouk et al. (2021) supported this fact, reporting that fallen leaves from Jatropha curcas had Cd and Pb content negligible relative to the green leaves.
Most studies document the response of plants subjected to the singular stress of a heavy metal despite soil being polluted with multiple metals (He et al. 2013a,b; Chen et al. 2014). Furthermore, there is currently a lack of evidence regarding the utilization of Jacaranda mimosifolia as a phytoremediation agent for soil contaminated with cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb) in Egypt, as well as the data about it in this aspect, are very limited in the other countries in the global. Furthermore, several regions in Egypt are contaminated with elevated levels of heavy metals (HMs), notably cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb), stemming from the utilization of sewage effluent, industrial discharge, or drainage water in irrigation practices, as well as the application of sewage sludge as organic fertilizer for soil enrichment. Therefore, a pot experiment was conducted to get available data about the growth and efficiency of J. mimosifolia in the phytoremediation process, specifically addressing the synergistic impacts of cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb).
EXPERIMENTAL
An experimental study in pots was carried out within the confines of Antoniadis Garden, Horticulture Research Institute, Alexandria branch, Ministry of Agriculture, Egypt, to investigate the synergistic impact of varying amounts of Cd and Pb on the development and chemical composition of Jacaranda mimosifolia during the period of 1st April 2020 to 1st August 2021. The goal was to study the relationship between the contents of these elements in plant parts and soil levels to estimate the phytoremediation potential and the soil properties after the plantation period.
Plant Material
A local nursery obtained one-year-old homogenous Jacaranda mimosifolia transplants (20 ± 2 cm in height).
Pollutant Treatments
Cadmium nitrate Cd (NO3)2 was applied at the rates of 40 [low concentration (L)], 80 [medium concentration (M)], and 120 [high concentration (H)] mg/kg soil, which was equivalent to 14.4, 28.8, and 43.2 mg of elemental Cd/kg soil. Also, lead nitrate Pb (NO3)2 was applied at the rates of 400 [low concentration (L)], 800 [medium concentration (M)], and 1200 [high concentration (H)] mg/kg soil, which was equivalent to 247.7, 495.4, and 743.2 mg of elemental Pb/kg soil. Plastic pots, measuring 40 cm in diameter, were filled with 9 kg of air-dried soil per pot. This soil was blended with metal solutions at the specified concentrations and kept for 60 days before being cultured outdoors under a plastic house (from 29th January to 31st March)—untreated soil was considered as a control. The treatments of heavy metals were conducted as follows: control, LCd LPb, MCd MPb, H Cd HPb, LCd HPb, HCd LPb, MCd HPb, and HCd MPb.
For context, world-high allowable Cd and Pb levels range from 1 to 5 and 20 to 300 mg/kg soil, respectively according to Kabata-Pendias (2011).
Transplanting Date
Similar transplants of Jacaranda mimosifolia were grown in pots filled with contaminated soil, while other pots contained untreated soil with HMs as a control (one plant/pot) on 1st April 2020. The transplants were placed in the open field.
Experimental Layout
The subject was designed using a randomized complete block design (Snedecor 1989). The experiment contained seven applications in addition to the control (untreated soil) repeated thrice. There were three plants of each replicate, thus nine transplants for each treatment.
Agricultural Practices
Routine agricultural practices (such as weeding and the controlling of insecticides and pesticides) were done during the experimental period; Tap water (pH 7.20; EC 0.59 ds/m) was used to irrigate the plants when needed.
Measurements
On 1st August 2021, 6 plants were randomly harvested for each utilization (2 plants of each repetition) to measure the following traits.
Vegetative Growth
Plant height (cm) and stem diameter were measured at a distance of 5 cm from the soil surface, number of branches, area/leaf (cm2) using a C1-202 Laser area meter (Cid Bio- Science, USA), software, weights of leaves, stem and roots (fresh and dry) and the longest root length (cm). The selected plants were categorized into their respective parts: roots, stems, and leaves. Subsequently, the specimens underwent two rounds of washing: first with tap water to eliminate any soil residue, and subsequently with deionized water. The plant samples were subjected to oven-drying at a temperature of 80 ˚C for a duration of 24 hours (Rautio et al. 2010). A Minolta SPAD, 502, Japan device was used to measure leaf greenness (SPAD units) (Markwell et al. 1995) in the field before harvesting the fifth leaf from the plant top.
Soil Analysis
Soil analysis was done before and after the plantation. A hydrometer was used to analyze soil physical parameters (the particle size distribution) (Gee and Bauder 1986) before the plantation only. Soil samples were collected from all repetitions for each application and then mixed carefully in one sample (Table 1). The soil air-dried samples were pulverized using a mortar and pestle and then filtered through a stainless-steel test sieve to obtain fractions smaller than 2 mm (Cools and De Vos 2010). In order to assess soil chemical characteristics, a mixture of 20 grams of dried soil and 100 milliliters of distilled water (at a ratio of 1:5) was allowed to sit for 24 h, after which the resulting extract was filtered. The recorded measurements of the soil samples were as follows: EC was measured using an EC-Meter (MI 170, Szeged, Hungary) (Jackson 1973). A volumetric Calimeter was used to determine total carbonate (Nelson and Sommers 1996).
The micro Kjeldahl method was utilized to determine the available nitrogen (N) (Bremner 1982). Available P was assessed according to Olsen et al. (1982). Ca, Mg, and Cl were also estimated (Jackson 1973). The method for measuring Na and K used a flame photometer PSP7 (JENEWY, Staffordeshire, UK) (Black 1965). The concentrations of cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb) were determined using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer ( AAS ) (Page et al. 1982). The pH of the soil was determined by measuring the soil suspension (1:2.5, soil: distilled water) with a pH meter after a 30-minute period (JENEWY3510, Staffordeshire, UK) (Jackson 1973). For organic matter (OM) determination, 1 g of soil was blended with 10 mL of 0.1667 M K2Cr2O7 and 20 mL of concentrated H2SO4 containing 1.25% of Ag2SO4. The mixture was stirred, and after 30 minutes, the green color of chromium sulfate was measured using a spectrophotometer at 660 nm. Sucrose (0.42%) served as a standard, and carbon (C%) was calculated as follows:
(1)
Finally, organic matter percentage (OM%) was computed as:
(2)
Chemical Composition of Leaves, Stems, and Roots
A metal-free mill (IKa-Werke, M20 Germany) made from stainless steel was used to grind the dry samples of plant organs. 5 mL concentrated sulphuric acid was mixed with 0.2 g a homogenous powder of the plant parts, and the mixture was heated for 10 min. Then 0.5 mL of perchloric acid was added drop by drop, and the heating process was continued until a clear solution was obtained. The solution was then cooled and filtered. After that, distilled water was supplied to bring the total volume of the solution to 50 mL (Evenhuis and Dewaard 1980). The solution of samples was prepared for estimating N, P, K, and carbohydrate% in leaves (D.W), cadmium, and lead in leaves, stems, and roots (mg/kg D.W.). Also, the fallen leaves were collected during Nov. 2021, and then their Cd and Pb concentrations were determined.
Measurements of N% were obtained by the modified micro-Kjeldahl (Horwitz 1990) method, P% colorimetrically in a spectrophotometer (GT 80 + UK) (Murphy and Riley 1962), K% by flame photometer (Cottenie et al. 1982), and total carbohydrate% by (Herbert et al. 1971). Cadmium and Pb levels (mg/kg D.W.) were estimated in different plant parts using Perkin, 3300 Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (Page et al. 1982). The uptake of Cd or Pb was calculated as follows: Cd or Pb concentrations × D.W. (leaves, stems, and roots)/ 1000.
Total uptake = uptake of leaves +stems +roots (mg/plant) (3)
Indicators to Determine the Efficiency of Jacaranda mimosifolia for Phytoextraction of Cd and Pb in Polluted Soil
Bioconcentration (BCF) factor and translocation factor (TF) were calculated as follows,
(4)
(5)
where PO is the plant organ metal content (mg/kg D.W.), and SM is the soil metal content (mg/kg soil), also known as “metal level added + soil metal level before contamination”, MC is the shoots metal content (mg/kg D.W.), and MH refers to the metal content in the roots (mg/kg D.W.). TF % is used to calculate the efficiency of ion transfer from roots to aboveground plant organs (Maiti and Jaiswal 2008), where shoots refer to leaves and stems.
Accumulation efficiency was calculated based on BCF values and categorized into one of four types. The bioconcentration factor (BCF) is greater than 1 for substances with high concentration, between 1 and 0.1 for substances with medium concentration, between 0.1 and 0.01 for substances with weak concentration, and between 0.01 and 0.001 for substances that do not accumulate (Kabata-Pendias and Pendias 1999). The tolerance index biomass (TIb) is defined as,
(6)
where TP is the treated plant D.W. (g/plant), and CP is the control plant D.W. (g/plant).
Plant D.W. referred to leaves + stems + roots.
The parameter TIb was used to evaluate the resistance of Jacaranda mimosifolia in soil polluted with Cd and Pb, to calculate (TIb). According to Wilkins (1978), there are 3 values: (TIb) < 1 (a net reduction in biomass and a stressed condition of plants), TIb = 1 (no difference comparing to treatment of control), and TIb > 1 (a net increase in biomass and correct plant development).
The Jacaranda mimosifolia tolerance index of roots (TIr) was also estimated (Wilkins 1978),
(7)
where AR is the length of plant roots treated with metal (cm), and LR is the control plant root length (cm).
Statistical Analysis
The data were analyzed using the SAS program (version 6.12; SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Average separation was performed using Duncan’s multiple range test using one-way ANOVA ± standard deviation (SD) (n = 3). The statistical significance was determined at a level of P ≤ 0.05.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Soil Analysis
The used soil for the planting of Jacaranda mimosifolia analysis showed that the texture was sandy. The soil had an O.M of 0.53%, a pH of 8.50, and an EC level of 0.37 ds/m (Table 1). After planting, it was found that changes in the values of chemical parameters were to happen relative to prior planting and contamination; the values of pH, EC, Na +, Cl –, HCO3–, and SO4— increased after planting. On the contrary, reductions in O.M%, CaCO3, Ca++, Mg++, K+, and N, P, and K available levels after plantation were noticeable. Indeed, Cd and Pb levels decreased relative to their added quantities to the soil after planting. Also, the most considerable reduction in the available nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium was to occur in the control treatment, HCd LPb, and LCd HPb, applications, each in turn after the planting. Furthermore, pH rose to 9.10 after applying MCd HPb and HCd MPb treatments. At the same time, EC value increased to 1.29 after using MCd MPb treatment.
Heavy metals application usage affected soil parameters; in this concern, some studies showed that soil characteristics including pH, O.M, and alteration capacity were more related to Cd and Pb retention (Jopony and Young 1994). The addition of metals, causing an increase in cations such as Na+ and anions such as Cl –, HCO3–, and SO4– may lead to an increase in EC value. Sharma and Raju (2013) reported that high amounts of ions and soluble salts raised EC levels in soil irrigated with industrial effluent. However, the decrease in available N, P, K, soluble cations (regardless of Na+), and concentrations of Cd and Pb at the ending of the trial may be due to the absorption via plant roots or the displacement by watering. Cd and Pb soil concentrations have been reduced significantly after applying phytoremediation compared to their initial levels (Durante-Yánez et al. 2022). The soil surface chemistry and metal retention are affected by pH value (Bradl 2004). Also, high pH levels lead to increased metal retention and reduced soil solubility. When the pH decreases, plant Cd uptake rises (Bolan et al. 2003). Heavy metals negatively impact microbial activities and the structure of microbial populations (Obbard 2001).
Additionally, Zhao et al. (2019) documented that metallic processes may cause alteration in the soil microenvironment, particularly HMS precipitation. The present data were matched with those of El-Mahrouk et al. (2019), who found that EC values increased in soil polluted with CdCl2 at 80 mg/kg soil to 5 ds/m, as well as the available N, P, K. In addition, the Cd, Cu, and Pb levels were decreased after the culture of Salix mucronata in comparison to their levels prior to planting. Also, soil characteristics, e.g., pH, CEC, and Ca levels, significantly influence on the Pb soil bioavailability (Zhang et al. 2019). Also, El-Mahrouk et al. (2020) revealed that EC increased, while the available N, P, K, and Cd, Cu, and Pb levels were reduced with a culture of Populus nigra in Cd, Cu, and Pb polluted soil. In contrast, soil pH decreased significantly under Cd stress (Wang et al. 2022).
Table 1. Soil Physiochemical Parameters before Culture and Soil Chemical Analysis as Impacted by Soil Cd and Pb Levels after Plantation of Jacaranda
Effect of HMS in Soil on Vegetative Traits
Various combinations of Cd and Pb at different concentrations significantly decreased the majority of vegetative parameters relative to their respective control (Table 2). The highest plant stature measurements (164.68 cm), stem diameter (1.36 cm), branch number (25.33/plant), and area/leaf (205.57 cm2) were produced from the negative control group. In addition, the control plants had the maximum fresh and dried weights of leaves (53.44 and 26.27 g/plant), stems (126.01 and 47.57 g/plant), and roots (106.67 and 52.59 g/plant), respectively. The non-treated control reported higher values of the longest root and greenness degrees as 55.67 cm and 36.73 SPSD units in succession. In contrast, HCd HPb treatment had the most negative impact on the traits mentioned above.
The reduction in vegetative traits after applying HCd HPb reached 28% in plant height, 13% in stem diameter, 41% in branch number, 35% in area/ leaf, 34 and 30%, 49 and 41%, and 64 and 55% in leaves, stems, and roots fresh and dry weights, consecutively, 39% in the longest root length, and 26% in SPAD units. It is noticed from the data that some Cd and Pb combinations had a significant impact similar to their respective controls on some vegetative parameters. Also, the effects on vegetative traits of some treatments used were insignificant (P ≤ 0.05) among themselves, regardless of the control treatments. Despite the negative influence of Cd and Pb combinations, particularly at high concentrations, the Jacaranda plants could tolerate and grow with 100% survival in all the used treatments.
Surely, the detrimental impacts of Cd and Pb treatments on soil parameters conversely affected vegetative growth. Some harmful influences were noticed on the aged leaves, e.g., leaf edges exhibiting yellow discoloration and desiccation under treatments of high HMS levels. The toxicity symptoms were reduced with increasing plant age. Accordingly, Tu et al. (2004) mentioned that tolerance raised by the increment in plant age and some visual harm was reduced in aged Pteris vittata. This means that Jacaranda could grow in Cd- and Pb-rich environments. The previous studies indicated that growth reduction and leaves abscission in willow tangio (S. mastudana x S. alba) resulted from the application of 0.6 to 60.6 µg Cd/g soil (Robinson et al. 2000). Also, despite the retardation impacts on the growth traits related to soil Cd and Pb at high concentrations, Populus maximowiczii x P. nigra has the ability to thrive in 7.3 and 1368 mg Cd and Pb/kg soil, respectively (Kubátová et al. 2016). Conversely, the used HMS levels negatively affected all vegetative traits, and the inhibition impact was correlated with the HM concentration and growth traits. Dong et al. (2005) documented that Cd stress causes deleterious effects on the level of photosynthesis and CO2 level through cells and involves photosynthetic pigments via Cd++ replacing Mg2+ in chlorophyll structure, resulting in more decrease in fluorescence quantity in comparison to Mg chlorophylls. The two harmful impacts decrease the chlorophyll yield, reducing the photosynthetic rate that leads to aging and cellular demise (Santos et al. 2010). In addition, plant physiological and biochemical prosses have been deleterious and affected by cadmium (Cd) absorption and retention in plants (Li et al. 2023). Similarly, Zacchini et al. (2009) found that 38.5 mg/L Cd sulfate negatively affected the willow clone’s total leaf area. The study conducted by Tauqeer et al. (2016) found that the presence of Cd at a concentration of 0.225 mg/L and Pb at a concentration of 0.414 mg/L resulted in a significant decrease in the fresh and dry weights of Alternanthera bettzickiana. Additionally, Pb harm causes photosynthesis reduction, oxidative hazard, DNA harm, and undesirable in mitosis (Küpper 2017). The findings of the present study are consistent with the research conducted by Redovniković et al. (2017), which showed that different combinations of Cd (10, 25, and 50 mg/kg soil) and Pb (400, 800, and 1200 mg/kg soil) negatively affected leaves, stem, and root dry weights of P. nigra “Italica”, and the most negative effect was to be found at the combination of Cd and Pb at high levels. Similarly, El-Mahrouk et al. (2021), studying Jatropha curcas, found that Cd at 14.4, 28.8, and 43.2 mg/kg soil and Pb at 247.7, 495.4, and 743.2 mg/kg soil in different combinations negatively affected vegetative traits in relative to untreated negative plants. In addition, El-Mahrouk et al. (2019, 2020), studying Salix mucronata and Populus nigra, respectively, concluded that Cd at 3.9, 7.8, 11.9, and 15.6 mg/kg soil, Cu at 14.4, 29.8, 47.7, and 63.6 mg/kg soil, and Pb at 50.0, 91.1, 132.1, and 173.3 mg/kg soil had significantly inhibition influences on the aerial organs and root traits of the two species, and the negative impact was parallel with the HM concentration in the soil. The retardation in root growth and element and water uptake imbalance causes development reduction, structure harmful, reduction in biochemical and physiological processes, which influence on biomass yield negatively (Kumar et al. 2017; Wu et al. 2018). Also, the root, stem, leaf, and dry biomass of Clidemia sericea showed a decrease under Hg, Cd, and Pb stresses (Durante-Yánez et al. 2022). Furthermore, growth inhibition of Schima superba, Chinese sweetgum, and Chinese fir was presented at 6, 12, 24, and 36 mg Cd/kg soil (Wang et al. 2022). Additionally, Bhat et al. (2022) reported that a maximum reduction in the growth rate of Spirodela polyrhiza treated with Cu, Pb, and Cd at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 mg was noticed in treatments of Cd, followed by Pb, then Cu. They added that the highest photosynthetic pigment levels were observed in control plants (untreated). In addition, photosynthetic pigment contents have been differently affected depending on plant species, potentially toxic element levels, and the toxicity degree of metals individually and mixed according to the studies of Fargašová and Molnárová (2010) on Sinaps alba, Chinmayee et al. (2012) on Amaranthus spinosus, Leal-Alvarado et al. (2016) on Salvinia minima Baker, and Zhang et al. (2020) on tobacco. Zhang et al. (2020) documented that HMS such as Cr, Ni, Pb, Cd and Zn affected species growth. The reduction in vegetative traits of Jacaranda can be attributed to the detrimental impact of Cd and Pb on leaf chemical composition because N, P, and K elements are essential to several compounds, e.g., proteins, carbohydrates, amino acids, phospholipids, nucleic acids, and energy sources. Furthermore, the presence of cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb) exerts a detrimental impact on the plasma membrane permeability (Sharma et al. 2010; Pourrut et al. 2011).
Table 2. Growth Traits of Jacaranda as Impacted by Cd and Pb Levels in the Soil after the Experimental Period
Leaf Chemical Analysis
It is necessary to determine leaf N, P, and K nutrient levels because because the soil pH in which Jacaranda was grown increased after contamination of Cd and Pb metals from pH 8.5 to 9.1. This pH implied that the absorption of the vital elements via plant roots, particularly N, P, K, Mg, and Zn, is not enough. Our results indicated that Jacaranda grown in HMS polluted soil had significantly lower amounts of N, P, K, and total carbohydrates percentages than respective controls (Table 3), with some exceptions. Meanwhile, MCd MPb, LCd HPb, and MCd HPb treatments resulted in a non-significant lower P% compared to the control. Additionally, the applications of LCd LPb, MCd MPb, and HCd MPb recorded the same significant level of K% of control. Distinctly, leaf N, P, K, and total carbohydrate status depend on the concentration of HM in the application. This may be due to the synergistic effect of each HM used. Furtherance, lower significant levels of N, P, K, and total carbohydrates % were exhibited in HCd HPb treated plants. Such a treatment decreased N, P, K, and total carbohydrates by 25.35, 64.30, 32.26, and 19.89%, respectively, less than the control.
Foliage nutrient levels depend on soil or soil chemistry levels and the consanguinity of Salix species or clones (Mosseler and Major 2017). Heavy metals lead to hazards in plants via (i) an obstacle for uptake at root surface as a result to similarities with nutrient cations, like the competition between AS and P and Cd against Zn, (ii) a function collapse of necessary nutrients because of vital cations exclusion from their binding sites (Sharma and Dietz 2009; DalCorso et al. 2013). Also, reducing absorptions and transference of nitrate and nitrate reductase by Cd affect N metabolism (Lea and Miflin 2003).
Moreover, Küpper et al. (1996) documented that magnesium in the antenna and efficacy centers of chlorophyll can be substituted by Cu , which affects the composition and function of chlorophyll, causing a decrease in build-up carbohydrate. Moreover, the ADP or ATP phosphate group displaced by vital ions were reacted by Pb accumulation in the plant tissue, thus weakening essential nutrient uptake like Mg and Fe, and inducing CO2 retardation because of stomatal closure (Pourrut et al. 2011). Previously, Pietrini et al. (2009) cleared various nutrients (e.g., Fe, Zn, and Mg); their uptake, transport, and use in poplar clones were negatively affected by Cd SO4 at 50 µM. Also, Cd impairs the Calvin cycle enzymes, photosynthetic rate, and metabolism of carbohydrates (Tang et al. 2017) and changes the metabolism of antioxidants (Khan et al. 2009). Cadmium also is an obstacle to the absorption of Ca, K, P, Mg, and water and retards nitrate transportation and uptake by affecting nitrate reductase. Likewise, El-Mahrouk et al. (2019) on Salix mucronata and El-Mahrouk et al. (2020) on Populus nigra reported that leaf N, P, K, and total carbohydrates of two species significantly reduced Cd CL2 at 20, 40, 60, and 80, respectively, and Pb acetate at 250, 450, 600, and 850 mg/kg soil, respectively, relative to the control.
Table 3. Effect of Soil Cd and Pb Levels on the Chemical Composition of Jacaranda Leaves Following the Experiment Period
Means± (SD) (n = 3) with the same letters in a column are non-significant differences (P≤ 0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
Relationship between Cd and Pb Levels and Uptake in Plant Organs and their Soil Concentrations
The results in Table 4 show that the used Cd and Pb combinations were significantly elevated (P≤ 0.05) in leaves (green leaf and fallen leaf), stems, and roots Cd and Pb contents and uptake, as well as in plant total absorption relative to control untreated plants. Also, the Cd and Pb levels of different plant parts strongly depend on their soil levels. Further, combinations containing high Cd levels (HCd HPb, HCd LPb, and HCd MPb) recorded higher leaf, stem, and root Cd concentrations than the other treatments. This was found in Pb content in the plant parts, where HCd HPb, LCd HPb, and MCd HPb combinations resulted in higher Pb content. Data indicated that contents of Cd and Pb were in the order of roots ˃ stems ˃, and leaves under the most treatments.
Moreover, Cd or Pb transfer in various vegetative parts and total plant absorption were found to be dependent on their soil contents and plant organs. Higher significant Cd uptake in leaves stems, and roots resulted from applying HCd MPb treatment, besides HCd LPb treatment in the case of root uptake. Higher significant leaf, stem, and root Pb uptake was recorded for MCd and HPb treatment besides HCd and MPb in the case of root uptake. At the same time, total Cd and Pb plant uptake was significantly the highest at HCd MPb treatment (0.44 mg Cd/ plant) and MCd HPb (7.50 mg Pb/ plant), respectively. Generally, Cd and Pb uptake was in an order of roots > stem > leaves. The results indicated that the Cd and Pd contents of fallen leaves were negligible relative to their contents in the green leaves under the all-tested Cd and Pb combinations. The maximum significant content of Cd and Pb in the fallen leaves reached 0.03 (for the treatment content of high Cd level) and 0.08 (for the treatment of LCd HPb) mg/kg D.W. against 3.30 (HCd HPb) and 45.70 (MCd HPb) mg/kg D.W. in the green leaves, respectively.
As for Cd and Pb content and uptake in the plant organs, Samuilov et al. (2016) mentioned that Pb concentrations in Populus tremula x P. alba vegetative parts are conjunctive with their content in the soil. Previously, Zhivotovsky et al. (2011) documented that Cd and Pb accumulated in roots of several tree species more than in stems and leaves. Redovniković et al. (2017) reported that Cd and Pb accumulated in roots of P. nigra cv. ‘Italica’ rather than in leaves and stem when grown in Cd at 10, 25, and 50 mg/kg soil and Pb at 400, 800, and 1200 mg/kg soil. Likewise, Krajcarová et al. (2016) showed that when treated with Cd, Salix polaris plant parts have different Cd concentrations. In studies of Tang et al. (2017) on Salix matsudana, Pb in all vegetative organs was in an order of roots ˃ cuttings ˃ twigs ˃ leaves. Additionally, roots of S. mucronata and P. nigra have Cd and Pb content and uptake more than in stems or leaves (El-Mahrouk et al. 2019, 2020) of Salix and poplar, respectively. In addition, Durante-Yánez et al. (2022) documented that the levels of Hg, Pb, and Cd in roots, stem, and leaves of Clidemia sericea indicated significant differences among the used treatments, and the roots had higher concentrations than leaves or stems. According to Tatian et al. (2023), Cd and Pb uptake by Festuca species was mainly in the roots rather than aerial parts. Also, Bhat et al. (2022) treated Spirodela polyrhiza with Cu, Pb, and Cd at 0, 1, 2, 4, and 8 mg/L and they reported that elements levels in the plant was influenced by its behavior. The plant’s ability to accumulate these metals was directly related to the concentration of the metals in the soil, with higher concentrations leading to increased uptake by the plant. Furthermore, accumulation of HMS in the plant organs related to HM kind and plant variety. Accordingly, Rahman et al. (2022) revealed that the seasonal HMS contents in either leaves or bark of some tree species decreased in the order of Zn ˃ Pb ˃ Cu ˃ Cd in the industrial and residential areas. They added that the tree species markedly showed significantly various capacities for HM accumulation. Cadmium and lead contents in fallen leaves were negligible. That may be due to Cd and Pb transported from leaves to stem and root at the senescence stage. Also, the root of Jacaranda had more accumulation of Cd and Pb than the leaves or stems. Hence, the potential environmental hazard posed from falling leaves appears to be minimal, as proposed by Baker (1981), pointing out that a number of species of deciduous plants move the stored HMS to their aerial parts prior to senescence. In addition, willow stand (Salix viminalis L. ‘Orm’) reduces the pollution hazardous to the wider habitat within leaf fall when they do not accumulate HMS in their leaves (Vervaeke et al. 2003).
Also, the green leaves of Morus alba grown in 40 mg Cd/kg soil had higher content of Cd than fallen leaves; in contrast, fallen leaves had more Cr in a level of 60 mg/kg soil and Ni in a level of 1200 mg/kg soil than the green leaves (Rafati et al. 2011). They added that green and fallen leaves of P. alba Cd uptake levels did not significantly differ when treated with 40, 80, and 120 mg Cd/kg soil because green leaves occupied their Cd uptake until the fall season. This means that built-up Cd did not undergo translocation into the stem and root structures. Additionally, Jatropha curcas grown under 40, 80, and 120 mg Cd nitrate/kg soil and Pb nitrate at 400, 800, and 1200 mg/kg soil in various combinations, the green leaves had a considerable amount of Cd and Pb more than fallen leaves in all used combinations ( El-Mahrouk et al. 2021).
Table 4. Effect of the Different Cd and Pb Combinations on their Concentrations and Absorptions in Various Plant organs, and Plant Total Uptake
Means± (SD) (n = 3) with the same letters in a column are non-significant differences (P≤ 0.05). By Duncan’s multiple rang test.
BCF, TF, and TI
To estimate Jacaranda phytoremediation potential in Cd and Pb aggregation, BCF and TF were determined (Table 5). BCF was done to measure the transfer of ions from soil to different parts of the plant. According to the data, regardless of the control, Cd and Pb BCF shoots (BCFs) values under the all-tested HMS combinations had the same significant level. Moreover, the control plants recorded higher significant Cd BCF shoots (0.69) and Pb BCF shoots (0.56). In general, Cd and Pb BCFs values were decreased by raising the Cd and Pb concentrations in the used combinations. Regardless of the control treatment, higher Cd BCFs (0.27) was in LCd LPb treatment, and lower Cd BCFS (0.15) was in HCd LPb and MCd HPb. Also, higher Pb BCFs (0.22) was in LCd LPb, and lower Pb BCFs (0.09) was in MCd MPb. Also, BCF roots (BCFr) of Cd and Pb took a similar trend to their BCFs, with some exceptions. The control plants recorded the highest significant Cd and Pb BCFr of 0.26 and 0.61, respectively. Furthermore, regardless of the control, Cd BCFr under the used combinations of HMS have the same significant level (P ≤ 0.05), and maximum and minimum Cd BCFr (0.15 and 0.06) were in LCd LPb and MCd HPb, consecutively. Regarding Pb BCFr, also relative to control, all used combinations of HMs significantly reduced Pb BCFr. In addition, the treatments containing L Pb levels had higher significant Pb BCFr of 0.39 and 0.42 for LCd LPb and HCd LPb, respectively, with the same significant level. Meanwhile, under HCd HPb, LCd HPb, and MCd HPb, the movement of Pb from soil to roots was poor compared to the other treatments, and Pb BCFr was 0.17, 0.15, and 0.15, respectively, with the same significant level (P ≤ 0.05).
The uptake and aggregation of Cd and Pb in various Jacaranda parts are crucial factors limiting its phytoremediation. It is noted that Cd and Pb BCFs and BCFr values of the control treatment were significantly higher than the others, which may be attributed to the control soil having the lowest Cd and Pb concentrations. Whereas, the BCFs or BCFr represents the ratio of HM levels in plant organs to soil HM levels (Saraswat and Rai 2009; Zacchini et al. 2009). The results are similar to Redovniković et al. (2017) on poplar, who found that Cd and Pb BCF values were lower than the unit under Cd at 10, 25, and 50 mg/kg soil and Pb at 400, 800, and 1200 mg/kg soil. Also with an increase in soil Cd levels, the Cd bioconcentration factor (Cd BCF) was found to decrease. They concluded that the Pb BCF was lower (0.23) at the highest application levels of Pb, as previously clarified by Mette et al. (2014).
The present data showed that Cd and Pb BCF of shoots or roots were medium (BCF = 1- 0.1) with three exceptions. These exceptions were, 1.) Pb BCFs under MCd MPb (0.09); 2.) Cd BCFr under MCd MPb; and 3.) MCd HPb (0.08 and 0.06, respectively), consistent with the findings of Kabata-Pendias and Pendias (1999). Cadmium BCFr of P. alba and Cd BCFs or Cd BCFr of Morus alba in 40, 80, and 160 mg Cd/kg soil was lower than 1, and the values were reduced by increasing Cd level in soil (Rafati et al. 2011). The bioavailability of Pb in soil has been significantly (P ≤ 0.05) affected by some soil characteristics such as pH, CEC, and Ca levels (Zhang et al. 2019). In addition, in Pb, co-accumulation may have decreased Cd accumulation. Some studies are in accordance with the present results in which BCF ˂ 1, such as El-Mahrouk et al. (2019) on Salix mucronata and (El-Mahrouk et al. 2020) on P. nigra. The latter authors found that Cd, Cu, and Pb BCF of leaves, stems, and roots were lower than 1 under 20, 40, 60, and 80 mg CdCl2/kg soil, 50, 100, 150, and 200 CuCl2/kg soil, and 250, 450, 650, and 850 mg Pb acetate/kg soil. In addition, Bhat et al. (2022) documented that BCF of Cu, Pb, and Cd decreased by increasing their concentrations in Spirodela polyrhiza medium. Also, Rahman et al. (2022) found that metal accumulation index ˃ 1 and bioconcentration index ˂ 1 of Cd and Pb for aerial parts of Azadirachta indica, Cassia fistula, Eucalyptus camaldulensis, Morus alba and Populus deltoids grown in industrial and residential areas. The present data were in contrast to the finding of Domínguez et al. (2008), who found that Cd BCF leaves of P. alba were nearly 2 and (Zacchini et al. 2009) (BCF of aerial parts of P. alba L. clones 6K3 and 14P11 were 2.5 and 4.0). Migeon et al. (2009) reported leaf Cd BCF of about 1.39, 2.26, and 1.98 for P. deltoides x P. nigra, P. tremula x P. tremuloides, and P. trichocarpa x P. deltoides, in succession. Furthermore, Jakovljević et al. (2014) on poplar and Mette et al. (2014) on willow and poplar indicated that Cd BCF was higher than 1 and did not depend on soil Cd content. Moreover, Bhat et al. (2022) found that Cd and Pb BCF for Spirodela polyrhiza were 600 and 405, consecutively at 0.5 mg concentration. Additionally, Durante-Yánez et al. (2022) on Clidemia sericea documented that higher BCF values were calculated for Cd (˃ 1), because it is higher mobility than Pb and Hg, resulting in bioconcentrates more easily in plant roots (Huang et al. 2019).
The TF value was determined as a means to calculate ion transportation from roots to vegetative parts (shoots = leaves + stems) (Maiti and Jaiswal 2008). Where TF% is the ion level in shoot/root, data showed that Cd and Pb TF% under the used treatments exhibited different values among all combinations of Cd and Pb with significant levels (P ≤ 0.05) among some treatments. The Cd TF was higher than 1 (˃ 100), while Pb TF was lesser than the unit (˂ 100) under all treatments. The highest significant Cd TF% reached 266.7, 233.3, and 258.8 % for control, MCd MPb, and MCd HPb, respectively, with the same significant level. However, lower significant Cd TF% was 113.8 % for HCd LPb with the same significant level with LCd LPb, HCd HPb, and HCd MPb utilizations. The untreated negative plants and MCd HPb treated ones have recorded higher significant Pb migration from roots to shoots as registered Pb TF% of 92.0 and 79.0%, respectively. Conversely, lower significant Pb TF% was 44.5 and 48.2% for the treated plants with MCd MPb and HCd MPb, respectively.
Generally, the treatments containing high Pb levels caused more Pb movement toward shoots, in contrast to Cd translocation through plant organs. TF ˃ 1 for Cd and higher Cd TF values were obtained from low and medium Cd levels, and TF ˂ 1 for Pb and its higher values resulted from a high level of Pb, regardless of the control. This can be due to the least soil Cd and Pb concentrations, which are almost the main factors accounting for the substantial quantities of accumulation in the roots, which helps metals transportation during the plant detoxification mechanisms development by ions sequestration in the vacuole via union with ligands (proteins, organic acids, and peptides), causing more transference amounts (Nworie and Lin 2021; Sharma et al. 2021). Previously, Niu et al. (2007), Fulekar et al. (2009), and Pourrut et al. (2011) mentioned that Cd and Pb cellular displacement can affect the free levels, and therefore, metal transfer through the plant can be affected. The TF Pb values at different concentrations in the soil were not higher (˂ 1 or ˂ 100%); this may be due to its ability to sequester in the vacuole as a result of a Pb-phytoextraction complex (Lux et al. 2011). TF Cd ˃ 1 in the present results agrees with Zacchini et al. (2009), which made it clear that TF Cd of P. alba was nearly ten. Also, TF Cd in P. alba and M. alba was higher than 1 at 40, 80, and 160 mg Cd/kg soil (Rafati et al. 2011). Also, in the study of Redovniković et al. (2017), who reported that TF Cd ˃ 1 and TF Pb ˂ 1 in P. nigra cv. ‘Italica’ grown under 25 and 50 mg Cd/kg soil and 800 and 1200 mg Pb/kg soil. This is in accordance with the present results.
In contrast, El-Mahrouk et al. (2019, 2020) on S. mucronata and P. nigra found that TF Cd ˂ 1 and TF Pb ˃ 1 in the two species grown under 20, 40, 60, and 80 mg Cd/kg soil and 450, 650, and 850 mg Pb/kg soil. This was supported by Durante-Yánez et al. (2022) on Clidemia sericea. BCF Cd or Pb of shoots or roots were medium, and TF Pb ˂ 1, which indicates that the metal movement is limiting in plant tissue under higher levels of potentially toxic elements (Khan et al. 2009). Also, TF Pb ˂ 1 agrees with the resistance mechanism, resulting in Pb mainly still in the root and a slow transfer to aerial organs (Fahr et al. 2013). This phenomenon may be attributed to a plant process that involves altering the permeability of the membrane and modifying the capacity of the cell walls or secretion of many chelating compounds to keep the physiological levels of vital elements and reduce the exposure to non-necessary HMS, which then alleviates harmful impacts to aerial parts (Kalaivanan and Ganeshamurthy 2016). Also, the majority of plant species record limitations in the movement of Pb and Cd from roots to shoots, so in several plants, the TF is lesser than 0.07 according to the findings of Małkowski et al. (2019). Thus, BCFs and TF for HMS are fundamental values necessary to assess a plant’s efficiency for phytoextraction and phytostabilization. The Jacaranda plant, which shows Cd BCFs or CFr ˂ 1 and TF Cd ˃ 1, can be employed as a phytoextractor for Cd under the tested concentrations. At the same time, Jacaranda exhibited Pb bioconcentration factors (BCFs) or bioconcentration ratios (BCFr) less than 1, as well as transfer factors (TF) for Pb also less than 1, indicating its potential for Pb phytostabilization at the examined levels.
TIb and TIr were calculated to evaluate the Jacaranda tolerance against Cd and Pb and to estimate the growth development in the suggested HMS combinations (Table 5). A notable decrease in TIb and TIr values was observed across all tested Cd and Pb levels in the soil in comparison to the untreated plants, except TIr in LCd HPb and HCd LPb values, which take place at the same significant level of the control. Likewise, TIb and TIr values were lower than the unity (˂ 1) at all used Cd and Pb combinations, and the least value of either TIb (0.55) or TIr (0.62) was found in the HCd HPb treatment. This means that the Jacaranda plants were under stress, with a net reduction in biomass and stressed plant condition (Wilkins 1978), and the root length was limited.
The results indicated that TIb or TIr values differed under the various tested HMS combinations. Utmazian et al. (2007) reported that metal tolerances differed among 20 different willow and poplar clones treated by Cd and Zn. Despite the reduction in TIb or TIr, the Jacaranda plant has shown better tolerance under some tested HMS treatments, whereas TIb reached 0.88 and 0.89 in MCd HPb and HCd MPb and TIr got 0.90 and 0.86 in LCd HPb and HCd LPb. This implies that TIb or TIr is related to the type of metal and its level in the soil. Additionally, Wu et al. (2010) declared that at 4.35 g Cd/kg purple soil, there was a significant reduction in TI of P. deltoides x P. nigra. Dickinson et al. (1994) reported that metal resistance or absorption depended on species and clones of willow. The S. viminalis biomass or root tolerance index was ˂ 1 at three µM Cu (NO3)2 and at a ratio of Ca/Mg (20: 1 and 1: 10) (Mleczek et al. 2013). The TIb and TIr of each P. nigra or S. mucronata were less than the unity at the following CdCl2 levels (20, 40, 60, and 80 mg/kg soil) and Pb acetate levels (250, 450, 650, and 850 mg/kg soil) (El-Mahrouk et al. 2019, 2020). El-Mahrouk et al. (2021) documented that tolerance index biomass or roots of Jatropha curcas was ˂ 1 under different Cd and Pb combinations, except that Pb TIr was ˃ 1 at 40 mg Cd nitrate + 400 mg Pb nitrate. Generally, BCF, TF and TIb or TIr are keys that can be estimated to define Cd and Pb hyperaccumulator. The plausible species for phytoremediation could have a big accumulation quantity in its tissues (particularly in aerial organs) and greater metal tolerances (Shi et al. 2009). Therefore, Jacaranda mimosifolia emerges as a promising candidate for phytoremediation applications in soil contaminated with Cd and Pb at the examined levels.
CONCLUSIONS
- The study was done to estimate the behavior of Jacaranda growth and its efficiency in phytoremediation strategies under Cd and Pb stresses in various combinations.
- Despite Cd and Pb treatments having impaired impacts on the growth and essential chemical parameters, Jacaranda plant could grow without exhibiting toxicity symptoms with increasing age, and the survival was 100% until the end of the experiment.
- Cd and Pb contents and uptake in the plant parts were related to the metal concentration in the tested treatments. Jacaranda exhibited good tolerance against Cd and Pb, particularly at low and medium levels.
- The Cd and Pb contents of fallen leaves were negligible relative to their contents in the green leaves; thus, the contamination damage worldwide from the leaf fall is expected to be relatively small.
- Cd BCFr was ˂ 1, and Cd TF was ˃ 1; therefore, the tested Jacaranda can be a suitable candidate for Cd phytoextraction. Pb BCFr and TF values were ˂ 1; thus, Jacaranda can be suitable only as a phytostabilizator for Pb remediation.
- The experiment period was 16 months (1st April 2020 to 1st August 2021). It is beneficial to carry out studies for prolonged exposure in open fields and include environmental conditions for the long-life cycle of woody species to identify more realistic changes in growth traits and HMS accumulation and contents in the plant tissues.
- Jacaranda-mediated phytoremediation offers economic feasibility and scalability advantages compared to conventional remediation methods. Its lower initial costs, adaptability to various environments, and long-term sustainability make it an attractive option for addressing soil contamination.
- Future studies on Jacaranda will estimate the enzymatic activity, reactive oxygenates species (ROS), electrolyte leakage, total antioxidant activity, amino-acids, and pigments (Carotenoids, chlorophylls) because these measurements are strongly related to resistance mechanism against heavy metal stress.
- The discovered species as hyperaccumulators for heavy metals (HMs) can acclimate them to grow under different environmental conditions.
- Harvested organs of either long-life plants (trees and shrubs) or short-life plants (annual and genial herbs), which are intermediate to phytoremediation can be used in biogas production rather than being composted or burned on site.
Table 5. BCF Shoots, BCF Roots, TF%, TIb, and TIr of Jacaranda were Affected by Cd and Pb Levels in the Soil after the Experimental Period
Means ± (SD) (n = 3) have similar letters in a column with non-significant differences (P≤0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test.
REFERENCES CITED
Ali, B., Qian, P., Jin, R., Ali, S., Khan, M., Aziz, R., Tian, T., and Zhou, W. (2014a). “Physiological and ultra-structural changes in Brassica napus seedlings induced by cadmium stress,” Biologia Plantarum 58(1), 131-138. DOI: 10.1007/s10535-013-0358-5
Ali, B., Xu, X., Gill, R. A., Yang, S., Ali, S., Tahir, M., and Zhou, W. (2014b). “Promotive role of 5-aminolevulinic acid on mineral nutrients and antioxidative defense system under lead toxicity in Brassica napus,” Industrial Crops and Products 52, 617-626. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.11.033
Aziz, R. A., Rahim, S., Sahid, I., Idris, W. M. R., and Bhuiyan, M. A. R. (2015). “Determination of heavy metals uptake in soil and paddy plants,” Am. Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 15(2), 161-164.
Baker, A. J. (1981). “Accumulators and excluders‐strategies in the response of plants to heavy metals,” J. Plant Nutrition 3(1-4), 643-654. DOI: 10.1080/01904168109362867
Balint, R., and Boajă, I. P. (2024). “Assisted phytoextraction as a nature-based solution for the sustainable remediation of metal(loid)-contaminated soils,” Integr. Environ. Assess Manag. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38441364. DOI: 10.1002/ieam.4907
Benavides, M. P., Gallego, S. M., and Tomaro, M. L. (2005). “Cadmium toxicity in plants,” Brazilian J. Plant Physiol. 17, 21-34. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-04202005000100003
Bhargava, A., Carmona, F. F., Bhargava, M., and Srivastava, S. (2012). “Approaches for enhanced phytoextraction of heavy metals,” J. Environ. Managem. 105, 103-120. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.04.002
Bhat, T. A., Bhat, J., Bano, H., Bhat, A., Khan, I., and Nazki, I. (2022). “Phytoremediation potential and physiological changes in Spirodela polyrhiza L. exposed to different heavy metal concentrations,” The Pharma Innovation J. 11(2), 3426-3432.
Black, C. A. (1965). Methods of Soil Analysis. Sponsored by the American Society of Agronomy and the American Society for Testing Materials, 1572 pp. DOI: 10.2134/agronmonogr9.1
Bolan, N. S., Adriano, D. C., and Curtin, D. (2003). “Soil acidification and liming interactions with nutrient and heavy metal transformation and bioavailability,” Advances in Agronomy 78, 215-272. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2113(02)78006-1
Bradl, H. B. (2004). “Adsorption of heavy metal ions on soils and soils constituents,” J. Colloid and Interface Sci. 277(1), 1-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.04.005
Bremner, J. M. (1982). “Nitrogen-total,” Methods of Soil Analysis 2, 595-624. DOI: 10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c31
Brunner, I., Luster, J., Günthardt-Goerg, M. S., and Frey, B. (2008). “Heavy metal accumulation and phytostabilisation potential of tree fine roots in a contaminated soil,” Environ. Pollut. 152(3), 559-568. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2007.07.006
Chang, F.-C., Ko, C.-H., Tsai, M.-J., Wang, Y.-N., and Chung, C.-Y. (2014). “Phytoremediation of heavy metal contaminated soil by Jatropha curcas,” Ecotoxicology 23, 1969-1978. DOI: 10.1007/s10646-014-1343-2
Chen, L., Gao, S., Zhu, P., Liu, Y., Hu, T., and Zhang, J. (2014). “Comparative study of metal resistance and accumulation of lead and zinc in two poplars,” Physiologia Plantarum 151(4), 390-405. DOI: 10.1111/ppl.12120
Chinmayee, M. D., Mahesh, B., Pradesh, S., Mini, I., and Swapna, T. (2012). “The assessment of phytoremediation potential of invasive weed Amaranthus spinosus L.,” Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 167, 1550-1559. DOI: 10.1007/s12010-012-9657-0
Cools, N., and De Vos, B. (2010). Sampling and Analysis of Soil, UNECE, ICP Forests, Hamburg, 208 pp.
Cottenie, A., Verloo, M., Kiekens, L., Velghe, G., and Camerlynck, R. (1982). “Chemical analysis of plant and soil laboratory of analytical and agrochemistry,” State Univ., Ghent, Belgium. 42, 80-284.
Dai, H.-P., Shan, C.-J., Jia, G.-L., Yang, T.-X., Wei, A.-Z., Zhao, H., Wu, S.-Q., Huo, K.-K., Chen, W.-Q., and Cao, X.-Y. (2013). “Responses to cadmium tolerance, accumulation and translocation in Populus× canescens,” Water, Air, & Soil Pollut. 224, article 1504. DOI: 10.1007/s11270-013-1504-6
DalCorso, G., Manara, A., and Furini, A. (2013). “An overview of heavy metal challenge in plants: from roots to shoots,” Metallomics 5(9), 1117-1132. DOI: 10.1039/c3mt00038a
Dickinson, N., Punshon, T., Hodkinson, R., and Lepp, N. (1994). “Metal tolerance and accumulation in willows,” Willow Vegetation Filters for Municipal Wastewater and Sludges, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala 121-127.
Domínguez, M. T., Maranón, T., Murillo, J. M., Schulin, R., and Robinson, B. H. (2008). “Trace element accumulation in woody plants of the Guadiamar Valley, SW Spain: a large-scale phytomanagement case study,” Environ. Pollut. 152(1), 50-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2007.05.021
Dong, J., Wu, F.-B. and Zhang, G.-P. (2005). “Effect of cadmium on growth and photosynthesis of tomato seedlings,” J. Zhejiang University Sci. B 6(10), 974-980. DOI: 10.1631/jzus.2005.B0974
Drzewiecka, K., Mleczek, M., Gąsecka, M., Magdziak, Z., Budka, A., Chadzinikolau, T., Kaczmarek, Z., and Goliński, P. (2017). “Copper and nickel co-treatment alters metal uptake and stress parameters of Salix purpurea× viminalis,” J. Plant Physiol. 216, 125-134. DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2017.04.020
Durante-Yánez, E. V., Martínez-Macea, M. A., Enamorado-Montes, G., Combatt Caballero, E., and Marrugo-Negrete, J. (2022). “Phytoremediation of soils contaminated with heavy metals from gold mining activities using Clidemia sericea D. Don.,” Plants 11(5), article 597. DOI: 10.3390/plants11050597
Ef, A., Abeer, H., Alqarawi, A., and Hend, A. A. (2015). “Alleviation of adverse impact of cadmium stress in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi’,” Pak. J. Bot 47(2), 785-795.
El-Mahrouk, E. M., Gaber, M. K., Aly, M. A., EL-Naggar, A. A. M., and Ebrahim, M. A. H., (2021). “Usage of Jatropha Curcas plant for phytoremediation of Cd and Pb contaminated soil,” Middle East J. Appl. Sci. 4(11), 1005-1017.
El-Mahrouk, E.-S. M., Eisa, E. A.-H., Hegazi, M. A., Abdel-Gayed, M. E.-S., Dewir, Y. H., El-Mahrouk, M. E., and Naidoo, Y. (2019). “Phytoremediation of cadmium-, copper-, and lead-contaminated soil by Salix mucronata (Synonym Salix safsaf),” HortScience 54(7), 1249-1257. DOI: 10.21273/HORTSCI14018-19
El-Mahrouk, E. M., Eisa, E. A. E. H., Ali, H. M., Hegazy, M. A. E. N., and Abd El-Gayed, M. E. S., (2020). “Populus nigra as a phytoremediator for Cd, Cu, and Pb in contaminated soil,” BioResources 15(1), 869-893. DOI: 10.15376/biores.15.1.869-893
Erakhrumen, A. A., and Agbontalor, A. (2007). “Phytoremediation: An environmentally sound technology for pollution prevention, control and remediation in developing countries,” Educational Res. Rev. 2(7), 151-156.
Evenhuis, B., and Dewaard. P. (1980). “Principles and practices in plant analysis,” FAO soils Bull 38(1), 152-163.
Fahr, M., Laplaze, L., Bendaou, N., Hocher, V., Mzibri, M. E., Bogusz, D., and Smouni, A. (2013). “Effect of lead on root growth,” Frontiers in Plant Science 4, article 175. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00175
Fargašová, A., and Molnárová, M. (2010). “Assessment of Cr and Ni phytotoxicity from cutlery-washing waste-waters using biomass and chlorophyll production tests on mustard Sinapis alba L. seedlings,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 17, 187-194. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-009-0136-2
Fulekar, M., Singh, A., and Bhaduri, A. M. (2009). “Genetic engineering strategies for enhancing phytoremediation of heavy metals,” African J. Biotechnol. 8(4).
Gee, G. W., and Bauder, J. W. (1986). “Particle‐size analysis,” Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 1 Physical and Mineralogical Methods 5, 383-411. DOI: 10.2136/sssabookser5.1.2ed.c15
Gentry, A. H. (1992). “Bignoniaceae: Part II (tribe Tecomeae),” Flora Neotropica 1-370.
Gilman, E. F., Watson, D. G., Klein, R. W., Koeser, A. K., Hilbert, D. R., and Mclean, D. C. (2019). “Jacaranda mimosifolia: Fact Sheet ENH476, IFAS Extension,” University of Florida, 4 pp.
He, J., Li, H., Luo, J., Ma, C., Li, S., Qu, L., Gai, Y., Jiang, X., Janz, D., and Polle, A. (2013a). “A transcriptomic network underlies microstructural and physiological responses to cadmium in Populus × canescens,” Plant Physiol. 162(1), 424-439. DOI: 10.1104/pp.113.215681
He, J., Ma, C., Ma, Y., Li, H., Kang, J., Liu, T., Polle, A., Peng, C., and Luo, Z.-B. (2013b). “Cadmium tolerance in six poplar species,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 20, 163-174. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-012-1008-8
He, J., Qin, J., Long, L., Ma, Y., Li, H., Li, K., Jiang, X., Liu, T., Polle, A., and Liang, Z. (2011). “Net cadmium flux and accumulation reveal tissue‐specific oxidative stress and detoxification in Populus× canescens,” Physiologia Plantarum 143(1), 50-63. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2011.01487.x
Herbert, D., Phipps, P., and Strange, R. (1971). “Chapter III. Chemical analysis of microbial cells,” Methods in Microbiology 5, 209-344. DOI: 10.1016/S0580-9517(08)70641-X
Horwitz, W. (1990). “Official methods of analysis,” Association of Official Analytical Chemists Washington, DC.
Hossain, M. A., Piyatida, P., Silva, J. A. T. da, and Fujita, M. (2012). “Molecular mechanism of heavy metal toxicity and tolerance in plants: central role of glutathione in detoxification of reactive oxygen species and methylglyoxal and in heavy metal chelation,” J. Bot. 2012, 1-37. DOI: 10.1155/2012/872875
Huang, Y., Xi, Y., Gan, L., Johnson, D., Wu, Y., Ren, D., and Liu, H. (2019). “Effects of lead and cadmium on photosynthesis in Amaranthus spinosus and assessment of phytoremediation potential,” Inter. J. phytoremediation 21(10), 1041-1049. DOI: 10.1080/15226514.2019.1594686
Jackson, M. (1973). Soil Chemical Analysis, Prentice Hall (India), Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi, 498 pp.
Jakovljević, T., Bubalo, M. C., Orlović, S., Sedak, M., Bilandžić, N., Brozinčević, I., and Redovniković, I. R. (2014). “Adaptive response of poplar (Populus nigra L.) after prolonged Cd exposure period,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 21, 3792-3802. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-013-2292-7
Jopony, M., and Young, S. (1994). “The solid solution equilibria of lead and cadmium in polluted soils,” European J. Soil Sci. 45(1), 59-70. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1994.tb00487.x
Kabata-Pendias, A. (2011). Trace Elements in Soils and Plants, 4th Edition, Taylor and Francis Group, LLC, pp. 548. DOI: 10.1201/b10158
Kabata-Pendias, A., and Pendias, H. (1999). “Biogeochemistry of trace elements,” Pwn, Warszawa 400 pages (in polish).
Kalaivanan, D., and Ganeshamurthy, A. N. (2016). “Mechanisms of heavy metal toxicity in plants,” Abiotic Stress Physiology of Horticultural Crops 85-102. DOI: 10.1007/978-81-322-2725-0_5
Khan, M. S., Zaidi, A., Wani, P. A., and Oves, M. (2009). “Role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in the remediation of metal contaminated soils,” Environ. Chemistry Letters 7, 1-19. DOI: 10.1007/s10311-008-0155-0
Khan, S., El-Latif Hesham, A., Qiao, M., Rehman, S., and He, J.-Z., (2010). “Effects of Cd and Pb on soil microbial community structure and activities,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 17, 288-296. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-009-0134-4
Krajcarová, L., Novotný, K., Chattová, B., and Elster, J. (2016). “Elemental analysis of soils and Salix polaris in the town of Pyramiden and its surroundings (Svalbard),” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 23, 10124-10137. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-6213-4
Kubátová, P., Hejcman, M., Száková, J., Vondráčková, S., and Tlustoš, P. (2016). “Effects of sewage sludge application on biomass production and concentrations of Cd, Pb and Zn in shoots of Salix and Populus clones: Improvement of phytoremediation efficiency in contaminated soils,” BioEnergy Res. 9, 809-819. DOI: 10.1007/s12155-016-9727-1
Kumar, B., Smita, K., and Flores, L. C. (2017). “Plant mediated detoxification of mercury and lead,” Arabian J. Chem. 10: S2335-S2342. DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.08.010
Küpper, H. (2017). “Lead toxicity in plants,” Metal Ions in Life Sci. 17, 491-500. DOI: 10.1515/9783110434330-015
Küpper, H., Küpper, F., and Spiller, M. (1996). “Environmental relevance of heavy metal-substituted chlorophylls using the example of water plants,” J. Experimental Botany 47(2), 259-266. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/47.2.259
Lea, P. J., and Miflin, B. J. (2003). “Glutamate synthase and the synthesis of glutamate in plants,” Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 41(6-7), 555-564. DOI: 10.1016/S0981-9428(03)00060-3
Leal-Alvarado, D. A., Espadas-Gil, F., Sáenz-Carbonell, L., Talavera-May, C., and Santamaría, J. M. (2016). “Lead accumulation reduces photosynthesis in the lead hyper-accumulator Salvinia minima Baker by affecting the cell membrane and inducing stomatal closure,” Aquatic Toxicology 171, 37-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2015.12.008
Li, S., Yang, W., Yang, T., Chen, Y., and Ni, W. (2015). “Effects of cadmium stress on leaf chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis of Elsholtzia argyi—a cadmium accumulating plant,” Inter. J. Phytoremediation 17(1), 85-92. DOI: 10.1080/15226514.2013.828020
Li, Y., Rahman, S. U., Qiu, Z., Shahzad, S. M., Nawaz, M. F., Huang, J., Naveed, S., Li, L., Wang, X., and Cheng, H. (2023). “Toxic effects of cadmium on the physiological and biochemical attributes of plants, and phytoremediation strategies: A review,” Environ. Pollut. article 121433. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121433
Luo, Z.-B., He, J., Polle, A., and Rennenberg, H. (2016). “Heavy metal accumulation and signal transduction in herbaceous and woody plants: paving the way for enhancing phytoremediation efficiency,” Biotechnol. Adv. 34(6), 1131-1148. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.07.003
Lux, A., Martinka, M., Vaculík, M., and White, P. J. (2011). “Root responses to cadmium in the rhizosphere: A review,” J. Experimental botany 62(1), 21-37. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erq281
Madanan, M. T., Shah, I. K., Varghese, G. K. and Kaushal, R. K. (2021). “Application of Aztec Marigold (Tagetes erecta L.) for phytoremediation of heavy metal polluted lateritic soil,” Environ. Chem. Ecotoxicol. 3, 17-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.enceco.2020.10.007
Maiti, S. K., and Jaiswal, S. (2008). “Bioaccumulation and translocation of metals in the natural vegetation growing on fly ash lagoons: a field study from Santaldih thermal power plant, West Bengal, India,” Environ. Monitoring and Assessment 136, 355-370. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-007-9691-5
Małkowski, E., Sitko, K., Zieleźnik-Rusinowska, P., Gieroń, Ż., and Szopiński, M. (2019). “Heavy metal toxicity: Physiological implications of metal toxicity in plants,” in: Plant Metallomics and Functional Omics: A System-wide Perspective, G. Sablok (ed.), pp. 253-301. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-19103-0_10
Manoj, S. R., Karthik, C., Kadirvelu, K., Arulselvi, P. I., Shanmugasundaram, T., Bruno, B., and Rajkumar, M. (2020). “Understanding the molecular mechanisms for the enhanced phytoremediation of heavy metals through plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: A review,” J. Environ. Managem. 254, article 109779. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109779
Markwell, J., Osterman, J. C., and Mitchell, J. L. (1995). “Calibration of the Minolta SPAD-502 leaf chlorophyll meter,” Photosynthesis Res. 46. 467-472. DOI: 10.1007/BF00032301
Marques, A. P., Moreira, H., Rangel, A. O., and Castro, P. M. (2009). “Arsenic, lead and nickel accumulation in Rubus ulmifolius growing in contaminated soil in Portugal,” J. Hazardous Materials 165(1-3), 174-179. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.09.102
Mette, A., Stefan, T., and Arno, R. (2014). “Phytoscreening and phytoextraction of heavy metals at Danish polluted sites using willow and poplar trees,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 21, 8992-9001. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-013-2085-z
Migeon, A., Richaud, P., Guinet, F., Chalot, M., and Blaudez, D. (2009). “Metal accumulation by woody species on contaminated sites in the north of France,” Water, Air, and Soil Pollut. 204, 89-101. DOI: 10.1007/s11270-009-0029-5
Mleczek, M., Gąsecka, M., Drzewiecka, K., Goliński, P., Magdziak, Z., and Chadzinikolau, T. (2013). “Copper phytoextraction with willow (Salix viminalis L.) under various Ca/Mg ratios. Part 1. Copper accumulation and plant morphology changes,” Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 35, 3251-3259. DOI: /10.1007/s11738-013-1360-4
Mosseler, A., and Major, J. E. (2017). “Phytoremediation efficacy of Salix discolor and S. eriocephela on adjacent acidic clay and shale overburden on a former mine site: Growth, soil, and foliage traits,” Forests 8(12), article 475. DOI: 10.3390/f8120475
Murphy, J., and Riley, J. P. (1962). “A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters,” Analytica chimica acta 27, 31-36. DOI: 10.1016/S0003-2670(00)88444-5
Nelson, D. W., and Sommers, L. E. (1996). “Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter,” Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 3. Chemical Methods 5, 961-1010. DOI: 10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c34
Niu, Z.-X., Sun, L.-N., Sun, T.-H., Li, Y.-S., and Hong, W. (2007). “Evaluation of phytoextracting cadmium and lead by sunflower, ricinus, alfalfa and mustard in hydroponic culture,” J. Environ. Sci. 19(8), 961-967. DOI: 10.1016/S1001-0742(07)60158-2
Nworie, O. E., and Lin, C. (2021). “Seasonal variation in tissue-borne heavy metal (loid) s in herbaceous plants growing in contaminated soils developed from industrial wastes of industrial revolution age,” Environ. Adv. 5, article 100113. DOI: 10.1016/j.envadv.2021.100113
Obbard, J. (2001). “Ecotoxicological assessment of heavy metals in sewage sludge amended soils,” Appl. Geochemistry 16(11-12), 1405-1411. DOI: 10.1016/S0883-2927(01)00042-7
Olsen, S. R., Sommers, L. E., and Page, A. L. (1982). in: Methods of Soil Analysis, Part, 2, pp. 403-430.
Page, A., Miller, R., and Keeney, D. (1982). in: Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2, American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, USA 4(2), 167-179.
Pietrini, F., Zacchini, M., Iori, V., Pietrosanti, L., Bianconi, D., and Massacci, A. (2009). “Screening of poplar clones for cadmium phytoremediation using photosynthesis, biomass and cadmium content analyses,” Inter. J. Phytoremediation 12(1), 105-120. DOI: 10.1080/15226510902767163
Pourrut, B., Shahid, M., Dumat, C., Winterton, P. and Pinelli, E. (2011). “Lead uptake, toxicity, and detoxification in plants,” Rev. of Environ. Contamination Toxicol. 213, 113-136. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-9860-6_4
Rafati, M., Khorasani, N., Moattar, F., Shirvany, A., Moraghebi, F., and Hosseinzadeh, S. (2011). “Phytoremediation potential of Populus alba and Morus alba for cadmium, chromium and nickel absorption from polluted soil,” Inter. J. Environ. Res. 5(4), 961-970.
Rahman, S. U., Yasin, G., Nawaz, M. F., Cheng, H., Azhar, M. F., Riaz, L., Javed, A., and Lu, Y. (2022). “Evaluation of heavy metal phytoremediation potential of six tree species of Faisalabad city of Pakistan during summer and winter seasons,” J. Environ. Managem. 320, article 115801. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115801
Rautio, P., Fürst, A., Stefan, K., Raitio, H., and Bartels, U. (2010). “Sampling and analysis of needles and leaves. Manual Part XII,” Manual on Methods and Criteria for Harmonized Sampling, Assessment, Monitoring and Analysis of the Effects of Air Pollution on Forests, UNECE, ICP Forests Programme Co-ordinating Centre, Hamburg 1-19.
Redovniković, I. R., De Marco, A., Proietti, C., Hanousek, K., Sedak, M., Bilandžić, N., and Jakovljević, T. (2017). “Poplar response to cadmium and lead soil contamination,” Ecotoxicol. and Environ. Safety 144, 482-489. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.06.011
Robinson, B. H., Mills, T. M., Petit, D., Fung, L. E., Green, S. R., and Clothier, B. E. (2000). “Natural and induced cadmium-accumulation in poplar and willow: Implications for phytoremediation,” Plant and soil 227, 301-306. DOI: 10.1023/A:1026515007319
Samuilov, S., Lang, F., Djukic, M., Djunisijevic-Bojovic, D., and Rennenberg, H. (2016). “Lead uptake increases drought tolerance of wild type and transgenic poplar (Populus tremula x P. alba) overexpressing gsh 1,” Environ. Pollut. 216, 773-785. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.06.047
Santos, C., Monteiro, M., and Dias, M. C. (2010). Cadmium Toxicity in Crops, A Review, Nova Science Publisher Inc., New York, NY.
Saraswat, S., and Rai, J. (2009). “Phytoextraction potential of six plant species grown in multimetal contaminated soil,” Chemistry and Ecology 25(1), 1-11. DOI: 10.1080/02757540802657185
Saxena, G., Purchase, D., Mulla, S. I., Saratale, G. D., and Bharagava, R. N. (2020). “Phytoremediation of heavy metal-contaminated sites: Eco-environmental concerns, field studies, sustainability issues, and future prospects,” Rev. Environ. Contamin. Toxicol. 249, 71-131. DOI: 10.1007/398_2019_24
Sebastiani, L., Scebba, F., and Tognetti, R. (2004). “Heavy metal accumulation and growth responses in poplar clones Eridano (Populus deltoides× maximowiczii) and I-214 (P.× euramericana) exposed to industrial waste,” Environmental and Experimental Botany 52(1), 79-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2004.01.003
Sharma, J. K., Kumar, N., Singh, N. P., and Santal, A. R. (2023). “Phytoremediation technologies and their mechanism for removal of heavy metal from contaminated soil: An approach for a sustainable environment,” Frontiers in Plant Sci. 14, article 1076876. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1076876
Sharma, M. R., and Raju, N. (2013). “Correlation of heavy metal contamination with soil properties of industrial areas of Mysore, Karnataka, India by cluster analysis,” Inter. Res. J. Environ. Sci. 2(10), 22-27.
Sharma, P., Jha, A. B., Dubey, R. S., and Pessarakli, M. (2012). “Reactive oxygen species, oxidative damage, and antioxidative defense mechanism in plants under stressful conditions,” J. Botany article ID 217037, 26 pp. DOI: 10.1155/2012/217037
Sharma, P., Tripathi, S., and Chandra, R. (2021). “Highly efficient phytoremediation potential of metal and metalloids from the pulp paper industry waste employing Eclipta alba (L) and Alternanthera philoxeroide (L), Biosorption and pollution reduction,” Bioresource Technol. 319, article 124147. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124147
Sharma, R., Devi, S., and Dhyani, P. (2010). “Comparative assessment of the toxic effects of copper and cypermethrin using seeds of Spinacia Oleracea L. plants,” Tropical Ecology 51(2), 375-387.
Sharma, S. S., and Dietz, K.-J. (2009). “The relationship between metal toxicity and cellular redox imbalance,” Trends in Plant Sci. 14(1), 43-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2008.10.007
Shi, G., Cai, Q., Liu, Q., and Wu, L. (2009). “Salicylic acid-mediated alleviation of cadmium toxicity in hemp plants in relation to cadmium uptake, photosynthesis, and antioxidant enzymes,” Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 31, 969-977. DOI: 10.1007/s11738-009-0312-5
Shrestha, P., Bellitürk, K., and Görres, J. H. (2019). “Phytoremediation of heavy metal-contaminated soil by switchgrass: A comparative study utilizing different composts and coir fiber on pollution remediation, plant productivity, and nutrient leaching,” Inter. J. Environ. Res. and Public Health 16(7), article 1261. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16071261
Snedecor, G. (1989). “Analysis of variance: The random effects model,” in: Statistical Methods, pp. 251-252.
Tang, C., Song, J., Hu, X., Hu X., Zhao, Y., Li, B., Ou, D., and Peng, L. (2017). “Exogenous spermidine enhanced Pb tolerance in Salix matsudana by promoting Pb accumulation in roots and spermidine, nitric oxide, and antioxidant system levels in leaves,” Ecological Engineering 107, 41-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.06.065
Tatian, M. R., Tamartash, R., Agajantabar A. H., and Faraji, A. (2023). “Evaluation of phytoremediation potential of lead and cadmium in rangeland plant species, Dactylis glomerata, Festuca ovina and Medicago sativa,” J. Natural Environ. 76(1), 15-28.
Tauqeer, H. M., Ali, S., Rizwan, M., Ali, Q., Saeed, R., Iftikhar, U., Ahmad, R., Farid, M., and Abbasi, G. H. (2016). “Phytoremediation of heavy metals by Alternanthera bettzickiana: Growth and physiological response,” Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 126, 138-146. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.12.031
Tu, S., Ma, L. Q., Fayiga, A. O., and Zillioux, E. J. (2004). “Phytoremediation of arsenic-contaminated groundwater by the arsenic hyperaccumulating fern Pteris vittata L.,” Inter. J. Phytoremediation 6(1), 35-47. DOI: 10.1080/16226510490439972
Utmazian, M. N. D. S., Wieshammer, G., Vega, R., and Wenzel, W. W. (2007). “Hydroponic screening for metal resistance and accumulation of cadmium and zinc in twenty clones of willows and poplars,” Environ. Pollut. 148(1), 155-165. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2006.10.045
Vangronsveld, J., Herzig, R., Weyens, N., Boulet, J., Adriaensen, K., Ruttens, A., Thewys, T., Vassilev, A., Meers, E., and Nehnevajova, E. (2009). “Phytoremediation of contaminated soils and groundwater: lessons from the field,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 16, 765-794. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-009-0213-6
Vervaeke, P., Luyssaert, S., Mertens, J., Meers, E., Tack, F., and Lust, N. (2003). “Phytoremediation prospects of willow stands on contaminated sediment: a field trial,” Environ. pollut. 126(2), 275-282. DOI: 10.1016/S0269-7491(03)00189-1
Wan, X., Lei, M., and Chen, T. (2016). “Cost–benefit calculation of phytoremediation technology for heavy-metal-contaminated soil,” Sci. of the Total Environ. 563, 796-802. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.080
Wang, L., Hou, D., Shen, Z., Zhu, J., Jia, X., Ok, Y. S., Tack, F. M., and Rinklebe, J. (2020). “Field trials of phytomining and phytoremediation: A critical review of influencing factors and effects of additives,” Critical Rev. in Environ. Sci. and Technol. 50(24), 2724-2774. DOI: 10.1080/10643389.2019.1705724
Wang, Z., Jin, S., Su, Y., He, D., Wang, Y., Chen, Y., Lin, C., Liao, X., and Zheng, D. (2022). “Impact of silica addition on alleviating cadmium stress: Case studies of three afforestation tree species seedlings in southern China,” Forests 13(10), article 1641. DOI: 10.3390/f13101641
Wang, Z., Zhang, Y., Huang, Z., and Huang, L. (2008). “Antioxidative response of metal-accumulator and non-accumulator plants under cadmium stress,” Plant and Soil 310, 137-149. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-008-9641-1
Wilkins, D. (1978). “The measurement of tolerance to edaphic factors by means of root growth,” New Phytologist 80(3), 623-633. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1978.tb01595.x
Wu, F., Yang, W., Zhang, J., and Zhou, L. (2010). “Cadmium accumulation and growth responses of a poplar (Populus deltoids× Populus nigra) in cadmium contaminated purple soil and alluvial soil,” J. Hazardous Materials 177(1-3), 268-273. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.12.028
Wu, M., Luo, Q., Liu, S., Zhao, Y., Long, Y., and Pan, Y. (2018). “Screening ornamental plants to identify potential Cd hyperaccumulators for bioremediation,” Ecotoxicol. and Environ. Safety 162, 35-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.06.049
Wuana, R. A., and Okieimen, F. E. (2011). “Heavy metals in contaminated soils: a review of sources, chemistry, risks and best available strategies for remediation,” Inter. Scholarly Res. Notices, article ID 402647, 20 pp. DOI: 10.5402/2011/402647
Ye, S., Zeng, G., Wu, H., Zhang, C., Liang, J., Dai, J., Liu, Z., Xiong, W., Wan, J., and Xu, P. (2017). “Co-occurrence and interactions of pollutants, and their impacts on soil remediation—A review,” Critical reviews in Environ. Sci. and Technol. 47(16), 1528-1553. DOI: 10.1080/10643389.2017.1386951
Zacchini, M., Pietrini, F., Scarascia Mugnozza, G., Iori, V., Pietrosanti, L., and Massacci, A. (2009). “Metal tolerance, accumulation and translocation in poplar and willow clones treated with cadmium in hydroponics,” Water, Air, and Soil Pollut. 197, 23-34. DOI: 10.1007/s11270-008-9788-7
Zaouchi, Y., Rezgui, S., and Bettaieb, T. (2015). “Influence of mycorrhization on adaptation capacity of Jacaranda mimosifolia D. Don grown in urban conditions,” J. New Sci. 18.
Zhang, H., Xu, Z., Guo, K., Huo, Y., He, G., Sun, H., Guan, Y., Xu, N., Yang, W., and Sun, G. (2020). “Toxic effects of heavy metal Cd and Zn on chlorophyll, carotenoid metabolism and photosynthetic function in tobacco leaves revealed by physiological and proteomics analysis,” Ecotoxicol. and Environ. Safety 202, article 110856. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110856
Zhang, L., Verweij, R. A., and Van Gestel, C. A. (2019). “Effect of soil properties on Pb bioavailability and toxicity to the soil invertebrate Enchytraeus crypticus,” Chemosphere 217, 9-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.10.146
Zhao, X., Huang, J., Lu, J., and Sun, Y. (2019). “Study on the influence of soil microbial community on the long-term heavy metal pollution of different land use types and depth layers in mine,” Ecotoxicol. and Environ. Safety 170, 218-226. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.11.136
Zhivotovsky, O. P., Kuzovkina, Y. A., Schulthess, C. P., Morris, T., and Pettinelli, D. (2011). “Lead uptake and translocation by willows in pot and field experiments,” Inter. J. Phytoremediation 13(8), 731-749. DOI: 10.1080/15226514.2010.525555
Article submitted: February 4, 2024; Peer review completed: April 9, 2024; Revisions accepted April 28, 2024; Published: December 18, 2024.
DOI: 10.15376/biores.20.1.1547-1576