NC State
BioResources
Muthuramamoorthy, M., Aldalbahi, A., Alanzi, K. M. R., Pandiaraj, S., Karuppiah, P., Govindasami, P. (2024). “Production of low-cost lactic acid from dairy wastes and dates wastewater and bioactive silver-poly (lactic acid) nanocomposite for biological applications,” BioResources 19(3), 5632-5653.

Abstract

L-Lactic acid-producing Lactobacillus lactis and L. plantarum were isolated from date wastes. The fermentation process was optimized using a one-variable-at-a-time approach. Dairy wastewater and wastewater from the date industry were utilized as low-cost culture media to produce lactic acid. The selected two bacterial strains were co-cultured in wastewater medium to produce L-lactic acid and D-lactic acid. Lactic acid production was significantly improved by glucose (carbon source), yeast extract (nitrogen source), initial inoculum level, and polysorbate 80. A central composite design and response surface methodology were used to optimize the variables and their levels to improve lactic acid yield. The supplemented yeast extract, glucose, and polysorbate 80 improved lactic acid. The predicted variables and their levels for maximum lactic acid production were glucose (67.5 g/L), yeast extract (10.28 g/L), and polysorbate 80 (0.48 mL/L). The prepared nanocomposites exhibited antibacterial activity against foodborne bacterial pathogens. The structural properties of the silver-polylactic acid nano compost materials were determined. The characterized compost materials exhibited a peak absorption wavelength of 430 nm. The silver and poly(lactic acid) were characterized using X-ray diffraction analysis and were 30 to 50 nm in size.


Download PDF

Full Article

Production of Low-cost Lactic Acid from Dairy Wastes and Dates Wastewater for Bioactive Silver-Poly(lactic acid) Nanocomposite for Biological Applications

Muthumareeswaran Muthuramamoorthy,a,* Ali Aldalbahi,b Khwater Mishaal Radi Alanzi,b Saravanan Pandiaraj,c Ponmurugan Karuppiah,d and Periyasami Govindasami b

L-Lactic acid-producing Lactobacillus lactis and L. plantarum were isolated from date wastes. The fermentation process was optimized using a one-variable-at-a-time approach. Dairy wastewater and wastewater from the date industry were utilized as low-cost culture media to produce lactic acid. The selected two bacterial strains were co-cultured in wastewater medium to produce L-lactic acid and D-lactic acid. Lactic acid production was significantly improved by glucose (carbon source), yeast extract (nitrogen source), initial inoculum level, and polysorbate 80. A central composite design and response surface methodology were used to optimize the variables and their levels to improve lactic acid yield. The supplemented yeast extract, glucose, and polysorbate 80 improved lactic acid. The predicted variables and their levels for maximum lactic acid production were glucose (67.5 g/L), yeast extract (10.28 g/L), and polysorbate 80 (0.48 mL/L). The prepared nanocomposites exhibited antibacterial activity against foodborne bacterial pathogens. The structural properties of the silver-polylactic acid nano compost materials were determined. The characterized compost materials exhibited a peak absorption wavelength of 430 nm. The silver and poly(lactic acid) were characterized using X-ray diffraction analysis and were 30 to 50 nm in size.

DOI: 10.15376/biores.19.3.5632-5653

Keywords: Lactic acid bacteria; Lactic acid; Poly lactic acid; Silver-polylactic acid composite; Antibacterial

Contact information: a: King Abdullah Institute for Nanotechnology, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia; b: Department of Chemistry, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia; c: Department of Self-Development Skills, CFY Deanship, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; d: Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh – 11541, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; *Corresponding author: mramamoorthy@ksu.edu.sa

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION

Plastic production started in the late 1950s, and production has risen to about 8.3 to 9.1 million metric tons (Mt) globally (Pappa et al. 2021). These synthetic plastics are used in packing industries and are highly complicated to recycle. It has been estimated that more than 75% of prepared plastics accumulate in the soil environment or are discarded in landfills (Geyer et al. 2017). These plastics are slowly degraded, highly stable under environmental conditions, and form fragments of various sizes. The sizes of plastics range between 1 μm and 5 mm and are commonly termed microplastics. Microplastics are emerging pollutants that pose a serious threat to almost all living organisms in the environment. Microplastics are reported in sediments, oceans, sewage, and rivers (Huang et al. 2021). Emerging microplastic pollutants concern industrialists and scientists, leading to a focus to developing eco-friendly polymers, which could be completely degraded in the soil environment. In recent years, great interest has been devoted to the development of biodegradable polymers instead of traditional petroleum-based polymers (Kian et al. 2019). Many waste management strategies, including composting, reusing, and recycling, decrease plastic pollution in the environment. However, the production of eco-friendly biopolymers is an alternate method because this method utilizes polymers from waste biomass.

Polylactic acid (PLA) is considered an important biopolymer, and the production of PLA from biowastes may reduce pollution in the natural environment (Balla et al. 2021). PLA is produced from lactic acid (LA), and LA is obtained by microbial processing using potato, cassava starch, and corn (Kervran et al. 2022). PLA, a linear aliphatic polyester, is considered an alternative material in the packing industry (John et al. 2023). PLA-based bioplastic would be an excellent substitute for the existing conventional plastics in various applications. It is widely used in the food industry, and due to its exceptional properties, it is recommended for use in the textile, medical, and agriculture industries (Sanusi et al. 2021). Polylactic acid can be degraded slowly, resulting in the generation of microplastics; moreover, microplastics generated from PLA do not pose any toxic effects on living organisms or soils in the environment (Ainali et al. 2022). In humans, it is considered a non-toxic biopolymer; hence, it is widely used in biomedical and medical applications (Vlachopoulos et al. 2022). In the human body, PLA degrades slowly and is converted into a non-toxic LA (Beslikas et al. 2011). However, the use of PLA shows certain disadvantages, such as high permeability to vapour and gas, fragility, low thermal stability, and low melt strength, while its biodegradation rate is very low compared to waste biomass such as yard waste and food waste (Mayekar et al. 2020).

Polylactic acid can be prepared by two different methods (chemical and fermentation methods) (Wee et al. 2006). In the chemical method of PLA synthesis, petrochemical resources are utilized, followed by the supplementation of hydrogen cyanide (HCN) and lactic acid catalysts (Wee et al. 2006). In the case of the fermentation method, renewable resources can be utilized from natural sources, including carbohydrates in the culture medium, in the production of lactic acid (Jamshidian et al. 2010). To prepare PLA, the pure forms of D (-) lactic acid and L (+) lactic acid are important. In the chemical method, both D (-) and L (+) lactic acids are prepared simultaneously.  By contrast, in the fermentation process, only D (-) lactic acid or L (+) lactic acid is obtained (Wee et al. 2006). The advantages of PLA are its antimicrobial, biodegradability, and antioxidant activities (Jamshidian et al. 2010). The PLA is biodegradable and eco-friendly, and it can be degraded into carbon dioxide and water, which protects the environment from toxic pollutants. Anaerobic bacteria are utilized for the production of lactic acid (Ghaffar et al. 2014). Lactic acid bacteria utilize sugars such as lactose, glucose, and galactose without any heat generation. Batch fermentation and fed batch fermentation are more useful for the production of LA than continuous fermentation. In a continuous fermentation system, productivity is high under controlled pH and temperature (Ghaffar et al. 2014). Fungi and bacteria were utilized for the production of lactic acid; however, the productivity of LA is high in bacteria (Ghaffar et al. 2014). To decrease the production cost of lignocellulosic biomass, it was recommended due to sustainability and availability (Abdel-Rahman et al. 2011). The wastewater discharged from the dairy and date palm effluent pollutes the environment, and the disposal of waste poses a serious environmental threat. Considering the circular economy, the present study was performed to use dairy wastewater and date palm wastewater for the production of LA-L and LA-D lactic acids by lactic acid bacteria. Lactic acids and silver nanoparticles were used in the present work for preparation of PLA-silver nanocomposite materials. The formulated PLA-silver nanocomposite materials were characterized, and antimicrobial properties against food-borne bacterial pathogens were determined.

EXPERIMENTAL

Isolation of Bacteria from the Date Palm Waste

De Man, Rogosa, and Lactobacilli (MRS) agar was used for the isolation of lactobacilli from date palm waste. Briefly, 5 g of date palm waste was collected from the field food processing industry and blended mechanically (0.5 cm in length). It was ground with a pestle and mortar, and a 1 mL sample was inoculated into De Man, Rogosa, and Lactobacilli broth (MRS broth) and incubated for two days at 30 ± 1 °C. It was serially diluted and streaked onto MRS agar plates. The MRS agar plates were prepared using 8 mM sodium dihydrogen phosphate and 100 mM disodium hydrogen phosphate (pH 7.2). The plates were incubated for 48 h at 37 °C. A total of 12 lactic acid bacteria (LAB) were isolated from the date palm waste (Balasubramanian et al. 2021).

Lactic Acid Screening-modified MRS Agar Medium Method

The bacteria isolated from the MRS agar medium (12 bacteria) were streaked on a MRS agar medium containing 2.5% and 5% CaCO3. The plates were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. CaCO3 is used with MRS agar medium and is considered a neutralizing agent in LA production. The bacterial strain that showed a halo zone on MRS-modified medium was selected for fermentation (Zhang et al. 2020).

Lactic Acid Production and Assay

The isolated bacterial strain was inoculated into MRS broth medium and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. The culture medium is composed of (g/L): meat extract, 5; peptone from casein, 10; (+)-glucose, 20; yeast extract, 4; dipotassium hydrogen phosphate, 2.0; di-ammonium hydrogen citrate, 2.0; manganese sulphate, 0.04; magnesium sulphate, 0.2; and sodium acetate, 5.0, and polysorbate 80. The culture was incubated for 72 h, and LA production was determined every 24 h. After 24 h, it was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min. The amount of LA was determined using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Park and Chang 2017). It was equipped with a C18 column and connected to a photodiode detector. About 20 µL of sample was injected into the HPLC column, and the spectrum was monitored for 10 min. The amount of lactic acid in the sample was calculated using a lactic acid calibration curve. The column temperature was maintained at 65 °C, and 5 mM H2SO4 was used as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min.

Morphological, Biochemical and 16S rDNA Sequencing

One L-Lactic acid producing LAB strain (LAB04) and one potent D-Lactic acid producing strain (LAB09) were selected for optimized production of lactic acid in submerged fermentation. These two bacteria were subcultured continuously on MRS agar slants and stored at 2 to 8 °C, and for long-term storage, they were cultivated in MRS broth medium and stored in 20% glycerol at -20 °C. The isolates were grown on nutrient agar plates and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h.

The morphological and biochemical tests were performed and tentatively characterized as LAB. DNA was extracted from these LAB strains, and the purity was tested using a nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Ltd., Waltham, MA, USA). The universal primers (27F and 1429R) were used for the amplification of 16S rDNA. The amplified gene was sequenced and compared using the basic local alignment search tool, and gene bank accession numbers were assessed (Atif et al. 2020; Al-Dhabi et al. 2020).

Inoculum Preparation

The strains LAB04 and LAB09 were inoculated individually in an Erlenmeyer flask containing 100 mL of MRS broth medium (Himedia, Mumbai, India). The culture was incubated for 12 h, and cell density (colony-forming unit) (CFU/mL) was maintained between 10 × 106 and 10 × 107 CFU/mL. The cell density was determined by growing the cells on MRS agar plates (Wu et al. 2020).

Screening of Variables for the Production of LA

Lactic acid production was optimized using the traditional method. The strains LAB04 and LAB09 were used for LA production. In the one-variable approach method, five different variables (inoculums, carbon source, nitrogen source, and polysorbate 80) were selected. Carbon sources (50 g/L), such as sucrose, maltose, glucose, xylose, fructose, and lactose, were used, and beef extract, yeast extract, ammonium sulphate, and casein were used as nitrogen sources (25 g/L). Inoculum was tested at a 2 to 5% level, and polysorbate 80 was supplemented between 0.2 and 1.0%. The culture was incubated for 24 h at 37 °C, and the amount of LA was determined by the high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (ThermoFisher Scientific Ltd., Waltham, MA, USA) method. Three significant variables influencing LA production were selected for the central composite design.

Central Composite Design and Response Surface Methodology

Glucose (carbon source), yeast extract (nitrogen source), and polysorbate 80 (inducer) were selected to determine the optimum response to LA production based on the one-variable-at-a-time approach. The central composite design (CCD) was comprised of 20 runs for three variables (Marraiki et al. 2020). Two potent LAB strains (LAB04 and LAB09) were applied for the production of LA. The experiment was performed in triplicate, and an average value was computed for analysis of variance (ANOVA). Design Expert (Version 8.0, Minneapolis, MN, USA) software was used to design the experiments and analyze the data. The three selected factors were coded according to Eq .1,

(1)

The variables and their levels are provided in Table 1. The experiment was performed in a 250-mL Erlenmeyer flask containing 50 mL of culture medium, 50 g/L of calcium carbonate (to control pH), and 5% inoculum. The culture was incubated in an orbital shaker incubator at 130 rpm for 24 h at 37 °C. After 24 h, LA production was determined by the HPLC method.

Table 1. Analysis Of Variables Influence on Lactic Acid Production in Submerged Fermentation Using Lactic Acid Bacteria

Production of Lactic Acid in Fermenter

Batch fermentation was performed in a 7-L fermenter (Applikon, Delft, The Netherlands). The pH of the fermenter was maintained at 6.5 using NaOH (5 N), and a fermentation experiment was performed using milk wastewater and date processing wastewater. The milk wastewater was derived from cheese processing waste, and date wastewater was obtained from date syrup processing waste. Production of lactic acid in fermentation was performed using manual inoculation and sampling. The pH of the medium was controlled using 50 g/L CaCO3. The selected two bacterial strains were inoculated (0.400 to 0.500 OD at 600 nm). The total operating volume was 4 L, with 130 rpm, and a pH of 6.5. The temperature was automatically controlled. In the culture medium, the optimum levels of glucose, yeast extract, and polysorbate 80 were supplemented based on statistical optimization and experimental results. The experiment was performed for 48 h, and the sample was withdrawn from the fermenter. It was centrifuged at 5000 ×g for 10 min, and the culture filtrate was filtered using a 0.20 μm filter. The concentrated LA was stored at -20º for further studies. The amount of LA was determined, and the result was expressed as g LA/L.

Synthesis of Polylactic Acid (PLA) using LA

The PLA was prepared by the direct polycondensation method, as previously described. A white crystalline powder was obtained, and the final product was dissolved in chloroform. It was further purified in methanol, filtered, and dried at 60 °C under vacuum. The material was poured into clean Petri dishes, dried at 80 °C for 12 h, and the solvent was removed. Then, it was removed from the Petri dishes and maintained in desiccators for further chromatinization (Wang et al. 2009).

Preparation of Silver-PLA Nanocomposite Materials

Chloroform and dimethylformamide (DM)F were prepared at a 1:8 ratio (v/v), where the final concentration was 10%, and AgNO3 was added (1.6 g). The AgNO3/PLA suspension was continuously stirred for two days under an ice bath, and 10 mL of NaBH4 (aqueous solution) was added dropwise for 120 min. The Ag-NPs developed, and the stable Ag-NP colloid was obtained due to the interactions of the hydroxyl groups of the PLA (Roucoux et al. 2002). The colloid material was removed from the aqueous phase, and silver ions were removed by shaking. It was dried at room temperature, and the Ag/PLA-NC films were suspended in chloroform. It was dried using the solution-casting technique and used for further experiments (Lu et al. 2008).

Determination of Antibacterial Activity

The antibacterial activity of the prepared silver-PLA nanocomposite was in vitro tested against bacterial strains (Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 12600), Escherichia coli (ATCC 13706), Enterobacter aerogenes (ATCC 13048), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 25619)). Mueller-Hinton (MH) agar medium was prepared. Pathogenic strains cultivated in MH broth medium were swabbed on it. After 30 min, Ag/PLA-NC film was cut and placed on MH agar medium, incubated for 24 h at 37  °C, and the zone of inhibition analyzed (Atif et al. 2020). Chloroamphenicol was used as a positive control.

Characterization of Silver-PLA Material

The prepared Ag/PLA nanocomposite material was characterized by UV-visible spectroscopy (M/s. Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan), X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis (Model D8, M/s. Bruker, Germany), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (JSM‐7600F,M/s. Jeol Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The morphology of the Ag/PLA nanocomposites was determined using SEM, and XRD analysis was performed using a Philips, X’pert diffractometer that featured Cu Ka radiation. The degree of crystallinity, was calculated using Eq. 2:

χc = Ac / Ac + Aa (2)

where Ac=crystallized areas and Aa amorphous areas on the x-ray diffractogram.

UV-VIS spectra were performed using a UV-visible spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan). The scheme of PLA-silver nanocomposite materials preparation, analysis, and antimicrobial properties were depicted in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. PLA-silver nanocomposite materials preparation, analysis of composite materials and antimicrobial properties

Statistical Analysis

The amount of LA production was expressed as mean ± standard deviation, and the significance level was determined using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) software (Chicago, IL, USA).

RESULTS

Isolation of Lactic Acid Bacteria from the Date Palm Waste

A total of 12 LABs were isolated from the date palm waste. Among 12 bacterial strains, 10 isolates were Gram-positive and fermented glucose. These glucose hydrolyzing isolates released acid in the culture medium. The rapidly growing glucose hydrolyzing bacterial strains were selected for batch production of LA.

Batch Production of LA

The culture medium was centrifuged, and the filtered cell-free supernatant was used for the determination of LA. The HPLC spectrum of LA is depicted in Fig. 2. The LA is the major end product produced using available nutrients in the wastewater.  The isolated LAB strain, LAB04 produced L-lactic acid, and the strain LAB09 produced D-lactic acid. The amount of LA in the extract was determined using HPLC, and the result is described in Table 1. Bacterial biomass and LA production were found to be high in the LAB strains LAB04 and LAB09.

Fig. 2. High Performance Liquid Chromatography profile of lactic acid from the bacterial strains: (a) lactic acid standard, (b) sample

Table 1. Bacterial Biomass and LA Production by the LAB Strains Isolated from the Date Palm Waste

Table 2. Morphological and Biochemical Properties of LAB Strains Isolated from the Date Palm Waste

Morphological and Molecular Characters of LAB Strains

Colony morphology, biochemical analysis, and molecular characterization were performed for the two selected LAB strains for optimization. The morphological and biochemical characters of LA-producing LAB strains are described in Table 2 and Fig. 3. These two strains were characterized by 16S rDNA sequencing, and strain LAB04 was characterized as Lactobacillus lactis and strain LAB09 was determined to be L. plantarum.

Fig. 3. Growth of Lactobacillus lactis LAB04 (A) and Lactobacillus plantarum LAB09 (B) on nutrient agar plates. The plates were incubated at 37 ºC for 24 h and visible growth was observed.

Optimization of LA Production by Traditional Method

LAB04 and LAB09 were selected for optimization studies. The supplemented carbon sources in dairy wastewater and palm wastewater medium improved LA production (Fig. 4a) compared to the control (p<0.05). The supplemented nitrogen sources significantly influenced LA production (p<0.05) (Fig. 4b). Inoculum is one of the significant factors that directly affected LA production, and 4% was optimal for LA production (p<0.05) (Fig. 4c). The supplemented polysorbate 80 improved LA production (Fig. 4d).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Fig. 4. Effect of carbon (a), nitrogen (b), inoculums (c), and polysorbate 80 (d) on lactic acid production

Optimization of Lactic Acid Production Using Central Composite Design

A central composite design and response surface methodology were used to optimize the significant variables affecting LA fermentation. The designed coded values and response (LA production) for co-culture (LAB04 and LAB09) are shown in Table 3. The amount of LA in the culture medium varied significantly. The coded variables and variation in the response revealed the significance of optimization for LA production. Fisher’s test was performed to determine the significance level, and the model value was p <0.05, which showed statistical significance (Table 4). The independent variable polysorbate 80 exhibited a significant effect (p<0.05), and the model p value was 0.0004. The designed model was fitted to a quadratic model, and the model F-value was 11.18. The interactive effects (A2 and B2) are significant. The lack of fit F-value of this model was 1.86, and the coefficient estimate was positive for glucose and Tween-80. The decreased level of yeast extract could improve the LA yield. The R2 value of this model was 0.9, and the adjusted R2 model was 0.82. The final equation in terms of coded factors is as follows:

LA production = +92.98+3.72 × A-4.45 × B+14.96 × C+2.29 × A × B-5.04 × A × C+1.71 × B × C-33.44 × A2-16.79 × B2-12.34 × C2

Table 3. Central Composite Design and Response Surface Methodology on Lactic Acid Production

Table 4. ANOVA for Response Surface Quadratic Model for the Production of Lactic Acid

Figure 5 shows that a concentration of <20 g/L of yeast extract improved lactic acid. The increasing concentration of glucose improved LA production, and 75.4 g/L was optimum for LA production. Among the three variables, supplemented polysorbate 80 significantly improved LA production.